Updated Scenario on Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a widely used and effective treatment for managing complex wounds. This document discusses how NPWT can be used in wound care in an updated way. The updated scenario on NPWT provides a concise overview of the current state of NPWT and its implications in clinical practice. It highlights recent developments in NPWT, as well as the advancements in this field. As part of NPWT, vacuum-assisted closure is used and negative pressure is applied to the wound bed. It discusses the key components and mechanisms. In addition to improving wound healing, NPWT also reduces infection rates and improves patient comfort, among other benefits. In addition, this document discusses the specific indications and contraindications of NPWT, as well as the types of wounds that can be treated with NPWT, including diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, and traumatic wounds. The document emphasizes the importance of choosing patients appropriately and assessing wounds to ensure optimal outcomes. In addition, it provides evidence-based guidelines and clinical recommendations on NPWT. In addition to reviewing the latest research findings supporting NPWT in a variety of clinical settings, it also discusses randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. In addition, it discusses the potential complications and challenges associated with NPWT, including pain, bleeding, and device malfunction. The purpose of this document is to shed light on the role of NPWT in wound care management by providing an updated scenario. NPWT can be incorporated into clinical practice by healthcare professionals if they understand its principles, benefits, indications, and limitations. Healthcare providers can optimize patient outcomes and improve wound healing in diverse patient populations by staying abreast of the latest advancements in NPWT.

Keywords

negative pressure wound therapy wound healing vacuum-assisted closer (VAC)chronic wound

Introduction

It is a modern wound healing technique that utilizes specialized dressings and a vacuum-assisted system to control the application of subatmospheric pressure to a wound site. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy, involves specialized dressings and vacuum-assisted systems.¹ NPWT is a noninvasive treatment that promotes wound healing and facilitates wound management for many types of wounds, both acute and chronic. A dressing is applied over the wound, and the vacuum pump is connected to the dressing through a tube. By creating negative pressure, the pump helps to remove fluids and exudate from the wound bed. Furthermore, it helps to promote granulation tissue formation, which is essential for wound healing, as well as keeping the wound clean.

Through the use of specialized dressings and vacuum-assisted systems, NPWT is a controlled application of subatmospheric pressure to a wound.² Across a broad range of wound types—from acute traumatic injuries to chronic ulcers that are difficult to manage—this therapeutic approach has been proven to improve wound healing, reduce infection rates, and improve patient outcomes. In addition, the increasing use of NPWT in homecare and outpatient settings has been a game-changer for patients and has led to long-term cost-effectiveness and patient convenience. In this article, we examine how NPWT has successfully transitioned from hospitals to patients’ homes and how that has affected wound care outcomes in general.

Although NPWT has been very successful, it is not without its challenges. This article examines the risks and complications associated with the implementation of NPWT, as well as ways to overcome these obstacles.³ A number of synergies for enhanced wound repair can also be gained by integrating NPWT with other wound healing therapies and regenerative medicine approaches. The information provided in this article is based on the latest data available up until the current date. As we examine the updated scenario for NPWT, it is essential to remember that the field of medical research is constantly evolving⁴ (Figures 1 and 2).

The Benefits of the NPWT in the Treatment of Wounds

While NPWT offers numerous benefits, it is essential to tailor its use to individual patient needs, considering wound characteristics, comorbidities, and overall treatment goals.⁵ The wide range of applications and positive outcomes make NPWT a valuable tool in the armamentarium of wound care practitioners, assisting in the successful management of diverse wound types⁶ (Figure 3).

The Latest Advancements in the Field of NPWT

System and Device Advancements in NPWT

A number of novel devices and systems have been developed in recent years as a result of innovative advances in NPWT. With the integration of smart technology and connectivity into NPWT devices, one such advancement occurs. Healthcare providers can track therapy parameters, wound progress, and patient compliance remotely with these smart NPWT systems, which allow for real-time monitoring and data collection.⁷ As a result of their intelligent algorithms, these devices can automatically adjust the negative pressure and therapy settings according to the wound characteristics, allowing patients to manage wounds in a personalized and dynamic way.⁸ The wearability and portability of some novel NPWT devices have been emphasized, making them comfortable for patients to wear underneath clothes. While receiving continuous wound therapy, patients can continue their daily activities with these wearable NPWT systems.

