In this brief article, we review the history of the human subjects review process and identify key aspects of that review as they relate to action research. In particular, we examine the issues of coercion, predictability, confidentiality, and risk –concerns central to the criteria used in current review processes but reflecting fundamental differences in the basic conceptualization of ethical practice as this is understood in action research.
Anderson, P. V. (1996). Ethics, institutional review boards, and the involvement of human participants in composition research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy(pp. 260–285). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .
2.
Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research after reading Milgram's ‘Behavioral study of obedience’ . American Psychologist, 19(6), 421–423 .
3.
Brydon-Miller, M. (2004). The terrifying truth: Interrogating systems of power and privilege and choosing to act. In M. Brydon-Miller , P. Maguire & A. McIntyre (Eds.), Traveling companions: Feminism, teaching, and action research(pp. 3–19). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
4.
Fine, M. , Torre, M. E. , Boudin, K. , Bowen, I. , Clark, J. , Hylton, D. , Martinez, M. , Rivea, M. , Roberts, R. A. , Smart, P. , & Upegui, D. (2004). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. In L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.), Working method: Research and social justice(pp. 95–119). New York: Routledge .
5.
Haney, C. , Banks, W. , & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison . International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97 .
6.
Haney, C. , & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twentyfive years after the Stanford Prison Experiment . American Psychologist, 53(7), 709–727 .
7.
Hock, R. (2001). Forty studies that changed psychology: Explorations into the history of psychological research. 4th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
8.
Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment(Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press .
9.
Linders, A. (2005, May). The bureaucritization of ethics . Paper presented at the First International Qualitative Inquiry Conference, Urbana, Illinois.
10.
Lykes, M. B. in collaboration with the Association of Maya Ixil Women –New Dawn, Chajul, Guatemala (2001). Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Guatemala. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice(pp. 363–371). London: SAGE .
11.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378 .
12.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper/Collins .
13.
Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 3–16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .
14.
Sales, B. D. , & Folkman, S. (2000). Ethics in research with human subjects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
15.
Thomas, S. B. , & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932–1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk programs in the Black community . American Journal of Public Health, 81(11), 1498–1505 .
16.
Women of ADMI , & Lykes, M. B. (2000). Voces e imagenes: Las mujeres Maya Ixiles de Chajul/Voices and images: Mayan Ixil women of Chajul. Guatemala: Magna Terra .
