The Tea-Steeping Metaphor: Origin,Application,Advantages,Disadvantages,and Impact on Forensic Medicine Teaching

Abstract

Modern medical education increasingly emphasizes deep learning, professional identity formation (PIF), and longitudinal competency development. The tea-steeping metaphor, drawn from the gradual infusion process of tea leaves into water, offers a novel lens to conceptualize immersive and time-dependent learning. This metaphor holds particular relevance in forensic medicine, where learners must develop a nuanced understanding of medico-legal principles, ethical reasoning, and procedural competence over time. Objective of this article is to explore the origin, educational applications, benefits, limitations, and practical impact of the tea-steeping metaphor in the context of forensic medicine teaching. A narrative review methodology was employed, integrating theoretical frameworks from constructivist learning, competency-based education, and experiential learning. Real-world applications in forensic education were examined, including longitudinal case-based learning, simulation-based training, reflective practice, and PIF. The tea-steeping metaphor supports gradual cognitive and affective skill development by allowing learners to process complex information over time and within context. In forensic medicine, this approach enhances critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and integration of theory with practice. Benefits include promotion of deep learning, reflective practice, and adaptability. However, challenges such as time constraints, potential information overload, and the need for optimal learning conditions limit its universal applicability. The tea-steeping metaphor provides a valuable pedagogical framework for forensic medicine education. When implemented strategically, it can foster immersive, reflective, and ethically grounded learning experiences. Further research is warranted to assess its longitudinal outcomes and adaptability across diverse educational contexts.

Keywords

tea-steeping metaphor forensic medicine education competency-based learning reflective practice simulation-based training case-based learning professional identity formation medical education theory

Introduction

In contemporary medical education, the shift from rote memorization to competency-based, reflective, and experiential learning has driven educators to adopt innovative metaphors and models that facilitate deeper cognitive engagement and professional development. One such emerging pedagogical framework is the tea-steeping metaphor, which analogizes the learning process to the gradual infusion of tea leaves in water—emphasizing the importance of time, environmental conditions, and steady immersion for optimal flavor, or in this case, understanding and skill acquisition.^1,2

The tea-steeping metaphor underscores several key principles of effective education: learning takes time, must occur in supportive and enriched environments, and often requires incremental exposure to complex ideas before integration is complete. It critiques surface-level, time-constrained learning models, instead favoring depth over breadth, and quality over quantity. These ideals are well-aligned with constructivist and experiential learning theories, where learners build meaning through active engagement and reflection.^3,4 By allowing knowledge and experiences to percolate gradually, this metaphor fosters a deeper, more authentic learning experience that resonates with learners across disciplines.

In the field of forensic medicine, where cognitive complexity, legal accountability, and emotional resilience intersect, the tea-steeping metaphor offers a particularly powerful conceptual lens. The discipline demands not only factual knowledge but also ethical judgment, procedural competence, and professional identity—qualities that cannot be cultivated through hurried instruction or episodic exposure alone.⁵ As such, the metaphor provides a useful framework for designing pedagogical strategies that foster longitudinal learning, reflective practice, and scaffolded professional growth.

Despite its intuitive appeal, the tea-steeping metaphor remains under-theorized in medical education literature, particularly in specialized disciplines such as forensic medicine. This article aims to address that gap by exploring the origin, educational applications, advantages, and disadvantages of the tea-steeping metaphor, with a specific focus on its impact on forensic medicine teaching. By drawing upon both educational theory and practical examples, the discussion seeks to illuminate how this metaphor can guide curriculum development, teaching methods, and learner assessment in this unique and challenging field.

Origin of the Tea-Steeping Metaphor

The “tea-steeping metaphor” originates from a universally familiar process—brewing tea—where the infusion of flavor, color, and aroma is directly influenced by the duration of steeping and the conditions in which it occurs. This analogy has been increasingly embraced in educational literature to illustrate the pedagogical necessity of allowing learners adequate time and appropriate contexts to achieve deep, meaningful learning. The metaphor emphasizes that just as tea leaves gradually infuse water to create a robust brew, learners too require sustained engagement within conducive environments to fully internalize, reflect upon, and apply new knowledge.

The metaphor aligns with constructivist principles, particularly those proposed by Vygotsky, who stressed the importance of socio-cultural context and the gradual development of understanding through guided participation and scaffolding within the learner's zone of proximal development (ZPD).⁶ In this context, “steeping” symbolizes the learner's immersion in an educational environment rich in interaction, reflection, and contextual relevance. It posits that knowledge acquisition is not instantaneous but requires immersion, reflection, and repeated exposure, akin to how steeping tea involves time and temperature to elicit its full essence.

