Bilingualism and the relationship between perception and production: Greek/English bilinguals and Thai bilabial stops

Abstract

This study investigates two issues: the effect of bilingualism(Greek/AustralianEnglish) on speakers' ability to perceive unfamiliar speech contrasts (in this case Thai); and whether speakers' speech productions bear any relationship to their speech perception. Thai has three bilabial stop contrasts in word-initial position, voiced /b/,voiceless /p/ and voiceless aspirated /p^h/. English and Greek both have two-way voicing distinctions, voiced /b/ and voiceless /p/, but in the wordinitial position in English, /p/ is realized as an aspirated [p^h] and only occurs as an unaspirated [p] when in other than the initial position. Experiment 1 examined the perception of Thai bilabial stops by monolingual Australian-English speakers, bilingual Greek/Australian-English speakers, and a control group of Thai speakers. Experiment 2 examined the production of bilabial stops by these speaker groups. The results of Experiment 1 show no difference between the three speaker groups when discriminating the Thai distinctions /ba/ versus /p}a/ and /pa/ versus /p}a/. However, there was a tendency for Greek/Australian-English speakers to discriminate /ba/ versus /pa/ better than monolingual English speakers. More importantly, when participants were classified on the basis of their production profiles obtained in Experiment 2, Greek/Australian-English speakers with extreme voice onset times for /ba/ and /pa/ productions showed comparable perceptual performance to that of the Thai speakers. These results suggest that bilinguals who exaggerate the voicing differences between sounds when speaking, best perceive these differences when listening. These findings show that production profiles are an important adjunct to the assessment of bilingual speakers, and have important implications for the interface between perception and production.

Keywords

Greek English bilinguals perception production

References

Aslin, R.N. , Pisoni, D.B. , Hennessy, B.L. , & Perry, A.J. ( 1981). Discrimination of voice onse time by human infants: New findings and implications for the effect of early experience. Child Development,52,1135-1145.

Baetens Beardsmore, H. ( 1986). Bilingualism: Basic principles. Cleveland , England: Multilingual Matters.

Best,C.T. ( 1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: A window on early phonological development. In B.de Boyyson-Bardies., S.de Schonen. , P. Jusczyk. , P. MacNeilage & J.Morton ,(Eds.),Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp.289-304). Dordrecht,the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Best, C.T. ( 1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In J. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Best, C.T. ( 1995).Learning to perceive the sound patterns of English. In C. Rovee-Collier & L.P. Lipsitt (Eds.),Advances in infancy research'Vol9(pp.217-304).Norwood ,NJ:Ablex.

Best, C.T. ( 1999). Development of language-specific influences on speech perception and production in preverbal infancy. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Science, San Franciso(pp.1261-1264).

Best, C.T. , McRoberts, G.W. , & Sithole, N.M. ( 1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for non- native speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English- speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,14,345-360.

Best,C. T., & Strange, W. ( 1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journalof Phonetics,20,305-330.

BOHN ,O-S , & Flege,J.E. ( 1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics ,11, 303-328.

10.

Burnham, D. ( 1986). Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language. Applied Psycholinguistics ,7,207-240.

11.

Burnham D.K. ( 2000). Excavations in language development: Cross-linguistic studies of consonant and tone perception. In D. Burnham , S. Luksaneeyanawin , C. Davis , & M. Lafourcade (Eds.), interdisciplinary approaches to language processing: The International Conferenceon Human and Machine Processing of Language and Speech. Bangkok: NECTEC.

12.

Flege,J.E. ( 1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time(VOT)in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89,395-411.

13.

Flege,J.E. ( 1999). The relation between L2 production and perception. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Science , San Franciso(pp.1273-1276).

14.

Fourakis, M. ( 1986). An acoustic study of the effects of tempo and stress on segmental intervals in Modern Greek. Phonetica,43,172-188.

15.

Kollia, H.B. ( 1993). Segmental duration changes due to variations in stress,vowel,place of articulation,and voicing of stop consonants in Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2298.

16.

Lisker, L. , & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word ,20,384-422.

17.

Logan,J.S. , Lively,S.E. , & Pisoni,D.B. ( 1991).Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and/l/:A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America ,89, 874-886.

18.

Mack, M. ( 1989). Consonant and vowel perception and production:Early English- French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Perception and Psychophysics ,46(2),187-200.

19.

MacKridge,P. ( 1985). The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of standard Modern Greek. London: Oxford university Press.

20.

Pisoni, D.B. , Aslin, R.N. , Perey,A.J. , & Hennessy,B.L. ( 1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,8,297-314.

21.

Raphael, L.J. , Tobin,Y. , Faber,A. , Most,T. , Kollia, H.B. , & Milstein, D. ( 1995). Intermediate values of voice onset time. In F. Bell-Berti & L.J. Raphael , (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues for Katherine Safford. Harris. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.

22.

Seliger, H.W. ( 1978). Implications of a multiple critical period's hypothesis for second language learning. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research (pp.1-19). New York: Academic Press.

23.

Sheldon, A. , & Strange, W. ( 1982). The acquisition of/r/ and/l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics ,3,243-261.

24.

Sitaras, K.M. , & Gottfried, T.L. (1984). Perception of French vowel contrasts by native and non-native speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,76,S80.

25.

Tees, R. , & Werker,J.F. ( 1984).Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non- native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology,38,579-590.

26.

Vihman, M. ( 1999). The relationship between perception and production in early phonological development. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Science, San Franciso(pp.1269-1272).

27.

Werker, J.F. ( 1986). The effect of multilingualism on phonetic perceptual ability. Applied Psycholinguistics,7,141-156.

28.

Werker,J.F. , Gilbert,J.H.V. , Humphrey, G.K. , & Tees, R.C. ( 1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception . Child Development,52,349-355.

29.

Werker,J.F. , & Lalondec.E. ( 1988).Cross - language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology,24, 672-683.

30.

Werker,J.F. , & Tees, R.C. ( 1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development ,7,49-63.

31.

Whalen, D.H. ( 1999).Three lines of evidence for direct links between production and perception in speech. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Science, San Franciso (pp. 1257- 1260).

32.

Wode,H. ( 1999).Perception and production in early L1 acquisition and some theoretical implications. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Science, San Franciso(pp.1265-1268).