A submerged flexible mound breakwater can be employed for wave control in shallow water as an advanced alternative to the conventional rigid submerged designs. This study presents a flexible breakwater with an innovative geometry based on model experimentation. Experimental studies were performed to compare the wave energy dissipation by the flexible mound and rigid structures, over a range of test conditions, for example, three different diameters of structure, three water depths, and different regular wave heights for three different beach slopes. Results indicate that the present submerged flexible mound breakwater is stable, being appropriate for most operational sea conditions. Large amplitude waves can induce significant motions of the structure; therefore, the interaction between radiating and scattering waves is highly contributing to the wave energy dissipation. The wave energy dissipation at breaking zone of the present submerged flexible mound breakwater is significantly greater than that of the other types of flexible and rigid formerly investigated structures.
PilkeyOHRiceTNealWJ. How to read a North Carolina Beach: bubble holes, barking sands, and rippled runnels. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press Books, 2004.
2.
PilkeyOHNealWJ. North Topsail Beach, North Carolina: a model for maximizing coastal hazard vulnerability. In: KelleyJTPilkeyOHAndrewJ, et al. (eds) America’s most vulnerable coastal communities, vol. 460. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, 2009, pp.73–90.
3.
OumeraciHHinzMBleckM, et al. GroBmaBstabliche Untersuchungen zur hydraulischen Stabilitat geotextiler Sandcontainer unter Wellenbelastung. LIW—TUB Nr. 878. Braunschweig: Leichtweiss-Institut für Wasserbau, 2002 (in German).
4.
RecioJOumeraciH. Effect of deformations on the hydraulic stability of coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers. Geotext Geomembranes2007; 25(4–5): 278–292.
5.
RecioJOumeraciH. Process based stability formulae for coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers. Coast Eng2009; 56(5–6): 632–658.
D’AngremondKVan Der MeerJWDe JongRJ. Wave transmission at low-crested structures. Coast Eng1997; 21: 2418–2427.
8.
AhmadianASSimonsRR. Estimation of nearshore wave transmission for submerged breakwaters using a data-driven predictive model. Neural Comput Appl2018; 29(10): 705–719.
RamanHShankarJDattatriJ. Submerged breakwater. Cent Board Irrig Power J1977; 34: 205–212.
11.
JohnsonJWFuchsRAMorisonJR.The damping action of submerged breakwaters. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union1951; 32(5): 704–718.
12.
DhinakaranGSundarVSundaravadiveluR. Review of the research on emerged and submerged semicircular breakwaters. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2012; 226(4): 397–409.
13.
Hom-maMHorikawaK. A study on submerged breakwaters. Coast Eng Japan1961; 4(1): 85–102.
14.
DhinakaranGSundarVSundaravadiveluR, et al. Performance of a perforated submerged semicircular breakwater due to non-breaking waves. Proc IMechE, Part M: J Engineering for the Maritime Environment2012; 226(1): 36–50.
15.
BabaM. Computation of wave transmission over a shore protecting submerged breakwater. Ocean Eng1986; 13(3): 227–237.
16.
ManiJSVijaykumarSMahadevanR. Diffraction of waves by submerged breakwater. In: Proceedings of the 4th Indian national conference on ocean engineering, Goa, September 1991, pp.403–407. National Institute of Oceanography.
17.
BurcharthHFZanuttighBAndersenTL, et al. Innovative engineering solutions and best practices to mitigate coastal risk. In: ZanuttighBNichollsRJVanderlindenJ-P, et al. (eds) Coastal risk management in a changing climate. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015, pp.55–170.
18.
HeertenG. Geotextiles in coastal engineering—25 years experience. Geotext Geomembranes1984; 1(2): 119–141.
19.
LefaiveE. Durability of geotextiles: the French experience. Geotext Geomembranes1988; 7: 553–558.
20.
SantvoortGP. Geotextiles and geomembranes in civil engineering. Rotterdam: AA Balkema, 1994.
21.
PilarczykKW. Geosynthetics & geosystems in hydraulic and coastal engineering. Rotterdam: AA Balkema, 2000.
22.
GreenwoodJHFridayA. How to predict hundred year lifetimes for geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, 18–22 September 2006, pp.1539–1542. Rotterdam: Millpress. S.
23.
FowlerJBagbyRMTrainerE. Dewatering sewage sludge with geotextile tubes. In: Proceedings of the 49th Canadian geotechnical conference, St. John’s, NL, Canada, 23–25 September 1996, pp.1–31. Canadian Geotechnical Society.
24.
LenzeBHeertenGSaathoffF, et al. Geotextile sand containers-Successful solutions against beach erosion at sandy coasts and scour problems under hydrodynamic loads. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference, LITTORAL, Porto, 22–26 September 2002, pp.375–381. Porto: Associação EUROCOAST-Portugal.
25.
HeibaumMFourieAGirardH, et al. Hydraulic applications of geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, 18–22 September 2006, pp.79–120. Rotterdam: Millpress. S.
26.
KavazanjianRDiwonNKatsumiT, et al. Geosynthetic barriers for environmental protection at landfills. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, 18–22 September 2006, pp.121–152. Rotterdam: Millpress. S.