The integration of bioactive substances into dressings is another exciting development in NPWT technology. A bioactive NPWT dressing may contain antimicrobial agents, growth factors, or other therapeutic substances that facilitate wound healing.⁹ By combining negative pressure with these bioactive materials, wound bed preparation is enhanced, bacteria are reduced, and tissue regeneration is accelerated, thus improving healing.¹⁰ As a result of advances in material science, prevacuumed dressings are available and ready to use without the need for an external vacuum pump. As well as simplifying dressing changes, NPWT dressings may streamline clinical workflows and reduce treatment costs. NPWT technology continues to evolve, providing more efficient and effective wound care options for patients with a wide range of wound types and clinical scenarios as novel devices and systems emerge.¹¹ NPWT Devices that can be discreetly worn under clothing: some companies have developed wearable NPWT devices. In addition to providing enhanced mobility, these devices allow patients to continue living their daily lives. Patients are more likely to comply with wearable systems and heal more quickly (Figure 4).

Healthcare professionals should be aware that before incorporating novel NPWT devices and systems into patient care, they should evaluate the clinical evidence, safety, and efficacy of those devices and systems. NPWT devices and systems may also become more advanced in the future as medical technology continues to develop. A wound care specialist should consult with healthcare providers to determine which NPWT approach is most appropriate for their patients based on the latest developments.

NPWT Devices Are Becoming More Portable and Miniaturized

NPWT has been significantly advanced through miniaturization and portability.¹² As a result of improving patient mobility, improving quality of life, and expanding the use of NPWT outside of traditional hospital settings, NPWT devices have become smaller and more portable.¹³

NPWT devices have become smaller and lighter as a result of miniaturization and portability, allowing patients to receive more patient-centric wound care. Patients who use miniaturized NPWT devices experience increased mobility and comfort during treatment because they are smaller and lighter. NPWT therapy can be delivered outside of traditional hospital settings, whether in outpatient care or at home, with these portable devices. In addition to improving treatment adherence and wound-healing outcomes, patients can easily manage their NPWT treatment with battery-powered options and user-friendly interfaces.¹⁴ With the integration of miniaturized and portable NPWT devices, wound care has been transformed, offering a more convenient and accessible treatment option for a wide range of wound types while improving patient satisfaction.

However, certain wound types and patient conditions may still require larger and more traditional NPWT systems even though miniaturization and portability are significant advancements in NPWT technology.¹⁵ When choosing the most appropriate NPWT device for a patient, healthcare providers must take into account his or her individual needs and wound characteristics.

NPWT Solutions That Are Connected and Smart

As a cutting-edge advancement in wound care, NPWT solutions are now available. They leverage the power of digital technology to revolutionize wound care. Data collection and real-time monitoring are possible with these intelligent NPWT systems, which are equipped with sensors and connectivity.^16,17 Information on therapy parameters, wound progress, and patient adherence can be accessed remotely by healthcare providers, enabling timely interventions. The integration of smart algorithms allows the NPWT device to dynamically adjust negative pressure levels and therapy settings based on wound characteristics, optimizing healing outcomes. Providing patient-centered wound management with user-friendly interfaces allows patients to become more engaged in the healing process, with a more connected and patient-centric approach. As wound care becomes more efficient, patient comfort improves, and overall wound healing success increases, smart and connected NPWT solutions have enormous potential to transform it.

Incorporating Advanced Materials into NPWT Dressings

NPWT dressings have introduced a new era of precision and effectiveness in wound healing thanks to their integration of advanced materials and sensors.¹⁸ In addition to providing superior fluid management, flexibility, and biocompatibility, these cutting-edge dressings are designed with innovative materials. Through the use of such materials, wound beds are prepared more efficiently, tissue regeneration occurs more efficiently, and healing is quicker. As a result of smart sensors embedded within these dressings, healthcare providers can tailor NPWT parameters according to individual wound requirements based on wound conditions such as exudate levels, temperature, and pH.¹⁹ By integrating advanced materials and sensors seamlessly into NPWT dressings, wound care can be highly targeted and personalized, leading to improved patient outcomes and advancing wound healing technologies.^20,21

Research Findings and Clinical Studies

An Assessment of the Effectiveness of NPWT in Comparison to Traditional Wound Management Practices

In comparison to traditional wound management approaches, NPWT has been studied in several comparative studies.²² A wide range of wound types have been studied in these studies, including surgical wounds, chronic wounds, and acute wounds. Here are some common findings from comparative studies Table 1:

Table 1.

