Coaching supervision has expanded rapidly, yet questions remain regarding how supervision conceptualizes participation, relationality, reflexivity, and knowing within complex coaching systems. While contemporary approaches increasingly acknowledge relational and systemic dimensions, tensions persist between reflexive aspirations and assumptions of supervisory overview, interpretive privilege, and epistemic certainty.
This conceptual paper responds through an interpretive synthesis drawing on systemic psychotherapy, anthropology, relational epistemology, philosophy of language, and sociocultural perspectives on meaning-making. Rather than positioning the supervisor as an external observer of coaching practice, the paper develops a conceptualization of supervision in which the supervisor is understood as an embedded and reflexively implicated participant within recursive relational systems. Five synthetic conceptualizations emerge through the inquiry: recursively generated relationships, co-created meaning, situated participation, the supervisor-in-the-web, and safe uncertainty as an ethical orientation. Collectively, these constructs reframe supervision as a recursively organized, participatory, and ethically situated practice, contributing to ongoing conceptual development within coaching supervision theory.
BachkirovaT. (2021). Supervision for working pluralistically. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 14–26). Open University Press.
2.
BachkirovaT.JacksonP.HennigC.MoralM. (2020). Supervision in coaching: A systematic literature review. International Coaching Psychology Review, 15(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2020.15.2.31
3.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.
4.
BirchD.de HaanE. (2021). Supervising organization consultants. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 278–291). Open University Press.
5.
BoumansM. J.DavisJ. B.MaasH.van den BogaardA. (2016). Kuhn and Lakatos. In DavisJ. B.BoumansM. J.van den BogaardA. (Eds.), Economic methodology: Understanding economics as a science (pp. 103–134). Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BurnhamJ. (1993). Systemic supervision: The evolution of reflexivity in the context of the supervisory relationship. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation & Management, 4, 349–381.
7.
ChiuL. W. Y. (2022). Conceptualising allyship for coaching to promote social change. International Journal of Evidence-based Coaching and Mentoring, 20(S16), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.24384/AJWW-CE78
8.
Dixon-WoodsM.CaversD.AgarwalS.AnnandaleE.ArthurA.HarveyJ.HsuR.KatbamnaS.OlsenR.SmithL.RileyR.SuttonA. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
9.
FatienP. (2024, May 2). Supervising towards epistemic reflexivity [Unpublished keynote presentation]. International Conference on Coaching Supervision. Oxford Brookes University.
10.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
11.
GrayD. E. (2007). Towards a systemic model of coaching supervision: Some lessons from psychotherapeutic and counselling models. Australian Psychologist, 42(4), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060701648191
JacksonP. (2021). Supervision for enhancing reflexivity. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 27–42). Open University Press.
16.
LaneD. A.CavanaghM. (2021). Supervision for working ethically. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 49–64). Open University Press.
17.
LawrenceP. (2021). Supervision for working systemically. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 2–13). Open University Press.
18.
LawrenceP.WhyteA. (2014). What is coaching supervision, and is it important?Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2013.878370
19.
MasonB. (1993). Towards positions of safe uncertainty. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation and Management, 4(3–4), 189–200.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
22.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala.
23.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Beacon Press.
24.
SandbergJ.AlvessonM. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization?Organization, 18(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372151
25.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
26.
ShenkW. R. (1998). Lesslie Newbigin’s contribution to the theology of mission. The Bible in TransMission, 3–6.
27.
ShohetR. (2021). Supervision for working with the self. In BachkirovaT.JacksonP.ClutterbuckD. (Eds.), Coaching and mentoring supervision: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 39–48). Open University Press.
28.
TkachJ. T.DiGirolamoJ. A. (2017). The state and future of coaching supervision. International Coaching Psychology Review, 12(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119656913.ch2
29.
ToddT.StormC. (2014). The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics. McGraw-Hill Education.
van Coller-PeterS.de VriesD. J. A. (2022). Towards building theory on coachee readiness. International Journal of Evidence-Based Coaching and Mentoring, 20(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.24384/HDS1-2J35
