This study analyzes cross-sectional data obtained from respondents in neo-Nazi online discussion forums and textual data from postings to these forums. It assesses the impact of participation in radical and homogeneous online groups on opinion extremism and probes whether this impact depends on political dissimilarity of strong and weak offline ties. Specifically, does dissimilarity attenuate (as deliberative theorists hope) or rather exacerbate (as research on biased processing predicts) extreme opinions? As expected, extremism increases with increased online participation, likely due to the informational and normative influences operating within online groups. Supporting the deliberative and biased processing models, both like-minded and dissimilar social ties offline exacerbate extremism. Consistent with the biased processing model, dissimilar offline ties exacerbate the effects of online groups. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Aiken, L. and S. West ( 1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions . London: Sage.
2.
Arendt, H. ( 1968) ‘Truth and Politics’, in H. Arendt (ed.) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, pp. 227-64. New York: Viking Press.
3.
Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld and W. McPhee ( 1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Boase, J., J.B. Horrigan, B. Wellman and L. Rainie ( 2006) ‘The Strength of Ties’, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted November 2007): http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_internet_ties.pdf
5.
Chadwick, A. ( 2006) Internet Politics: States, Citizens and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Deutsch, M. and H.B. Gerard ( 1955) ‘A Study of Normative and Informational Influences upon Individual Judgment’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology51(3): 629-36.
7.
Eveland, W.P. ( 2004) ‘The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation and Elaboration’ , Political Communication21(2): 177-94.
8.
Eveland, W.P. and D. Scheufele ( 2000) ‘Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation’, Political Communication17(3): 215-37.
9.
Feldman, L. and V. Price ( 2008) ‘Confusion or Enlightenment? How Exposure to Disagreement Moderates the Effects of Political Discussion and Media Use on Candidate Knowledge’ , Communication Research35(1): 61-87.
10.
Finifter, A.W. ( 1974) ‘The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Political Deviants’, American Political Science Review68(2): 607-25.
11.
Garrett, R.K. ( 2006) ‘Protest in an Information Society: A Review of Literature on Social Movements and New ICTs’, Information, Communication & Society9(2): 202-24.
12.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-80.
13.
Hardy, B.W. and D.A. Scheufele ( 2005) ‘Examining Differential Gains from Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions’, Journal of Communication55(1): 71-84.
14.
Hill, K.A. and J.E. Hughes ( 1997) ‘Computer-mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities’, Political Communication14(1): 3-27.
15.
Huckfeldt, R. and J. Sprague ( 1988) ‘Choice, Social Structure and Political Information: The Informational Coercion of Minorities’, American Journal of Political Science32(2): 467-82.
16.
Huckfeldt, R. and J. Sprague ( 1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Hyman, H. and E. Singer (eds) (1968) Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research. New York: Free Press .
18.
Kunda, Z. ( 1990) ‘The Case for Motivated Reasoning’, Psychological Bulletin108(3): 480-98.
19.
Lavine, H. ( 2001) ‘The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence Toward Presidential Candidates’, American Journal of Political Science45(4): 915-29.
20.
Lee, E. ( 2006) ‘When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-mediated Communication?’, Communication Research33(6): 423-47.
21.
Lenart, S. ( 1994) Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Liebes, T. and R. Ribak ( 1992) ‘The Contribution of Family Culture to Political Participation, Political Outlook and its Reproduction’, Communication Research19(5): 618-41.
23.
Lord, C., M. Ross and M. Lepper ( 1979) ‘Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(11): 2098-109.
24.
McGuire, W.J. ( 1964) ‘Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 191-229. New York: Academic Press.
25.
McKenna, K.Y.A. and J.A. Bargh ( 1998) ‘Coming Out in an Age of the Internet: Identity "Demarginalization" through Virtual Group Participation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(3): 681-94.
26.