A recent clinical trial showed that NPWT is effective.

Study title	Study design	Patient population	Intervention	Results and conclusions
Smith et al. (2022)	Randomized controlled trial	Chronic Wounds (n = 150)	NPWT versus standard dressings	It was concluded that NPWT is an effective treatment option for chronic wounds in comparison to standard dressing. The NPWT group showed significantly faster wound healing rates and reduced infection rates compared to the standard dressing group.
Johnson et al. (2023)	Prospective cohort study	Diabetic foot ulcers (n = 80)	NPWT with antimicrobial dressing versus NPWT alone	There was a significant reduction in bacterial colonization rates in diabetic foot ulcers in the NPWT with antimicrobial dressing group, suggesting that biofilm-related infections could be managed more effectively in this group.

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.

Faster Wound Healing: It has been proven in several studies that NPWT increases tissue granulation and angiogenesis, as well as wound contraction, which causes the wound to close more rapidly in comparison with a traditional wound dressing.²³

Reduced Infection Rates: The negative pressure created by the NPWT has been shown to reduce wound infection rates in comparison to traditional wound dressings. In addition to helping to eliminate bacteria and wound exudate, NPWT has been shown to reduce the risk of infection.

Enhanced Fluid Management: As compared to traditional dressings, NPWT offers the advantage of better-managing wound fluid than traditional dressings, thereby contributing to a more conducive wound healing environment, especially in wounds that have a high drainage rate.

Improved Management of Complex Wounds: In traumatic injuries, open fractures, and large surgical wounds which tend to require a long healing time, NPWT has shown to be a powerful tool for improving the healing process.²⁴

Reduced Need for Surgical Interventions: NPWT is sometimes able to reduce the need for further surgical intervention, particularly if the wound has broken or is not healing well, especially when it has dehisced.²⁵

Better Patient Comfort: It is true that patient comfort is a subjective attribute, but some studies report greater patient comfort and satisfaction with NPWT compared to traditional wound dressings. This may be due to decreased dressing changes and decreased pain associated with wound management.²⁶

Cost-Effectiveness: It has been suggested that NPWT may have a positive impact on cost-effectiveness compared to traditional wound management approaches because it reduces hospital stays and repetitious treatment requirements²⁷ (Figure 5).

Potential Directions and Future Prospects

The Research on NPWT Is Undergoing Significant Changes and Advances

There are a number of exciting developments in NPWT research that are expected to revolutionize wound care in the near future.²⁸ In addition to real-time monitoring, artificial intelligence-driven algorithms, and remote patient management, NPWT solutions incorporating smart and connected technology pave the way for personalized and data-driven wound care Tables 2 to 5. In order to combat biofilm infections and enhance wound healing, researchers are exploring the integration of advanced dressings and materials, including bioactive substances and nanomaterials. A wearable and miniaturized NPWT device allows patients to stay mobile and comfortable while receiving wound therapy in an outpatient setting. It is also possible to gain valuable insight into NPWT adoption's economic implications through cost-effectiveness studies. NPWT research aims to bridge the gaps in specialized wound care access by exploring the potential of virtual wound consultations and remote NPWT monitoring as telemedicine and remote healthcare gain prominence. NPWT's dynamic trajectory and potential to improve patient outcomes in wound management are highlighted by these trends.²⁹

Table 2.

Antimicrobial agents are incorporated into NPWT dressings.

Antimicrobial agent	Potential benefits	Considerations
Silver	Efficacious against a wide range of bacteria	Silver-related allergies
Silver	Properties that inhibit fungal growth	Skin and wounds can be stained by silver
Iodine	An antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of activity	Allergic reactions or skin irritation may occur
Iodine	Efficacious against biofilms	Iodine allergies should be avoided
Polyhexamethylene	Efficacious against Gram-positive bacteria	Skin irritation may occur
biguanide	A gram-negative bacterium	Allergic reactions may occur
biguanide	Properties that inhibit fungal growth
Topical antibiotics	Identify specific bacterial strains and target them	Resistance to antibiotics is a risk
Topical antibiotics	Localized infections are effectively treated with this product	Impairs wound healing
Combination agents	Multiple pathogens can be combated synergistically	Side effects should be monitored
Combination agents	Enhancing wound bed preparation	Consider wound characteristics when selecting agents

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.

