A New Risk Index Combining d -Dimer,Fibrinogen,HE4,and CA199 Differentiates Suspecting Endometrial Cancer From Patients With Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding or Discharge

Abstract

Purpose:

To establish an efficient new risk index for screening patients with endometrial cancer from patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge.

Method:

A total of 254 patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge were included in this study. Several candidate markers, including HE4, CA125, CA199, CA153, AFP, CEA, d-dimer, and fibrinogen, were employed. A new risk index for endometrial cancer screening was established by binary logistic regression. The diagnostic value of the candidate markers and the new risk index were assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results:

The most valuable diagnostic indicator for endometrial cancer was HE4, followed by d-dimer and then fibrinogen (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: HE4 = 0.794, d-dimer = 0.717, fibrinogen = 0.690). The new risk index was superior to a single application of markers and a widely used combination (HE4 and CA125). At the ideal cutoff level, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.34% and 70.08%, respectively. In addition, only patients without organic disease served as controls, which further increase its performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.932, sensitivity = 94.49%, and specificity = 77.42%).

Conclusions:

The new risk index combining HE4, d-dimer, fibrinogen, and CA199 was the ideal combination for the screening of endometrial cancer. As a simple, rapid, nondestructive detection method, the new risk index is worth promotion in clinical practice, especially in primary medical institutions.

Keywords

CA199 HE4 fibrinogen diagnosis endometrial cancer

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC), the primary symptom of which is abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge, is the most common gynecological malignancy.^1,2 Since 1987, its incidence and mortality have increased continuously, especially in Asia.³ According to a study conducted by the China Cancer Society in 2015, 63.4 out of 1000 women will be diagnosed with EC and 21.8 per 1000 women will die per year.⁴ With disease progression, the prognosis becomes worse. The 5-year survival rates for localized, regional, and distant disease were 91%, 57%, and 17%, respectively.³ Therefore, early diagnosis and management are key factors to improve the outcomes of EC. Currently, the gold standard way to diagnose EC is pathological examination.^5,6 However, it is not a routine examination, especially in some primary medical institutions. Therefore, under the system of the hierarchical medical system, screening for suspected patients with EC and referring them to the Regional Medical Center for early diagnosis and selection of a treatment strategy is very important.

Serum markers are widely used in the diagnosis of malignant tumors. With in-depth study, researchers have found that their standalone application does not work well and have tried to improve the use of serum markers in other ways. Combined detection is a promising method. Many studies have been carried out and have achieved some results. Dong et al and Saarelainen et al suggested that the combined detection of HE4 and CA125 could achieve a higher detection rate and was superior to the single application of HE4 or CA125.^7,8 There were also some studies that combined multiple serum markers.^9,10 However, their results were not very satisfactory. For example, the combined detection of HE4, CA125, CA724, and CA199 was not very greatly superior to the combined detection of any 3 of them alone.¹¹ Considering the literature review of common serum markers (CA125, HE4, CA199, CA153, AFP, and CEA) in gynecological malignancies, we surmised that the detection rate of suspected patients with EC does not increase with the number of markers in the combined detection. Therefore, the introduction of new serum markers to distinguish suspected patients with EC is needed.

Serum d-dimer and fibrinogen are used as coagulation parameters and change with changes in coagulation function. Emerging data suggest that they are correlated with tumor stage and prognosis in several cancer types.^12

-16 The hypercoagulable microenvironment is very closely related to carcinoma tumorigenesis and progression.^17
-19 The procoagulants, tissue factors, or inflammatory cytokines expressed by tumor cells cause blood hypercoagulability, even in the early stages.²⁰ Therefore, tumors could cause an increase in the levels of serum d-dimer and fibrinogen. Some studies have confirmed that their levels are associated with the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors.^14,21
-23 However, few studies have concentrated on their application in the diagnosis of cancer, especially EC. Therefore, the intensive study of their diagnostic value in EC is the focus of this study.

The primary aim of this study was to detect the diagnostic value of d-dimer and fibrinogen in EC. Next, we developed a new risk forecast model based on candidate markers for different diseases to improve the detection rate of suspected patients with EC.

