Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection

Abstract

Heart transplantation continues to be the gold standard clinical intervention to treat patients with end-stage heart failure. However, there are major complications associated with this surgical procedure that reduce the survival prognosis of heart transplant patients, including allograft rejection, malignancies, infections, and other complications that arise from the use of broad-spectrum immunosuppression drugs. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) against allotransplantation rejection in both in vitro and in vivo settings due to their immunomodulatory properties. Therefore, utilization of MSCs provides new and exciting strategies to improve heart transplantation and potentially reduce the use of broad-spectrum immunosuppression drugs while alleviating allograft rejection. In this review, we will discuss the current research on the mechanisms of cardiac allograft rejection, the physiological and immunological characteristics of MSCs, the effects of MSCs on the immune system, and immunomodulation of heart transplantation by MSCs.

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells heart transplantation immunomodulation rejection immunological tolerance

Impact statement

This review is centered on the interactions between mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and immunological rejection after heart transplantation. The use of MSC as a new immunosuppressive agent has the potential to improve the survival of patients after heart transplantation. Understanding the process of rejection and the mechanism of protection provided by MSC is important for designing relevant studies. Furthermore, latest relevant results from rodent in vivo studies have been summarized in this review. Therefore, this review will not only provide useful information to guide basic research, but also discuss the potential clinical use of MSC.

Introduction

Since human heart transplantation was first performed by Dr Barnard in 1967, the procedure has proven to be the most effective and final treatment for end-stage heart failure.¹ However, the prognosis of heart transplant patients remains poor. Immune rejection remains to be the most significant challenge for heart transplant recipients despite the breakthrough use of immunosuppressive agents. While this treatment is effective against acute rejection, it is less so for chronic rejection.² Moreover, long-term use of nonspecific immunosuppression agents, such as Mycophenolate mofetil and Tacrolimus, are associated with many fatal complications. These include infections, malignancies, accelerated cardiovascular disease, metabolic complications, and direct toxic effects on transplanted tissues, all limiting the median survival of patients following heart transplantation procedure to under 12.5 years.^3,4 Therefore, it is critical to find new methods to both reduce acute immune rejection and replace the long-term use of nonspecific immunosuppression agents.

In recent years, several studies have revealed unique properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that regulate the immune response.^5–7 Some of the novel regulation of MSCs to inhibit the immune rejection response occur at different levels, including the silencing of the cell activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems and promoting a cardioprotective response from other cells. Due to their low immunogenicity, attributed to low expression of human leukocyte antigen major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I), and a lack of MHC II molecules and co-stimulatory antigens (such as CD80 and CD86), MSCs-based cell therapy promises several advantages over other cell-type based therapies against cardiac allograft rejection. Therefore, MSCs are considered immunologically safe for use in allogeneic clinical therapies.⁸ Moreover, MSC-based cell therapy was shown to reduce necrosis, apoptosis, fibrosis, while promoting angiogenesis, therefore enhancing the overall cardioprotection and reducing the damage caused by immunological rejection with an increase in survival time of the transplanted heart. Thus, MSCs have significant potential to develop into the next novel preventative cell-based therapy for patients suffering from immunological rejection.

In this review, we provide a current synopsis of the alloimmunity response that accompanies heart transplantation and discuss the protective immunomodulatory function of MSCs on the innate and adaptive immune systems, and review the efficacy of MSC-based therapies in experimental models of heart transplantation.

Physiological and immunological characteristics of MSCs

Identification of MSCs

MSCs are a heterogeneous subset of non-hematopoietic cells that are characterized by their capacity to differentiate into tissues of mesodermal lineages. Although there are no unique cell-specific markers for MSCs, minimal criteria have been provided by The International Society for Cellular Therapy to define MSCs. Briefly, in vitro, cells with the ability of adherence to plastic under standard culture conditions, expressing cluster of differentiation (CD) genes such as CD105, CD73, and CD90, but not expressing CD45, CD34, CD14, CD11b, CD19, CD79, and HLA-DR genes. These cells have also been described to have the capacity to differentiate into chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and adipocytes in vitro.⁹ MSCs can be obtained from several tissue sources, including bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, Wharton's jelly, amniotic fluid, adipose tissue, and dental pulp.¹⁰

Immunological characteristics of MSCs

MSCs have the ability to inhibit the immune response by regulating several immune cell lineages at different levels; meanwhile, they show extremely low antigenicity allowing to escape alloreactivity.¹¹ Altogether, utilizing MSCs prove to be a potential cell-based therapy against cardiac allograft rejection. The most significant advantage of MSC therapy compared to the use of broad-spectrum immunosuppressive agents is their dynamic and specific regulation of the immune system. More specifically, broad-spectrum immunosuppressive agents protect allografts from rejection by nonspecific suppression of the total immune system; therefore, these agents not only stop the transplant rejection but also effectively shut down the immune surveillance of tumors and infections. Hence, transplant patients suffer from post-surgical health risks due to malignancies and severe infections when they are on broad-spectrum immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives.

In comparison, the immunomodulatory functions of MSC are dependent on and adaptive to the inflammatory microenvironment.¹² Preclinical studies have shown that tumor immune responses are not compromised by MSCs injection treatment.¹³ Furthermore, MSCs have been shown to have antibacterial capabilities mediated by direct secretion of antibacterial factors or indirect activation of innate immune effector cells.¹⁴ Together, these immunological properties of MSCs confer their bio-effectiveness and biosafety in comparison to broad-spectrum immunosuppressive agents.

MSCs alleviate innate immune response of cardiac allografts

MSCs protect cardiac allografts from ischemia-reperfusion injury

Currently, ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury remains as an inevitable part of organ transplantation. Following transplantation, the damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) release, which is a potent activator of the innate immune response and correlates to the survival prognosis of the patient.¹⁵ DAMPs include intracellular constituents such as nucleic acids or heat shock proteins that remain sequestered from the immune system during homeostasis but are released into the extracellular environment or exposed on the cell surface following cell damage.^15,16 DAMPs also include extracellular constituents, such as matrix components that are modified in the context of cell stress or injury.^15,17 During I-R injury, DAMPs are released and stimulate the innate immune system by activating pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are readily expressed and presented on the surface of most immune cells and some structural cells.¹⁸ Toll-like receptors (TLRs), located at the surface and outer membrane of intracellular vesicles, are the principal member of PRRs. Activation of TLRs mediates a complex cascade of intracellular kinase activity, which later upregulates the transcription factor NF-κB and induce the expression of pro-inflammatory genes.¹⁹ As a result of TLRs activation, the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, the recruitment of neutrophil, the maturation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and the upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules and the MHCs are all also elevated.^18,20,21 Therefore, donor hearts begin to experience an allogeneic injury from the nonspecific immune response, with no resolution in sight due to continuous DAMP release upon further cell damage, and this vicious cycle of injury-response eventually leads to organ rejection.^22–24

