Adhesively bonded joints are increasingly employed in structural applications due to their advantages in weight reduction and efficient load transfer. However, impact fatigue represents one of the most severe and practically relevant loading conditions, as such joints are frequently subjected to repeated impacts in service. Despite its importance, the performance and failure behaviour of adhesive joints under impact fatigue loading remains poorly understood. This review examines the existing body of work on this topic (covering approximately 40 studies published between 1970 and 2026), identified through Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. While the studies vary in scope, methodology, and testing configurations, they collectively reveal a significant knowledge gap. Compared with standard fatigue, impact fatigue imposes more severe damage conditions, yet, its underlying mechanisms and design implications remain underexplored. By consolidation of the current knowledge, this review highlights critical gaps and aims to stimulate further research and industry attention toward the development of more reliable and durable design strategies for adhesively bonded joints under impact fatigue loading.
MalekinejadHRamezaniFCarbasRJC, et al.Study of CFRP laminate gradually modified throughout the thickness using thin ply under transvers tensile loading. Materials (Basel)2024; 17(10): 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102388
3.
HoriuchiSSaitoNHanadaT, et al.Failure of adhesive bonding unveiled by in-situ strain testing by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy. Discover Mech Eng2024; 3: 11.
4.
kusukawaK. Effects of laminate stacking sequence on the strength properties of aluminum alloy–carbon fiber-reinforced plastic dissimilar single-lap adhesive joints. J Adv Join Proce2024; 10: 100239.
5.
KarimiS. Investigating the durability of nano-reinforced CFRP-aluminum and CFRP-CFRP bonded and bonded/bolted joints under hygrothermal conditions. Polym Compos2025; 46: 4075–4095.
6.
MalekinejadHCarbasRJCMarquesEAS, et al.Experimental investigation of bio-inspired bouligand-type CFRP adherends in adhesive joints under multi-rate and multi-directional tensile loading. Int J Adhes Adhes2025; 143: 104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104170
7.
ZhelyazovT. Models analyzing the response of the adhesive joint between FRP and concrete: a comparative analysis. Discover Mech Eng2024; 3: 23.
8.
SurósMVerdugoPSantiagoD, et al.Improving the reversible adhesion performance of an epoxy vitrimer adhesive through surface treatment technology. J Adhesn.d.; 102(4): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2025.2532693
9.
WickALehmannMVolkmerT. Adhesive joint formation between porous wood adherends with one-component polyurethane part 1. J Adhes2025; 101: 1541–1569.
10.
WuSDelpAFreundJ, et al.Correlation between interlaminar shear strength of CFRP and joint strength of aluminium-CFRP hybrid joints. J Adhes2025; 101: 1193–1218.
11.
HuJFanCWangX, et al.Experimental investigation on scarf repair of damaged composite honeycomb sandwich structures with adhesively bonded carbon fiber-reinforced prepreg patches. J Adhesn.d.; 102(2): 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2025.2519427
12.
BenelliAGoglioLPaolinoDS. Estimation of relevant shear properties of adhesive joints through analytical modeling of experimental torsion tests. J Adhes2025; 101: 1341–1362.
13.
LecceseFPirondiAMoroniF, et al.Mechanical characterization of innovative recyclable monomaterial films and laminates for food packaging. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2025; 239(12): 2282–2294. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207251324375
14.
KłonicaM. Analysis of the effect of selected factors on the strength of adhesive joints. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018; 393: 012041.
15.
GrieseMStammenEDilgerK. Production-related effects on the adhesive bondline performance of structural adhesives joining dissimilar materials. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2024; 238: 2307–2318.
16.
MalekinejadHCarbasRJCAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Bio-inspired helicoidal composite structure featuring graded variable ply pitch under transverse tensile loading. Journal of Composites Science2024; 8(6): 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8060228
17.
De GoeijWCVan ToorenMJLBeukersA. Composite adhesive joints under cyclic loading. Mater Des1999; 20: 213–221.
18.
SekiguchiYSatoC. Experimental investigation of the effects of adhesive thickness on the fracture behavior of structural acrylic adhesive joints under various loading rates. Int J Adhes Adhes2021; 105: 102782.
19.
MalekinejadHCarbasRJCMarquesEAS, et al.From nature to engineering: a comprehensive mechanical response analysis of novel bio-inspired CFRP adhesive joints. Thin-Walled Struct2026; 224: 114675.
20.
ErtürkEVitalePHöferP. Hybrid structural joints between PBF-LB manufactured Ti6Al4 V and CFRP – role of surface morphologies. J Adhesn.d.; 102(9): 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2025.2560880
21.
