As severe social problems persist, analysts from various sectors suggest that policies and programs should increase their sensitivity and effectiveness through collaborations among universities, communities, and political officials. A model of collaboration is presented, and the nature and importance of such collaborations are examined. The benefits, challenges, and roles of the three collaboration partners (university, community, and government) and the three stages of the collaboration process (initiation, deliberation, and implementation) are discussed in the context of a real-world application. Recommendations for future applications are presented.
References
1.
Center for the Study of Social Policy. (1994). 1994 kids count data book: State profiles of child well-being. (Available from the Center for the Study of Social Policy, Suite 503, 1250 Eye Street, N.W., Washington DC, 20005)
2.
Emery, M. (1986). Toward an heuristic theory of diffusion. Human Relations, 39, 411-432.
3.
Gopalan, P. (1997). The trust factor in participation and social education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 178-192.
4.
Hutchins, J. (1998). Coming together for children and families: A report from the Family Impact Seminar. Washington, DC: Family Impact Seminar.
5.
Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 149-171.
6.
Johnson, A. (1996). “It's good to talk”: The focus group and the sociological imagination. The Sociological Review, 44, 517-538.
7.
Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Colleges. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
8.
Kennedy, E. M. (1999). University-community partnerships: A mutually beneficial effort to aid community development and improve academic learning opportunities. Applied Developmental Science, 3(4), 197-198.
9.
Lerner, R. M., & Simon, L. A. K. (Eds.). (1998). University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century: Outreach scholarship for youth and families. New York: Garland.
10.
Mathews, D., & McAfee, N. (2000). Making choices together: The power of public deliberation. Dayton, OH: Charles F. Kettering Foundation.
11.
Mawby, R. G. (1998). Boldness for our times: Mobilizing university expertise to meet youth needs. In R. M. Lerner & L. A. K. Simon (Eds.), University-community collaborations for the twenty-first century: Outreach scholarship for youth and families (pp. 367-388). New York: Garland.
12.
Ostrom, C. W., Lerner, R. M., & Freel, M. A. (1995). Building the capacity of youth and families through university-community collaborations: The development-in-context evaluation (DICE) model. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 427-449.
13.
Overton, B. J., & Burkhardt, J. C. (1999). Drucker could be right, but...:New leadership models for institutional-community partnerships. Applied Developmental Science, 3(4), 217-227.
14.
Poole, D. L. (1997). Building community capacity to promote social and public health: Challenge for universities. Health and Social Work, 22, 1663-1670.
15.
Richardson, W. C. (1996). A new calling for higher education. Paper presented at the John W. Oswald Lecture, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
16.
Sokoloff, H. (1997). Public action: Acting in concert with others. Clarion, p. 9.
17.
Spanier, G. B. (1999). Enhancing the quality of life: A model for the 21st century land-grant university. Applied Developmental Science, 3(4), 199-205.
18.
Stevens, P. E. (1996). Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nursing, 13, 170-176.
19.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Taylor, J. R., Beane, E. G., & Genee, C. L. (1998). The Michigan Public Health Institute: A model for university, government and community research and practice partnerships. Society of Research Administrators, 30, 17-23.
23.
Thompson, L. S. (1999). Creating partnerships with government, communities, and universities to achieve results for children. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 213-216.