Hence, protecting the donor heart from I-R injury is a critical first step. On this front, several studies have shown the efficacy of MSCs against I-R injury.^25–30 Korkmaz-Icöz et al. showed that in the presence of MSCs, in which the isolated hearts are perfused with a hypothermic histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution supplemented by MSC conditioned medium, the donor hearts show greater preservation and gain resistance to I-R injury.³⁰ Compared to groups perfused with HTK only, the supply of MSCs-conditioned medium improved the cardiac function of the allografted heart. Moreover, the gene expression related to apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress had all been downregulated. Similar results were also obtained on other solid organ preservation. For example, Daisuke et al. used MSCs therapy during ex vivo pig lung perfusion. They found that MSCs therapy can significantly protect the isolated pig lung from I-R injury with an evident decrease of apoptosis and inflammations.³¹ Similar results have also been shown in liver transplantation trials. Even after 24 h of preservation at 4°C in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, the portal transfusion of the MSCs ameliorated the injury of the liver graft after prolonged cold preservation and transplantation.³² In light of these studies, MSC treatment of donor organs presents a critical improvement to the standard protocols of organ preservation and resistance to I-R injury.

MSCs affect maturation and differentiation of dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are not only the APCs with the most potent antigen-presenting properties but also serve as an essential modulator of the cross-talk between the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system. Donor DCs mature immediately and migrate to the secondary lymphoid organs of the recipient through the lymphatic system under the activation of DAMPs-induced TLRs signaling.^33,34 In the lymphatic organ, DCs present intact donor MHC–antigene complexes to host T cells, then provide efficient co-stimulatory signals like B7 molecules (namely CD80 [B7-1] or CD86 [B7-2]), CD40 to host T cells^35,36 which is termed as the “direct presentation.” Subsequently, when the DCs from the donor’s heart are exhausted, DCs from the recipient take over. The antigen-presenting process mediated by recipient DCs is termed “indirect presentation.” Through direct presentation and indirect presentation, T cells are activated, which in turn caused the adaptive immune response (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Schematic mechanism of cardiac allograft rejection. After heart transplantation, donor APCs present antigens to the secondary lymphoid organs of the recipient. In the lymphatic organs, APCs present intact donor MHC–antigene complexes to host T cells. T cells are activated by a combination of MHC–antigene complexes and efficient co-stimulatory signals. T cells then exert effects of adaptive immunity to cardiac allografts. When donor APCs are exhausted, recipient APCs take control. When recipient B cells present antigen to T cells, B cells are activated to plasmablasts. Plasmablasts then play a humoral immune response on the cardiac allografts. The effects of other innate immune cells are not shown in the figure.

DCs are only APCs that can activate inactivated naive T cells. The maturation of DCs is a necessary condition for their function to activate T cells. In this regard, MSCs have been shown to prevent the maturation and the migration of DCs.³⁷ Co-culture experiments with MSCs and DCs showed that the expression of co-stimulatory genes and antigen presentation of DCs are attenuated.³⁸ Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) secreted by MSCs have been reported to be involved in this maturation inhibition.^37,39 Further studies have suggested that other soluble factors (such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)) may play a main role in the inhibition of DC maturation in addition to IL-6 and M-CSF.⁴⁰

Interestingly, DC inhibition through the paracrine factors secreted by MSCs was much weaker than the predominant regulation through MSC contact-dependent Notch signaling pathway.⁴⁰ MSC inhibitory actions regarding DC maturation have also been confirmed in a heart transplantation in vivo study.⁴¹ Altogether, MSCs negatively influence DCs (the most significant APC), and prevent DCs from presenting antigens while inhibiting their ability to induce T-cell response.⁴² Additionally, Zhao et al. have suggested that MSCs can induce differentiation of mature DCs into a distinct regulatory DCs (DCreg) population.⁴³ These regulatory DCs are known to promote anti-inflammatory effects on T cell activation, which result in CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cell generation from CD4⁺CD25^-Foxp3⁻ T cells. In a rat heart transplantation study, CD45RB⁺ DCs, which were induced by bone marrow-derived MSCs, promoted regulatory T cell (Treg) production and alleviate rejection injury in vivo. As a result, the survival time of cardiac allografts has been prolonged.⁴⁴ In summary, the anti-inflammatory effects of MSCs on DCs play a significant role in MSC-mediated immune tolerance induction.

MSCs polarize macrophages to M2 macrophages

Although the classification of macrophages is still controversial, most studies suggest that macrophages have two main subtype lineages, namely M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages are regarded as pro-inflammatory subtype of polarized macrophages. Hence, M1 macrophages secrete cytokines, such as IL1β, IL-6, IL12, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), which promote inflammation. M1 macrophages can be obtained by polarizing M0 macrophages (naïve) using lipopolysaccharides, or INF-γ (which are secreted by Th1 cells).⁴⁵ M2 macrophages are produced from M0 induced by IL4, IL13 (which are secreted by Th2 cells), as well as IL10 (which is secreted by Treg) and are considered the anti-inflammatory subtype of macrophages. Cytokines released from M2 macrophages, including transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and IL-10, contribute to the anti-inflammatory response. These cytokines alleviate allograft immune injuries and facilitate tissue repairs.⁴⁶ Although macrophages are part of the APC family, like DCs, presenting donor antigen to the lymphocytes of the recipient, M2 macrophages do not express MHC-II molecules on their surface.⁴⁷ Thus, the skewing of M1 to M2 polarization is considered another feasible approach to regulate alloimmune rejection.

The effects of MSCs on macrophages reported in the literature are mostly reflected in terms of the enumeration on the polarization of macrophages. With the modulation of MSCs, macrophages are skewed toward M2 macrophage production. Many cytokines secreted by MSCs, such as IL10, PGE2, stanniocalcin-2, have been identified in this process.^43,48–50 It is worth noting that the influence of MSCs on other immune cells also feeds back into the macrophage polarization. For instance, the effect of MSCs on the differentiation of Th2 cells and Treg indirectly contributes to M2 polarization. Gao et al. demonstrated the ability of MSC on macrophage polarization in vivo on a mouse heart transplantation model.⁵¹ They suggested gene-modified MSC, such as soluble fibronectin-like protein 2 (sFgl2) overexpressing MSCs, therapy had a better benefit than wild type MSCs. This is of great importance, highlighting the potential of enhancing the MSC derived therapeutic response through further genetic modifications.

