Do Practitioners Compromise Scholarly Standards? Do Scholars Comprehend the Rigors of Practice? Can a Theory Journal be a Viable Bridge Across the Chasm?
Available accessEditorialFirst published online March, 2007
Do Practitioners Compromise Scholarly Standards? Do Scholars Comprehend the Rigors of Practice? Can a Theory Journal be a Viable Bridge Across the Chasm?
Anderson, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational psychology: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391-411.
2.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1, 11-20.
3.
Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2006). To know and to do: Academics’ and practitioners’ approaches to management research. Irish Journal of Management, 26(2), 1-22.
4.
Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Draft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 340-355.
5.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
6.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.
