As regards labour-market reform and employment policies, the European Union currently touts the concept of ‘flexicurity’, aiming at simultaneously enhancing both flexibility and security in the labour market in response to the globalisation of the economy and far-reaching demographic developments such as the ageing of the population. Each Member State is expected to map out its own distinct pathway towards more flexicurity and the European Commission has, for its part, suggested a set of four general pathways. Therefore a need exists for ideas and examples on how to elaborate a flexicurity pathway, looking for inspiration rather than imitation. In the Netherlands, a government-appointed Committee on Labour Market Participation (the so-called Bakker Committee) has recently published proposals and recommendations for further reform of the Dutch labour market. This paper discusses that part of these proposals involving a particular flexicurity pathway towards better transition security and higher labour-market mobility. This possible pathway, now being debated in the Netherlands, may also be of interest to other Member States.
AhearnR. (2008), Globalization, Worker Insecurity and Policy Approaches (CRS Report for Congress). Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service (31 July 2008).
2.
AndersenT. (2008), Job Mobility in the European Union, Optimising its Social and Economic Benefits (Report to the European Commission). Copenhagen, Danish Technological Institute.
3.
ArtsW. and GelissenJ. (2002), ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2) 137–158.
4.
BeggI.DraxlerJ. and MortensenJ. (2008), Is Social Europe Fit for Globalisation? (Report to the European Commission), Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies.
5.
BlanchardO. (2006), ‘Is there a Viable European Social and Economic Model', (Van Lanschot Lecture). Tilburg, Tilburg University (June).
6.
BlanchardO. and TiroleJ. (2008), ‘The Joint Design of Unemployment Insurance and Employment Protection, A First Pass’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1) 45–77.
7.
CazesS. and NesporovaN. (2007), Flexicurity A Relevant Approach in Central and Eastern Europe, Geneva, International Labour Office.
8.
Committee on Labour Market Participation (2008), Naar een Toekomst die Werkt (Towards a Future that Works), Rotterdam.
9.
DeelenA.P.JongenE.L.W. and VisserS. (2006), Employment Protection Legislation; Lessons from Theoretical and Empirical Studies for the Dutch Case (Document No 135), The Hague, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (November 2006).
10.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
11.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999), The Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
12.
European Commission (2006), Employment in Europe 2006. Luxembourg, Office for Publication.
European Social Partners (2007), Key Challenges Facing European Labour Markets, a Joint Analysis of European Social Partners, Brussels (October 2007).
15.
FerreraM.HemerijckA. and RhodesM. (2000), The Future of Social Europe, Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy. Oeiras, Celta Editora.
16.
FerreraM. and HemerijckA. (2003), ‘Recalibrating Europe's Welfare Regimes’, in ZeitlinJ. and TrubekD.M. (eds.), Governing Work and Welfare in the New Economy European and American Experiments, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
17.
GiddensA. (2007), Europe in the Global Age. Cambridge, Polity Press.
18.
HallP. and SoskiceD. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19.
IMF (2008), Kingdom of the Netherlands, The Netherlands 2008 Article IV Consultation, Preliminary Conclusions, Washington, DC.
20.
von MaydellB.BorchardtK.HenkeK.D.LeitnerR.MuffelsR.QuanteM.RauhalaP.L.VerschraegenG. and ZukowskiM. (2006), Enabling Social Europe, Berlin, Springer.
21.
MuffelsR.ChungH.FouargeD.KlammerU.LuijkxR.ManzoniA. and WilthagenT. (2008), Flexibility and Security Over the Life Course, Results and Policy Implications, Luxembourg, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications.
22.
OECD (2007), Babies and Bosses, Reconciling Work and Family Life – A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries, Paris, OECD.
PacelliL. (2008), Employment Security and Employability a Contribution to the Flexicurity Debate, Luxembourg, Publication Office of the European Communities/ European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
25.
PenningsF. (forthcoming), ‘De werkverzekering, flex en zeker?’, Tijdschrift Recht en Arbeid.
26.
PhilipsK. and EametsR. (2007), Approaches to Flexicurity, EU Models, Luxembourg, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
27.
RománA. (2006), Deviating from the Standard, Effects on Labor Continuity and Career Patterns (PhD Dissertation), Utrecht, Utrecht University.
28.
SapirA. (2005), ‘Globalisation and the Reform of European Social Models’, Brussels, Bruegel Policy Brief2005/1
29.
SchmidG. and GazierB. (eds.) (2002), The Dynamics of Full Employment, Social Integration Through Transitional Labour Markets, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
30.
SchmidG. (2008), Full Employment in Europe Managing Labour Market Transitions and Risks. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
31.
PenedaSilva J. and De RossaAlbino P. (2006), A European Social Model for the Future, Brussels, European Parliament Report.
32.
VielleP. and WaltheryP. (2003), Flexibility and Social Protection, Dublin, European Foundation.
33.
VisserJ. and HemerijckA. (1997), A Dutch Miracle, Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press
34.
VisserJ.WilthagenT.BeltzerR. and Koot-Van Der PutteE. (2004), ‘The Netherlands, from atypicality to typicality’, in SciarraS.DaviesP. and FreedlandM. (eds.), Employment Policy and the Regulation of Part-Time Work in the European Union. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
35.
WhitleyR. (2000), Divergent Capitalisms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
36.
WilthagenT. (2002), ‘Managing Social Risks with Transitional Labour Markets’, in MosleyH.O'ReillyJ. and SchönmannK. (eds), Labour Markets, Gender and Institutional Change Essays in Honour of Guenther Schmid, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 264–289.