GinsterVHeymMKBeierCJA, et al.Curing of epoxy adhesives between thin metal foils by means of inductive heating. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2024; 238: 2319–2327.
22.
WeilandJLuberMSeewaldR, et al.Structural health monitoring of adhesively bonded joints: proposing a new method by use of polymer optical fibers. Procedia Structural Integrity2020; 28: 1249–1257.
23.
MalekinejadHCarbasRJCMarquesEAS, et al.Performance of hybrid reinforced composite substrates in adhesively bonded joints under varied loading rates. Polymers (Basel)2025; 17(4): 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040469
24.
YamazakiTIkedaKSekiguchiY, et al.Experimental investigation of adhesive joint strength and stress-based criteria under tensile/compression–shear stress state using a developed fixture. J Adhes2026; 102: 179–200.
25.
EghbalpoorRAkhavan-SafarAJalaliS, et al.A progressive damage model to predict the shear and mixed-mode low-cycle impact fatigue life of adhesive joints using cohesive elements. Finite Elem Anal Des2023; 216: 103894.
26.
KhashabaUANajjarIMRAlmitaniKH. Failure analysis of scarf adhesive joints modified with SiC-nanoparticles under fatigue loading at room temperature. Compos Sci Technol2022; 221: 109301.
27.
SartorPBeckerWWordenK, et al.Bayesian Sensitivity analysis of flight parameters in a hard-landing analysis process. J Aircr2016; 53: 1317–1331.
28.
BautistaACasas-RodriguezJPSilvaM, et al.A dynamic response analysis of adhesive - bonded single lap joints used in military aircrafts made of glass fiber composite material undercyclic impact loading. Int J Adhes Adhes2020; 102: 102644.
29.
Karthik GoudRVTruptiPW. Stress analysis of the landing gear-well beams and damage calculation due to landing cycles. IJRAME J2014; 2(5). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4473.6085
30.
RajendranSFonsecaNGuedes SoaresC. Simplified body nonlinear time domain calculation of vertical ship motions and wave loads in large amplitude waves. Ocean Eng2015; 107: 157–177.
31.
CarvajalDRACorreaRAMCasas-RodríguezJP. Durability study of adhesive joints used in high-speed crafts manufactured with composite materials subjected to impact fatigue. Eng Fract Mech2020; 225: 106393.
32.
ShuiGSongXXiJ, et al.Experimental characterization of impact fatigue damage in an adhesive bonding using the second harmonics. J Nondestr Eval2017; 36: 23.
33.
Casas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Delamination in adhesively bonded CFRP joints: standard fatigue, impact-fatigue and intermittent impact. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2401–2409.
34.
ShaabaniSBehjatBEbrahimiS. Assessment of the shear and creep behavior of reinforced thick adhesively bonded joints at various temperatures. J Adhes Sci Technol2025: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2025.2604189
35.
DarvishiINouraniABahramiB. Combined effects of loading rate, adherend stiffness, and surface roughness on the fracture of epoxy adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2025; 40(11): 1939–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2025.2603637
36.
JohnsonAAStoreyRJ. The impact fatigue properties of iron and steel. J Sound Vib2007; 308: 458–466.
37.
Casas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Damage evolution in adhesive joints subjected to impact fatigue. J Sound Vib2007; 308: 467–478.
38.
MurakamiYTakagiTWadaK, et al.Essential structure of S-N curve: prediction of fatigue life and fatigue limit of defective materials and nature of scatter. Int J Fatigue2021; 146: 106138.
39.
WöhlerA. Bericht uber die Versuche, welche auf der Konigl. Niederschlesisch-Markischen Eisenbahn mit Apparaten zum Messen der Biegung und Verdrehung von Eisenbahnwagen-Achsen wahrend der Fahrt angestellt wurden. Z Fur Bauwes1858; 8: 641–652.
40.
CurleyAJHadaviniaHKinlochAJ, et al.Predicting the service-life of adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract2000; 103: 41–69.
41.
KinlochAJOsiyemiSO. Predicting the fatigue life of adhesively-bonded joints. J Adhes1993; 43: 79–90.
42.
Casas-RodriguezJP. Damage in adhesively bonded joints: sinusoidal and impact fatigue. PhD thesis, Loughborough: Loughborough University, 2008.
43.
SilberschmidtVVCasas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIA. Impact fatigue in adhesive joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2008; 222: 1981–1994.
44.
Casas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. 22 - Dynamic fractures of adhesively bonded carbon fibre-reinforced polymeric joints. In: BeaumontPWRSoutisCHodzicA (eds) Structural integrity and durability of advanced composites. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing, 2015, pp.581–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100137-0.00022-5.
