Ergonomics of UAV/UCAV Mission Success: Considerations for Data Link,Control,and Display Issues

Abstract

The United States Armed Forces are turning to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), and their combat-modified counterparts (UCAVs), to support human pilots and improve electronic surveillance and weapons deployment capabilities, particularly for risky suppression of enemy air-defense (SEAD) operations. Successful implementation and integration of UAVs/UCAVs into today's military requires focused attention toward human factors issues to ensure mission success and efficiency. In addition to considerations for satellite links, positive target verification, and assurance of collateral safety prior to weapon(s) launch, a primary concern is how operators interact with the UAV/UCAV system. This paper describes a portion of these concerns by presenting human factors considerations for UAV/UCAV-operator data links, vehicle control, and operator display issues. Relevant empirical findings are reviewed and implications for training and systems design are outlined.

References

Douglass

(2001, June). No pilot required Popular Science, 258(1), 40–44.

Haduch

T. W.

(1993). Operator interaction with unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) (with limited data transmission). In Smith

M. J.

(Vol. Ed.) & G. Salvendy (Series and Vol. Ed.), Advances in human factors/ergonomics: 19A. Human-computer interaction: Applications and case studies (pp. 289–294). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Hancock

P. A.

Scallen

S. F.

(1996). The Future of function allocation Ergonomics in Design, 4(4), 24–29.

Iannotta

(2001, March). UCAVs prepare for battle Aerospace America, 39(3), 28–32.

Jenkins

(1947). The tactual discrimination of shapes for coding aircraft-type controls In Fitts

(Ed.), Psychological research on equipment design (Research Rept. 19). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Army Air Force, Aviation Psychology Program.

Miller

G. A.

(1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information Psychological Review, 63, 81–87.

Scallen

S. F.

Hancock

P. A.

(2001). Implementing adaptive function allocation International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 197–221.

Stuart

M. A.

Sampaio

C. E.

Hendrich

R. C.

Fleming

T. F.

Legendre

A. J.

(1993). Remote operations in the hazardous environment of space. In Smith

M. J.

(Vol. Ed.) & G. Salvendy (Series and Vol. Ed.), Advances in human factors/ergonomics: 19A. Human-computer interaction: Applications and case studies (pp. 295–300). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Wickens

C. D.

(1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.