Although participation is widely discussed in the action research literature, relatively few studies deal with building the participative relationship itself. This article attempts to fill that gap through a ‘first-person action research’ involving a relationship between Jewish researchers and a Palestinian Arab non-governmental organization in Israel that failed to live up to our espoused values of participation. It employs an action science method for joint critical reflecting on this relationship and analyzing the data from the reflection. It presents two ‘theories of action’: one aimed at explaining the paradox of participation and one for dealing with it more effectively. By opening our learning, including our errors, to the scrutiny of other action researchers, we hope to generate actionable knowledge that can contribute to building genuinely participative relationships in action research.
Argyris, C. ( 1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Argyris, C. ( 1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77-85.
3.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. ( 1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
4.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. ( 1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective . Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
5.
Argryis, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. ( 1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Avnimelech, M., & Tamir, Y. ( 2002). A social time bomb: Economics and politics of welfare in Israel. Tel Aviv, Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House (in Hebrew).
7.
Baghar, K. ( 2007). Critical reflections on participatory action research for rural development in Iran. Action Research, 5(2), 103-22.
8.
Baldwin, M. ( 2001). Co-operative inquiry in social work. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 288-293). London: SAGE.
9.
Bar-Tal, D., & Teichman, Y. ( 2005). Stereotypes and prejudice in conflict: Representation of Arabs in the Israeli Jewish Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Braithewaite, R., Cockwill, S., O’Neill, M., & Rebane, D. ( 2007). Insider participatory action research in disadvantaged post-industrial areas: The experience of community members as the become Community Based Action Researchers. Action Research, 5(1), 61-74.
11.
Brown, L.D., Bammer, G., Batliwala, S., & Kunreuther, F. (2003). Framing practice-research engagement for democratizing knowledge. Action Research, 1(1), 81-102.
12.
Busza, J. ( 2004). Participatory research in constrained settings. Action Research, 2(2), 191-208.
13.
Collins, S.B. ( 2005). An understanding of poverty from those who are poor. Action Research, 3(1), 9-31.
14.
Fals Borda, O. ( 2001). Participatory action research in social theory. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 27-37). London : SAGE.
15.
Fine, M., & Torre, M.E. ( 2006). Participatory action research in prison. Action Research, 4(3), 253-269.
16.
Freire, P. ( 1970). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.
17.
Friedman, V. ( 2001). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 159-170). London: SAGE.
18.
Friedman, V., & Antal, A.B. ( 2004). Negotiating reality: An action science approach to intercultural competence. Management Learning, 36(1), 67-84.
19.
Friedman, V., & Rogers, T. ( 2008). Action science: Linking causal theory and meaning making in action research. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), The handbook of action research (pp. 159-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE:
20.
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. ( 2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 70-80). London: SAGE.
21.
Hall, B. ( 2001). I wish I were a poem of practices of participatory research . In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 171-178). London: SAGE.
22.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. ( 2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 179-188). London: SAGE.
23.
Iversen, S., Ellertsen, B., Joacobsen, S.R., Raheim, M. & Knivsberg, A. ( 2006). Developing a participative multidisciplinary team approach to enhance the quality of school start. Action Research, 4(3), 271-293.
24.
Kelly, J., Mock, L., & Tandon, D. ( 2001). Collaborative inquiry with African American Community Leaders: Comments on a participatory action research process. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 349-355). London: SAGE.
25.
Lewis, H. ( 2001). Participatory research and education for social change: Highlander research and education center. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 356-362). London: SAGE.
26.
Lykes, M. ( 2001). Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Quatemala. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 363-371). London: SAGE.
27.
Ospina, S., Dodge, J., Godsoe, B., Minieri, M., Reza, J., & Schall, E. ( 2004). From consent to mutual inquiry: Balancing democracy and authority in action research. Action Research, 2(1), 47-70.
28.
Park, P. ( 2001). Knowledge and participatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 81-90). London : SAGE.
29.
Pyrch, T., & Castillo, M.T. (2001). The sights and sounds of indigenous knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 379-385). London: SAGE.
30.
Reed, C., Tom, A., & Frisby, W. ( 2006). Finding the ‘action’ in feminist participatory action research. Action Research, 4(3), 315-332.
31.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. ( 2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 1-14). London: SAGE.
32.
Rinawie-Zoabi, G. ( 2006). The future vision of the Palestinian Arabs in Israel. The National Committee for the Heads of Local Arab Authorities. Retrieved from: www.arab-lac.org.
33.
Rudolph, J., Taylor, S., & Foldy, E. ( 2001). Collaborative off-line reflection: A way to develop skill in action science and action inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 405-412). London: SAGE.
34.
Swantz, M., Ndedya, E., & Saiddy Msaiganah, M. (2001). Participatory action research in Southern Tanzania, with special reference to women. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 386-395). London: SAGE.
35.
Swidler, A. ( 1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273-286.
Williams, V., St Quintin, P., & Hoadley, S. ( 2006). ‘Take your partners’: Reflecting on a partnership project in a learning disability research. Action Research , 4(3), 295-324.
38.
Zuber-Skerrit, O. ( 2001). Action learning and action research: Paradigm, praxis and programs. In S. Shankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield & P. Swepson (Eds.), Effective change management through action research and action learning: Concepts, frameworks, processes and applications (pp. 1-20). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University Press.