MSCs inhibit cytokine production and proliferation of natural killer cells

Natural killer (NK) cells are another central component of the innate immune system that recognize and attack allografts with a combination of MHC class I recognition and pro-inflammatory factor secretion. Once NK cells are activated, cytotoxic molecules are secreted without the need for priming by APCs. In addition, cytokines secreted from NK cells (such as TNF-α and IFN-γ) are involved in DCs maturation and Th1 cell polarization.^52,53

Similar to previous findings, the proliferation of NK cells is significantly inhibited by co-culture with MSCs.⁵⁴ It is shown that MSCs are a potent inhibitor to activating receptors (e.g. NKp30, NKp44, and NKG2D) of NK cells, and this inhibition effect is further associated with impaired cytotoxic activity and cytokine production. Specifically, PGE2 and indoleamine-pyrrole 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) secreted by MSCs are suggested to mediate this process.⁵⁵ Recent studies reported that MSCs enhance the ability of IL-2/IL-12/IL-18-stimulated NK cells to secrete IFN-γ, which is a pro-inflammatory factor.^56,57 However, it is important to mention that MSCs most likely play an anti-inflammatory role through NK cells on a limited NK cell-mediated inflammatory cases.

MSCs alleviate the adaptive immune response of cardiac allografts

The effects of MSCs on T cell activities: MSCs suppress T cell proliferation

Upon transplantation, naive T cells in host lymphoid organs quickly activate and proliferate due to the presence of MHC-antigene complexes and efficient co-stimulatory signals provided by APCs. It is noted that CD4⁺T cells, usually equipped with a helper function, are only able to recognize the donor peptides in the context of MHC class II molecules, which are presented on the surface of APCs. In contrast, CD8⁺T cells more often play cytotoxic roles and are activated by MHC I molecules expressed on nucleated cells (including donor APCs).

Several studies have shown that MSCs are potent suppressors of T-cell proliferation. In one example, Di Nicola et al. found that MSCs can inhibit both CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells proliferation in the mixed lymphocyte reaction system, and this inhibition is dose-dependent (positively associated with the total number of MSCs).⁵⁸ Furthermore, Sarah et al. demonstrated that the inhibition of T cell proliferation depends on the arrest of T cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle.⁵⁹ Interestingly, when MSCs were removed from the mixed culture system and restimulated with the cognate peptide, T-cells failed to proliferate but produced IFN-gamma. To date, many cytokines have been implicated in the proliferation inhibiting process of MSCs on T cells, including TGF-β1, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF),⁵⁸ IDO,⁶⁰ PGE2,⁶¹ and NO.⁶² However, Di Nicola et al. demonstrated that the paracrine effect of MSCs does not describe the entire mechanism by which they inhibit T-cell proliferation.⁵⁸ Comparing “non-contact” system, “contact” co-culture systems using MSCs with T-cells showed a stronger proliferation inhibiting.

MSCs affect the differentiation of CD4⁺ T cells

Activated CD4⁺ T cells can be classified into four main categories, including Th1, Th2, Th17, and CD4⁺Tregs. Th1 cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as INF-γ/TNF-α) that can stimulate inflammatory responses in the transplanted heart by immune cell recruitment, and further promote activation of alloantigen-specific T-cells.⁶³ Th2 cells can trigger an antibody-mediated rejection and promote the involvement of eosinophils through the secretion of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13.⁶⁴ Although acute rejection is typically viewed as a T cell-mediated process, and alloantibodies are considered a valuable treatment of chronic rejection, several studies have indicated that antibodies also serve a vital role in some cases of acute rejection.^65–67

While IL17 is a well-known pro-inflammatory cytokine that is produced by Th17 cells, recently, it is shown that gamma delta T cells rather than CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were the key IL-17 producers in the allografts.⁶⁸ IL-17 recruit the immune cells, such as monocytes and neutrophils, to the site of inflammation and is crucial for the acceleration of acute rejection.^69–71 Moreover, IL-17 has been identified to suppress Treg expansion.^68,71 CD4⁺ Tregs are regarded as a significant part of donor heart tolerance.⁷² CD4⁺ Tregs express the transcription factor FoxP3 and are known to suppress the alloreactivity through modulation of antigen presentation, production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and competition and cytolysis of effector T cells.

In addition to affecting T cell proliferation, MSCs also affect T cell differentiation. Many studies have shown that MSCs are able to suppress the formation of Th1 and Th17, which are essential for the activation of cytotoxic T-cells and the boost of phagocytic capacity of neutrophils and macrophages.^73–75 MSCs also contribute to the formation of Th2 cells.⁷⁶ As mentioned above, Th2 cells contribute to B-cell mediated rejection. However, in the presence of MSCs, B-cells proliferation in response to CD40L and IL-4 expressed by Th2 is also inhibited.⁵⁹ Thus, in this specific example, the ratio of Th2 to Th1 increased by MSCs is seen as a protective effect in allograft rejection setting. More importantly, MSCs are shown to prompt the production of Tregs via the secretion of IDO,⁷⁷ TGF-β1, and PGE2⁷⁸ by MSCs. Equally, the regulatory effect of MSCs on APCs is treated as a therapeutic target to indirectly control the mechanism to induce Treg production.^79,80

Most in vivo studies using heart transplantation models attribute the cardioprotection of MSCs to the Tregs production and Th1/Th2 skewing.^{41,44,81–85} However, whether Tregs production via MSCs in vivo is yet to be explored by most authors.⁸⁶ Several outstanding questions including the influence of administration time, administration dose, and administration route of MSC on CD4⁺ T cell differentiation and fate in a heart transplantation model should be considered.