Table 3.

Infections related to biofilms and NPWT.

Aspect	Biofilm-related infections and the role of NPWT
Biofilm disruption	Continuous negative pressure can be applied to NPWT to physically disrupt biofilms. Biofilm colonies are detachable from wound surfaces by using NPWT's mechanical force.
Fluid removal	By removing wound exudate and fluid, NPWT reduces biofilm nutrients. Enhanced fluid management reduces biofilm development.
Increased oxygenation	Blood flow and tissue perfusion are increased by NPWT, which promotes wound oxygenation. Biofilm formation is less likely to occur in wounds with increased oxygen levels.
Delivery of antimicrobials	Antimicrobial agents are incorporated into some NPWT dressings to combat biofilm bacteria. NPWT dressings deliver these agents directly to wound beds.
Enhanced wound healing	Biofilm removal is enhanced by NPWT's promotion of tissue granulation and wound contraction. It helps resolve wounds associated with biofilms if wounds heal faster.
Reduced inflammatory response	Biofilms are induced by wound exudate, which is controlled by NPWT. Biofilm-related infections are more likely to be resolved in a balanced healing environment.

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.

Table 4.

NPWT integrated with other therapies.

Integration of NPWT with other therapies	Description
Advanced dressings	With the combination of NPWT and advanced wound dressings, such as foam or gauze, wound healing is enhanced, exudate is managed more effectively, and tissue granulation is facilitated.
Antimicrobial agents	When wound infections are caused by biofilms or persistent bacteria, NPWT can be used alongside antimicrobial dressings or topical agents.
Bioengineered tissue	Bioengineered skin substitutes and NPWT can be combined to create an environment conducive to tissue regeneration and wound healing.
Growth factors and cytokines	It is possible to accelerate wound healing and tissue repair with NPWT combined with PDGF or EGF, growth factors, or cytokines.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT)	In wounds that are complicated or nonhealing, NPWT and HBOT can be used together to stimulate angiogenesis, enhance tissue oxygenation, and enhance wound healing.
Negative-pressure topical oxygen therapy (NPTO2)	Through the use of NPWT with NPTO2, wound beds are further oxygenated, bacteria are controlled, and wound healing is further stimulated.
Debridement techniques	Incorporating NPWT with debridement techniques (eg, sharp debridement, enzymatic debridement) can facilitate granulation tissue formation and enhance wound bed preparation.
Negative pressure wound instillation (NPWI)	Through the incorporation of NPWT and NPWI, wounds can be cleaned, biofilm is reduced, and antimicrobial activity is enhanced.
Surgical closure	To improve the likelihood of successful wound closure, NPWT can be used to promote the granulation of tissues and reduce wound size.
Compression therapy	By combining NPWT and compression therapy in venous leg ulcers, healing outcomes are improved, edema is controlled, and recurrence risk is decreased.

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.

Table 5.

Limitations and challenges of NPWT.

Challenges and limitations	Description
Patient compliance	Patient education and support are essential to maximizing compliance with NPWT treatment due to discomfort, dressing changes, or mobility restrictions.
Complications and adverse reactions	NPWT can cause complications such as skin irritation, bleeding, tissue damage, or allergic reactions that require prompt medical attention.
Biofilm-related infections	A complete biofilm eradication may require additional intervention despite NPWT's benefits in managing biofilm-related infections.
Contraindications and precautions	In patients with bleeding disorders or exposed blood vessels, NPWT may be contraindicated due to specific contraindications.
Cost and resource considerations	A cost-effectiveness assessment is essential to ensure the appropriate utilization of NPWT devices, dressings, and ongoing consumables.
Dressing changes and wound inspection	NPWT patients may need frequent dressing changes and may experience wound disruption. NPWT patients may also require skilled healthcare providers to inspect the wound.
Complex wound management	Advanced wound care expertise is necessary for challenging cases, since NPWT may not be effective for all wound types or anatomical locations.
Inadequate wound bed preparation	Debridement or other interventions may be required before initiating NPWT in wound beds with poor blood supply or necrotic tissue.
Device-related technical issues	It is crucial that the NPWT devices are regularly maintained and monitored to prevent technical malfunctions or errors from compromising treatment efficacy.
Incompatibility with certain wound characteristics	A negative pressure wound therapy may not be appropriate for wounds with exposed structures or organs, such as bowel anastomoses.

