THIS ARTICLE EXPLORES PARANTAL and childcare staff perceptions of quality across alternative childcare governance structures in Australia. A total of 21 childcare staff currently working within both ‘non-profit’ and ‘for-profit’ long day care centres were interviewed. In addition, 20 interviews with parents of children attending community-based, independent-private and corporate chain centres were conducted. Significant differences between the quality perceptions of parent and staff cohorts were found. In addition, inter-group differences were also observed. The results tentatively suggest that both parents and staff attach importance to both structural (regulated and flexible) and procedural elements of childcare service delivery—although parental age and caregiver experience appear to moderate the levels of importance assigned to identified quality dimensions.
References
1.
AakerD., KumarA. V., DayG. S., & LawleyM. (2005). Marketing Research: The Pacific Rim Edition. Milton, Queensland: John Wiley and Sons Australia Ltd.
2.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2005). Australia's welfare 2003.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
3.
Bergin-SeersS., & BreenJ. (2002). The performance of long day care centres in rural and remote areas. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(1), 24–32.
4.
CeglowskiD., & BacigalupaC. (2002). Four perspectives on childcare quality. Early Childhood Education, 30(2), 87–92.
5.
CryerD., & BurchinalM. (1997). Parents as child care consumers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 35–58.
6.
da SilvaL., & WiseS. (2006). Parent perspectives on childcare service quality among a culturally diverse sample. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(3), 6–14
7.
Doherty-DerkowskiG. (1995). Quality matters: Excellence in early childhood programs. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.
8.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
9.
EmlenA. C., KorenP. E., & SchultzeK. H. (1999). From a Parent's Point of View: Measuring the Quality of Child Care. Final Report. Portland, OR: Regional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University.
10.
FenechM., SumsionJ., & GoodfellowJ. (2006). The regulatory environment in long day care: A ‘double edged sword’ for early childhood professional practice. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(3), 49–58.
11.
GoodfellowJ. (2005). Market Childcare: Preliminary considerations of a ‘property view’ of the child. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 54–65.
12.
GubriumJ. F., & HolsteinJ. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
13.
HatchJ. A., & GrieshaberS. (2002). Child observation and accountability in early childhood education: Perspectives from Australia and the United States. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(4), 227–231.
14.
JohnsonB. R. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282–292.
15.
KarvelasP. (2007, 3 September). Childcare centres failing on safety. The Australian, p. 3.
16.
KrugerC. (2009, 2 January). Lessons to be learnt from ABC Learning's collapse. Sydney Morning Herald, p.24.
17.
LoveP. E. D., WoodB. M., PickenD., & ConfoyB. (2000). The privatisation of correctional facilities in Australia. Facilities, 18(1–2), 56–65.
18.
McMurrayA. J., PaceR. W., & ScottD. (2004). Research: A commonsense approach.Thompson: Sydney.
19.
NobleK. (2007). Complexities and compromises. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(1), 24–29.
20.
NisbettR. E., & WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.
21.
NylandB. (2001). Child care in Australia: The rights of children and child care workers. The Society for International Development, 44(2), 81–85.
22.
PatakiB., NemethB., BarkanyiM., & KoczkaT. (1998). Observations of mutual benchmarking efforts in Hungary. European Management Journal, 16(4), 485–494.
23.
PhillipsD., MekosD., ScarrS., McCartneyK., & Abbott-ShimM. (1995). Within and beyond the classroom door: Assessing quality in childcare centres. Early Childhood Research Quality, 15(4), 475–496.
24.
PhillipsenL. C., BurchinalM. R., HowesC., & CryerD. (1997). The prediction of process quality from structural features and child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 281–303.
ScarrS., EisenbergM., & Deater-DeckardK. (1994). Measurement of quality in child care centres. Early Research Childhood Quarterly, 9, 131–151.
27.
SimsM. (2003). SUPS workers' perspective of child care quality. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(3), 25–31.
28.
SmithA. (1999). Quality childcare and joint attention. International Journal of Early Years Education, 7(1), 85–98.
29.
SmithA. E., & HumphreysM. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer Concept Mapping. Behaviour Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.
30.
SumsionJ. (2006a). Rereading metaphors as cultural texts: A case study of early childhood teacher attrition. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(3), 67–87.
31.
SumsionJ. (2006b). The corporatisation of Australian childcare. Journal of Early Chilhood Research, 4(2), 99–120.
32.
WhitebrookM., HowesC., & PhillipsD. (1989). Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Final report National Child Care Staffing Study. Oakland: Child Care Employee Project.
33.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