Materials and Methods

Patients

A total of 254 patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge who were treated at the Affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between June 2017 and February 2019 were included in this retrospective study. A total of 127 cases of EC confirmed histologically were classified as the experimental group (EG), and 127 other cases (including 96 patients with atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium [AHE] and 31 patients without organic disease) were classified as the control group (CG). All patients in this study had no other complications (including malignant tumors of other systems, poor blood glucose or blood pressure control, thrombotic diseases, coagulation dysfunction, endocrine system diseases, liver and kidney dysfunction, etc). This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital (No. NFKSL-003) and was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900023149). Because of the retrospective nature of the analysis, the ethics committee waived the requirement for written informed consent from the participants.

Candidate Marker Serum Concentration Measurements

Preoperative CA125, HE4, CA199, CA153, AFP, and CEA concentrations were measured using a COBAS 6000 analyzer (Roche, Switzerland) with the chemiluminescent reagent kit supplied by Roche. Preoperative d-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations were measured using a CA7000 automated coagulation analyzer (Sysmex, Japan) with particular reagents. All measurements were performed at room temperature according to the manufacturers’ instructions blinded to the results of the histopathologic report.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23 (Chicago, Illinois) and MedCalc Statistical Software version 15.6.1 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org; 2015). Normally distributed data are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Nonnormally distributed data are presented as the median (M) and interquartile range (Q). The Mann-Whitney U test was implemented to assess the differences between groups. Logistic regression model analysis was employed to test the relationship between candidate markers and EC and construct a new risk forecast model. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was employed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the candidate tumor markers.^24
-26 The estimation of sensitivity and specificity was based on the Youden index.²⁷ The DeLong method was used to compare the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).²⁸ Value of P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 briefly shows the basic clinical data of all included patients. By comparison with EG, we noted whether patients with atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium or without organic disease had markedly lower levels of all candidate markers except AFP.

Table 1.

The Characteristics of the Patient Population.

	Numerical Display	EC	Control Group		P Value
	Numerical Display	EC	AHE	No Organic Lesions	P Value
Number	N	127	96	31
Age, year	mean (SD)	54.45 (8.48)	45.39 (12.820)	44.0 (13.90)	.000
BMI, kg/m²	mean (SD)	25.131 (4.035)	25.269 (3.729)	23.217 (3.268)	.02
Fibrinogen, g/L	M (Q)	2.602 (2.303-2.987)	2.235 (1.95-2.59)	2.36 (1.73-2.73)	.000
d-dimer, mg/L	M (Q)	0.28 (0.2-0.4)	0.18 (0.11-0.27)	0.18 (0.12-0.28)	.000
CA125, U/mL	M (Q)	20.4 (15.29-31.49)	18.2 (12.673-33.033)	16.45 (11.15-26.02)	.041
HE4, pmol/L	M (Q)	74.52 (58.43-114.0)	54.37 (45.57-62.298)	44.45 (36.78-56.32)	.000
CA199, U/mL	M (Q)	15.86 (9.08-31.39)	9.56 (6.89-15.686)	9.28 (6.89-12.68)	.000
CA153, U/mL	M (Q)	9.18 (6.39-12.49)	8.785 (6.238-11.635)	6.12 (2.12-9.72)	.002
AFP, ng/mL	M (Q)	2.79 (2.08-3.73)	2.505 (1.72-3.805)	2.36 (1.68-3.22)	.115
CEA, ng/mL	M (Q)	1.55 (1.06-2.28)	1.215 (0.748-1.87)	1.2 (0.84-1.83)	.002

Abbreviations: AHE, atypical hyperplasia of endometrium; BMI, body mass index; EC, endometrial cancer; M, median; Q, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

Univariate analysis demonstrated that the d-dimer, fibrinogen, HE4, CA199, and CA153 levels were correlated with EC. Multivariate analysis was used to verify the results and confirmed that the relationship remained significant except for CA153 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Candidate Marker Expression in EC.

