This study explored how people with dementia who live alone experienced the meaning of their everyday technology, such as telephones and electronic equipment, and the use of it. Eight participants with mild to moderate stage dementia were included. Repeated interviews and observations were undertaken in each participant's home and surroundings. A phenomenological, interpretative method was adopted in the analysis. In summary, the participants experienced their everyday technology to be embedded with both practical and existential meaning, as it could assist them in different ways in daily life as well as support their perception and presentation of themselves. Although important, habit and familiarity did not seem to provide them with enough support to continue using technology, unless the technology was experienced as very significant and incorporated in a bodily experience through continuous and very frequent practice. The abundance of experienced meanings and the significance of the technology in the participants' lives call for further studies in order to better understand the conditions for managing everyday technology in home and society and, when relevant, to facilitate technology use in people with dementia.
Agüero-Torres, H., Fratiglioni, L., & Winblad, B. (1998). Natural history of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: Review of the literature in the light of the findings from the Kungsholmen Project. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry , 13, 755-766.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2001). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Rev. 5th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
3.
Berndtsson, I. (1999). Tekniska hjälpmedel, synskadade och samhället (Technical devices, low-vision users and society). In J. Bengtsson (Ed.), Med livsvärlden som grund (With the life world as the point of departure). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
4.
Bodine C., & Scherer M. (2006). Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the US Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR): Report from working groups. Disability and Rehabilitation , 28, 1567-1571.
5.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen S. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Clare, L., Marková, I., Verhey, F., & Kenny, G. (2005). Awareness in dementia: A review of assessment methods and measures. Aging & Mental Health, 5, 395-413.
7.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Emiliani, P.L. (2006). Assistive Technology (AT) versus Mainstream Technology (MST): The research perspective. Technology and Disability , 18, 19-29.
9.
Eriksson, A., Karlsson, G., Söderström, M., & Tham, K. (2004). A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: Lived experiences of persons with brain damage. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 261-271.
10.
Flynn, D., van Schaik, P., Blackman, T., Femcott, C., Hobbs, B., & Calderon, C. (2003). Developing a virtual reality-based methodology for people with dementia: A feasibility study. Cyber Psychology & Behaviour, 6, 591-611.
11.
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). `Mini Mental State Examination': A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician . Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
12.
Freeman, E., Clare, L., Savitch, N., Royan, L., Litherland, R., & Lindsay M. (2005). Improving website accessibility for people with early-stage dementia: A prliminary investigation. Aging & Mental Health, 9(5), 442-448.
13.
Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press .
14.
Hofmann, M., Hock, C., Kuhler, A., & Muller-Spahn, F. (1996). Interactive computer-based cognitive training in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 30(6), 493-501.
15.
Hofmann, M., Hook, C., & Muller-Spahn, F. (1997). Computer-based cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 777, 249-254.
16.
Hofmann, M., Rösler, A., Schwarz, W., Muller-Spahn, F., Kräuchi, K., Hock, C., et al. (2003). Interactive computer-training as a therapeutic tool in Alzheimer's disease. Comprehensive Psychology, 44(3), 213-219.
17.
Hubbard, G., Downs, M.G., & Tester, S. (2003). Including older people with dementia in research: Challenges and strategies. Aging & Mental Health, 7, 351-362.
18.
Husserl, E. (1970/1900-01). Logical investigations. New York: Humanities Press.
19.
Karlsson, G. (1993). Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
20.
Kontos P.C. (2004). Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease. Ageing & Society, 24, 829-849.
21.
Larsson-Lund, M., & Nygård, L. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches in achieving a desired occupational self-image. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 23, 67-75.
22.
Lawton, M.P. (1986). Environment and aging. New York: The Center for the Study of Aging.
23.
Lawton, M.P. (2001). The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer's disease. Aging & Mental Health, 5, Suppl. 1, S56-S64.
24.
Mann, W.C., Belchior, P., Tomita, M., & Kemp, B. (2005). Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. Technology and Disability, 17, 1-9.
25.
Mann, W.C., Helal, S., Davenport, R., Justiss, M., Tomita, M., & Kemp, B. (2004). Use of cell phones by elders with impairments: Overall appraisal, satisfaction, and suggestions. Technology and Disability, 16, 49-57.
26.
Marshall, M. (1999). Technology to help people with dementia remain in their own homes. Generations, 23, 85-87.
27.
McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2005). The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing & Society, 25, 91-110.
28.
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R.Price, D., & Stadlan, E.M. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology , 34, 939-944.
29.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/1945). The phenomenology of perception . London: Routledge.
30.
Mynatt, E., & Rogers, W. (2002). Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing International, 27, 24-41.
31.
Norman, D.A. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Nygård, L. (2004). The responses of persons with dementia to challenges in daily activities: A synthesis of findings from empirical studies. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 435-445.
33.
Nygård, L. (2006). How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia? Suggestions and reflections. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 101-112.
34.
Nygård, L., & Borell, L. (1998). A life-world of altering meaning: Expressions of the illness experience of dementia in everyday life over three years. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 18, 109-136.
35.
Nygård, L., & Öhman, A. (2002). Managing changes in everyday occupations: The experience of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22, 70-81.
36.
Nygård, L., & Starkhammar, S. (2003). Telephone use among non-institutionalised persons with dementia living alone: Mapping out difficulties and management strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 239-249.
37.
Nygård L., Starkhammar S. (2007). The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone. Aging & Mental Health, 11(2), 144-155.
38.
Orpwood, R., Bjoerneby, S., Hagen, I., Mäki, O., Faulkner, R., & Topo P. (2004). User involvement in dementia product development . Dementia, 3(3), 263-279.
39.
Orpwood, R., Faulkner, R., Gibbs, C., & Adlam, T. (2003). A design methodology for assistive technology for people with dementia. In G.M. Craddock , L.P. McCormack, R.B. Reilly, & H.T.P. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology - Shaping the future (pp. 766-770). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
40.
Östlund, B. (1999). Images, users, practices - senior citizens entering the IT society (KFB report 1999:9). Stockholm: KFB-Kommunikationsforskningsberedningen.
41.
Pettersson, I., Berndtsson I., Appelros P., & Ahström, G. (2005). Lifeworld perspectives on assistive devices: Lived experiences of spouses of persons with stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12, 159-169.
42.
Rosenberg, L., Kottorp, A., Nygård, L. (accepted). Competence in everyday technology use among people with MCI or dementia in comparison to elderly without cognitive deficits. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy.
43.
Scheidt, R.J., & Norris-Baker, C. (2003). The general ecological model revisited: Evolution, current status, and continuing challenges. In H-W. Wahl, R.J. Scheidt, & P.G. Windley (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics,Volume 23, Focus on aging in context: Socio-physical environments (pp. 37-58). New York: Springer.
44.
Schreiber, M., Schweizer, A., Lutz, K., Kalveram, K.T., & Jäncke L. (1999). Potential of an interactive computer-based training in therehabilitation of dementia: An initial study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9(2), 155-167.
45.
Selwyn, N. (2003). Apart from technology: Understanding people's non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society, 25, 99-116.
46.
Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communication technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 369-384.
47.
Williams, S., & Keady, J. (2006). Editorial: The narrative voice of people with dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 5, 163-166.
48.
Wimo, A., Jonsson, L., & Winblad, B. (2006). An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and direct cost of dementia in 2003. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 21, 175-181.
49.
Wimo, A., Winblad, B., & Grafström, M. (1999). The social consequences for families with Alzheimer's disease patients: Potential impact of new drug treatment. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 338-347.
