Technological changes in securities trading systems over the past decades not only changed the traditional business model in Europe and the U.S., but also put questions to the existing regulatory framework at both sides of the Atlantic. Heterogeneous customer demands for different vectors of services give rise to customised trading platforms. Regulation which forces trading venues into categories with fixed bundles of services is not in line with customer demands and limits innovation in securities trading landscape.
CaseyJ.P.LannooK. (2006), “The MiFID Revolution: A Policy View”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, this issue.
2.
EngelenP.J. (2006), “Changes in the Securities Trading Landscape in Europe and the U.S.”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, this issue.
3.
GentzoglanisA. (2006), “Reg NMS and Competition in the Alternative Trading Systems in the U.S.”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, this issue.
4.
GomberP.GsellM. (2006), “Catching up with technology – The impact of regulatory changes on ECNs/MTFs and the trading venue landscape in Europe”, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, this issue.
5.
HarrisL. (2003). Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners, Oxford University Press, Inc.
6.
KitchE. (1996), “Competition between securities markets: Good or bad?” in OditahFidelis (ed.), The Future for the Securities Market: Legal and Regulatory Aspects, Oxford, Clarendon, 233–241.
7.
KitchE. (2000), “Regulation of the securities market”, in BouckaertB. en De GeestG. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume III, The regulation of contracts, Edward Elgar, p. 813–836.
8.
LevineR. (1997), “Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 35, 688–726.
9.
MaceyJ.KandaH. (1990), “The Stock Exchange as a Firm: The Emergence of Close Substitutes for the New York and Tokyo Stock Exchanges”, Cornell Law Review, vol. 75, 1007.
10.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (1999), “Globalization, Exchange Governance, and the Future of Exchanges”, in LitanR.SantomeroM. (eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, Brookings Institution Press.
11.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (1999), “Regulating Exchanges and Alternative Trading Systems: A Law and Economics Perspective”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 28, 17–54.
12.
MaceyJ.O'HaraM. (2005), “From Markets to Venues: Securities Regulation in an Evolving World”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 58, 563–599.
13.
McAndrewsJ.StefanadisC. (2000), “The Emergence of Electronic Communications Networks in the U.S. Equity Markets”, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 6, no. 12, 1–6.
14.
MertonR.BodieZ. (1995), “A conceptual framework for analyzing the financial environment”, in CraneD. B.MertonR. C.FrootK. A. (eds.), The Global Financial System. A Functional Perspective, Harvard Business School Press, 3–32.
15.
MühlbergerM. (2005), “Alternative Trading Systems: A Catalyst of Change in Securities Trading”, Deutsche Bank Research, no. 47, 1–12.
