Previous research has suggested that diversity effects depend on how group members perceive their group’s composition. However, what determines how diversity is perceived is unclear. We argue that the way in which group members construe their group’s diversity is shaped by group members’ beliefs about the value in diversity. Focusing on groups with objective subgroups, we show in two studies that the more group members value diversity, the more likely they are to construe their diversity in terms of individual differences and the less likely they are to construe their diversity in terms of subgroups. We also show that diversity construal is only affected by diversity beliefs during intellectual tasks (where diversity matters), but not during physical tasks.
Ashfort, B.E., & Mael, F. ( 1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3.
Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K.A., Thatcher, S., & Zanutto, E. ( 2009). A field study of group faultlines, team identity, conflict, and performance in diverse groups. Organization Science, 20, 35-50.
4.
Bliese, P.D. ( 2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions(pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Bowers, C.A., Pharmer, J.A., & Salas, E. ( 2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305-327.
6.
Brewer, M.B. ( 1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
7.
Brewer, M.B., & Brown, R.J. ( 1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Chatman, J.A., Polzer J.T., Barsade, S.G., & Neale, M.A. ( 1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly,43, 749-780.
9.
Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2006). Multiple social categorization: Processes, models and applications. New York: Psychology Press.
10.
Earley, P.C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
11.
Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. ( 2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable-and person-centered approach. European Journal of Personality , 17, 449-464.
12.
Ely, R.J., & Thomas, D.A. ( 2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on workgroup processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly,46, 229-273.
13.
Flynn, F.J. ( 2005). Having an open mind: The impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88, 816-826.
14.
Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Murrell, A.J., & Dovidio, J.F. ( 1989). Reduction of intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 239-249.
15.
Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. ( 1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45-99.
16.
Harrison, D.A., & Klein, K.J. ( 2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
17.
Hart, C.M., & Van Vugt, M. ( 2006). From fault line to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 392-400.
18.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. ( 2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology , 53, 575-604.
19.
Hobman, E.V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. ( 2003). Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 301-325.
20.
Homan, A.C., Hollenbeck, J.R., Humphrey, S.E., van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D.R., & Van Kleef, G.A. (2008). Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1204-1222.
21.
Homan, A.C., & Jehn, K.A. (in press). How leaders can make diverse groups less difficult: The role of attitudes and perceptions of diversity. In S. Schuman (Ed.), The handbook for working with difficult groups: How they are difficult, why they are difficult, and what you can do. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Homan, A.C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007a). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: The effects of diversity beliefs on information elaboration and performance in diverse workgroups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199.
23.
Homan, A.C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007b). Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse workgroups . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 79-94.
24.
Horwitz, S.K., & Horwitz, I.B. ( 2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management,33,987-1015.
25.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. ( 1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
26.
Jehn, K., & Shah, P. ( 1997). Interpersonal relationship and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
27.
Kashy, D.A., & Kenny, D.A. ( 2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Lau, D., & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy ofManagement Review, 23, 325-340.
29.
Laughlin, P.R., Kerr, N.L., Munch, M.M., & Haggarty, C.A. (1976). Social decision schemes of the same four-person groups on two different intellective tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 80-88.
30.
LeBreton, J.M., & Senter, J.L. ( 2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods , 11, 815-852.
31.
Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. ( 2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443-453.
32.
Mannix, E.A., & Neale, M.A. ( 2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31-55.
33.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52,81-90.
34.
McKay, P.F., Avery, D.R., & Morris, M.A. ( 2008). Mean racial differences in employee sales performance: The moderating role of diversity climate. Personnel Psychology , 61, 349-374.
35.
Milliken, F.J., & Martins, L.L. ( 1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
36.
Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. ( 2005). Personality at work: Creating awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.
37.
Polzer, J.T., Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Kim, J.W. ( 2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How collocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679-692.
38.
Sawyer, J.E., Houlette, M.A., & Yeagley, E.L. ( 2006). Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,99, 1-15.
39.
Sommers, S.R. ( 2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612.
40.
Stewart, G. ( 2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management , 32, 29-54.
41.
Strauss, J.P., Barrick, M.R., & Connerley, M.L. (2001). An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 637-657.
42.
Swann, W.B., Jr., Kwan, V.S.Y., Polzer, J.T., & Milton, L.P. ( 2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1396-1406.
43.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Thatcher, S.M.B., Jehn, K.A., & Zanutto, E. ( 2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 217-241.
45.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Van der Vegt, G.S., & Van de Vliert, E. (2005). Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of Management, 31, 73-89.
47.
van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Homan, A.C. ( 2004). Workgroup diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
48.
van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S.A., & Platow, M.J. ( 2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs as moderator of the relationship between workgroup diversity and group identification . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,11, 207-222.
49.
van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M.C. (2007). Workgroup diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541.
50.
van Oudenhoven-van der Zee, K. , Paulus, P., Vos, M., & Parthasarathy , N. (2008). The impact of group composition and attitudes towards diversity on anticipated outcomes of diversity in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,12, 257-280.
Williams, H.M., Parker, S.K., & Turner, N. ( 2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking in work teams. Group and Organization Management,32, 569-597.
53.
Williams, K.Y., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
54.
Wit, A.P., & Kerr, N.L. ( 2002). "Me versus just us versus us all": Categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83, 616-637.
55.
Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E.A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. ( 1998). Social identity and productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1191-1205.
56.
Zanutto, E., Bezrukova, K., & Jehn, K.A. (in press). Revisiting faultline conceptualization: Measuring potential and active faultline strength and distance. Quality and Quantity .
57.
Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E., Maloney, M.M., Bhappu, A.D., & Salvador, R.B. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 41-59.
