During the last century, a whole new ‘industry’ legitimized its locus as more books and articles in more and more magazines and journals offered more ‘new’ concepts and frameworks for the efficient running of organizations. In the article it is suggested that this management theory industry serves a wider cultural call. According to the interpretation presented, the management theory industry feeding the management wisdom of the efficient running of organizations is serving an internal, therapeutic, mission. In this sense, the thousands of studies and writings on the management and efficient running of organizations can be seen as communication not only to others but also to oneself. It is thus suggested that the idea of autocommunication, introduced by the Soviet semiotic Yuri M. Lotman, can be applied when trying to understand why the management theory industry gains its legitimacy again and again even though the promised fundamental changes and reforms of actual working life have remained modest.
Ahonen, A.2001. Organisation, management and the discourses of progress. Fields, strata and cultural locus of management knowledge: English summary of doctoral dissertation written in Finnish. TurkuSchool of Economics: Turku.
2.
Alvesson, M.1987. Organization theory and technocratic consciousness: Rationality, ideology and quality of work. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
3.
Banner, D.1987. Of paradigm, transformation and organizational effectiveness . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Barnard, C.I. [1938] 1968. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bauman, Z.1992. Intimations of postmodernity. London : Routledge.
6.
Bennis, W., and B. Nanus1985. Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Blyton, P., and P. Turnbull.1992. HRM: Debates, dilemmas and contradictions . In Reassessing Human Resource Management, ed. P. Blyton and P. Turnbull.London: Sage.
8.
Boje, D.M., ed. 1992. Postmodern discourse and change: Part II. Journal of Organization Change Management5(2): 3-69.
9.
Broms, H., and H. Gahmberg.1983. Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly28: 482-495.
10.
Burnham, J.1941. Managerial revolution. London: Indiana University Press.
11.
Burrell, G.1988. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies9: 221-235.
12.
Burrell, G.1994. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The contribution of Jürgen Habermas. Organization Studies15: 1-20.
13.
Burrell, G.1997. Pandemonium: Towards a retro-organization theory. London: Sage.
14.
Carter, C., A. McKinlay, and M. Rowlinson.2002. Introduction: Foucault, management and history. Organization9: 515-526.
15.
Chandler, A.D., Jr.1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
16.
Clark, T., and G. Salaman.1996. The management guru as organizational witchdoctor. Organization3: 85-107.
17.
Clark, T., and G. Salaman.1998. Telling tales: Management gurus’ narratives and the construction of managerial identity. Journal of Management Studies35: 137-161.
18.
Deetz, S.1992. Democracy in an age of corporate colonialization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
Donaldson, L.1995. American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Dreyfus, H.L., and P. Rabinow. [1982] 1983. Michel Foucault. Beoynd structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd edition. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited .
21.
Drucker, P.F.1988. The Coming of The New Organisation. Harvard Business Review66(1): 45-53.
22.
Durkheim, É.1915. The elementary forms of the religious life, trans. J.W. Swain. New York and London: The Free Press.
23.
Eccles, R.G., and N. Nohria.1992. Beyond the hype. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
24.
Etzioni, A.1988. The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. Free Press: New York.
25.
Foucault, M.1974a. The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences . London: Tavistock Publications .
26.
Foucault, M.1974b. The archaeology of knowledge. London : Tavistock Publications.
27.
Foucault, M.1980. Power/Knowledge. Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977 by Michel Foucault, ed. C. Gordon.New York: Harvester Press.
28.
Fukuyama, F.1992. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
29.
Goshal, S., and C.A. Bartlett.1997. The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. New York: Harper.
30.
Guest, D.E.1990. Human resource management and theAmerican dream. Journal of Management Studies27: 377-397.
31.
Habermas, J.1992. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures . Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
Hinings, C.R., S.R. Clegg, J. Child, H. Aldrich, L. Karpik, and L. Donaldson.1988. Offence and defence: A symposium with Hinings, Clegg, Child, Aldrich, Karpik, and Donaldson. Organization Studies9: 1-32.
33.
Jackson, N., and P. Carter.1995. The ‘fact’ of management . Scandinavian Journal of Management11: 197-208.
34.
Jones, C., and S. Böhm.2004. Handle with care. Ephemera4(1): 1-6.
35.
Kallio, T.J., and J. Sandström .2009. Academic writing as autocommunication: The case of doctoral dissertations on CSR. Culture & Organization15(1): 75-87.
36.
Kanter, D., and P. Mirvis.1989. The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Kets de Vries, M.1989. Prisoners of leadership. New York: Wiley.
38.
Kieser, A.1997. Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization4: 49-74.
39.
Knights, D.2002. Writing organizational analysis into Foucault. Organization9: 575-593.
40.
Koontz, H.1961. The management theory jungle. Academy of Management Journal4: 174-188.
41.
Lawler, E.E.1978. The new plant revolution. Organizational Dynamics6(3): 3-12.
42.
Legge, K.1995. Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
43.
Lotman, Y.M.1977. Two models of communication. In Soviet semiotics, ed. D.P. Lucid.London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
44.
Lotman, Y.M.1990. Universe of the mind: a semiotic theory of culture. London: I.B. Tauris.
45.
Lyotard, J.F.1988. The differend: Phrases in dispute, trans. G. Van Den Abbeele . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
Micklethwait, J., and A. Wooldridge.1997. The witch doctors: What the management gurus are saying, why it matters and how to make sense of it. London: Heinemann.
47.
Miller, G.J.1997. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
O’Connor, E.S.1999. The politics of management thought: A case study of the Harvard Business School and the Human Relations School. Academy of Management Review24: 117-131.
49.
Peters, T.J., and R.H. Waterman.1982. In search of excellence: Lessons from American best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.
50.
Pfeffer, J.1994. Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the work force. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
51.
Pfeffer, J.1997. New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
52.
Pinchot, G., and E. Pinchot.1994. The end of bureaucracy & the rise of the intelligent organization. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
53.
Plato.2000. The republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Rabinow, P.1984. Introduction. In The Foucault reader, 2nd edition, ed. P. Rabinow.London: Penguin Books.
55.
Rawls, J.1971. The theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
Rawls, J.1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
57.
Rowlinson, M., and C. Carter.2002. Foucault and history in organization studies. Organization9: 527-547.
58.
Smart, B.1985. Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock.
59.
Townley, B.2002. Managing with modernity. Organization9: 549-573.
60.
Whyte, W.H.1957. The organization man. New York: Doubleday.
