Analysis of the Tony!™ Variable Geometry VDT Keyboard

Abstract

This study utilizes a variable geometry keyboard to analyze the optimal configuration for a split QWERTY-type keyboard. The measured criteria were muscle activity as measured by EMG and reported operator discomfort. A variable geometry keyboard, simultaneously adjustable in opening angle (yaw) and lateral angle (roll) was obtained. The upward slope (tilt) was preset at 10%. The study manipulated the keyboard geometry to assess the difference in musculoskeletal activity between using (1) a conventional, flat, linear keyboard; (2) a neutral, undeviated wrist position; and (3) two forearm positions that essentially eliminate pronation. Eight experienced subjects with no prior history of wrist injury or other pathology were tested. EMG activity of four relevant muscle groups was measured on each subject for each of the four keyboard positions. The study suggested an 18° opening angle and a 30°–60° lateral angle as optimal when compared with a flat, standard keyboard (they minimize objective EMG activity and subjective discomfort).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beusen

(1984). Product development of an ergonomic keyboard. Behavior and Information Technology, 3 (4), 387–390.

Gomer

Silverstein

Berg

Lassiter

(1987). Changes in electromyographic activity associated with occupational stress and poor performance in the workplace. Human Factors, 29 (2), 131–143.

Grandjean

(1987). Ergonomics in Computerized Offices. New York: Taylor & Francis (pp.150–154).

Hobday

S.W.

(1988). A keyboard to increase productivity and reduce postural stress. In Aghazadeh

(Ed.), Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors V (pp. 321–330). New York: North-Holland.

Klockenberg

E.A.

(1926). Rationalisierung der Schreibmaschine une ihrer Bedienung (Rationalization of typewriters and their operation). Berlin: Springer.

Kreifeldt

J.G.

Levine

S.L.

Iyengar

Des

(1989). Reduced keyboard designs using disambiguation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 441–444). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Kroemer

K.H.E.

(1972). Human engineering the keyboard. Human Factors, 14 (pp. 51–63).

Lundervolt , (1958). Electromyographic investigations during typewriting. Ergonomics, 1 (pp. 226–233).

Morita

(1989). Development of new keyboard optimized from standpoint of ergonomics. In Smith

M.J.

Salvendy

(Eds.), Work with computers: organizational, management, stress and health aspects (pp. 595–603). New York: Elsevier.

10.

Nakaseko

Grandjean

Hunting

Gierer

(1985). Studies on ergonomically designed alphanumeric keyboards. Human Factors, 27 (2), 175–187.

11.

Zipp

Haider

Halpern

Mainzer

Rohmert

(1981). Untersuchung zur ergonomischen Gestaltung von Tastaturen (Studies on the ergonomic design of keyboards). Zentralblatt fur Arbeitsmedizin, 31, 326–330.