	Univariate			Multivariate
	Relative Risk	95% CI	P Value	Relative Risk	95% CI	P Value
Fibrinogen	3.237	1.958-5.353	.000	3.229	1.760-5.922	.000
d-dimer	32.483	6.133-172.048	.000	30.372	4.233-217.906	.001
CA125	1.002	0.997-1.007	.518	-
HE4	1.046	1.030-1.061	.000	1.044	1.027-1.061	.000
CA199	1.044	1.021-1.069	.000	1.033	1.008-1.058	.01
CA153	1.052	1.008-1.098	.019	0.982	0.924-1.042	.541
AFP	1.089	0.931-1.275	.285	-
CEA	1.042	0.961-1.130	.321	-

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

The risk index of endometrial cancer (RIEC) screening was established based on combining the serum levels of d-dimer, fibrinogen, HE4, and CA199. The P value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the prediction equation was greater than .05, indicating an adequate model formulation.²⁹

The coefficients in the prediction equation were as follows:

RIEC = 3.385 * LN (Fibrinogen) + 1.462 * LN (D-dimer) + 3.243 * LN (HE4) + 0.456 * LN (CA199) - 15.547

The predicted probability (PP) was:

PP (RIEC) = Exp (RIEC) / (1+Exp (RIEC))

The areas under the ROC curve were used to evaluate the efficiency of d-dimer, fibrinogen, HE4, CA199, HE4+CA125, and RIEC in differentiating EC (Table 3). The results showed that the performance of HE4 was greater when it was used as a single marker in EC screening, and RIEC showed the best efficiency of diagnosis compared with the single markers and the most common combination (P value < .001; Table 3).

Table 3.

Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Sensitivity for Individual and Combined Tumor Marker Assays for Endometrial Cancer.

	AUROC	95% CI	P Value	Cutoff	Specificity (Sensitivity = 94.5%)	P Value^a
Fibrinogen	0.690	0.625-0.754	.000	2.25	24.4%	.000
CA199	0.681	0.615-0.746	.000	21.45	4.7%	.000
HE4	0.794	0.740-0.849	.000	59.07	31.5%	.000
d-dimer	0.717	0.654-0.779	.000	0.17	34.6%	.000
CA125 + HE4	0.797	0.743-0.844	.000	0.46	33.1%	.000
RIEC	0.884	0.838-0.920	.000	0.36	66.1%	-

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; RIEC, risk index of endometrial cancer.

^a Value of P compared with the AUROC of RIEC.

According to the pathological type, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and grade, subgroup analysis was performed. When only patients without organic disease served as a control, the AUROC was high and reached 0.932, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94.49% and 77.42%, respectively (Table 4 and Figure 1). In addition, the value of RIEC in screening patients with stage II to IV or middle to low differentiation was higher (Table 4).

Figure 1.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for RIEC. A, Patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and patients without organic diseases served as the control group. B, Only patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia served as the control group. C, Only patients without organic diseases served as the control group.

Table 4.

Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Sensitivity, and Specificity of RIEC in the Diagnosis of Patients With Endometrial Cancer With Different Clinical Characteristics.

	AUROC	95% CI	P Value	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
EG vs CG	0.884	0.838-0.920	.000	91.34	70.08
Histological type
EC vs AHE	0.868	0.817-0.910	.000	85.04	75.0
EC vs POD	0.932	0.881-0.966	.000	94.49	77.42
FIGO
I vs CG	0.869	0.817-0.910	.000	89.80	70.08
II-IV vs CG	0.935	0.884-0.968	.000	93.10	82.68
Grade
G1 vs CG	0.857	0.796-0.905	.000	91.84	70.08
G2-3 vs CG	0.906	0.856-0.944	.000	86.15	81.89

Abbreviations: AHE, atypical hyperplasia of endometrium; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CG, control group; CI, confidence interval; EC, endometrial cancer; EG, experimental group; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; POD, patient without organic disease; RIEC, risk index of endometrial cancer.

Discussion

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in females, and the primary symptom is abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge. However, this primary symptom is not specific for EC.^30
-32 Pathological examination, the diagnostical gold standard for EC, is not a routine inspection due to the shortage of pathologists, especially in areas underdeveloped at the medical level. Thus, the timely screening of suspected patients with EC from patients with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge to achieve a definite diagnosis and select a treatment strategy as early as possible are very important. The detection of serum markers is simple, quick, accurate, stable, and inexpensive, so it is a very promising approach, especially the combined detection of markers.