MSCs affect the formation and lysis function of CTLs, induce CD8⁺ regulatory T cells

CD8⁺ T cells activate into cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with the assistance of CD4⁺ helper cells and banding of MHC-1 molecules presented by donor cells such as donor APCs. These cells then migrate into the donor’s heart, and lyse allogeneic recognized target cells. Specifically, CTLs release membrane-damaging proteins from intracellular granules (such as perforin and granzyme⁸⁷) and recruit other effector cells to the donor’s heart. Perforin polymerizes in the lipid bilayer of the donor tissue cell plasma membrane, creating a sizeable aqueous pore that allows other T-cell enzymes to enter into the target cell. Therefore, granzyme, as a serine protease enzyme in T-cell granules, enters the target cells through the pore, and then proteolytically cleaves and activates caspases that induce target cell apoptosis. In addition, activated CD8⁺ T cells also express FasL on their surface. When the FasL binds to their Fas receptor, which is expressed on target cells, Fas/FasL pathway will be activated. Fas/FasL signaling pathway is another critical mechanism that is directly utilized by CD8⁺ T cells to induce apoptosis.⁸⁸

MSCs are suggested to have a strong ability to inhibit CTLs formation in vitro.⁸⁹ In the presence of MSCs, the lysis function of CTLs on target cells has been significantly inhibited. The effect of MSCs on CTLs is mainly mediated by their paracrine function. PGE2, IDO, and TGF-β are suggested being involved in this process.⁹⁰ Furthermore, there is evidence that shows the correlation between MSCs and CD8⁺ regulatory T cells increase.^91,92 Similar to CD4⁺ regulatory T cells, CD8⁺ regulatory T cells can inhibit the immune response of CD4⁺ T cells by several pathways.⁹³ CD8⁺ regulatory T cells have several subtypes with different surface markers. CD8⁺CD28^– regulatory T cells is a widely recognized subtype of CD8⁺ regulatory T cells. Liu et al. reported that MSCs increase the proportion of CD8⁺CD28⁻ T cells by reducing their rate of apoptosis.⁹² MSCs also enhance CD8⁺CD28⁻ regulatory T cells’ ability to hamper naive CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation and activation.

Although the effects of MSCs on CD8⁺ T cells may provide novel therapeutic strategies for heart transplant tolerance, there is a big gap of knowledge for the relevance of this mechanism in an in vivo laboratory model.

The effects of MSCs on B cells activities

B cells are one of the three primary subtypes of APCs and differ from DCs and macrophages with their capability of the secretion of specific antibodies. B cells can specifically recognize antigens from the donor’s heart with B cell receptors (BCR), which is formed by membrane-bound IgD and an IgM receptor in addition to other membrane molecules. Although such recognition and binding is the first step to initiate the process of activation, it is not enough to fully activate the function of B-cells. The assistance of other factors (including complement and CD4⁺ T helper cells) is required for B-cell activation. To complete the activation, B-cells endocytose and process the donor antigen bound with BCR, then present them to CD4⁺ T cells in the form of MHC II-antigene complexes. In return, activated T cells will bind the CD40 molecules on B cells surface with their ligand CD40L. CD40–CD40L interaction is a strong co-stimulatory signal for B-cell proliferation and differentiation.

Moreover, cytokines produced by activated CD4⁺ T helper cells will also add to a more fully developed B-cell response. During B cells activating, soluble Igs that is secreted from the cells are elevated, and membrane-bound Igs that are attached to the surface of a B cell are gradually decreased. Then, most activated B-cells differentiate into antibody-secreting cells (also named Plasma cells), which mediate specific antibody targeted to an antigen expressed on the cells from the donor heart. The form of antigen–antibody complexes activates complement cascades, ultimately transforming the endothelial cell surface from an anticoagulant condition to a procoagulant status. Therefore, microthrombus can be formed from the tiny blood vessel, and finally cause the closure.

Furthermore, activation of complement cascades also initiates the development of the membrane attack complex, which contains a series of pores in the cell membrane that bring about cell death in the donor’s heart. Coincidentally, some of the products from the complement system (like C3a and C5a) are puissant triggers of mast cell degranulation and inflammations. Even without assistance from the complement system, Fc receptor-bearing effectors can recognize and kill antibody-coat target cells expressing an allogeneic antigen on their surface. These Fc receptor-bearing effectors include follicular DCs, NK cells, macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells that simultaneously exert their immune functions on the donor’s heart.

MSCs have been reported to influence B-cell proliferation, plasmablast formation, and promote the induction of regulatory B-cells (Bregs).^59,94 Like Treg, Breg is an immunosuppressive subtype of B cells. The secretion of IL10 by the Breg was shown to convert effector CD4⁺ T cells into Foxp3⁺ Tregs.⁹⁵ Interestingly, it is reported that the stimulatory effect of MSCs on Breg formation and IL-10 production is mediated by direct cell–cell contact mechanism and not through a paracrine signaling.^96,97 Although B-cells may directly be influenced by MSCs to alter their characteristics of proliferation, antibody production, and other immune cells (e.g. T-cells and DCs), it is equally possible that MSCs play an indirect regulatory role.^98,99 Unfortunately, it is still unknown whether MSC has any effect in chronic rejection of heart transplantation by exerting related effects on B cells in vivo experiments.

Challenges for use of MSCs in cell therapy

There are several challenges to characterize the immunomodulation involved in MSCs-based cell therapy. Firstly, the heterogeneity of MSCs related to donor origin, cell development stage, and expansion protocol are major issues that restrict the therapeutic benefits of MSCs.¹⁰⁰ For instance, culture conditions and expression of miRNAs can modify the immunomodulatory function of MSCs. Secondly, cell distribution to the targeted tissues would be limited after delivery. The majority of MSCs could be transferred to organs with a high vessel density (especially the lung) through the circulation system.¹⁰¹ With the increase in infused cells, a risk of occlusion in microvessels is raised. Thirdly, the long-term survival and effectiveness of infused cells are still a concern. Although MSCs have an extremely low antigenicity, repeated administration of MSCs may cause the production of antibodies.¹⁰² Finally, although anti-tumor immune responses are not compromised by MSCs, the potentials of ectopic tissue formation and malignant transformation are still concerned. Importantly, these challenges would be addressed with the use of MSCs.

Compared to cell infusion, delivery of exosomes or extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from MSCs might be an attractive strategy for development of a cell-free therapeutic. As a type of nano-level membrane particle, the secreted exosomes/EVs can pass through most physiological barriers and have been considered a major contribution to the therapeutic effect of MSCs via a paracrine pathway. It remains unknown whether the exosomes have similar capacities as MSCs for alleviating cardiac allograft rejection in specific conditions. However, as mentioned above, the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs not only rely on several growth factors or cytokines, but cell–cell contact is also involved in the procedure. Furthermore, MSCs’ immunomodulatory effects are not static in response to the varying microenvironment. Therefore, the components of exosomes/EVs would be complex and their dynamic changes may lead to various consequences in different settings. To optimize this cell-free approach, the isolation or manufacture of exosomes/EVs should be developed in a GMP condition and their biological features must be clearly defined prior to clinical use. Additional investigation is needed to determine whether exosomes or EVs can completely replace MSCs in the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection in the future.

