THIS PAPER REPORTS ON an analysis of teachers' talk of play-based learning and intentional teaching of mathematics. The participants in the study were two early childhood teachers in a pre-Prep program (the year before school). Teachers' talk of how they engaged in the interplay between children's play and the use of intentional teaching practices to introduce mathematics concepts formed the data set to be analysed. Conversational interviews and stimulated recall were used to gather data.
A poststructural analysis of the teachers' talk suggests that socially and culturally constructed ways of being an early childhood teacher are both enabled and constrained by discourses of play and intentional teaching.
References
1.
AilwoodJ. (2003). Governing early childhood education through play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 286–299.
2.
AitkenH., & KennedyA. (2007). Critical issues for the early childhood profession. In KeesingL. & HedgesH. (Eds), Theorising early childhood practice: Emerging dialogues (pp.165-186). Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.
3.
ArthurL., BeecherB., DeathE., DockettS., & FarmerS. (2007). Programming and planning in early childhood settings (4th edn). Southbank, Victoria: Thomson.
4.
BoalerJ. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 1–19.
5.
BodrovaE. (2008). Make-believe play versus academic skills: A Vygotskian approach to today's dilemma of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 16(3), 357–369.
6.
BruceT. (2001). Learning through play: Babies, toddlers and the foundation years.London: Hodder Education.
7.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009a). Being, belonging and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.Canberra: Australian Government.
8.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009b). Draft for trial – Interpreting the Early Years Learning Framework: A guide for educators.Canberra: Australian Government.
9.
EdwardsS., BlaiseM., & HammerM. (2009). Beyond developmentalism? Early childhood teachers' understandings of multiage grouping in early childhood education and care. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 55–63.
10.
EdwardsS., & HammerM., (2006). The foundations of early childhood education: Historically situated practice. In FleerM., EdwardsS., HammerM., KennedyA., RidgwayA., RobbinsJ., & SurmanL. (Eds), Early childhood learning communities: Sociocultural research in practice (pp. 193–208). Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
11.
FoucaultM. (1976/1978). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). London: Allen Lane.
12.
GrieshaberS. (2008). Interrupting stereotypes: Teaching and the education of young children. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 505–518.
13.
HatchJ. A. (2007). Assessing the quality of early childhood qualitative research. In HatchJ. A. (Ed), Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 223–244). New York: Routledge.
14.
HatherleyA., & RichardsonC. (2007). Building connections: Assessment and evaluation revisited. In L. Keesing & H. Hedges (Eds). Theorising early childhood practice: Emerging dialogues (pp. 51–70). Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.
15.
HedgesH. (2000). Teaching in early childhood: Time to merge constructivist views so learning through play equals teaching through play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25(4) 16–21.
16.
HillL., StremmelA., & FuV. (2005). Teaching as inquiry: Rethinking curriculum in early childhood education.Boston: Pearson.
17.
JordanB. (2009). Scaffolding learning and co-constructing understandings. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds), Early childhood education: Society & culture. (2nd edn) (pp. 39–52). LA: Sage.
18.
LangfordR. (2010). Critiquing child-centred pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into the centre of a democratic pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 113–127.
19.
MacmillanA. (2009). Numeracy in early childhood.Oxford Press: Melbourne, Australia.
20.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21.
McArdleF., & McWilliamE. (2005). From balance to blasphemy: Shifting metaphors for researching early childhood education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 323–336.
22.
McLachlanC., FleerM., & EdwardsS. (2010). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation.Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
RyanS. (2005). Freedom to choose: Examining children's experiences in choice time. In YellandN. (Ed), Critical issues in early childhood education (pp. 99–114). New York: Open University Press.
26.
RyanS., & GoffinS. (2008). Missing in action: Teaching in early care and education. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 385–395.
27.
Siraj-BlatchfordI. (2009). Quality teaching in early years. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds), Early childhood education: Society & culture (pp. 147–157). London: Sage.
28.
ThomasL. (2009). Certainties and uncertainities: Ethics and professional identities of early childhood educators. Unpublished PhD Thesis, QUT.
29.
TobinJ. (1995). Post-structural research in early childhood education. In HatchJ. A. (Ed), Qualitative research in early childhood settings (pp. 223–243). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
30.
WarrenE. (2009). Early childhood teachers' professional learning in early algebraic thinking a model that supports new knowledge and pedagogy. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 10, 30–45.
31.
WarrenE., deVriesE., & ThomasL. (2009). Early numeracy in pre-prep settings: Final report. ACU.
32.
WoodE. (2009). Developing a pedagogy of play. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds), Early childhood education: Society & culture (pp. 27–38). London: Sage.
