THE POTENTIAL OF A SOCIOCULTURAL approach for empowering early childhood educators cannot be presumed, and its impact on leadership strategies and literacy teaching may be open to question. This paper reports on research into a professional learning program, the Programa Futuro Infantil Hoy, developed and implemented by a team of Australian early childhood academics in collaboration with Chilean early childhood educators. To contextualise and add meaning to this study in terms of the shifts from teacher-directed, instructional teaching to a child-centred, sociocultural approach, a brief partial account is provided of Chilean early childhood education. Analysis of interview data reveals that the participant early childhood educators changed from heroic leadership to a more distributed leadership role in their pedagogical interactions with children, parents and colleagues. The data analysis indicates changes occurred in the early childhood educators' teaching philosophy, curriculum, teaching strategies and model of literacy teaching.
References
1.
AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (2009) Early childhood education.London: Sage.
2.
AnsteyM. & BullG. (2004). Literacy as social practice. In AnsteyM. & BullG. (eds), The Literacy Labrinth (pp. 55–74). French Forest (NSW): Pearson.
3.
ArthurL., BeecherB., DeathE., DockettS. & FarmerS. (2011). Programming and planning in early childhood settings.Melbourne: Cengage.
DeBarysheB. & GoreckiD. (2007). An experimental validation of a preschool emergent literacy curriculum. Early Education & Development, 18(1), 93–110.
8.
EdwardsS. (2006). Early childhood educators' conceptions of sociocultural theory as an informant to curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Education, 7(3), 238–252.
9.
EdwardsS. (2007). Theoretical transitions and professional learning. NZ Research in Early Childhood Education Journal, 10, 131–144.
10.
EdwardsS. (2009). Early childhood education and care.Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon Press.
FilpJ. (1998). From mutual blame towards trust. Childhood Education, 74(6), 346–350.
13.
FleerM. (2006). The cultural construction of child development. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(2), 127–140.
14.
HarmsT. & CliffordR. (1980). Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scale.New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
HerránC., Gustavo CuadraG., BassiM., LinaresE., CoxC. & CayoJ., (2010). Sector program to strengthen early childhood education (CH-L1022)/ Support for the sector program to strengthen early childhood education (CH-L1055).Santiago, Chile: Inter-American Development Bank.
16.
HoD. (2010). Identifying leadership roles for quality in early childhood education programmes. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 30 September (iFirst), 1–13.
17.
JordanB. (2008). Leadership leading learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 74–86.
18.
JordanB. (2009). Scaffolding learning and co-constructing understandings. In AnningA., CullenJ. & FleerM. (Eds), Early childhood education. (pp. 39–52). London. Sage.
19.
LeithwoodK., MascallB., & StraussT. (2009). New perspectives on an old idea: A short history of the old idea. In LeithwoodK., MascallB. & StraussT. (Eds), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp.1-14). New York: Routledge.
20.
LukeA. (2005). Foreword. In PahlK. & RowsellJ. (Eds), Literacy and Education. (pp. x–xiv). London: Paul Chapman.
21.
NeumannM., HoodM. & NeumannD. (2009). The scaffolding of emergent literacy skills in the home environment: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(4), 313–319.
22.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting Strong 11: Early childhood education and care, Paris. OECD.
23.
ParetteH., QuesenberryA. & BlumC. (2010). Missing the boat with technology usage in early childhood settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 335–343.
24.
SpillaneJ. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150.
25.
SurteesN. (2008). Teachers following children? Heteronormative responses within a discourse of child-centredness and the emergent curriculum. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(3), 10–17.
26.
SwanbornP. (2010). Case Study Research.Los Angeles: Sage.
27.
TimperleyH. (2009). Distributing leadership to improve outcomes for students. In LeithwoodK., MascallB. & StraussT. (Eds), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence (pp.197–222). New York: Routledge.
28.
UmayaharaM. (2006). Early childhood education policies in Chile.Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
29.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2000). Dakar Framework for Action.Paris: Office of the Assistant Director-General for Education.
30.
VillalonM., SuzukiE., HerreraM., & MathiesenM. (2002). Quality of Chilean early childhood education from an international perspective. International Journal of Early Years Education, 10(1), 49–59.
31.
WoodrowC., WangmannJ., & NewmanL. (2008). Informe Primera Etapa-Proyecto Piloto Programa Futuro Infantil Hoy. Penrith, Australia: University of Western Sydney.
