Teenagers' reported use of fictitious drugs. A study of false positives

Abstract

Aims

We have analyzed teenagers' self-reported experiences with a fictitious drug, and explored whether observed characteristics of individuals who report use of real, illegal substances change when overreporters are excluded from the analyses.

Methods & Data

Data stemmed from a school-based, nationwide survey of 13–19 year olds in Norway (N = 11928, response rate: 92%).

Results

Two percent reported that they had been offered the non-existent drug “zetacyllin”, whereas 0.5% allegedly had used it. “Zetacyllin users” appeared to be heavy users of existing substances, and therefore rates of GHB-, heroin-, LSD- and cocaine use dropped markedly when they were excluded from the sample. Correlates of such real drug use also changed when analyses without “zetacyllin users” were performed: The statistical effect of gender (i.e. being male) vanished, whereas the impact of age increased. The pattern of correlates with respect to indicators of socio-economic background also changed, but in different directions.

Conclusions

False positives may seriously distort the validity of survey-data on rare phenomena such as hard drug use. Due to this kind of response error, rates of uncommon behaviors may be inflated and observed correlates may deviate from the true pattern of correlates.

Keywords

Self-report drug use validity over-reporting false positives adolescents survey research general population.

References

Akenci

I.H.

, & Tarter

R.E.

, & Kirisci

(2001): Concordance between verbal report and urine screen of recent marijuana use in adolescents. Addictive Behaviors 26: 613–619

Babor

T.F.

, & Brown

, & Del Boca

F.K.

(1990): Validity of self-reports in applied research on addictive behaviors: Fact or fiction? Behavioral Assessment 12: 5–31

Barnea

, & Rahav

, & Teichman

(1987): The reliability and consistency of self-reports on substance use in a longitudinal study. British Journal of Addiction 82: 891–898

Barnard

, & Forsyth

A.J.M.

(1998): Drug use among school children in rural Scotland. Addiction Research 6 (5): 421–434

Brener

N.D.

, & Billy

J.O.G.

, & Gradly

W.R.

(2003): Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behaviour among adolescents: Evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of Adolescent Health 33: 436–457

Cone

E.J.

(1997): New developments in biological measures of drug prevalence. I: Harrison

, & Hughes

(red.) (1997): The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving accuracy of survey estimates, s. 108–129. NIDA Research Monograph 167. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health

Darke

(1998): Self-report among injecting drug users: A review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 51: 253–263

Edwards

A.L.

(1953): The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology 37: 90–103

Harrel

A.V.

(1997): The validity of self-reported drug use data: The accuracy of responses on confidential self-administered answer sheets. I: Harrison

, & Hughes

(red.): The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving accuracy of survey estimates. NIDA Research Monograph 167, s. 37–58. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health

10.

Harrison

L.D.

(1995): The validity of self-reported data on drug use. Journal of Drug Issues 25 (1): 91–111

11.

Harrison

, & Hughes

(red.) (1997): The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving accuracy of survey estimates. NIDA Research Monograph 167. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health

12.

Hauge

, & Nordli

(1983): Påliteligheten av selvrapportert stoffbruk blant ungdom. Nordisk tidsskrift for kriminalvidenskab 70: 145–158

13.

Krange

, & Pedersen

(1999): Return of the Marlboroman. Journal of Youth Studies 3: 155–174

14.

Leigh

(2000): Using daily reports to measure drinking and drinking patterns. Journal of Substance Abuse 12: 51–65

15.

Martin

G.W.

, & Wilkonson

D.A.

, & Bhushan

M.K.

(1988): Validation of self-reported cannabis use by urine analysis. Addictive Behavoirs 13: 147–150

16.

Mäkel

ä. K.

(1971): Measuring the consumption of alcohol in the 1968–1969 alcohol consumption study. Helsinki: Social Research Institute of Alcohol Studies

17.

Midanik

(1982): The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: A literature review. British Journal of Addiction 77: 375–382

18.

Midanik

(1988): Validity of self-reported alcohol use: A literature review and assessment. British Journal of Addiction 83: 1019–1029

19.

Oetting

E.R.

, & Beauvais

(1990): Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58: 385–394

20.

Pape

, & Rossow

(2004): Ordinary people with normal lives? A longitudinal study of ecstasy and other drug use among Norwegian youth. Journal of Drug Issues 24: 385–414

21.

Pape

, & Storvoll

E.E.

(2005): Mot normalt? Narkotikabruk i to tenåringsgenerasjoner. (Innsendt manuskript)

22.

Petzel

T.P.

, & Johnson

J.E.

, & McKhillip (1973): Response bias in drug surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 40: 437–439

23.

Pernanen

(1974): Validity of survey data on alcohol use. I: Gibbons

(red.): Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, vol. 1. New York: Wiley & Sons

24.

Popham

, & Schmidt

(1981): Words and deeds: The validity of self-report data on alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 42: 344–368

25.

Poulin

, & MacNeil

, & Mitic

(1993): The validity of a province-wide student drug use survey: Lessons of design. Canadian Journal of Public Health 84: 259–262

26.

Richter

, & Johnson

P.B.

(2001): Current methods of assessing substance use: A review if strengths, problems and developments. Journal of Drug Issues 31: 809–832

27.

Rossow

, & Bø

A.K.

(2003): Metoderapport for datainnsamlingen til Ung i Norge 2002. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring

28.

Rutherford

M.J.

, & Cacciola

J.S.

, & Alterman

A.I.

, & McKay

J.R.

, & Cook

T.G.

(1999): Contrasts between admitters and deniers of drug use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 18: 343–348

29.

Single

, & Kandel

, & Johnson

B.D.

(1975): The reliability and validity of drug use responses in a large longitudinal survey. Journal of Drug Issues 5: 426–443

30.

Single

, & Wortley

(1994): A comparison of alternative measures of alcohol consumption in the Canadian National Survey of Alcohol and Drug use. Addiction 89: 395–399

31.

Skog

O.J.

(1992): The validity of self-reported drug use. British Journal of Addiction 87: 539–548

32.

Sloan

J.J.

, & Bodapati

M.R.

, & Tucker

T.A.

(2004): Respondents misreporting of drug use in self-reports: Desirability and other correlates. Journal of Drug Issues 34 (2): 269–292

33.

Strandbu

Å.

, & Skogen

(2000): Environmentalism among Norwegian youth – different paths to attitudes and action? Journal of Youth Studies 3 (2): 189–209

34.

Swadi

(1990): Validating and improving the validity of self-reports in adolescent substance misuse surveys. Journal of Drug Issues 20 (3): 473–486

35.

Schwartz

R.H.

(1998): Urine testing and the detection of drugs of abuse. Archives of International Medicine 148: 2407–2421

36.

White

H.R.

, & Labouvie

E.W.

(1989): Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 50: 30–37

37.

Whitehead

P.C.

, & Smart

R.G.

(1972): Validity and reliability of self-reported drug use. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections 14: 83–89

38.

Willis

(1977): Learning to Labour. Alders-hot: Gower

39.

Wislar

J.S.

, & Fendrich

(2000): Can self-report drug use data be used to assess sex risk behaviour in adolescents? Archives of Sexual Behaviour 29: 77–89

40.

Zerbe

W.J.

, & Paulhus

D.L.

(1987): Socially desirable responding in organization behaviour: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12: 250–264