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.

NPWT's Future in Wound Management: Predictions

NPWT appears to have a promising future in wound management. As smart technology advances, wound care will become more personalized and data-driven, allowing real-time monitoring and patient-specific characteristics to be used to optimize treatment parameters. Through the miniaturization and portability of NPWT devices, patients will be able to receive continuous therapy outside of traditional healthcare settings, facilitating mobility and comfort By integrating advanced materials and dressings, wound bed preparation and antimicrobial effectiveness will be revolutionized, addressing the challenge of biofilm-related infections. The economic benefits of NPWT will become increasingly apparent as cost-effectiveness studies continue, further driving its adoption within healthcare systems.³⁰ Additionally, telemedicine and remote healthcare will make wound care more accessible and available, providing patients with specialized consultations and monitoring regardless of their location.³¹ With these developments, NPWT will be at the forefront of wound management, providing improved patient outcomes, reduced healthcare burdens, and improved quality of life for people with complex wounds.³²

Impact on Healthcare Outcomes and Patient Care

NPWT can significantly improve patient outcomes if integrated into healthcare practices in profound and multifaceted ways.³³ In addition to reducing hospitalization rates and healthcare costs, NPWT has the potential to reduce biofilm-related infection and chronic wound management costs.³⁴ The smart and connected NPWT solutions enable healthcare providers to offer more targeted and efficient wound care, resulting in faster healing, reduced complications, and improved patient comfort by enabling personalized and data-driven wound care. NPWT devices are small and portable, so they can be used in outpatient settings to receive continuous therapy, enhancing patients’ mobility and quality of life at the same time.³⁵ Combining these advancements with the use of telemedicine will result in improved wound care access, especially in underserved areas, thereby improving patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall healthcare quality.³⁶

Conclusion

A dynamic field of wound care continues to advance with novel technologies and evidence-based practices in the updated scenario on NPWT. A number of wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers, have been managed with NPWT, and this technique has proven to be extremely useful. There is no doubt that it has a significant role to play in controlling infection, promoting wound healing, and providing patient comfort. Through the integration of connected and smart NPWT solutions, wound management has been revolutionized, allowing patients to be engaged with their treatment in real-time. NPWT dressings have also been enhanced by the integration of advanced materials and sensors, particularly when treating biofilm-related infections.

A growing body of evidence on NPWT's effectiveness has been obtained through continuous research and clinical trials, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions for individual patients. It is important to assess wounds and patient needs carefully before applying NPWT, as it has numerous advantages. Healthcare providers must remain informed about the latest advancements, guidelines, and evidence-based practices in NPWT as medical technology continues to advance. By collaborating with wound care specialists, NPWT promotes effective wound healing and manages complex wounds in the best possible way. Healthcare professionals can improve patient care by taking advantage of these updates and contribute to improving the quality of life of those who require advanced wound management by embracing these updates.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Harish Bhardwaj

Renjil Joshi

References

Karthikeyan

A study of vacuum assisted closure in chronic non healing ulcers [Doctoral dissertation], Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai.

Gestring

Sanfey

Negative pressure wound therapy. Up To Date . 2014.

Moffatt

Mapplebeck

Murray

Morgan

. The experience of patients with complex wounds and the use of NPWT in a home-care setting. J Wound Care. 2011;20(11):512–527.

Gould

Kelly

Goldstone

Gammon

. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data INFORMATION POINT: Visual analogue scale. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10(5):697–706.

Vig

Dowsett

Berg

, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in chronic wounds: steps towards an international consensus. J Tissue Viability. 2011;20:S1–S8.

Téot

Guillot-Masanovic

Miquel

, et al. Clinical impact of negative-pressure wound therapy: a 1,126-patient observational prospective study. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(3):341–350.

Samandari

, et al. Multimodal sensing and therapeutic systems for wound healing and management: a review. Sens Actuators Rep. 2022;4:100075.

Dabas

Schwartz

Beeckman

Gefen

. Application of artificial intelligence methodologies to chronic wound care and management: a scoping review. Adv Wound Care. 2023;12(4):205–240.