45.
Akhavan-SafarAEisaabadi BozchaloeiGJalaliS, et al.Impact fatigue life of adhesively bonded composite-steel joints enhanced with the bi-adhesive technique. Materials (Basel)2023; 16(1): 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010419
46.
JalaliSAyatollahiMRAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Effects of impact fatigue on residual static strength of adhesively bonded joints. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2021; 235: 1519–1531.
47.
LiDYeeAFChenI-W, et al.Fracture behaviour of unmodified and rubber-modified epoxies under hydrostatic pressure. J Mater Sci1994; 29: 2205–2215.
48.
TakeshiO. The fatigue behaviour of toughened epoxy polymers. PhD thesis, London: Imperial College of Science, 1999.
49.
Casas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Propagation of delamination zones in bonded joints. vol. 56. 2007.
50.
AshcroftIACasas-RodriguezJPSilberschmidtVV. Mixed-mode crack growth in bonded composite joints under standard and impact-fatigue loading. J Mater Sci2008; 43: 6704–6713.
51.
Bautista VillamilAACasas-RodriguezJPPorras HolguinA, et al.Mode I crack propagation experimental analysis of adhesive bonded joints comprising glass fibre composite material under impact and constant amplitude fatigue loading. Materials (Basel)2021; 14(16): 4380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164380
52.
ValdoleirosJAkhavan-SafarAMalekiP, et al.Effects of temperature on the fracture response of EMC-Si interface found in multilayer semiconductor components. Surfaces2025; 8(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces8010002
53.
KhoshmaneshSWatsonSJZarouchasD. Early detection of impact fatigue damage in an adhesively-bonded connection using acoustic emission. Eng Struct2024; 308: 117973.
54.
HigginsA. Adhesive bonding of aircraft structures. Int J Adhes Adhes2000; 20: 367–376.
55.
MalekinejadbahabadiHFarrokhabadiARahimiG, et al.Effect of core shape on debonding failure of composite sandwich panels with foam-filled corrugated core. Steel Comp Structur2022; 45: 467–482.
56.
MalekinejadHFarrokhabadiARahimiGH, et al.Skin thickness effects on failure mechanisms in foam infilled composite sandwich structures. J Compos Mater2024; 58: 2457–2471.
57.
MalekinejadHFarrokhabadiAKhatibiMM. The influence of skin / core debonding effects on the natural frequencies of composite sandwich structures using experimental and numerica. Journal of Science and Technology of Composites2018; 5: 91–98.
58.
SadighiMAlderliestenR. Impact fatigue, multiple and repeated low-velocity impacts on FRP composites: a review. Compos Struct2022; 297: 115962.
59.
RamkumarRL. Effect of low-velocity impact damage on the fatigue behavior of graphite/epoxy laminates available to purchase. Long-Term Behavior of Composites. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM International, 1983.
60.
CantwellWJCurtisPTMortonJ. Impact and subsequent fatigue damage growth in carbon fibre laminates. Int J Fatigue1984; 6: 113–118.
61.
RaoufAIbrahimVIBMO. Vibro-impact dynamics of ocean systems and related problems. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 2009.
62.
RichardsonMOWWisheartMJ. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1996; 27: 1123–1131.
63.
MachadoJJMMarquesEASda SilvaLFM. Adhesives and adhesive joints under impact loadings: an overview. J Adhes2018; 94: 421–452.
64.
HuangWSunLLiL, et al.Investigations on low-energy impact and post-impact fatigue of adhesively bonded single-lap joints using composites substrates. J Adhes2020; 96: 1326–1354.
65.
PeroniLAvalleMBelingardiG. Comparison of the energy absorption capability of crash boxes assembled by spot-weld and continuous joining techniques. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 498–511.
66.
BornP. Structural bonding in automotive applications. AutoTechnol2004; 4: 44–47.
67.
HarrisJAAdamsRD. An assessment of the impact performance of bonded joints for use in high energy absorbing structures. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part C: Mech Eng Sci1985; 199: 121–131.
68.
AvalleMPeroniLPeroniM, et al.Bi-Material joining for car body structures: experimental and numerical analysis. J Adhes2010; 86: 539–560.
69.
BlackmanBRKKinlochAJTaylorAC, et al.The impact wedge-peel performance of structural adhesives. J Mater Sci2000; 35: 1867–1884.
70.
VermaASVedvikNPGaoZ. A comprehensive numerical investigation of the impact behaviour of an offshore wind turbine blade due to impact loads during installation. Ocean Eng2019; 172: 127–145.
71.
ASTM International. ASTM D1002-10, standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (Metal-to-Metal) 2019;15.06:6.
