Female Autonomy and Fertility in Nepal

Abstract

We explore the effect of female autonomy on individual fertility in Nepal. We find that families where wives have high level of autonomy have fewer children than other families. Using gender of the first child as a natural experiment, we also find that son preferences are present in Nepal. Moreover, the results indicate that women have more influence when the first born is a boy, compared to when the first child is a girl. We discuss policy implications with respect to the problem of excess children due to son preference.

Keywords

Fertility empowerment of women son preference

References

Anderson

Eswaran

(2009). What determines female autonomy: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 179–191.

Arnold

Kishor

Roy

T.K.

(2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 759–785.

Becker

G.S.

(1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Becker

G.S.

(Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 225–256). New York City: Columbia University Press.

Becker

G.S.

(1992). Fertility and the economy. Journal of Population Economics, 5(3), 185–201.

Becker

G.S.

Lewis

(1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(2, Part 2), 279–288.

Bhatta

S.D.

Sharma

S.K.

(2006). The determinants and consequences of chronic and transient poverty in Nepal (Working Paper 66). Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

Brunson

Jan

(2010). Fertility decline: Limits to new constructions of gender and kinship in Nepal. Studies of Family Planning, 41(2), 89–98.

Cohen

J.E.

(1995). Population growth and earth’s human carrying capacity. Science, 269(5222), 341–346.

Dyson

Moore

(1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.

10.

Eswaran

(2002). The empowerment of women, fertility and child mortality: Towards a theoretical analysis. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 433–545.

11.

Greene

W.H.

(1997). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

12.

Guillebaud

Hayes

(2008). Population growth and climate change. British Medical Journal, 337(7664), 247–248.

13.

Gurung

(2006). Inclusive human development in Nepal. In Pande

S.R.

Tropp

Sharma

Kantiwada

Y.R.

(Eds), Nepal: Readings in human development (pp. 71–79). Kathmandu: UNDP.

14.

Hatlebakk

(2008). Inclusive growth in Nepal. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.

15.

Herrin

A.N.

(1979). Rural electrification and fertility change in the southern Philippines. Population and Development Review, 5(1), 61–86.

16.

Hondroyiannis

(2004). Modeling household decisions in Greece. The Social Science Journal, 41(3), 477–483.

17.

Jeffery

(1994). Killing my heart’s desire: Education and female autonomy in rural north India. In Women as subjects: South Asian histories. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

18.

Karki

Y.B.

Krishna

(2008). Factors responsible for the rapid decline of fertility in Nepal—An interpretation: Further analysis of the 2006 Nepal demographic and health survey. Calverton, Maryland: Macro International Inc.

19.

Koolwal

G.B.

(2007). Son preference and child labor in Nepal: The household impact of sending girls to work. World Development, 35(5), 881–903.

20.

Leone

Matthews

Dalla Zuanna

(2003). Impacts and determination of sex preference in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 69–75.

21.

Malthus

(1798). An essay on the principle of population (2001 edition). London: J. Johnson.

22.

Mason

K.O.

(1987). The impact of women’s social position on fertility in developing countries. Sociological Forum, 2(4), 718–745.

23.

Ministry of Health and Population, Nepal(2007a). Nepal demographic and health survey 2006: Key findings. Kathmandu: Measure DHS.

24.

Ministry of Health and Population, Nepal(2007b). Nepal demographic and health survey 2006: Final Report. Kathmandu: Measure DHS.

25.

Morgan

S.P.

Stash

Smith

H.L.

Mason

K.O.

(2002). Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537.

26.

Nguyen-Dinh

(1997). A socioeconomic analysis of the determinants of fertility: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Population Economics, 10(3), 251–271.

27.

Rodriguez

Cleland

(1988). Modelling marital fertility by age and duration: An empirical appraisal of the page model. Population Studies, 42(2), 241–257.

28.

Sachs

(2008). The specter of Malthus returns. Scientific American, 299(3), 38.

29.

Sen

(1990). More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 37(20), 61–66.

30.

UNDP (2010). Human Development Reports. Retrieved 19 July 2010, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/

31.

UNFPA(2010). The United Nations Population Fund country profile. Retrieved 19 July 2010, from http://www.unfpa.org/public/countries

32.

Winkelmann

Zimmermann

K.F.

(1994). Count data models for demographic data. Mathematical Population Studies, 4(3), 205–221.

33.

Wooldridge

(2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Oklahoma City: South-Western.

34.

World Bank(2010). The World Databank. Retrieved 19 July 2010, from http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do

35.

Zhang

(1990). Determinants of fertility in China: A microeconometric analysis. Journal of Population Economics, 3(2), 105–123.