This study, which is a preliminary survey of the Chinese descriptive pivotal construction (D-PVC), focuses primarily on the taxonomy and prototype effects of this construction. In contrast to previous discussions, which have been based on observations from a limited number of examples, this study extracted data from both a large-scale Chinese corpus and Internet sources. In the D-PVC, usually the pivot N (i.e. noun phrase between matrix verb and complement verb) is indefinite. It is often, but not always, preceded by a numeral phrase. Statistically the D-PVC instances in which the pivot N is preceded by a classifier phrase dominate. Particularly, the classifier phrases preceding the pivot N are most often the combination of ‘one’ and a classifier. Based on the semantic properties of the matrix verbs, instances of this construction are classified into nine primary types. The D-PVC instances are prototypically structured and those in which the matrix verbs designate ‘presence’ are the central members. Determined by multiple factors, the non-prototypical instances deviate from the central members in different ways. This indicates that D-PVC instances are semantically related to one another continuously. That the D-PVC permits considerable semantic extension from its prototype characterization accords well with the facts that in modern Mandarin, the D-PVC is productive and capable of encoding a wide range of semantic variations.
AmbridgeBen, & GoldbergAdele E.. 2008. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation.Cognitive Linguistics19.3:357–389.
2.
BlakeBarry J.2001. Case. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BybeeJoan L.2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BybeeJoan L., & EddingtonDavid. 2006. A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’.Language82.2:323–355.
5.
ChaoYuen Ren. 2010. Hanyu Kouyu Yufa [A Grammar of Spoken Chinese], translated by LüShuxiang. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
6.
CroftWilliam. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
FanFanglian. 1963. Cunzaiju [On the existential sentences].Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]1963.5:386–395.
8.
FanXiao. 1996. Sange Pingmian de Yufaguan [The Three-level View of Grammar]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
9.
FisherCynthia, GleitmanHenry, & GleitmanLila R.. 1991. On the semantic content of subcategorization frames.Cognitive Psychology23.3:331–392.
10.
FoleyWilliam A., & Van ValinRobert D.Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GoldbergAdele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GoldbergAdele E.2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
GoldbergAdele E.2009. The nature of generalization in language.Cognitive Linguistics20.1:93–127.
14.
GuYang. 1997. Guanyu cunxian jiegou de lilun tantao [The existential sentences in Chinese].Xiandai Waiyu [Modern Foreign Languages]1997.3:14–25.
15.
HaleKen L., & KeyserSamuel J.. 1987. A view from the middle.Lexicon Project Working Papers10. Cambridge: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
16.
HuangC.-T. James. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness.The Representation of (In)definiteness, ed. by ReulandEric J. & ter MeulenAlice G. B., 226–253. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
LakoffGeorge. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
LambrechtKnud. 1988. There was a farmer had a dog: syntactic amalgams revisited.Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS)14:319–339.
19.
LaPollaRandy J.1995. Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese.Word Order in Discourse, ed. by DowningPamela & NoonanMichael, 297–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20.
LevinBeth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
LiCharles N., & ThompsonSandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
LiZiping. (ed.) 2013. Hanyu Liangci Dacidian [Dictionary of Chinese Classifiers]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Press.
24.
McCawleyJames D.1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, Vol. 1.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
MurphyGreg L.1982. Cue validity and levels of categorization.Psychological Bulletin91.1:174–177.
26.
NieWenlong. 1989. Cunzai he cunzaiju de fenlei [Existence and the categorization of the existential sentences].Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language]1989.2:95–103.
27.
NormanJerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
NosofskyRobert M.1988. Similarity, frequency, and category representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14.1:54–65.
29.
NosofskyRobert M.1992. Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules.From Learning Theory to Connectionist Theory, ed. by HealyAlice F., KosslynStephen M. & ShiffrinRichard M., 149–167. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
PengRui. 2006. The development of Chinese pivotal construction: the perspective of grammaticalization.Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University.
31.
PengRui. 2013. A diachronic construction grammar account of the Chinese cause-complement pivotal construction.Language Sciences40:53–79.
32.
PrinceEllen F.1981. Towards a taxonomy of given/new information.Radical Pragmatics, ed. by ColePeter, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.
33.
RenYing. 2000. Jingtai cunzaiju zhong ‘V le’ dengyu ‘V zhe’ xianxiang jiexi [On the functional interchangibility between V le and V zhe in static existential sentences]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the World]2000.1:28–34.
34.
RoschEleanor. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, ed. by MooreThomas, 111–144. New York: Academic Press.
35.
RoschEleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General104:192–233.
36.
SasseHans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited.Linguistics25.3:511–580.
37.
TanFu. 1993. Covert category change in isolating languages: the case of modern Chinese.Linguistics31.4:737–748.
38.
TangTing-chi. 1999. Hanyu de ‘jianyushi’: jiegou yu gongneng [The pivotal constructions in Chinese: structure and function]. Diwujie Hanyu Yuyanxue Guoji Yantaohui Lunwen Xuanji [The Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics], 87–118. Taipei: Crane.
39.
TaylorJohn R.1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory(2nd edition). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
TaylorJohn R.1998. Syntactic constructions as prototype categories.The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. by TomaselloMichael, 177–202. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
XingXin. 2004. Xiandai Hanyu Jianyushi [Modern Mandarin Pivotal Constructions]. Beijing: Communication University of China Press.
42.
YinHuanxian, & HePing. (eds.) 1991. Xiandai Hanyu Changyong Liangci Cidian [A Dictionary of the Commonly Used Classifiers in Modern Mandarin]. Jinan: Shandong University Press.
43.
ZhangYujin. 2004. Xizhou Hanyu Yufa [Chinese Grammar in Western Zhou Period]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
44.
ZhuDexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
