Experimental investigation of aerodynamic effect–induced dynamic characteristics of an OC4 semi-submersible floating wind turbine

Abstract

Compared to onshore wind turbines, aerodynamics-induced dynamic characteristics of a floating wind turbine are more complicated due to its coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic behaviours. The study investigates these aerodynamics-induced dynamic characteristics using an OC4 semi-submersible floating wind turbine. In this research, a high-fidelity wind field and a 1/50th scale model were tested. The dynamic characteristics induced by the aerodynamic effects were investigated in detail via the experimental results, including aerodynamic damping effects, gyroscopic effects, dynamic responses of the Rotor-Nacelle-Assembly and dynamic responses of the mooring system. It is found that aerodynamic damping is active in reducing surge and pitch resonant responses and probably increases with the inflow wind speed and the rotating-blades–induced induction coefficient; the gyroscopic effect intensifies the yaw motion and increases with the rotational speed of a rotor; the significant responses from the Rotor-Nacelle-Assembly may occur when the natural frequencies of the tower are close to aerodynamic periodic frequencies; and the mooring system is more sensitive to wave loads rather than to aerodynamic loads. This study presents the complexity of the dynamic characteristics induced by the aerodynamic effects in a floating wind turbine, and in the design code, using time-domain analysis software, which considers the coupling effects between the wind- and wave-induced loads and responses are suggested.

Keywords

Semi-submersible floating wind turbine aerodynamic loads model test aerodynamic damping gyroscopic effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sethuraman

. Hydrodynamics and drive-train dynamics of a direct-drive floating wind turbine. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2014.

Muliawan

Karimirad

Gao

. Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes. Ocean Eng 2013; 65: 71–82.

Bae

Kim

. Rotor-floater-tether coupled dynamics including second-order sum–frequency wave loads for a mono-column-TLP-type FOWT (floating offshore wind turbine). Ocean Eng 2013; 61: 109–122.

Farrugia

Sant

Micallef

. A study on the aerodynamics of a floating wind turbine rotor. Renew Energ 2016; 86: 770–784.

Sebastian

Lackner

. A comparison of first-order aerodynamic analysis methods for floating wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2010. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Sebastian

Lackner

. Offshore floating wind turbines – an aerodynamic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2011, pp.1–27. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Karimirad

Moan

. Effect of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic damping on dynamic response of a spar type floating wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Warsaw, 20–23 April 2010.

Larsen

Hanson

. A method to avoid negative damped low frequent tower vibrations for a floating, pitch controlled wind turbine. J Phys Conf Ser 2007; 75: 012073.

Martin

Kimball

Viselli

. Methodology for wind/wave basin testing of floating offshore wind turbines. J Offshore Mech Arct 2014; 136: 020905.

10.

Coulling

Goupee

Robertson

. Validation of a FAST semi-submersible floating wind turbine numerical model with DeepCwind test data. J Renew Sustain Energ 2013; 5(2): 023116.

11.

Karimirad

Meissonnier

Gao

. Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine. Mar Struct 2011; 24: 412–435.

12.

Cordle

Jonkman

. State of the art in floating wind turbine design tools. In The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Maui, HI, 19–24 June 2011, vol. 8, pp.367–374.

13.

Bachynski

Moan

. Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines. Mar Struct 2012; 29: 89–114.

14.

Jonkman

Musial

. Offshore code comparison collaboration (OC3) for IEA task 23 offshore wind technology and deployment, 2010, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/48191.pdf

15.

Robertson

Jonkman

Musial

. Offshore code comparison collaboration, continuation: phase II results of a floating semisubmersible wind system. In: Proceedings of EWEA offshore conference, Frankfurt, 19–21 November 2013, pp.1–15.

16.

Skaare

Hanson

Yttervik

. Dynamic response and control of the Hywind demo floating wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Brussels, 14–17 March 2011.

17.

Aubault

Cermelli

Lahijanian

. WindFloat contraption: from conception to reproduction. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering: volume 4 – offshore geotechnics; Ronald W. Yeung honoring symposium on offshore and ship hydrodynamics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–6 July 2012, pp.847–853. New York: ASME.

18.

Fukushima Offshore Wind Consortium. Fukushima floating offshore wind farm demonstration project (Fukushima FORWARD). Japan: Fukushima Offshore Wind Consortium, Fukuoka 2014, pp.1–8.

19.