Meffert, M.F., S. Chung, A.J. Joiner, L. Waks and J. Garst ( 2006) ‘The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing during a Political Campaign’, Journal of Communication56(1): 27-51.
27.
Moscovici, S. and M. Zavalloni ( 1969) ‘The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology12(2): 125-35.
28.
Munro, G.D. and P.H. Ditto ( 1997) ‘Biased Assimilation, Attitude Polarization and Affect in Reactions to Stereotype-relevant Scientific Information’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23(6): 636-53.
29.
Mutz, D. ( 2002a) ‘Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice’, American Political Science Review96(2): 111-26.
30.
Mutz, D. ( 2002b) ‘The Consequences of Cross-cutting Networks for Political Participation’, American Journal of Political Science46(4): 838-55.
31.
Mutz, D. ( 2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Mutz, D.C. and J.J. Mondak ( 2006) ‘The Workplace as a Context for Cross-cutting Political Discourse’, Journal of Politics68(1): 140-55.
Nickerson, R.S. ( 1998) ‘Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises’, Review of General Psychology2(2): 175-220.
35.
Nir, L. ( 2005) ‘Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research17(4): 422-42.
36.
Noelle-Neumann, E. ( 1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion - Our Social Skin . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Norris, P. ( 2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Paccagnella, L. ( 1997) ‘Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities’, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication3(1), URL (consulted April 2007): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html
39.
Page, B.I. ( 1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Papacharissi, Z. ( 2002) ‘The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’ , New Media & Society4(1): 9-27.
41.
Petty, R.E. and J.T. Cacioppo ( 1990) ‘Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Integration’ , Psychological Bulletin107(3): 367-74.
42.
Postmes, T., T. Spears and M. Lea ( 1998) ‘Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? SIDE-effects of Computer Mediated Communication’, Communication Research25(6): 689-715.
43.
Price, V., J.N. Cappella and L. Nir ( 2002) ‘Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?’ Political Communication19(1): 97-114.
44.
Price, V., L. Nir and J.N. Cappella ( 2006) ‘Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions’, Communication Theory16(1): 47-75.
45.
Scheufele, D.A. ( 2002) ‘Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and Their Implication for Participatory Behavior’, Communication Research29(1): 46-65.
46.
Shah, D.V., N.R. Kwak and L. Holbert ( 2001) ‘"Connecting" and "Disconnecting" with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication18(2): 141-62.
47.
Sniderman, P. ( 1981) A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
Southern Poverty Law Center (1999) ‘Hate on the Net: Intelligence Report’, Winter, URL (consulted October 2005): http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=363
49.
Southern Poverty Law Center (2009) ‘Hate Group Numbers Up by 54% Since 2000’, URL (consulted April 2009): http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=366
50.
Spears, R., M. Lea and S. Lee ( 1990) ‘De-individuation and Group Polarization in Computer-mediated Communication’, British Journal of Social Psychology29(2): 121-34.
51.
Steiner, I. ( 1966) ‘Personality and the Resolution of Interpersonal Disagreements’, in B.A. Maher (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research, pp. 195-239. New York: Academic Press.
52.
Sunstein, C. ( 2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Turner, J.C. ( 1991) Social Influence. Pacific Grove, CA : Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
54.
Van Alstyne, M. and E. Brynjolfsson ( 1997) ‘Electronic Communities: GlobalVillage or Cyberbalkans?’, URL (consulted October 2004): http://web.mit.edu/marshall/www./papers/CyberBalkans.pdf
55.
Wojcieszak, M. ( 2008) ‘False Consensus Goes Online: Impact of Ideologically Homogeneous Groups on False Consensus’, Public Opinion Quarterly72(4): 781-91.
56.
Wojcieszak, M. (in press) ‘Carrying Online Participation Offline: Mobilization by Radical Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties’, Journal of Communication.
57.
Wojcieszak, M. and D. Mutz (2009) ‘Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?’, Journal of Communication59(1): 40-56.