27.
LawsonCR. Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering. Geosynth Int2008; 15(6): 384–427.
28.
SaathoffFOumeraciHRestallS. Australian and German experiences on the use of geotextile containers. Geotext Geomembranes2007; 25(4–5): 251–263.
29.
TanakaMMitsumataMOhyamaT, et al. Experimental study on wave control by a flexible submerged dike. In: Proceedings of 34th Japan conference on coastal engineering, Tokyo, Japan, September 1987, pp.492–496. JSCE.
30.
KiyokawaTMMitsumata TanakaMOhyamaT.Wave control by radiation wave generator. In: Proceedings of 34th Japan conference on coastal engineering, Tokyo, Japan, September 1987, pp.472–476 (in Japanese). JSCE.
31.
OhyamaTTanakaMKiyokawaT, et al. Wave deformation on a flexible submerged dike. In: Proceedings of 34th Japan conference on coastal engineering, Tokyo, Japan, September 1987, pp.497–501. JSCE.
32.
OhyamaTTanakaMKiyokawaT, et al. Transmission and reflection characteristics of waves over a submerged flexible mound. Coast Eng Japan1989; 32(1): 53–68.
33.
TanakaMOhyamaTKiyokawaT, et al. Characteristics of wave dissipation by flexible submerged breakwater and utility of the device. Coast Eng1992; 20(1): 1615–1624.
34.
AlvarezIERubioRRicaldeH. Beach restoration with geotextile tubes as submerged breakwaters in Yucatan, Mexico. Geotext Geomembranes2007; 25(4–5): 233–241.
35.
BloxomAMedellinAVinceC, et al. Modeling & testing of inflatable structures for rapidly deployable port infrastructures. Bethesda, MD: Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, 2010.
36.
YimS. A feasibility study on numerical modeling of large-scale naval fluid-filled structure contact-impact problems. Bethesda, MD: Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, 2011.
37.
IribarrenCRNoralesC. Protection des ports. In: Proceedings of XVIIth international navigation congress, Lisbon, Portugal, 19–22 September 1949, pp.31–80. PIANC.
38.
NewALMcIverPPeregrineDH. Computations of overturning waves. J Fluid Mech1985; 150: 233–251.
39.
DuncanJH. Spilling breakers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2001; 33(1): 519–547.
40.
HeikalEMIbraheemAAOwaisTM, et al. Damping action of near-shore trapezoidal submerged breakwaters. Bull Facul Eng Ain Shams Univ2002; 37(1): 235–249.
41.
YuliastutiDIHashimAM. Wave transmission on submerged rubble mound breakwater using L-blocks. In: 2nd international conference on environmental science and technology (IPCBEE 2011), http://www.ipcbee.com/vol6/no1/55-F00108.pdf
42.
El-FikyGSKatoTFujiiY. Vertical crustal movement in Tohoku District, Japan, deduced from dynamic adjustment of levelling and tidal data. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo1996; 71: 47–71.
43.
CokgorSKapdasliMS. Performance of submerged breakwaters as environmental friendly coastal structures. In: ZimmermannCDeanRGPenchevV, et al. (eds) Environmentally friendly coastal protection. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp.211–218.
44.
ShirlalKGRaoS. Ocean wave transmission by submerged reef—a physical model study. Ocean Eng2007; 34: 2093–2099.
StamosDGHajjMRTelionisDP. Performance of hemi-cylindrical and rectangular submerged breakwaters. Ocean Eng2003; 30(6): 813–828.
47.
McCowanJ. On the solitary wave. Philos Mag1891; 32: 45–58.
48.
MicheR. Mouvements ondulatoires de la mer en Profondeur Croissante ou Décroissante. Ann Ponts Chausses1944; 116: 369–406.
49.
MunkWH. The solitary wave theory and its application to surf problems. Ann NY Acad Sci1949; 51(3): 376–424.
50.
MartinA. Wave breaking analysis with laboratory tests. Lisbon: University of Lisbon, 2013.
51.
GodaYSuzukiY. Estimation of incident and reflected waves in random wave experiments. Coast Eng1977; 1: 828–845.
52.
IsaacsonM. Measurement of regular wave reflection. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng1991; 117(6): 553–569.
53.
RathbunJRCoxDTEdgeBL. Wave runup and reflection on coastal structures in depth-limited conditions. In: 26th international conference on coastal engineering, Copenhagen, 22–26 June 1998, pp.1053–1067. Reston, VA: ASCE.
54.
ChangHK. A three-point method for separating incident and reflected waves over a sloping bed. China Ocean Eng2002; 16(4): 499–512.
55.
ChangHKHsuTW. A two-point method for estimating wave reflection over a sloping beach. Ocean Eng2003; 30(14): 1833–1847.
56.
WangSKHsuTWWengWK, et al. A three-point method for estimating wave reflection of obliquely incident waves over a sloping bottom. Coast Eng2008; 55(2): 125–138.
57.
YoungDMTestikFY. Wave reflection by submerged vertical and semicircular breakwaters. Ocean Eng2011; 38(10): 1269–1276.
