THIS STUDY ASSESSED THE effects of contextual factors embedded in stories on children's conception of the fair allocation of resources. Previous studies on children's concept of distributive justice led to the conclusion that preschool children use only the equality rule to allocate resources among recipients and are unable to use the equity rule to reward effort or task performance. We hypothesised that children's allocation decisions can include an equity rule, depending on the context of resource allocation. Five-year-olds' allocation decisions varied with contextual factors, supporting the view that cognitive development takes place in context. They used the equity rule more in the family context and preferred the equality rule in the school context. Implications for classroom practice are discussed.
References
1.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AndersonN. H., & ButzinC. A. (1978). Integration theory applied to children's judgments of equity. Developmental Psychology, 14(6), 593–606.
3.
BaumardN., MascaroO., & ChevallierC. (2012). Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 492–498.
4.
CarlessD., & LamR. (2012). The examined life: Perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.689988
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
Curriculum Development Council. (2006). Guide to the pre-primary curriculum.Hong Kong: Author.
8.
DamonW. (1980). Patterns of change in children's social reasoning: A two-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 51(4), 1010–1017.
9.
DeutschM. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.
10.
FieldA., & MilesJ. (2010). Discovering statistics using ASA.London, UK: Sage.
11.
GardnerH. (2006). Multiple intelligence: New horizons in theory.New York, NY: Basic books.
12.
GreenV. A., CillessenA. H. N., RechisR., PattersonM. M., & HughesJ. M. (2008). Social problem solving and strategy use in young children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(1), 92–112.
13.
HamannK., WarnekenF., GreenbergJ. R., & TomaselloM. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328–331.
14.
HuntsingerC. S., & JoseP. E. (2009). Parental involvement in children's schooling: Different meanings in different cultures. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(4), 398–410.
15.
JohanssonE. (2009). The preschool child of today—The world-citizen of tomorrow?International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 79–95.
16.
LiJ. (2004). “I learn and I grow big”: Chinese preschoolers' purposes for learning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 116–128.
17.
MillerN. (2011). Korean children's cultural adjustment during transition to the early years of school in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 10–18.
18.
NielsenM., & BlankC. (2011). Imitation in young children: When who gets copied is more important than what gets copied. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1050–53.
19.
OpperS. (1992). Hong Kong's young children: Their preschools and families.Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
20.
PeersI. (1996). Statistical analysis for education and psychology researchers.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
21.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgement of the child.New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
RambuschJ., & SusiT. (2008). Situated play. In Hardy-ValléeB. & PayetteN. (Eds.), Beyond the brain: Embodied, situated and distributed cognition (pp. 215–226). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
23.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24.
SaltzsteinH. D., RoazziA., & DiasM. G. (2003). The moral choices children attribute to adults and to peers: Implications for moral acquisition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(3), 295–307.
25.
SanagavarapuP. (2010). What does cultural globalisation mean for parenting in immigrant families in the 21st century?Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(2), 36–42.
26.
SharpeP. (2002). Preparing for primary school in Singapore—Aspects of adjustment to the more formal demands of primary one mathematics syllabus. Early Child Development and Care, 172(4), 329–335.
27.
SimsM. (2009). Neurobiology and child development: Challenging current interpretation and policy implications. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(1), 36–42.
28.
SinghR., ChongS. S. K., LeowH. C., & TanR. C. H. (2002). Cognitive and social effects in allocation behaviour: A new view on loci of developmental differences. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 21–47.
29.
WarnekenF., LohseK., MelisA. P., & TomaselloM. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological Science, 22, 267–273.
30.
WatkinsD. A., & BiggsJ. B. (Eds.) (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press
31.
WongM., & NunesT. (2003). Hong Kong children's concept of distributive justice. Early Child Development and Care, 173(1), 119–129.
32.
WongM. (2010). Care-based and justice-based morality in preschool. The International Journal of Learning, 17(9), 271–284.
33.
WongN. C. (2003). A study of children's difficulties in transition to school in Hong Kong. Early Child Development and Care, 173(1), 83–96.
34.
WuP., RobinsonC. C., YangC., HartC. H., OlsenS. F., PorterC. L., & WuX. (2002). Similarities and differences in mothers' parenting of preschoolers in China and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(6), 481–491.
35.
ZajdaJ. (2011). Globalization and schooling: Equity and access issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 143–152.
