Visual Entropy Metric Reveals Differences in Drivers' Eye Gaze Complexity across Variations in Age and Subsidiary Task Load

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the global complexity of drivers' eye movement behavior as a function of advanced adult age and variations in information processing resource demands. Global complexity was operationalized using an information theory metric commonly known as entropy. Fourteen young (mean age = 27) and 14 older (mean age = 75) participants drove on a 2-lane rural highway while simultaneously performing a subsidiary loading task designed to increase cognitive demands drawing upon either verbal-memory resources or visual-spatial resources (within the context of Wickens' (1980) multiple resource model of attention). Compared to traditional distributional measures of eye movement behavior such as mean saccade amplitude and fixation dwell time, the entropy measure of global complexity was better able to distinguish between young and old drivers as well as between baseline driving and conditions of high visual-spatial task load. These results strongly suggest that global measures of eye movement behavior hold significant potential for increasing our understanding of the interacting effects of normal adult aging and task-induced cognitive demands within the context of real-world driving.

References

Ball

Owsley

Sloane

M.E.

Roenker

D.L.

Bruni

J.R.

(1993). Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34(11), 3110–3123.

Cerrelli

(1989). Older drivers: The age factor in traffic safety (DOT-HS-807–402). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Donges

(1978). A two-level model of driver steering behavior. Human Factors, 20, 691–707.

Green

(2002). Where do drivers look and for how long? In Dewar

R. E.

Olson

P. L.

(Eds), Human factors in traffic safety. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers and Judges Publishing. (pp. 77–110).

Korteling

J.E.

(1994). Effects of aging, skill modification and demand alternation on multiple task performance, Human Factors 36(1), 27–43.

Leibowitz

H.W.

Owens

D.A.

(1977). Nighttime accidents and selective visual degradation. Science, 197, 422–423.

Owsley

Ball

Sloane

M.E.

Roenker

D.L.

Bruni

J.R.

(1991). Visual-cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychology and Aging, 6(3), 403–415.

Recartes

Nunes

(2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(1), 31–43.

Schieber

Burns

D.M.

Myers

Willan

Gilland

(2004). Legibility and eye fixation patterns while reading highway signs under dynamic driving conditions: Effects of age, luminance and environmental demand. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.

10.

Schieber

(2000). What do driving accident patterns reveal about age-related changes in visual information processing? In Schaie

K. W.

Pietrucha

(Eds.), Mobility and transportation in the elderly. New York: Springer. (pp. 207–211).

11.

Schlorholtz

Schieber

(2006). Assessment of age differences in mental workload while driving using verbal versus visual-spatial subsidiary tasks. 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2378–2382.

12.

Shannon

(1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423; 623–656.

13.

Tole

Stephens

Viraudou

Ephrath

Young

(1983). Visual scanning behavior and pilot workload. NASA CR-3717 Technical Report. Camridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

14.

van der Lubbe

J.C.A.

(1997). Information theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Wickens

C.D.

(1984). Processing resources in attention. In Parasuraman

Davies

(Eds.), Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Zwahlen

H.T.

Schnell

(1998). Driving eye scanning behavior when reading warning signs. In Gale

(Ed.), Vision in Vehicles 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier. (pp. 3–11).