Canadian Sport Policy calls for an increase in the number and diversity of Canadians participating in sport between 2012-2022 (Canadian Sport Policy, 2012). Understanding the determinants of physical activity and sport participation is central to achieving this objective. We estimate double hurdle models to analyze the individual determinants of physical activity in Canada. Separate consideration of participation and time spent decisions is important for untangling the effects of income, age, gender, and family structure on choices. Income is positively associated with participation in swimming, golfing, weight lifting, and running. Time spent walking, exercising at home, golfing, weight lifting, and running decreases with income. Wage rates are generally positively associated with participation and time spent.
AmemiyaT. (1984). Tobit model: A survey.Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3–61.
2.
AnokyeN., PokhrelS., BuxtonM., & Fox-RushbyJ. (2012). The demand for sports and exercise: Results from an illustrative survey.The European Journal of Health Economics, 13, 277–287.
3.
BaliaS., & JonesA. (2008). Mortality, lifestyle and socio-economic status.Journal of Health Economics, 27, 1–26.
4.
BrownH., & RobertsJ. (2011). Exercising choice: The economic determinants of physical activity behaviour of an employed population.Social Science and Medicine, 73, 383–390.
5.
Canadian Sport Policy (2012). Canadian sport policy 2012.Technical report.
6.
ChristianT. J. (2009). Opportunity costs surrounding exercise and dietary behaviors: Quantifying trade-offs between commuting time and health-related activities.Social Science Research Network.
7.
ColleyR. C., GarriguetD., JanssenI., CraigC. L., ClarkeJ., & TremblayM. S. (2011). Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey.Health Rep, 22, 7–14.
8.
ContoyannisP., & JonesA. (2004). Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle.Journal of Health Economics, 23, 965–995.
9.
Costa-FontJ., & GilJ. (2005). Obesity and the incidence of chronic disease in Spain: A seemingly unrelated probit approach. Economics and Human Biology, 3, 188–214.
10.
CraggJ. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods.Econometrica, 39, 829–844.
11.
DohertyA., & ClutterbuckR. (2013). Chapter 24: Canada. In K. Hallmann & K. Petry (Eds.), Comparative sport development: Systems, particiaption and public policy (pp. 323–342). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
DownwardP. (2007). Exploring the economic choice to participate in sport: Results from the 2002 General Household Survey. International Review of Applied Economics, 21, 633–653.
13.
DownwardP., Lera-LopezF., & RasciuteS. (2011). The zero-inflated ordered probit approach to modelling sports participation.Economic Modelling, 28, 2469–2477.
14.
DownwardP., & RiordanJ. (2007). Social interactions and the demand for sport: An economic analysis.Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 518–537.
15.
EberthB., & SmithM. (2010). Modelling the participation decision and duration of sporting activity in Scotland.Economic modelling, 27, 822–834.
16.
EisenbergD., & OkekeE. (2009). Too cold for a jog? Weather, exercise, and socioeconomic status.The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9, 1–30.
17.
FarrellL., & ShieldsM. A. (2002). Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 165, 335–348.
18.
ForrestD., & McHaleI. (2011). Subjective well-being and engagement in sport: Evidence from England. In RodnguezP., KesenneS., & HumphreysB. R. (Eds.), The economics of sport, health and happiness: The promotion of well-being through sporting activities (pp. 184–199). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
19.
GarcıaJ., Lera-LopezF., & SuarezM. (2011). Estimation of a structural model of the determinants of the time spent on physical activity and sport.Journal of Sports Economics, 12, 515–537.
20.
GilmourH. (2007). Physically active Canadians. Technical Report 3. Statistics Canada.
21.
HuangH., & HumphreysB. (2012). Sports participation and happiness: Evidence from US microdata.Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 776–793.
22.
HumphreysB., & RuseskiJ. (2007). Participation in physical activity and government spending on parks and recreation.Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 538–552.
23.