72.
ASTM International. ASTM D5868-01, Standard Test Method for Lap Shear Adhesion for Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Bonding 2014;15.06:2.
73.
MalekinejadHCarbasRJCAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Enhancing Fatigue Life and Strength of Adhesively Bonded Composite Joints: A Comprehensive Review. Materials (Basel)2023; 16(19): 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196468
74.
Javanmard SistaniAShariatiMZamaniP, et al.Mode-I and II fracture behavior of metal-to-composite bonded interfaces with a graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced structural epoxy adhesive. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2024; 238: 1538–1556.
75.
Salamat-TalabMKazemiHAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Effects of a novel three-dimensional-printed wood–polylactic acid interlayer on the Mode II delamination of composites. Journal of Composites Science2024; 8(12): 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8120489
76.
MakotaIKishimotoWOkitaK, et al.Improvement of impact fatigue strength of adhesive joint by CTBN modification. J Appl Polym Sci1984; 29: 373–382.
77.
MiriMAyatollahiMRAkhavan-SafarA, et al.The effect of recycled date palm tree fibers on the impact fatigue and residual static strength of adhesively bonded joints. Compos Struct2024; 327: 117664.
78.
JalaliSCarbasRJCMarquesEAS, et al.Advancing impact and fatigue resistance in bio-adhesive joints: the combined effect of adhesive penetration and tough-layer techniques. Compos Struct2026; 378: 119923.
79.
DiharjoKAnwarMTariganRAP, et al.Effect of adhesive thickness and surface treatment on shear strength on single lap joint al/CFRP using adhesive of epoxy/al fine powder. AIP Conf Proc2016; 1710: 30030.
80.
TaibAABoukhiliRAchiouS, et al.Bonded joints with composite adherends. Part I. Effect of specimen configuration, adhesive thickness, spew fillet and adherend stiffness on fracture. Int J Adhes Adhes2006; 26: 226–236.
81.
OsiyemiSO. The fatigue performance of adhesively bonded fibre-composite joints. PhD thesis, Department of Strength of Materials, Imperial College, University of London, London, UK, 1992.
82.
TangJHSridharISrikanthN. Static and fatigue failure analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite single lap joints. Compos Sci Technol2013; 86: 18–25.
83.
HeXWangY. An analytical model for predicting the stress distributions within single-lap adhesively bonded beams. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2014; 2014: 346379.
84.
RenéQ. Rodrígueza. Analytical and numerical tools for bonded joint analysis. In: Mecánica Computacional, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010, pp.7557–7569.
85.
WeißgraeberPBeckerW. Finite fracture mechanics model for mixed mode fracture in adhesive joints. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50: 2383–2394.
86.
AshcroftIAShawSJ. Mode I fracture of epoxy bonded composite joints 2. Fatigue loading. Int J Adhes Adhes2002; 22: 151–167.
87.
KemikliogluUSaymanOBatarT, et al.Strength comparison of ductile and brittle adhesives under single and repeated impacts. Appl Adhesion Sci2015; 3: 15.
88.
Akhavan-SafarAEisaabadiBGJalaliS, et al.Impact fatigue life improvement of bonded structures using the bi-adhesive technique. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2022; 45: 1379–1390.
ASTM D950-98. Standard Test Method for Impact Strength of Adhesive Bonds (Withdrawn 2003) 2021;15.06:5.
92.
ISO 11343:2019. Adhesives — Determination of dynamic resistance to cleavage of high-strength adhesive bonds under impact conditions — Wedge impact method 2019;83.180.
93.
BezemerAAGuytCBVlotA. New impact specimen for adhesives: optimization of high-speed-loaded adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes1998; 18: 255–260.
94.
SchrammREDurcholzRLReedRP. Apparatus for impact-fatigue testing. J Res Nat Bur Standards Sec C: Eng Instrument1970; 75C: 95.
95.
RaoufAIbrahimVIBMO. Vibro-impact dynamics of Ocean systems and related problems. vol. 44. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.
96.
Casas-RodriguezJPAshcroftIASilberschmidtVV. Damage in adhesively bonded CFRP joints: sinusoidal and impact-fatigue. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2663–2670.
97.
AshcroftIASilberschmidtVVEchardB, et al.Crack propagation in a toughened epoxy adhesive under repeated impacts. Shock Vib2011; 18: 301761.
98.
AntunesDPCLopesAMMoreira da SilvaCMS, et al.Development of a drop weight machine for adhesive joint testing. J Test Eval2021; 49: 1651–1673.
99.
