AkaahI. P. (1991) Predictive performance of self-explicated, traditional conjoint, and hybrid conjoint models under alternative data collection modes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, pp. 309–314.
2.
AakerD.A., & DayG.S. (1990) Marketing Research, 4th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
AcitoF. (1977) An investigation of some data collection issues in conjoint measurement. In GreenbergB.A., & BellengerD.N. (eds) Contemporary Marketing Thought.American Marketing Association.
4.
BatesonJ.E.G., ReibsteinD., & BouldingW. (1987) Conjoint analysis reliability and validity: a framework for future research. In Review of Marketing.HoustonM.J. (ed.) American Marketing Association.
5.
BettmanJ.R., JohnsonE.J., & PayneJ.W. (1991) Consumer decision making. In RobertsonI.T.S., & KassarijanH. (eds) Handbook of Consumer Behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
BrucksM. (1985) The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, pp. 1–16.
7.
CattinP., & WeinbergerM.G. (1980) Some validity and reliability issues in the measurement of attribute utilities. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, pp. 780–783.
8.
CattinP., & WittinkD.R. (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 44–53.
9.
FiskeS.T., KinderD.R., & LarterW.M. (1983) The novice and the expert: knowledge-based strategies in political cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, pp. 381–400.
10.
GreenP.E., & KriegerA.M. (1996) Individualized hybrid models for conjoint analysis. Management Science, 42, pp. 850–867.
11.
GreenP.E., GoldbergS.M., & MontemayorM. (1981) A hybrid utility estimation model for conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, pp. 33–41.
12.
GreenP.E., KriegerA.M., & WindY. (2002) Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31, pp. S56–S73.
13.
HuberJ., & McCannJ. (1982) The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 324–333.
14.
HuberJ., WittinkD.R., FiedlerJ.A., & MillerR. (1993) The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation procedures in predicting choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, pp. 105–114.
15.
JacobyJ., SpellerD.E., & KohnC.A. (1974a) Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, pp. 63–69.
16.
JacobyJ., SpellerD.E., & Kohn-BeringC.A. (1974b) Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, pp. 33–42.
17.
JainA.K., AcitoF, MalhotraN.K., & MahajanV. (1979) A comparison of the internal validity of alternative parameter estimation methods in decompositional multiattribute preference models. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, pp. 313–322.
18.
JohnsonR. D. (1989) Making decisions with incomplete information: the first complete test of the inference model. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, pp. 522–528.
19.
JohnsonR.D., & LevinI.P. (1985) More than meets the eye: the effect of missing information in purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, pp. 169–177.
20.
KiretzR., & SimonsenI. (2000) The effects of incomplete information on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp. 427–48.
21.
KoutsoyiannisA. (1977) Theory of Econometrics, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan Press.
22.
LeighT.W., MacKayD.B., & SummersJ.O. (1981) On alternative experimental methods for conjoint analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, pp. 317–322.
23.
LeighT.W., MacKayD.B., & SummersJ.O. (1984) Reliability and validity of conjoint analysis and self-explicated weight: a comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, pp. 456–462.
24.
LinesR., DenstadliJ.M., & GrnhaugK. (1993) Predictive and convergent validity of conjoint derived and self explicated attribute weights.Barcelona: Proceedings, EMAC.
25.
LussierD.A., & OshlavskyR.W. (1979) Task complexity and contingent information processing in brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, pp. 154–165.
26.
McCulloughJ., & BestR. (1979) Conjoint measurement: temporal stability and structural reliability. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, pp. 26–31.
27.
MalhotraN. K. (1982) Information load and consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, pp. 419–430.
28.
MeyerR. J. (1981) A model of multi attribute judgments under attribute uncertainty and informational constraint. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 428–441.
29.
MilfordJ.T., & PerryR.P. (1977) A methodological study of overload. Journal of General Psychology, 97, pp. 131–137.
30.
MontgomeryD.B., & WittinkD.R. (1980) The predictive validity of conjoint analysis for alternative aggregation schemes. In Marketing Measurement and Analysis: Proceedings of the 1979 ORSA/TIMS Conference on Marketing.Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA, pp. 298–309.
31.
NeslinS. A. (1981) Linking product features to perceptions: self-stated versus statistically revealed importance weights. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 80–86.
32.
OlshavskyR. W. (1979) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: replication and extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, pp. 300–316.
33.
ParkerB.R., & SrinivasanV. (1976) A consumer preference approach to the planning of rural primary health care facilities. Operations Research, 24, pp. 991–1025.
34.
PayneJ. W. (1976) Task complexity and contingent information processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp. 366–387.
35.
PettyR.E., & CacioppoJ.T. (1979) Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, pp. 1915–1926.
ScottJ.E., & WrightP. (1976) Modeling organizational buyers' product evaluation strategy: validity and procedural considerations. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, pp. 211–224.
38.
SegalM. N. (1982) Reliability of conjoint analysis: contrasting data collection procedures. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, pp. 211–224.
39.
SelnesF., & GrnhaugK. (1986) Subjective and objective measures of product knowledge contrasted. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, pp. 67–71.
40.
ShuganS. M. (1980) The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, pp. 99–111.
41.
SrinivasanS., & PardkC.S. (1997) Surprising robustness of the self-explicated approach to customer preference structure measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, pp. 286–291.
42.
WittinkD.R., & CattinP. (1990) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: an update. Journal of Marketing, 53, pp. 91–96.