Conclusions

In this review, we provide a summary of immunomodulatory effects of MSCs for the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection. Although the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs observed from in vitro experiments reveal exciting therapeutic possibilities for MSC-based cell therapy (Figure 2), conflicting data in heart transplantation models with limited reproducibility render the application of this therapy experimental at best. However, there is a general agreement on some benefits from MSC cell therapy along with organ transplantation against allograft rejection and tolerance induction. A few studies have indicated that MSCs are more harmful than helpful and actually promote rejection.^103,104 The immediate goal at the moment seems to be the elimination of acute rejection and the reduction of the use of immunosuppressor agents, which may help induce immune tolerance in clinical cases.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of modulation in immune cells by MSCs.

Currently, studies need to focus on verifying the ability of MCSs to reduce immune response and explore the underlying mechanisms in heart transplantation models. As mentioned above, the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs are never static and depend on the microenvironment. Therefore, experiments need to identify, detect, and control the changes in the microenvironment while developing a reproducible heart transplant surgery method. Since MSCs express several TLRs,^105–107 the types of DAMPs released either due to ischemia/reperfusion injury, inflammations, hypoxia all may modify the patterns and functions of TLRs expressed on MSCs, and therefore impact the interactions between MSCs and immune systems.^{106,108–110}

Similarly, the source and state of MSCs used in studies need to be better defined and controlled in order to parse out the difference in their function and response in vivo. Therefore, there are so many outstanding questions and concerns that need to be addressed regarding immunogenicity, mechanisms of immunomodulation and differentiation of MSCs, administration time, administration route, the dosage of administration, indications and contraindications of administration, and the long-term safe use of these cells must be assessed before MSCs can be utilized as a suppressive treatment in a clinical setting.

Footnotes

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors (ZW, JL, WH, LJ, CP, XG, PA, OK, MX, YG) participated in the design and interpretation of the manuscript. JL, WH, LJ, and PA contributed to manuscript preparation. ZW drafted and wrote the manuscript. YW drafted and critically revised the manuscript. CP, OK, and MX carefully edited the manuscript.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

FUNDING

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL143490, RO1 HL136025 (YW)). This work was also supported by the National Institutes of Health [RO1 HL148598-01A1, (OK)] and American Heart Association, Career Development Award, 18CDA34110117 (OK). Finally, AHA award:18CDA34110223(JL), AHA postdoctoral grant: AHA_20POST35200267 (PA) were also used to support this work.

ORCID iD

Yigang Wang

References

McKellar

Clinical firsts - Christiaan Barnard's heart transplantations. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:2211–3

Costello

Mohanakumar

Nath

DS.

Mechanisms of chronic cardiac allograft rejection. Tex Heart Inst J 2013; 40:395–9

Khush

Cherikh

Chambers

Harhay

Hayes

Hsich

Meiser

Potena

Robinson

Rossano

Sadavarte

Singh

Zuckermann

Stehlik

The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult heart transplantation report - 2019; focus theme: Donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38:1056–66

Lodhi

Lamb

Meier-Kriesche

HU.

Solid organ allograft survival improvement in the United States: the long-term does not mirror the dramatic short-term success. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:1226–35

Le Blanc

Mougiakakos

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12:383–96

Podestà

Remuzzi

Casiraghi

Mesenchymal stromal cells for transplant tolerance. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1287

Ghannam

Bouffi

Djouad

Jorgensen

Noël

Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms and clinical applications. Stem Cell Res Ther 2010; 1:2

Machado

CDV

Telles

PDDS

Nascimento

ILO.

Immunological characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2013; 35:62–67

Dominici

Le Blanc

Mueller

Slaper-Cortenbach

Marini

Krause

Deans

Keating

Prockop

Horwitz

Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006; 8:315–7

10.

Marquez-Curtis

Janowska-Wieczorek

McGann

Elliott

JAW.

Mesenchymal stromal cells derived from various tissues: biological, clinical and cryopreservation aspects. Cryobiology 2015; 71:181–97

11.

Le Blanc

Tammik

Rosendahl

Zetterberg

Ringdén

HLA expression and immunologic properties of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Hematol 2003; 31:890–6

12.

Wang

Chen

Cao

Shi

Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat Immunol 2014; 15:1009–16

13.

Moquin-Beaudry

Colas

Bazin

Guimond

Haddad

Beauséjour

The tumor-immune response is not compromised by mesenchymal stromal cells in humanized mice. J Immunol 2019; 203:2735–45

14.

Chow

Johnson

Impastato

Coy

Strumpf

Dow

Antibacterial activity of human mesenchymal stem cells mediated directly by constitutively secreted factors and indirectly by activation of innate immune effector cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2020; 9:235–49

15.

Land

Agostinis

Gasser

Garg

Linkermann

Transplantation and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Am J Transplant 2016; 16:3338–61

16.

Roh

Sohn

DH.

Damage-associated molecular patterns in inflammatory diseases. Immune Netw 2018; 18:e27

17.

Frevert

Felgenhauer

Wygrecka

Nastase

Schaefer

Danger-associated molecular patterns derived from the extracellular matrix provide temporal control of innate immunity.

J Histochem Cytochem 2018; 66:213–27

18.

Takeuchi

Akira

Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010; 140:805–20

19.

Verstrepen

Bekaert

Chau

Tavernier

Chariot

Beyaert

TLR-4, IL-1R and TNF-R signaling to NF-κB: variations on a common theme. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65:2964–78

20.

O'Neill

LAJ

Golenbock

Bowie

AG.

The history of toll-like receptors — redefining innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13:453–60

21.

Di Gioia

Zanoni

Toll-like receptor co-receptors as master regulators of the immune response. Mol Immunol 2015; 63:143–52

22.

Johnsson

Tufveson

Serum hyaluronan—a potential marker of cardiac allograft rejection?

J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25:544–49

23.

Huang

Yin

Han

Huang

Zheng

Tan

Fang

Rui

Chen

Wang

Zheng

Wang

Gong

Extracellular Hmgb1 functions as an innate immune-mediator implicated in murine cardiac allograft acute rejection. Am J Transplant 2007; 7:799–808

24.

Land

Agostinis

Gasser

Garg

Linkermann

DAMP-induced allograft and tumor rejection: the circle is closing. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:3322–37

25.

Angoulvant

Ivanes

Ferrera

Matthews

Nataf

Ovize

Mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media attenuates in vitro and ex vivo myocardial reperfusion injury. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30:95–102

26.