Viselli

Goupee

Dagher

. VolturnUS 1:8: conclusion of 18-months of operation of the first grid-connected floating wind turbine prototype in the Americas. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, St. John’s, NL, Canada, 31 May–5 June 2015, pp.V009T09A055. New York: ASME.

20.

Nielsen

Hanson

Skaare

. Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, Hamburg, 4–9 June 2006, pp.671–679. New York: ASME.

21.

Koo

Goupee

Kimball

. Model tests for a floating wind turbine on three different floaters. J Offshore Mech Arct 2014; 136: 020907.

22.

Duan

Liu

. Experimental comparisons of dynamic properties of floating wind turbine systems based on two different rotor concepts. Appl Ocean Res 2016; 58: 266–280.

23.

Duan

Niedzwecki

. Model test investigation of a spar floating wind turbine. Mar Struct 2016; 49: 76–96.

24.

Wan

Gao

Moan

. Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a combined wind and wave energy converter concept in survival modes. Coast Eng 2015; 104: 151–169.

25.

Wang

. The development and validation of an aero-hydro simulation code for offshore floating wind turbine. J Ocean Wind Energ 2015; 2: 1–11.

26.

Roddier

Cermelli

Weinstein

. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines – part I: design basis and qualification process. In: Proceedings of the ASME 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering (OAME’2009), Honolulu, HI, 31 May–5 June 2009, pp.845–853. New York: ASME.

27.

Roddier

Cermelli

Aubault

. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines. J Renew Sustain Energ 2010; 2(3): 033104.

28.

Aubault

Cermelli

Roddier

. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines – part III: structural analysis. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, Honolulu, HI, 31 May–5 June 2009, pp.213–220. New York: ASME.

29.

Kvittem

Bachynski

Moan

. Effects of hydrodynamic modelling in fully coupled simulations of a semi-submersible wind turbine. Enrgy Proced 2012; 24: 351–362.

30.

Bachynski

Etemaddar

Kvittem

. Dynamic analysis of floating wind turbines during pitch actuator fault, grid loss, and shutdown. Enrgy Proced 2013; 35: 210–222.

31.

Zambrano

MacCready

Kiceniuk

. Dynamic modeling of deepwater offshore wind turbine structures in Gulf of Mexico storm conditions. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2006 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, Hamburg, 4–9 June 2006, pp.629–634. New York: ASME.

32.

Robertson

Jonkman

Masciola

. Definition of the semisubmersible floating system for phase II of OC4. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014, pp.1–38.

33.

Brommundt

Krause

Merz

. Mooring system optimization for floating wind turbines using frequency domain analysis. Enrgy Proced 2012; 24: 289–296.

34.

Chakrabarti

. Offshore structure modeling. Adv Ser Ocean Eng 1994; 9: 470.

35.

Martin

. Development of a scale model wind turbine for testing of offshore floating wind turbine systems. Master’s Thesis, The University of Maine, Orono, ME, 2011.

36.

Jonkman

Butterfield

Musial

. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development, 2009, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/38060.pdf

37.

Jonkman

. Definition of the floating system for phase IV of OC3, 2010, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47535.pdf

38.

Jonkman

. Influence of control on the pitch damping of a floating wind turbine, 2008, pp.1–15, http://www.mapcruzin.com/wind-power-publications/technologies/42589.pdf

39.

Mostafa

Murai

Nishimura

. Study of motion of spar-type floating wind turbines in waves with effect of gyro moment at inclination. J Nav Architect Mar Eng 2012; 9: 67–79.

40.

Nematbakhsh

Olinger

Tryggvason

. A nonlinear computational model of floating wind turbines. J Fluid Eng: T ASME 2013; 135: 121103-1–121103-13.

41.

Manwell

McGowan

Rogers

. Wind energy explained: theory, design and application. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.

42.

Burton

Sharpe

Bossanyi

. Wind energy handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

43.

Robertson

Goupee

Jonkman

. Summary of conclusions and recommendations drawn from the DeepCwind scaled floating offshore wind system test campaign. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, Nantes, 9–14 June 2013, pp.1–13. New York: ASME.

44.

Goupee

Fowler

Kimball

. Additional wind/wave basin testing of the DeepCwind semi-submersible with a performance-matched wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, San Francisco, CA, 8–13 June 2014, pp.V09BT09A026. New York: ASME.

45.

Goupee

Koo

Kimball

. Experimental comparison of three floating wind turbine concepts. J Offshore Mech Arct 2014; 136: 020906.