Background Screening potential participants for clinical trials can be labor-intensive, particularly when using long questionnaires administered by telephone.
Purpose This report describes the development and use of an interactive recruitment website as a supplemental screening strategy for a study using telephone screening interviews.
Methods Female HMO members, aged 40 and older, were recruited for a study testing dietary change interventions. Cohorts of potential participants were identified from electronic membership records every two to four weeks; they were sent a letter describing the study and then contacted by telephone. Those interested in the study were asked to complete a 27-question screening interview focused on dietary habits. After 14 cohorts of women were recruited by this method (n = 4246), a recruitment website was added and an additional 12 cohorts (n = 3000) were contacted. The modified recruitment letter for these later screening cohorts included the website address and a personal password for each woman. The website contained study information, and those who were interested could complete eligibility screening on-line.
Results Proactive participant response (women actively seeking study participation/screening) to the recruitment mailing was 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.6–10.4%) in the cohorts without the website option and 11.5% (CI, 10.4–12.7%) after addition of the website option (P = 0.004). About half of women screened were ineligible for the study, a proportion that did not statistically differ by recruitment method.
Limitations The study population was limited to middle-aged and older female members of a non-profit health plan, so the generalizability of these findings to other populations is unknown. The pre-post design used in this study does not control for possible temporal changes unrelated to the study methods.
Conclusions The addition of the website screening option was associated with a relative 22% increase in recruitment combined with reduced staff time required for screening, thereby increasing screening efficiency. Web-based options for clinical trial recruitment and screening in targeted populations may increase response rates while also reducing staff time.
References
1.
McAlindon T, Formica M, Kabbara K, LaValley M, Lehmer M.Conducting clinical trials over the Internet: feasibility study. Br Med J2003; 327: 484–487.
2.
Marks R, Bristol H, Conlon M, Pepine C.Enhancing clinical trials on the Internet: lessons from INVEST. Clin Cardiol2001; 24(Suppl V): V-17–V-23.
3.
Davis Kirsch SE, Lewis FM.Using the world wide web in health-related intervention research. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing2004; 22: 8–18.
4.
Jacobs BP, Bent S, Tice JA, Blackwell T, Cummings SR.An Internet-based randomized, placebo-controlled trial of kava and valerian for anxiety and insomnia. Medicine2005; 84: 197–207.
5.
Marks L, Power E.Using technology to address recruitment issues in the clinical trial process. Trends in Biotechnology2002; 20: 105–109.
6.
Ehrenberger, H.The E-recruitment of participants for clinical trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research2003; 25: 16–18.
7.
Thompson FE, Subar AF, Smith AF et al. Fruit and vegetable assessment: performance of 2 new short instruments and a food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc2002; 102: 1764–1772.
8.
Bowen A, Williams M, Horvath K.Uning the Internet to recruit rural MSM for HIV risk assessment: sampling issues. AIDS & Behavior2004; 8: 311–319.
9.
Litchfield J, Freeman J, Schou H, Elsley M, Fuller R, Chubb B.Is the future for clinical trials Internet-based? A cluster randomized clinical trial. Clinical Trials2005; 2: 72–79.
10.
Fallows D.How women and men use the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project2005; URL:http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/171/report_display.asp, last accessed 17 June 2006.
11.
Fox S, Madden M.Generations online. Pew Internet & American Life Project2005; URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/170/report_display.asp, last accessed 17 June 2006.
