The lack of integrated educational options in many communities suggests the need for continued advocacy efforts with local school districts. The case is made here that parents and professionals working in concert can form a more effective advocacy partnership, particularly when districts present resistance to integrated options. Strategies for obtaining integrated options through advocacy partnerships are suggested, with examples provided. The strategies are drawn from direct experience as well as from recommendations in the professional literature.
BerresM.KnoblockP. (1987). Introduction and perspective. In BerresM.KnoblockP. (Eds.), Program models for mainstreaming: Integrating students with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 1–18). Rockville, MA: Aspen.
2.
BiklenD. (1974). Let our children go: An organizing manual for advocates and parents. Syracuse, NY: Human Policy Press.
3.
BiklenD. (1985). Achieving the complete school: Strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
CertoN.HaringN.YorkR. (Eds.). (1984). Public school integration of severely handicapped students: Rational issues and progressive alternatives. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
Des JardinsC. (1971). How to organize an effective parent/advocacy group and move bureaucracies. Chicago: Coordinating Council for Handicapped Children.
6.
DonnellanA.MirendaP. (1984). Issues related to professional involvement with families of individuals with autism and other severe handicaps. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 16–25.
7.
ForestM. (Ed.). (1984). Education/integration. Downsview, Ontario: G. Alan Roeher Institute.
8.
ForestM. (Ed.). (1987). More integration/education. Downsview, Ontario: G. Alan Roeher Institute.
9.
FredericksB. (1987, June). Back to the future: Integration revisited. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps Newsletter, p. 1.
10.
Hamre-NietupskiS.NietupskiJ. (1981). Integral involvement of severely handicapped students within regular public schools. Journal of The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 30–39.
11.
Hamre-NietupskiS.NietupskiJ. (1985). Taking full advantage of interaction opportunities. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools (pp. 98–112). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
Hamre-NietupskiS.NietupskiJ.MoravecJ.Cantine-StullP.RiehleR. (In preparation). Summer integration: Community recreation integration opportunities for students with moderate/severe disabilities.
13.
HornerR. (1987). Editorial. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 1.
14.
Iowa Department of Public Instruction (1984). Integration strategies for students with moderate and severe handicaps. Des Moines, IA: Author.
15.
KenowitzL.ZweibelS.EdgarE. (1978). Determining the least restrictive educational opportunity for the severely and profoundly handicapped. In HaringN. G.BrickerD. (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped (Vol. 3). Seattle: AAESPH.
16.
McCarthyE.PerrealtW.Jr. (1987). Basic marketing (9th ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
17.
MeyerL.PutnamJ. (in press). Social integration. In Van HasseltV.StrainP.HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental and physical disabilities. New York: Pergamon.
18.
NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.BurgerP.EricksonK. (1987). A principal's role in integrating students with severe handicaps into regular schools. The Illinois Principal, 18, 14–16.
19.
NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.SchuetzG.OckwoodL. (Eds.). (1980). Severely handicapped students in regular schools. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee Public Schools.
20.
RootsK. (1987, February). Where are the services?The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps Newsletter, p. 2.
21.
RuttimanA.ForestM. (1986). With a little help from my friends: The integration facilitator at work. Entourage, 1, 24–33.
22.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1985). Integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
23.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1987, April). Educating all students in regular education. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps Newsletter, p. 7.
24.
StrullyJ. (1986, November). Our children and the regular education classroom: Or why settle for anything less than the best? Paper presented at the convention of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, San Francisco, CA.
25.
StrullyJ. (1987, October). All children can learn together: No more segregation of any kind. Paper presented at the convention of the Iowa Chapter of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Ames, IA.
26.
TaylorS.BiklenD. (1980). Understanding the law: An advocate's guide to the law and developmental disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Developmental Disability Rights Center of the Mental Health Law Project and the Center on Human Policy.
27.
TurnbullH. R. (1986). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (pp. 127–174). Denver, CO: Love.
28.
VincentL.LatenS.SalisburyC.BrownP.BaumgartD. (1981). Family involvement in the educational process of severely handicapped students: State of the art and directions for the future. In WilcoxB.YorkR. (Eds.), Quality educational services for the severely handicapped: The federal investment (pp. 164–179). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education.