At present, the most widely used serum markers in screening EC are CA125 and HE4.³³ However, their diagnostic value is not very satisfactory.³⁴ Accordingly, clinicians have been working toward establishing new screening methods and have achieved some results. The combined detection of HE4 and CA125 was a useful attempt and could improve the accuracy of screening. Unfortunately, the effect was not very ideal.^7,8 In this study, the performance of HE4 combined with CA125 was also presented, and the result, which was consistent with that of previous studies, showed that the accuracy of screening was increased.³⁵ Furthermore, some researchers have attempted to increase the number of markers in the combined detection to improve the accuracy of screening. Bian et al tried to develop a new risk index based on the combined detection of HE4, CA125, CA724, and CA199. However, their method did not work well. The AUROC of the new risk index was only increased by 0.05 compared with that of the single marker HE4. The sensitivity only increased 1.1%.¹¹ Therefore, we suspected that simply increasing the number of markers in the combined detection could not significantly improve the screening efficiency.

This study attempted to develop an innovative coagulation index (d-dimer and fibrinogen) for the screening of EC. Surprisingly, the application value of d-dimer and fibrinogen, only next to HE4, was higher than that of the other markers. Based on this finding, a new risk index (RIEC) was developed. The results showed that with the application of RIEC, the accuracy of EC screening increased significantly. The AUROC was 0.844, which was considerably greater than that of the combined detection of HE4 and CA125. In the subgroup analysis, when only patients without organic lesions served as controls, the AUROC was high and reached 0.932, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94.49% and 77.42%, respectively. The study also found that RIEC had more diagnostic value in patients with advanced disease and patients with middle to low differentiation.

Another characteristic of this study was the CG, which consisted of patients with AHE or without organic lesions. The primary symptoms were abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge. The members of the CG were more in accordance with clinical practice. This study indicated that the performance of RIEC was still satisfactory (AUROC = 0.868) when only patients with AHE were regarded as controls.

This study demonstrated that RIEC is a useful tool in screening for suspected patients with EC, especially applicable in areas underdeveloped at the medical level. Limited by the single-center retrospective nature of the study, the conclusions still need to be confirmed by a prospective multicenter study.

Footnotes

Authors’ Note

Guangquan Liu, Kai Hu, and Ke Huang contributed equally to this work. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital (No. NFKSL-003) and had been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900023149). A new risk index combining d-dimer, fibrinogen, HE4, and CA199 differentiates suspected patients with endometrial cancer from those with abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572556) and Science and Technology Development Fund of Nanjing Medical University (No. NMUB2018126).

ORCID iD

Xuemei Jia

Abbreviations

References

Pakish

Sun

, et al. Endometrial cancer associated symptoms: a case-control study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(11):1187–1192. doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5657.

Sorosky

. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 pt 1):383–397. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605bf1.

Siegel

Miller

Jemal

. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21387.

Chen

Zheng

Baade

, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338.

Prat

Gallardo

Cuatrecasas

Catasus

. Endometrial carcinoma: pathology and genetics. Pathology. 2007;39(1):72–87. doi:10.1080/00313020601136153.

Amant

Moerman

Neven

Timmerman

Van Limbergen

Vergote

. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491–505. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8.

Dong

Liu

. Value of HE4 combined with cancer antigen 125 in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):1013–1017. doi:10.12669/pjms.334.12755.

Saarelainen

Peltonen

Lehtimaki

Perheentupa

Vuento

Maenpaa

. Predictive value of serum human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 concentrations in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(2):142.e1-e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.014.

Kemik

Saatli

Yildirim

, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic values of preoperative serum levels of YKL-40, HE-4 and DKK-3 in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(1):64–69. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.020.

10.

Zhao

Shen

Wang

Wei

. Clinical implications and prognostic value of single and combined biomarkers in endometrial carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(8):1459–1463.

11.

Bian

Sun

Ming

Clinical significance of serum HE4, CA125, CA724, and CA19-9 in patients with endometrial cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16(4):435–439. doi:10.1177/1533034616666644.