Lai

Arslan

Lee

Sze

NSK

Choo

Chen

Salto-Tellez

Timmers

Lee

El Oakley

Pasterkamp

de Kleijn

DPV

Lim

SK.

Exosome secreted by MSC reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Res 2010; 4:214–22

27.

DeSantiago

Bare

Banach

Ischemia/reperfusion injury protection by mesenchymal stem cell derived antioxidant capacity. Stem Cells Dev 2013; 22:2497–507

28.

Preda

Rønningen

Burlacu

Simionescu

Moskaug

JØ

Valen

Remote transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Stem Cells 2014; 32:2123–34

29.

Tang

Xie

Pan

Wang

Mesenchymal stem cells participate in angiogenesis and improve heart function in rat model of myocardial ischemia with reperfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:353–61

30.

Korkmaz-Icöz

Hüttner

Ruppert

Radovits

Loganathan

Sayour

Brlecic

Lasitschka

Karck

Szabó

Hypothermic perfusion of donor heart with a preservation solution supplemented by mesenchymal stem cells. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38:315–26

31.

Nakajima

Watanabe

Ohsumi

Pipkin

Chen

Mordant

Kanou

Saito

Lam

Coutinho

Caldarone

Juvet

Martinu

Iyer

Davies

Hwang

Waddell

Cypel

Liu

Keshavjee

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38:1214–23

32.

Uemoto S, Fujimoto

Teratani

Kanazawa

Iwasaki

Xiangdong

Masano

Yagi

Hata

Kobayashi

Introduction of mesenchymal stem cells for liver surgery (hepatectomy and transplantation).In: Nakao K, Minato N, Uemoto S (eds) Innovative medicine: basic research and development. Tokyo: Springer, 2015, pp.281–93

33.

Messmer

Yang

Telusma

Knoll

Messmer

Tracey

Chiorazzi

High mobility group box protein 1: an endogenous signal for dendritic cell maturation and Th1 polarization. J Immunol 2004; 173:307–13

34.

Yang

Chen

Yang

Tracey

Bustin

Oppenheim

JJ.

High mobility group box-1 protein induces the migration and activation of human dendritic cells and acts as an alarmin. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 81:59–66

35.

Marino

Paster

Benichou

Allorecognition by T lymphocytes and allograft rejection. Front Immunol 2016; 7:582

36.

Cozzi

Colpo

De Silvestro

GJT

Science

The mechanisms of rejection in solid organ transplantation. Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56:498–505

37.

Nauta

Kruisselbrink

Lurvink

Willemze

Fibbe

WE.

Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit generation and function of both CD34⁺-derived and monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 2006; 177:2080–87

38.

Jiang

X-X

Zhang

Liu

Zhang

S-X

X-D

Mao

Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit differentiation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood 2005; 105:4120–26

39.

Djouad

Charbonnier

L-M

Bouffi

Louis-Plence

Bony

Apparailly

Cantos

Jorgensen

Noël

Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the differentiation of dendritic cells through an interleukin-6-dependent mechanism. Stem Cells 2007; 25:2025–32

40.

Y-P

Paczesny

Lauret

Poirault

Bordigoni

Mekhloufi

Hequet

Bertrand

Ou-Yang

J-P

Stoltz

J-F

Miossec

Eljaafari

Human mesenchymal stem cells license adult CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells to differentiate into regulatory dendritic cells through activation of the notch pathway. J Immunol 2008; 180:1598–608

41.

Jiang

Baroja

Arp

Zassoko

Liu

Bartholomew

Garcia

Wang

Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells and rapamycin synergize to attenuate alloimmune responses and promote cardiac allograft tolerance. Am J Transplant 2009; 9:1760–72

42.

Beyth

Borovsky

Mevorach

Liebergall

Gazit

Aslan

Galun

Rachmilewitz

Human mesenchymal stem cells alter antigen-presenting cell maturation and induce T-cell unresponsiveness. Blood 2005; 105:22141–9

43.

Zhao

Z-G

Sun

You

Q-B

Zou

Immunomodulatory function of regulatory dendritic cells induced by mesenchymal stem cells. Immunol Invest 2012; 41:183–98

44.

Hua

Chen

Yang

Teng

Huang

Shen

Protective action of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in immune tolerance of allogeneic heart transplantation by regulating CD45RB+ dendritic cells. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13231

45.

Muraille

Leo

Moser

TH1/TH2 paradigm extended: macrophage polarization as an unappreciated pathogen-driven escape mechanism?

Front Immunol 2014; 5:60303

46.

Rőszer

Understanding the mysterious M2 macrophage through activation markers and effector mechanisms. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015:1–16

47.

Chávez-Galán

Olleros

Vesin

Garcia

Much more than M1 and M2 macrophages, there are also CD169+ and TCR+ macrophages. Front Immunol 2015; 6:263

48.

Németh

Leelahavanichkul

Yuen

PST

Mayer

Parmelee

Doi

Robey

Leelahavanichkul

Koller

Brown

Jelinek

Star

Mezey

Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med 2009; 15:42–49

49.

Dayan

Yannarelli

Billia

Filomeno

Wang

X-H

Davies

Keating

Mesenchymal stromal cells mediate a switch to alternatively activated monocytes/macrophages after acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106:1299–310

50.

Liu

Sun

Wei

Liu

Zhang

Chen

Mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorate acute lung injury induced by LPS mainly through stanniocalcin-2 mediating macrophage polarization. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:334

51.

Gao

Wang

Jia

Chen

Chang

Liu

Zhang

Mesenchymal stem cells transfected with sFgl2 inhibit the acute rejection of heart transplantation in mice by regulating macrophage activation. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020; 11:241

52.

Martín-Fontecha

Thomsen

Brett

Gerard

Lipp

Lanzavecchia

Sallusto

Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:1260–65

53.

Gerosa

Baldani-Guerra

Nisii

Marchesini

Carra

Trinchieri

Reciprocal activating interaction between natural killer cells and dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2002; 195:327–33

54.

Pradier

Passweg

Villard

Kindler

Human bone marrow stromal cells and skin fibroblasts inhibit natural killer cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity. Cell Transplant 2011; 20:681–91

55.

Spaggiari

Capobianco

Abdelrazik

Becchetti

Mingari

Moretta

Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit natural killer–cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production: role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2. Blood 2008; 111:1327–33

56.

Thomas

Jäger

Mauel

Brandau

Lask

Flohé

Peake

Interaction with mesenchymal stem cells provokes natural killer cells for enhanced IL-12/IL-18-induced interferon-gamma secretion. Mediators Inflamm 2014; 2014:143463

57.