Originally invoked more colloquially in teacher training discussions and reflective teaching practices, the metaphor has gained theoretical footing within the broader discourse of experiential and transformative learning. Educators have used it to critique surface learning models that favor rapid content delivery and immediate performance assessments over deeper cognitive and affective engagement.⁷ As such, the tea-steeping metaphor has become a symbolic narrative supporting the argument for longitudinal exposure, especially in fields that demand professional identity formation (PIF) and ethical maturity, such as medicine and forensic sciences.⁸

In medical education, this metaphor has been utilized to advocate for longitudinal integrated clerkships, where students are embedded in clinical environments over extended periods, allowing for continuity, patient follow-up, and progressive responsibility—factors that contribute to deeper learning and professional enculturation.⁹ By extension, in forensic medicine education, the metaphor underscores the value of immersive experiences in medico-legal autopsies, courtroom observations, and real-time documentation, which cannot be adequately cultivated in fragmented, time-constrained instructional models.

The tea-steeping metaphor thus serves as a pedagogically rich analogy that highlights the temporal and environmental dimensions of effective learning. It suggests that educational outcomes improve not merely with curriculum content, but through strategic exposure, mentorship, and time for reflection—elements crucial for forming the cognitive frameworks and ethical dispositions expected of future forensic professionals.

Application of the Tea-Steeping Metaphor in Forensic Medicine Education

The “tea-steeping metaphor” offers a pedagogical lens through which the processes of deep, integrative learning can be understood and optimized, particularly in complex, multidisciplinary domains like forensic medicine. Rooted in the notion that learning—much like steeping tea—requires time, immersion, and an appropriate context to reach its full potential, this metaphor provides a valuable framework for the design and implementation of medical curricula. In forensic medicine, where learners must assimilate biological sciences, legal doctrines, ethical principles, and observational acuity, the metaphor underscores the importance of gradual, reflective, and contextually rich educational strategies.

Gradual Learning in Forensic Pathology

Forensic pathology is a cognitively demanding field that blends medical expertise with legal acumen. The tea-steeping metaphor supports educational models that prioritize progressive and cumulative learning, beginning with basic anatomical and physiological knowledge and evolving into complex diagnostic, interpretive, and medico-legal reasoning skills. This approach mirrors Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, in which knowledge acquisition transitions from recall to comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.¹⁰

Instead of short, discrete learning sessions that promote rote memorization, the steeping approach advocates for longitudinal exposure to forensic themes across the curriculum. For instance, a student initially learns gross anatomy, which is then contextualized through clinical forensic pathology modules involving real or simulated autopsies. As they progress, learners encounter advanced concepts such as estimation of post-mortem interval, injury interpretation, and toxicological analysis, culminating in complex integrative tasks such as drafting medico-legal reports or testifying in moot court simulations. This scaffolded educational trajectory ensures that students do not merely accumulate facts but develop a deep, conceptual understanding of forensic principles through continuous reinforcement and contextual learning.^11,12

Moreover, this longitudinal exposure is consistent with experiential learning theory, where learners cycle through concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation.¹³ The metaphor thus supports immersive curricular strategies such as longitudinal integrated forensic clerkships, elective autopsy rotations, and crime scene visits that offer the “hot water” needed for students to steep fully in forensic practice over time.

Reflective Practice in Forensic Training

The tea-steeping metaphor also emphasizes the importance of reflection—a key component in developing professional competence and identity. In the context of forensic medicine, reflective practice is critical for processing emotionally charged experiences such as viewing post-mortem examinations, documenting injuries in survivors of trauma, or attending legal proceedings.

Regular, structured reflective sessions encourage learners to evaluate their experiences, identify gaps in understanding, and align their learning with ethical and professional standards. This is supported by Schön's concept of the “reflective practitioner,” which posits that professional expertise arises from a cyclical process of reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action.¹⁴

Educational strategies that embody this approach include reflective journaling, group debriefings, and case-based learning (CBL) discussions, where students articulate their interpretations and reactions to forensic cases. For example, after observing an autopsy, students may be asked to reflect on how the findings correlate with the known clinical history, legal implications, and emotional reactions they experienced. This iterative process fosters critical thinking, ethical sensitivity, and emotional resilience, which are indispensable qualities in forensic practice.¹⁵

Integrating the Metaphor into Curricular Design

Beyond individual strategies, the tea-steeping metaphor can inform broader curricular philosophies. Educators are encouraged to move away from fragmented, assessment-heavy models toward curricula that privilege depth over breadth, continuity over disjunction, and meaning-making over information delivery. In forensic medicine education, this might translate to designing competency-based learning pathways that emphasize longitudinal mentoring, exposure to diverse case types, and sustained clinical responsibilities.

Furthermore, applying this metaphor aligns with Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), which assess a learner's readiness for unsupervised practice based on observation over time. Here, learners are “steeped” in real-life contexts until they demonstrate sufficient mastery and judgment to be entrusted with specific forensic responsibilities.¹⁶

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Tea-Steeping Metaphor in Forensic Medicine Education

The tea-steeping metaphor has gained traction in educational theory for its ability to convey the importance of gradual, reflective, and immersive learning. Its analogy to the process of tea infusion—where depth, quality, and flavor emerge over time under suitable conditions—offers a compelling model for developing curriculum in complex fields like forensic medicine. However, while the metaphor is pedagogically rich, it is not without limitations. A critical analysis of its strengths and challenges is essential for its effective implementation in medical education.

