THE ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OF teachers in designing classroom learning experiences contributes to teacher abilities to facilitate learning. This paper reports on a case study of one Dutch teacher designing a technology-rich learning environment for emergent literacy. Data was collected to explore the design and implementation of the learning environment. The main findings from the design study are that scaffolding teacher design takes mammoth effort; appears to contribute to teacher learning; yields usable products and ownership, both of which seem to contribute to classroom implementation, but also yields products whose subject matter quality is questionable. The pre-post test data from the implementation study indicates that all children working with the intervention exhibited significant learning gains. Based on the findings, it is hypothesised that the high degree of teacher ownership which stems from designing classroom materials positively influences integration of on-computer activities with off-computer classroom activities, and that a high level of integration yields positive influence on pupil learning about the functions of written language. This rich but small-scale study points to the need for more refined understanding of the gap between what teachers have already mastered and what they can achieve when provided with support, when engaging in technology-rich classroom innovation. We therefore call for innovation design to not only meet learner needs, but also to fit explicitly within a teacher's ‘technological zone of proximal development’.
References
1.
Ben-PeretzM. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter.Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
BitnerN., & BitnerJ. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95–100.
3.
BodrovaE. (2008). Make-believe play versus academic skills: a Vygotskian approach to today's dilemma of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(3), 357–369.
4.
BrookerL., & Siraj-BlatchfordJ. (2002). ‘Click on Miaow!’: how children of three and four years experience the nursery computer. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 251–273.
5.
BrunerJ. (1983). Child's Talk.New York: W. W. Norton.
6.
BurnsM., GriffinP., & SnowC. (1999). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children's reading success.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
CampbellA. & ScotellaroG. (2009). Learning with technology for pre-service early childhood teachers. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood34(2), 11–18.
8.
CarlgrenI. (1999). Professionalism and teachers as designers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 43–56.
9.
ClayM. (1966). Emergent Reading Behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
10.
CollinsA., BrownJ., & NewmanS. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In ResnickL. (Ed), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
11.
de HaanD. (2005). Social pretend play: Potentials and limitations for literacy development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 41–55.
12.
de JongM. T., & BusA. G. (2003). How Well Suited are Electronic Books to Supporting Literacy?Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 147–164.
13.
de JongM. T., & BusA. G. (2004). The Efficacy of Electronic Books in Fostering Kindergarten Children's Emergent Story Understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378–393.
14.
De JongT. & PietersJ. (Eds). (2006). The design of powerful learning environments (2nd edn). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
DoeringA., VeletsianosG., ScharberC., & MillerC. (2009). Using the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319–346.
16.
FisherT. (2003). Teacher professional development through curriculum development: teachers' experiences in the field trialling of online curriculum materials. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(3), 329–343.
17.
JusticeL. M., & PullenP. C. (2003). Promising Interventions for Promoting Emergent Literacy Skills: Three Evidence-Based Approaches. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(3), 99–113.
18.
KoehlerM., & MishraP. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, & technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
19.
LabboL., LeuD., KinzerC., TealeW., CammackD., Kara-SoteriouJ., (2003). Teacher wisdom stories: Cautions and recommendations for using computer-related technologies for literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 300–304.
20.
LankshearC., & KnoebelM. (2003). New technologies in early childhood literacy research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59–82.
21.
MacnamaraJ. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 79, 1–12.
22.
MakinL., HaydenJ., & Jones DiazC. (2000). High quality literacy programs in early childhood classrooms: An Australian case study. Childhood Education, 76(6), 368–373.
23.
MakinL., Jones DíazC. & McLaughlanC. (2007). Literacies in childhood: changing views, challenging practice (2nd edn). Sydney: Elsevier.
24.
MakinL., & WhitemanP. (2006). Young children as active participants in the investigation of teaching and learning. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 14(1), 33–41.
25.
McKenneyS. (2005). Technology for Curriculum and Teacher Development: Software to Help Educators Learn while Designing Teacher Guides. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 28(2), 167–190.
26.
McLoughlinC., & OliverR. (1998). Maximising the language and learning link in computer learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 125–136.
27.
MishraP., & KoehlerM. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
28.
MorrowL. (1990). Preparing the classroom environment to promote literacy during play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 537–544.
29.
MoylesJ. (Ed). (2005). The Excellence of Play (2nd edn). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
30.
NeumanS. B., & RoskosK. (2005a). The state of state prekindergarten standards. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(2), 125–145.
31.
NeumanS. B., & RoskosK. (2005b). Whatever happened to developmentally appropriate practice in early literacy?Young Children, 60(4), 22–26.
32.
OlsonJ. (2000). Trojan horse or teacher's pet? Computer and the culture of the school. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 1–8.
33.
PiagetJ. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children.New York: W. W. Norton.
34.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB. (1969). The psychology of the child.New York: Basic Books.
35.
PlowmanL., & StephenC. (2005). Children, play and computers in preschool education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 145–157.
36.
Purcell-GatesV. (2001). Emergent Literacy Is Emerging Knowledge of Written, Not Oral, Language. New directions for child and adolescent development, 92(Summer), 7–22.
37.
ReunamoJ., & NurmilaaksoM. (2007). Vygotsky and agency in language development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(3), 313–327.
38.
RoskosK., & ChristieJ. (2001). Examining the play–literacy interface: A critical review and future directions. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(1), 59–89.
39.
ScardmaliaM., BereiterC., & LamonM. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In McGillyK. (Ed), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
40.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.New York: Basic Books.
41.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
SchönD. (1996). Reflective conversation with materials. In WinogradT., BennettJ., EroungL. & HartfieldB. (Eds), Bringing design to software (pp. 171–184). New York: Addison-Wesley.
43.
SegersE., & VerhoevenL. (2002). Multimedia support of early literacy learning. Computers in Education, 39(3), 207–221.
44.
SegersE., & VerhoevenL. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 17–27.
45.
van OersB. (2007). Helping young children to become literate: the relevance of narrative competence for developmental education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(3), 299–312.
46.
Van ScoterJ. (2008). The Potential of IT to Foster Literacy Development in Kindergarten. In KnezekJ. V. (Ed), International Handbook of Information Technology in Education (pp. 149–161). London: Springer.
47.
VerhoevenL. & ArnoutseC. (Eds). (1999). Tussendoelen beginnende geletterdheid: Een leerlijn voor groep 1 tot en met 3.Nijmegen: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.
48.
VygotskyL. (1962). Thought and language.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
VygotskyL. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.
50.
WarashB., StrongM., & DonohoR. (1999). Approaches to environmental print with young children. In NelsonO. G. & LinekW. M. (Eds), Practical classroom applications of language experience: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 53–58). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51.
WoodE., & AttfieldJ. (2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum.London: Sage.