12.

Bao

Chen

Jiang

Zhu

. Prognostic and predictive value of plasma D-dimer in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2015;17(1):57–64. doi:10.1007/s12094-014-1198-2.

13.

Krenn-Pilko

Langsenlehner

Stojakovic

, et al. An elevated preoperative plasma fibrinogen level is associated with poor disease-specific and overall survival in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2015;24(5):667–672. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.003.

14.

Zhang

Jia

Zhang

. Prognostic and predictive value of plasma D-dimer levels in patients with small-cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(6):1070–1075. doi:10.1007/s10147-018-1320-5.

15.

Zhao

Deng

Qin

Liao

Liang

. Prognostic significance of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen and platelet levels in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;79(1):25–33. doi:10.1159/000365477.

16.

Wang

Gao

Zhao

. A high plasma D-dimer level predicts poor prognosis in gynecological tumors in East Asia area: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(31):51551–51558. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17936.

17.

Boccaccio

Medico

. Cancer and blood coagulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(9):1024–1027. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5570-9.

18.

Lima

Monteiro

. Activation of blood coagulation in cancer: implications for tumour progression. Biosci Rep. 2013;33(5):e00064. doi:10.1042/BSR20130057.

19.

Wojtukiewicz

Hempel

Sierko

Tucker

Honn

. Protease-activated receptors (PARs)—biology and role in cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(4):775–796. doi:10.1007/s10555-015-9599-4.

20.

Diao

Wang

Cheng

, et al. D-dimer: not just an indicator of venous thrombosis but a predictor of asymptomatic hematogenous metastasis in gastric cancer patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e10112 5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101125.

21.

Bao

Chen

Jiang

Zhu

22.

Yang

Dong

Pan

Qu Tan

. Correlation between circulating tumor cells and D-D and platelet in patients with pulmonary malignancies. Oncology Lett. 2018;15(2):2169–2172. doi:10.3892/ol.2017.7595.

23.

Liu

Jia

. Clinical significance of plasma D-dimer in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(25):e7062.

24.

Chatziioannou

Georgakopoulos

Pianou

Kafiri

Pavlou

Kallergi

Recurrent thyroid cancer diagnosis: ROC study of the effect of a high-resolution head and neck 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. Acad Radiol. 2014;21(1):58–63. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.017.

25.

Kottas

Kuss

Zapf

. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:26. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-26.

26.

Zivanovic

Abramian

Kullmann

, et al. HIPEC ROC I: a phase I study of cisplatin administered as hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemoperfusion followed by postoperative intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(3):699–708. doi:10.1002/ijc.29011.

27.

Martinez-Camblor

Pardo-Fernandez

. The Youden index in the generalized receiver operating characteristic curve context. Int J Biostat. 2019;15(1):/j/ijb.2019. doi:10.1515/ijb-2018-0060.

28.

DeLong

Clarke-Pearson

. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–845.

29.

Bascom

Dziodzio

Vasaiwala

, et al. Derivation and validation of the CREST model for very early prediction of circulatory etiology death in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction after cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2018;137(3):273–282. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024332.

30.

Cheong

Cameron

Critchley

HOD

. Abnormal uterine bleeding. Br Med Bull. 2017;123(1):103–114. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldx027.

31.

Marnach

Laughlin-Tommaso

. Evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(2):326–335. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.12.012.

32.

Mullins

Miller

Mullins

. Evaluation and management of adolescents with abnormal uterine bleeding. Pediatr Ann. 2015;44(9):e218–222. doi:10.3928/00904481-20150910-09.

33.

Escudero

Auge

Filella

Torne

Pahisa

Molina

. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 with cancer antigen 125 as a tumor marker in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Clin Chem. 2011;57(11):1534–1544. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.157073.

34.

Hsieh

ChangChien

Lin

, et al.

Can a preoperative CA 125 level be a criterion for full pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer?

Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86(1):28–33. doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6664.

35.

Moore

Brown

Miller

, et al. Utility of a novel serum tumor biomarker HE4 in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(2):196–201. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.002.