Najar

Fayyad-Kazan

Meuleman

Bron

Fayyad-Kazan

Lagneaux

Mesenchymal stromal cells of the bone marrow and natural killer cells: cell interactions and cross modulation. J Cell Commun Signal 2018; 12:673–88

58.

Di Nicola

Carlo-Stella

Magni

Milanesi

Longoni

Matteucci

Grisanti

Gianni

AM.

Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli. Blood 2002; 99:3838–43

59.

Glennie

Soeiro Is Dyson

Lam

EWF

Dazzi

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induce division arrest anergy of activated T cells. Blood 2005; 105:2821–27

60.

Meisel

Zibert

Laryea

GöBel

DäUbener

Dilloo

, Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase–mediated tryptophan degradation. Blood 2004; 103:4619–21

61.

Aggarwal

Pittenger

MF.

Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 2005; 105:1815–22

62.

Sato

Ozaki

Meguro

Hatanaka

Nagai

Muroi

Ozawa

Nitric oxide plays a critical role in suppression of T-cell proliferation by mesenchymal stem cells. Blood 2006; 109:228–34

63.

Szabo

Sullivan

Peng

Glimcher

LH.

Molecular mechanisms regulating Th1 immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2003; 21:713–58

64.

Walker

McKenzie

ANJ.

TH2 cell development and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2018; 18:121–33

65.

Crespo

Pascual

Tolkoff-Rubin

Mauiyyedi

Bernard Collins

Fitzpatrick

Lin Farrell

Williams

Delmonico

FL, B

Cosimi

Colvin

Saidman

SL.

Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: incidence, serology and clinical characteristics. Transplantation 2001; 71:652–58

66.

Puttarajappa

Shapiro

Tan

Akalin

Antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: a review. J Transplant 2012; 2012:193724

67.

Michaels

Fishbein

Colvin

RB.

Humoral rejection of human organ transplants. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2003; 25:119–40

68.

Itoh

Kimura

Axtell

Velotta

Gong

Wang

Kajiwara

Nambu

Shimura

Adachi

Iwakura

Saito

Okumura

Sudo

Steinman

Robbins

Nakae

Fischbein

MP.

Interleukin-17 accelerates allograft rejection by suppressing regulatory T cell expansion. Circulation 2011; 124:S187–96

69.

Fan

L-X

Han

D-D

Kou

J-T

Increase of peripheral Th17 lymphocytes during acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012; 11:606–11

70.

Vanaudenaerde

Dupont

Wuyts

Verbeken

Meyts

Bullens

Dilissen

Luyts

Van Raemdonck

Verleden

GM.

The role of interleukin-17 during acute rejection after lung transplantation. Eur Respir J 2006; 27:779–87

71.

Zhou

Yang

Zhang

Jiang

The roles of T helper type 17/regulatory T cells in acute rejection after liver transplantation in rats. Transplantation 2015; 99:1126–31

72.

Sakaguchi

Yamaguchi

Nomura

Ono

Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008; 133:775–87

73.

Rozenberg

Rezk

Boivin

M-N

Darlington

Nyirenda

Jalili

Winer

Artsy

Uccelli

Reese

Planchon

Cohen

, Bar-Or A. Human mesenchymal stem cells impact Th17 and Th1 responses through a prostaglandin E2 and myeloid-dependent mechanism. Stem Cells Transl Med 2016; 5:1506–14

74.

Luz-Crawford

Kurte

Bravo-Alegría

Contreras

Nova-Lamperti

Tejedor

Noël

Jorgensen

Figueroa

Djouad

Carrión

Mesenchymal stem cells generate a CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell population during the differentiation process of Th1 and Th17 cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 2013; 4:65

75.

Luz

Noël

Fernandez

Khoury

Figueroa

Carrion

Jorgensen

Djouad

Mesenchymal stem cells repress Th17 molecular program through the PD-1 pathway. PloS One 2012; 7:e45272

76.

Yuan

Ren

Nian

Zhang

Han

Zhang

The effect of mesenchymal stem cells on dynamic changes of T cell subsets in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Clin Exp Immunol 2013; 173:28–37

77.

Jiang

Arp

Liu

Garcia

Wang

Regulatory T-cell generation and kidney allograft tolerance induced by mesenchymal stem cells associated with indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression. Transplantation 2010; 90:1312–20

78.

English

Ryan

Tobin

Murphy

Barry

Mahon

BP.

Cell contact, prostaglandin E(2) and transforming growth factor beta 1 play non-redundant roles in human mesenchymal stem cell induction of CD4+CD25(high) forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2009; 156:149–60

79.

Zhang

Yeo

RWY

Lai

Sim

EWK

Chin

Lim

SK.

Mesenchymal stromal cell exosome-enhanced regulatory T-cell production through an antigen-presenting cell-mediated pathway. Cytotherapy 2018; 20:687–96

80.

Melief

Schrama

Brugman

Tiemessen

Hoogduijn

Fibbe

Roelofs

Multipotent stromal cells induce human regulatory T cells through a novel pathway involving skewing of monocytes toward anti-inflammatory macrophages. Stem Cells 2013; 31:1980–91

81.

Casiraghi

Azzollini

Cassis

Imberti

Morigi

Cugini

Cavinato

Todeschini

Solini

Sonzogni

Perico

Remuzzi

Noris

Pretransplant infusion of mesenchymal stem cells prolongs the survival of a semiallogeneic heart transplant through the generation of regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2008; 181:3933–46

82.

Zhou

Sun

Cui

Zhu

Liu

Zhang

TJ.

Administration of donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells can prolong the survival of rat cardiac allograft. Transplant Proc 2006; 38:3046–51

83.

J-G

Xie

Q-L

B-B

Zhou

Yan

Exosomes derived from IDO1-overexpressing rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote immunotolerance of cardiac allografts. Cell Transplant 2018; 27:1657–83

84.

J-G

B-B

Zhou

Yan

Xie

Q-L

Zhao

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxgenase-transfected mesenchymal stem cells suppress heart allograft rejection by increasing the production and activity of dendritic cells and regulatory T cells. J Investig Med 2020; 68:728–37

85.

Wang

Zhao

Gao

Yan

Guo

Inhibition of cardiac allograft rejection in mice using interleukin-35-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Scand J Immunol 2019; 89:e12750

86.

Jiang

Liu

Hao

Guo

Yao

Jiang

Cui

Zhu

Sun

Lin

Liang

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are not required for mesenchymal stem cell function in fully MHC-mismatched mouse cardiac transplantation. Cell Tissue Res 2014; 358:503–14

87.

Choy

JC.

