We explore the applications of our conceptualization of human-robot trust and human-automation trust, and develop a theoretical model for wider human-human trust. The exploration of similarities and differences between trust in robots and general automation aid in the establishment of our foundation for this comprehensive model of interpersonal trust. Our proposed model is described and its implications for research, design, and applications in applied behavioral research are adumbrated.
References
1.
BelonaxJ.J.JrNewellS.J.PlankR.E. (2007). The role of purchase importance on buyer perceptions of the trust and expertise components of supplier and salesperson credibility in business-to-business relationships. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(3), 247-258.
2.
BroadbentE. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627-652.
3.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
4.
HancockP. A. (2014). Autobiomimesis: Toward a theory of interfaces. In presentation at 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutoUI 14).
5.
HancockP.A. (2017). Imposing limits on autonomous systems. Ergonomics. In Press.
6.
HancockP.A.BillingsD.R.SchaeferK.E.ChenJ.Y.De VisserE.J.ParasuramanR. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517-527.
7.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
KesslerT.A.MacArthurK.R.HancockP.A. (2017). Mediators of trust in human robot interaction. Submitted.
9.
King-CasasB.TomlinD.AnenC.CamererC.F.QuartzS.R.MontagueP.R. (2005). Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78-83.
10.
LeeJ. D.SeeK. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50-80.
11.
MacArthurK.R.StowersK.HancockP.A. (2016, July). Human-robot interaction: Proximity and speed - Slowly back away from the robot!Proceedings of the 7th International Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Annual Meeting. Springer Publications.
12.
MayerR.C.DavisJ.H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123-136.
13.
MayerR.C.DavisJ.H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
14.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: 39(2), 230-253.
15.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT. B.WickensC. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
16.
RobertsB.W.WaltonK.E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological bulletin, 132(1).
17.
SandersT. (2016). Individual differences in trust towards robotic assistant. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Central Florida.
18.
SchaeferK.E.ChenJ.Y.SzalmaJ.L.HancockP.A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3), 377-400.
19.
SchoormanF.D.MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.
20.
SteinJ.P.OhlerP. (2017). Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind—The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting. Cognition, 160, 43-50.
21.
RiceS. (2009). Examining single-and multiple-process theories of trust in automation. The Journal of general psychology, 136(3), 303-322.
22.
StowersK., (In preparation). The Role of Accounts and Apologies in Mitigating Blame toward Human and Machine Agents. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
23.
StowersK.KasdaglisN.RuppM.ChenJ.BarberD.BarnesM. (2017). Insights into human-agent teaming: Intelligent agent transparency and uncertainty. In Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems (pp. 149-160).
24.
VolanteW.SandersT.DodgeD.YerdonV.HancockP.A. (2016). Specifying influences that mediate trust in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60, 1753-1757.