HumphreysB. R., McLeodL., & RuseskiJ. E. (2014). Physical activity and health outcomes: Evidence from Canada. Health Economics, 23, 33–54.
24.
HumphreysB. R., & RuseskiJ. E. (2011). An economic analysis of participation and time spent in physical activity.The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11, 1–47.
25.
JonesA. M. (2000). Health econometrics.Handbook of health economics, 1, 265–344.
26.
KavetsosG. (2011). Physical activity and subjective well-being: An empirical analysis. In RodrıguezP., KesenneS., & HumphreysB. R. (Eds.), The economics of sport, health and happiness: The promotion of well-being through sporting activities (pp. 213–222). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
KosteasV. (2012). The effect of exercise on earnings: Evidence from the NLSY.Journal of Labor Research, 33, 225–250.
28.
Kuvaja-KöllnerV., ValtonenH., KomulainenP., HassinenM., & RauramaaR. (2013). The impact of time cost of physical exercise on health outcomes by older adults: The DR's EXTRA Study.The European Journal of Health Economics, 14, 471–479.
29.
LechnerM. (2009). Long-run labour market and health effects of individual sports activities.Journal of Health Economics, 28, 839–854.
30.
LechnerM., & DownwardP. (2013). Heterogeneous sports participation and labour market outcomes in England. IZA Discussion Paper 7690, Bonn.
31.
Lera-LopezF., & Rapun-GarateM. (2007). The demand for sport: Sport consumption and participation models.Journal of Sport Management, 21, 103–122.
32.
MaruyamaS., & YinQ. (2012). The opportunity cost of exercise: Do higher-earning Australians exercise longer, harder, or both?Health Policy, 106, 187–194.
33.
MeltzerD., & JenaA. (2010). The economics of intense exercise.Journal of Health Economics, 29, 347–352.
34.
PawlowskiT., BreuerC., & LeyvaJ. (2011). Sport opportunities and local well-being: Is sport a local amenity? In RodrıguezP., KesenneS., & HumphreysB. R. (Eds.), The economics of sport, health and happiness: The promotion of well-being through sporting activities (pp. 223–241). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
35.
PawlowskiT., BreuerC., WickerP., & PoupauxS. (2009). Travel time spending behavior in recreational sports—An econometric approach with management implications.European Sport Management Quarterly, 9, 215–242.
36.
PawlowskiT., DownwardP., & Rasciute, S.(2011). Subjective well-beingin European countries on the age-specific impact of physical activity.European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 8, 93–102.
37.
RasciuteS., & DownwardP. (2010). Health or happiness? What is the impact of physical activity on the individual?Kyklos, 63, 256–270.
38.
RuhmC. (2005). Healthy living in hard times.Journal of Health Economics, 24, 341–363.
39.
RuseskiJ., & HumphreysB. (2011). Participation in physical activity and health outcomes: Evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey. In RodrıguezP., KesenneS., & HumphreysB. R. (Eds.), The economics of sport, health and happiness: The promotion of well-being through sporting activities (pp. 7–32). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
40.
RuseskiJ. E., & RazavilarN. (2013). United States. In K. Hallmann & K. Petry (Eds.), Comparative sport development: Systems, participation and public policy (pp. 311–322). New York, NY: Springer.
41.
SariN. (2009). Physical inactivity and its impact on healthcare utilization.Health Economics, 18, 885–901.
42.
SarmaS., DevlinR. A., GillilandJ., CampbellM. K., & ZaricG. S. (2013). The effect of leisure-time physical activity on obesity, diabetes, high bp and heart disease among Canadians: Evidence from 2000/01 to 2005/06. Canadian Centre for Health Economics Working Paper #2013–01.
TremblayM. S., WarburtonD. E., JanssenI., PatersonD. H., LatimerA. E., RhodesR. E., … DuganM. (2011). New Canadian physical activity guidelines.Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 36, 36–46.
