THIS QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY investigates Indian migrant parents' perspectives of early childhood education (ECE) in Melbourne, Australia. The study focuses on exploring parents' understanding of the structure, pedagogy and curriculum practices in early childhood settings. We selected a sample of six Indian parents, who had migrated to Melbourne not more than five years ago and had children attending Australian ECE. To gather their perspectives and experiences, in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted. A framework analysis of the data (Ritchie & Spencer, 1994) points to the preference of Australian ECE to Indian ECE. Their preference of Australian ECE is contingent on curriculum flexibility, opportunity for parent participation and active involvement of children in planning and learning. However, participatants, particularly the mothers, missed the academic aspect of Indian ECE and believed that the Australian curriculum and pedagogy distanced their children from their culture. Based on these findings, we argue for early childhood teachers to include the experiences of Indian migrant parents in their children's ECE in Australia to help sustain purposeful partnerships and incorporate culturally relevant activities into the curriculum.
References
1.
AdamsL. D.,&KirovaA. (Eds). (2007). Global migration and education: Schools, children and families.New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AliA. M. (2008). Loss of parenting self-efficiency among immigrant parents. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(2), 148–160.
BillmanN., GeddesC., &HedgesH. (2005). Teacher-Parent partnerships: Sharing understandings and making changes. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 30(1), 44–48.
5.
BraunV.,&ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
6.
CastlesS.,&MillerM. J. (2003). The age of migration.Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
ChavkinN. F. (1996). Involving migrant families in their children's education: Challenges and opportunities for schools. In FloresJ. L. (Ed), Children of la frontera: Binational efforts to serve Mexican migrant and immigrant students (pp. 325–339). Charleston: Eric, Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
8.
CreswellJ. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
9.
CuckleP. (1996). Children learning to read: exploring home and school relationships. British Educational Journal, 2(1), 17–32.
10.
DeepakA. C. (2005). Parenting and the process of migration: Possibilities within South Asian families. Child Welfare, 84(5), 585–605.
11.
DenzinN. K.,&LincolnY. S. (Eds). (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.California: Sage Publications.
12.
DominaT. (2005). Levelling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78(3), 233–249.
EdwardsP. (2003). Children's literacy development: Making it happen through school, family and community involvement.Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
15.
ElliottR. (2005). Engaging families: Building strong communication (Vol. 12). Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.
16.
FleerM.,&RichardsonC. (2009). Cultural-historical assessment: Mapping the transformation of understanding. In AnningA., CullenJ.&FleerM. (Eds), Early Childhood Education: Society and Culture (pp. 130–144). Los Angeles, London: Sage.
17.
GreenC. L.,&Hoover-DempseyK. V. (2007). Why do parents homeschool? A systematic examination of parental involvement. Education and Urban Society, 39(2), 264–285.
18.
GuptaA. (2001). Implementing change at the pre-primary level in school in India. International Journal of Early Childhood, 33(1), 34–42.
19.
HillN. E.,&TaylorL. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children's academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164.
20.
HughesP.,&MacNaughtonG. (1999). Who's the expert: Reconceptualizing parent-staff relations in early education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 24(4), 27–32.
21.
HungC. L. (2005). Family background, parental involvement and environmental influences on Taiwanese children. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 261–276.
22.
Huss-KeelerR. (1997). Teacher perception of ethnic and linguistic minority parental involvement and its relationship to children's language and literacy learning: A case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 171–182.
23.
IhmeidehF., KhasawnehS., MahfouzS., &KhawaldehM. (2008). The new workforce generation: Understanding the problems facing parental involvement in Jordanian kindergartens. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(2), 161–172.
JoshiA.,&TaylorA. (2005). Perceptions of early childhood teachers and parents of teacher-parent interactions in an Indian context. Early Child Development and Care, 175(4), 343–359.
26.
KvaleS.,&BrinkmannS. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
27.
LitchmanM. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide.United States of America: Sage Publications Ltd.
28.
LopezG. R., ScribnerJ. D.,&MahitivanichchaK. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 253–288.
29.
LuchtenbergS. (Ed). (2004). Migration, education and change.London: Routledge.
30.
LynchJ., AndersonJ., AndersonA., &ShapiroJ. (2006). Parents' beliefs about young children's literacy development and parent's literacy behaviours. Reading Psychology, 27(1), 1–20.
31.
McBrideB. A., Justin DyerW., LiuY., BrownG. L.,&HongS. (2009). The differential impact of early father and mother involvement on later student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 498–508.
32.
PunchK. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative&qualitative approaches.Great Britain: Sage Publications Ltd.
33.
QinD. B. (2008). Doing well vs. feeling well: Understanding family dynamics and the psychological adjustment of Chinese immigrant adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 22–35.
34.
RitchieJ&SpencerL. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In BrymanA. and BurgessR. G. (Eds), Analyzing Qualitative Data (pp. 173–194). London: Routtedge.
35.
RothW. M.,&LeeY. J. (2007). ‘Vygotsky's neglected legacy’: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.
36.
SchwandtT. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In DenzinN. K.&LincolnY. S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 189- 213). Thousand Oaks: Sage
37.
SeitsingerA. M., FelnerR. D., BrandS.,&BurnsA. (2008). A large-scale examination of the nature and efficiency of teachers' practices to engage parents: Assessment, parental contact, and student-level impact. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 477–505.
38.
SharpeP. (1991). Parental involvement in preschools: Parents' and teachers' perceptions of roles. Early Child Development and Care, 71(1), 53–62.
39.
StakeR. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.&LincolnY. S. (Eds), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 443–466). United States of America: Sage Publications.
40.
Suarez-OrozcoC.,&Suarez-OrozcoM. (2001). Children of immigration (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
41.
TheodorouE. (2008). Just how involved is ‘involved’? Rethinking parental involvement through exploring teachers' perceptions of immigrant families' school involvement in Cyprus. Ethnography and Education, 3(3), 253–269.
42.
TurneyK.,&KaoG. (2009). Barriers to school involvement: Are immigrant parents disadvantaged?Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 257–270.
43.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
44.
WaandersC., MendezJ. L.,&DownerJ. T. (2007). Parent characteristics, economic stress and neighbourhood context as predictors of parent involvement in preschool children's education. Journal of Psychology, 45, 619–636.