Akhavan-SafarAShJda SilvaLFM, et al.Effects of low cycle impact fatigue on the residual mode II fracture energy of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2023; 126: 103455.
100.
AshcroftIACasas-RodriguezJPSilberschmidtVV. Fatigue Crack Growth in Adhesively Bonded Joints with Intermittent Impacts. Key Eng Mater2011; 452–453: –8.
GomaaAIHamdyAHMoetA. Subcritical crack propagation under cyclic stress impulse. Int J Fract1992; 53: 187–199.
103.
YokoyamaT. Experimental determination of impact tensile properties of adhesive butt joints with the split Hopkinson bar. J Strain Anal Eng Des2003; 38: 233–245.
104.
FawcettALCHXSN. Impact fatigue performance of adhesive bonded structures based on GRIP MetalTM Concept. CANCOM2017-CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2017.
105.
KanamoriKKimotoYToriumiS, et al.On the cyclic fatigue of adhesively bonded aluminium: experiments and molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Adhes Adhes2021; 107: 102848.
106.
XuSDillardDA. Determining the impact resistance of electrically conductive adhesives using a falling wedge test. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol2003; 26: 554–562.
107.
AdamvalliMParameswaranV. Dynamic strength of adhesive single lap joints at high temperature. Int J Adhes Adhes2008; 28: 321–327.
108.
ChowdhurySCElderRMSirkTW, et al.Epoxy resin thermo-mechanics and failure modes: effects of cure and cross-linker length. Compos B Eng2020; 186: 107814.
109.
ParkHChoM. A multiscale framework for the elasto-plastic constitutive equations of crosslinked epoxy polymers considering the effects of temperature, strain rate, hydrostatic pressure, and crosslinking density. J Mech Phys Solids2020; 142: 103962.
110.
NaebeMAbolhasaniMMKhayyamH, et al.Crack damage in polymers and composites: a review. Polym Rev2016; 56: 31–69.
111.
ZhangFYangXXiaY, et al.Experimental study of strain rate effects on the strength of adhesively bonded joints after hygrothermal exposure. Int J Adhes Adhes2015; 56: 3–12.
112.
Juan Pablo Casas-RodriguezIAAVS. Effect of impact-fatigue on damage in adhesive joints. Key Eng Mater2007; 347: 653–658.
113.
Schaff JefferyRDavidson BarryD. Life prediction methodology for composite structures. Part I—constant amplitude and two-stress level fatigue. J Compos Mater1997; 31: 128–157.
114.
ErpolatSAshcroftIACrocombeAD, et al.Fatigue crack growth acceleration due to intermittent overstressing in adhesively bonded CFRP joints. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 1175–1183.
115.
ShenoyVAshcroftIACritchlowGW, et al.Strength wearout of adhesively bonded joints under constant amplitude fatigue. Int J Fatigue2009; 31: 820–830.
116.
P. Paris FE. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng1963; 85: 528–533.
117.
AshcroftIA. A simple model to predict crack growth in bonded joints and laminates under variable-amplitude fatigue. J Strain Anal Eng Des2004; 39: 707–716.
118.
ZhuY. Influence of carbon nanotubes on fatigue delamination growth in filament wound composites with rigid and flexible matrix materials. In: Proceedings of the 24th ASC Technical Conference (1st Joint US–Canada Conference), Newark, DE, USA, 2009.
119.
MalekiPAkhavan-SafarACarbasRJC, et al.A comprehensive review of failures in bi-material interfaces: mechanisms, prediction, and mitigation strategies. Proc Institut Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2026: 14644207261427056. 10.1177/14644207261427056
120.
StapletonSEWaasAMArnoldSM. Functionally graded adhesives for composite joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2012; 35: 36–49.
121.
JairajaRNaikGN. Single and dual adhesive bond strength analysis of single lap joint between dissimilar adherends. Int J Adhes Adhes2019; 92: 142–153.
122.
DadianARahnamaS. Experimental and numerical study of optimum functionally graded aluminum/GFRP adhesive lap shear joints using epoxy/CTBN. Int J Adhes Adhes2021; 107: 102854.
3M. 3m scotch-weld structural adhesive Film AF 163-2k technical datasheet 2009.
125.
LiJLuoRBiY, et al.The preparation and performance of short carbon fiber reinforced adhesive for bonding carbon/carbon composites. Carbon N Y2008; 46: 1957–1965.
126.
MiriMAyatollahiMRAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Impact strength improvement of adhesively bonded structures using natural date palm tree fibers. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31: 2483–2493.
127.
AwadSZhouYKatsouE, et al.A critical review on date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fibres and their uses in bio-composites. Waste Biomass Valorization2021; 12: 2853–2887.