Granzymes and perforin in solid organ transplant rejection. Cell Death Differ 2010; 17:567–76

88.

Xie

Dai

Role of CD8(+) regulatory T cells in organ transplantation. Burns Trauma 2014; 2:18–23

89.

Rasmusson

Ringdén

Sundberg

Le Blanc

Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the formation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but not activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes or natural killer cells. Transplantation 2003; 76:1208–13

90.

Sun

Kuang

Liao

Luo

Mesenchymal stem cells suppress CD8+ T cell-mediated activation by suppressing natural killer group 2, member D protein receptor expression and secretion of prostaglandin E2, indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and transforming growth factor-β. Clin Exp Immunol 2014; 178:516–24

91.

Hof-Nahor

Leshansky

Shivtiel

Eldor

Aberdam

Itskovitz-Eldor

Berrih-Aknin

Human mesenchymal stem cells shift CD8+ T cells towards a suppressive phenotype by inducing tolerogenic monocytes. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:4640–50

92.

Liu

Zheng

Chen

Peng

Huang

Xia

Sun

Xiang

AP.

Human mesenchymal stromal cells enhance the immunomodulatory function of CD8+CD28− regulatory T cells. Cell Mol Immunol 2015; 12:708–18

93.

Gong

Zhu

Wei

Yao

Recent advances in CD8(+) regulatory T cell research. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:8187–94

94.

Franquesa

Mensah

Huizinga

Strini

Boon

Lombardo

DelaRosa

Laman

Grinyó

Weimar

Betjes

MGH

Baan

Hoogduijn

MJ.

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells. Stem Cells 2015; 33:880–91

95.

Carter

Vasconcellos

Rosser

Tulone

Muñoz-Suano

Kamanaka

Ehrenstein

Flavell

Mauri

Mice lacking endogenous IL-10–producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2011; 186:5569–79

96.

Luk

Carreras-Planella

Korevaar

de Witte

SFH

Borràs

Betjes

MGH

Baan

Hoogduijn

Franquesa

Inflammatory conditions dictate the effect of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells on B cell function. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1042

97.

Carreras-Planella

Monguió-Tortajada

Borràs

Franquesa

Immunomodulatory effect of MSC on B cells is independent of secreted extracellular vesicles. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1288

98.

Rosado

Bernardo

Scarsella

Conforti

Giorda

Biagini

Cascioli

Rossi

Guzzo

Vivarelli

Dello Strologo

Emma

Locatelli

Carsetti

Inhibition of B-cell proliferation and antibody production by mesenchymal stromal cells is mediated by T cells. Stem Cells Dev 2014; 24:93–103

99.

Che

Huang

Wang

Liang

Hou

Gilkeson

Sun

Allogenic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation ameliorates nephritis in lupus mice via inhibition of B-cell activation. Cell Transplant 2013; 22:2279–90

100.

Fan

X-L

Zhang

Q-L.

Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2020; 77:2771–94

101.

Musiał-Wysocka

Kot

Majka

The pros and cons of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies. Cell Transplant 2019; 28:801–12

102.

Lee

Jeong

Kim

Jin

Kwon

S-J

Chang

Choi

Yang

Kim

J-S

Jeon

HB.

Low immunogenicity of allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 446:983–89

103.

Inoue

Popp

Koehl

Piso

Schlitt

Geissler

Dahlke

MH.

Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells in a rat organ transplant model. Transplantation 2006; 81:1589–95

104.

Eggenhofer

Steinmann

Renner

Slowik

Piso

Geissler

Schlitt

Dahlke

Popp

FC.

Mesenchymal stem cells together with mycophenolate mofetil inhibit antigen presenting cell and T cell infiltration into allogeneic heart grafts. Transpl Immunol 2011; 24:157–63

105.

Wang

Abarbanell

Herrmann

Weil

Manukyan

Poynter

Meldrum

DR.

TLR4 inhibits mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) STAT3 activation and thereby exerts deleterious effects on MSC-mediated cardioprotection. PloS One 2010; 5:e14206

106.

Raicevic

Rouas

Najar

Stordeur

Id Boufker

Bron

Martiat

Goldman

Nevessignsky

Lagneaux

Inflammation modifies the pattern and the function of toll-like receptors expressed by human mesenchymal stromal cells. Hum Immunol 2010; 71:235–44

107.

DelaRosa

Lombardo

Modulation of adult mesenchymal stem cells activity by toll-like receptors: implications on therapeutic potential. Mediators Inflamm 2010; 2010:865601

108.

Opitz

Litzenburger

Lutz

Lanz

Tritschler

Köppel

Tolosa

Hoberg

Anderl

Aicher

Weller

Wick

Platten

Toll-like receptor engagement enhances the immunosuppressive properties of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by inducing indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 via interferon-β and protein kinase R. Stem Cells 2009; 27:909–19

109.

Pevsner-Fischer

Morad

Cohen-Sfady

Rousso-Noori

Zanin-Zhorov

Cohen

Zipori

Toll-like receptors and their ligands control mesenchymal stem cell functions. Blood 2006; 109:1422–32

110.

Liotta

Angeli

Cosmi

Filì

Manuelli

Frosali

Mazzinghi

Maggi

Pasini

Lisi

Santarlasci

Consoloni

Angelotti

Romagnani

Parronchi

Krampera

Maggi

Romagnani

Annunziato

Toll-like receptors 3 and 4 are expressed by human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and can inhibit their T-cell modulatory activity by impairing notch signaling. Stem Cells 2008; 26:279–89

Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection

Abstract

Keywords

Impact statement

Introduction

Physiological and immunological characteristics of MSCs

Identification of MSCs

Immunological characteristics of MSCs

MSCs alleviate innate immune response of cardiac allografts

MSCs protect cardiac allografts from ischemia-reperfusion injury

MSCs affect maturation and differentiation of dendritic cells

MSCs polarize macrophages to M2 macrophages

MSCs inhibit cytokine production and proliferation of natural killer cells

MSCs alleviate the adaptive immune response of cardiac allografts

The effects of MSCs on T cell activities: MSCs suppress T cell proliferation

MSCs affect the differentiation of CD4+ T cells

MSCs affect the formation and lysis function of CTLs, induce CD8+ regulatory T cells

The effects of MSCs on B cells activities

Challenges for use of MSCs in cell therapy

Conclusions

Footnotes

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

FUNDING

ORCID iD

References

MSCs affect the differentiation of CD4⁺ T cells

MSCs affect the formation and lysis function of CTLs, induce CD8⁺ regulatory T cells