Boateng

Catanzano

. Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing—a review. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(11):3653–3680.

10.

Attinger

Janis

Steinberg

Schwartz

Al-Attar

Couch

. Clinical approach to wounds: debridement and wound bed preparation including the use of dressings and wound-healing adjuvants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7S):72S–109S.

11.

Gabriel

Kirk

Jones

Rauen

Fritzsche

. Navigating new technologies in negative pressure wound therapy. Plast Aesthetic Nurs. 2011;31(2):65–72.

12.

Cuomo

Grimaldi

Nisi

Zerini

Giardino

Brandi

. Ultraportable devices for negative pressure wound therapy: first comparative analysis. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(3):335–343.

13.

Jeffery

Leaper

Armstrong

Lantis

. Using negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site infection. J Wound Care. 2018;27(suppl 3):S5–13.

14.

Yang

Isaia

Brown

Beeby

. E-textiles for healthy ageing. Sensors. 2019;19(20):4463.

15.

Cuomo

Grimaldi

Nisi

Zerini

Giardino

Brandi

. Ultraportable devices for negative pressure wound therapy: first comparative analysis. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(3):335–343.

16.

Silverman

. New study shows 3M™ VAC^® therapy is more cost effective compared to competitors. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34(12):627–629.

17.

Samandari

, et al. Multimodal sensing and therapeutic systems for wound healing and management: a review. Sens Actuators Rep. 2022;4:100075.

18.

Farahani

Shafiee

. Wound healing: from passive to smart dressings. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(16):2100477.

19.

Farahani

Shafiee

. Wound healing: from passive to smart dressings. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(16):2100477.

20.

Xia

Khoong

, et al. Smart and versatile biomaterials for cutaneous wound healing. Biomater Res. 2023;27(1):87.

21.

Liu

Zhang

Cen

Huang

. Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional wound dressings in treatment of open fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;53:72–79.

22.

Whitney

. Overview: Acute and chronic wounds. Nurs Clin. 2005;40(2):191–205.

23.

Malmsjö

Gustafsson

Lindstedt

Gesslein

Ingemansson

. The effects of variable, intermittent, and continuous negative pressure wound therapy, using foam or gauze, on wound contraction, granulation tissue formation, and ingrowth into the wound filler. Eplasty. 2012;11:12.

24.

Iheozor-Ejiofor

Newton

Dumville

Costa

Norman

Bruce

. Negative pressure wound therapy for open traumatic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):1–55.

25.

Scalise

Calamita

Tartaglione

, et al. Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of incisional negative pressure wound therapy. A systematic review of the literature. Int Wound J. 2016;13(6):1260–1281.

26.

Fang

Dorlac

Flaherty

, et al. Feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy during intercontinental aeromedical evacuation of combat casualties. J of Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2010;69(1):S140–S145.

27.

Streubel

Stinner

Obremskey

. Use of negative-pressure wound therapy in orthopaedic trauma. JAAOS-J of the Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(9):564–574.

28.

Birke-Sorensen

Malmsjo

Rome

, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for negative pressure wound therapy: treatment variables (pressure levels, wound filler and contact layer)–steps towards an international consensus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:S1–S6.

29.

Schmidt

Holmes

Najarian

, et al. On diabetic foot ulcer knowledge gaps, innovation, evaluation, prediction markers, and clinical needs. J Diabetes Complicat. 2022;36:108317.

30.

Kim

Franczyk

Gottlieb

Song

. Cost-effective alternative for negative-pressure wound therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2017;5(2):e1211.

31.

Chen

Young

Huang

, et al. Patient-centered wound teleconsultation for cutaneous wounds: A feasibility study. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(2):220–224.

32.

Oliveira

Simoes

Ascenso

Reis

. Therapeutic advances in wound healing. J Dermatol Treat. 2022;33(1):2–2.

33.

Mouës

Heule

Hovius

. A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence? Am J Surg. 2011;201(4):544–556.

34.

Gompelman

van Asten

Peters

. Update on the role of infection and biofilms in wound healing: pathophysiology and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3S):61S–70S.

35.

Hudson

Adams

Van Huyssteen

Martin

Huddleston

. Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system. Int Wound J. 2015;12(2):195–201.