WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling,affiliations,and alignments in multi-unit turns
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2024
WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling,affiliations,and alignments in multi-unit turns
Due to an administrative error, the articles below were accidentally published Online First and in Volume 18 Issue 6 with different DOIs. The Online First versions have been withdrawn.
The correct and citable versions of the articles remain:
Relieu, M. (2024). How Lenny the bot convinces you that he is a person: Storytelling, affiliations, and alignments in multi-unit turns. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241271437
Reineke, S., & Helmer, H. (2024). User practices in dealing with trouble in interactions with virtual assistants in German: Repeating, altering and insisting. Discourse & Communication, 18(6), 942-953. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813241271494
Couper-KuhlenE (2012) Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In: PeräkyläASorjonenML (eds) Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.113–146.
2.
GarfinkelH (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
HeritageJ (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.299–345.
4.
HoltE (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction29(3): 219–245.
5.
HoltE (2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 425–454.
6.
HoltE (2017) Indirect reported speech in Storytelling: Its position, design, and uses. Research in Language and Social Interaction50(2): 171–187.
7.
IvarssonJLindwallO (2023) Suspicious minds: The problem of trust and conversational agents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)32(3): 545–571.
8.
JeffersonG (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: SchenkeinJ (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.219–248.
9.
JeffersonG (2004) A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In LernerGH (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, pp.43–59.
10.
JeffersonGLeeJ R E (1981) The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5): 399–442.
11.
KitzingerCMandelbaumJ (2013) Word Selection and Social Identities in Talk. Communication Monographs80(2): 176–198.
12.
RelieuMSahinMFrancillonA (2020) Une approche configurationnelle des leurres conversationnels (A configurational approach of conversational lures). Réseaux: Communication, technologie, société 220–221(2): 81–111.
13.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
14.
SacksS (1972) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In: SudnowD (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York, NY: Free Press, pp.31–74.
15.
SchegloffEA (1996) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In: FoxB (ed.) Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.437–485.
16.
SchegloffEA (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
SvennevigJ (2004) Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies6(4): 489–516.
18.
WatsonR (1987) Interdisciplinary considerations in the analysis of pro-terms. In: ButtonGLeeJ. (eds) Talk and Social Interaction. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp.261–289.
19.
WooffittR (2001) Raising the dead: Reported speech in medium-sitter interaction. Discourse Studies3(3): 351–374.