Advantages

Encourages Deep Learning

The metaphor inherently supports deep learning, which focuses on the meaningful integration of concepts rather than superficial memorization. In forensic medicine, where the interplay between medical, legal, and ethical dimensions is intricate, deep learning is essential for cultivating critical thinking and professional reasoning. This aligns with Marton and Säljö's distinction between deep and surface learning, with the former producing more lasting and transferable knowledge.⁷ When students are given time to “steep,” they can engage more fully with complex case scenarios, legal frameworks, and ethical dilemmas, fostering the development of integrated cognitive schemas.

Supports Patience and Persistence

In traditional educational environments, learners often experience pressure to rapidly acquire competencies within tight timelines. The tea-steeping metaphor counters this by emphasizing the value of patience and sustained engagement. This perspective encourages a culture where learning is seen as a developmental journey rather than a race to completion. Students who are struggling are given the reassurance that mastery takes time, which can promote persistence and reduce academic anxiety—a factor that is increasingly recognized in enhancing learner well-being.^17,18

Promotes Reflective Practice

Reflection is a key driver of PIF, especially in emotionally and ethically challenging disciplines like forensic medicine. The metaphor naturally accommodates reflective practice by implying that learning outcomes are not immediate but require time for synthesis. This is consistent with Kolb's experiential learning cycle, where reflection is central to transforming experience into knowledge.¹³ Structured reflection in the form of debriefings, case discussions, or learning portfolios can help students internalize lessons from medico-legal cases and improve their ethical reasoning and clinical judgment.¹⁵

High Adaptability Across Contexts

Strength of the tea-steeping metaphor is its versatility. It can be adapted across disciplines, teaching formats, and learner levels. In forensic education, it is equally applicable in anatomy labs, autopsy rooms, courtroom simulations, and interdisciplinary case conferences. Its flexibility makes it a useful curricular design tool for both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, as well as for continuing medical education. This adaptability aligns with principles of adult learning theory, which emphasize the need for context-relevant, self-directed, and experiential learning opportunities.¹⁹

Disadvantages

Time-Intensive Nature

While the metaphor promotes quality learning, it can be resource and time-intensive. Modern medical curricula are often constrained by regulatory requirements, assessment schedules, and administrative pressures to cover broad content within limited timeframes. Implementing a tea-steeping model may clash with these structural realities, potentially leading to tension between ideal educational approaches and practical feasibility.²⁰ Moreover, faculty availability for longitudinal mentorship—essential for the success of this model—may be limited.

Risk of Over-Saturation

Just as tea can become over-steeped, there exists a potential for cognitive overload if students are exposed to excessive or poorly structured information without adequate intervals for rest, reflection, and integration. Without careful planning, the metaphorical “infusion” of knowledge can turn into over-saturation, leading to confusion, fatigue, or disengagement. Cognitive load theory warns against exceeding the working memory capacity of learners, emphasizing the importance of balanced instructional design.²¹

Dependence on Optimal Learning Conditions

The effectiveness of the tea-steeping model hinges on favorable learning environments, including access to supportive mentors, protected learning time, and psychologically safe spaces for reflection and discussion. In settings where these are absent—due to faculty shortages, hierarchical structures, or limited infrastructural support—the intended benefits may not materialize. Vygotsky's theory of the ZPD stresses the importance of scaffolding by more knowledgeable others, a condition that may be difficult to ensure consistently across institutions.⁶

Impact of the Tea-Steeping Metaphor on Forensic Medicine Teaching

The tea-steeping metaphor, which symbolizes the importance of time, depth, and context in the educational process, can significantly reshape forensic medicine teaching. In a domain characterized by complex, multidisciplinary content and high emotional stakes, this metaphor offers a conceptual framework for cultivating progressive learning, PIF, and long-term competence. When applied intentionally, it can transform both curriculum design and pedagogical practice, fostering immersive and integrative educational experiences.

Case-Based Learning: Longitudinal Immersion in Medico-Legal Complexity

One of the most effective applications of the tea-steeping metaphor in forensic medicine is through longitudinal CBL. Traditional CBL approaches often compartmentalize cases into isolated learning events. However, aligning with the metaphor, educators can design extended case trajectories that allow learners to follow medico-legal cases from the initial scene investigation to autopsy, documentation, reporting, courtroom testimony, and even the post-judgment reflection phase.

This longitudinal exposure provides the “slow steeping” necessary to appreciate the continuity, ethical dilemmas, and legal ramifications that unfold over time. Such integration promotes clinical reasoning, interdisciplinary communication, and ethical sensitivity, all of which are essential competencies in forensic practice. A study by Thistlethwaite, et al emphasized that longitudinal exposure to complex cases enhances diagnostic accuracy, learner engagement, and inter-professional understanding.²² By following real or simulated cases across a temporal arc, learners can develop a mature, systems-oriented perspective—akin to how a rich, well-steeped tea acquires layered flavors over time.

Simulation-Based Training: Scaffolded Immersion and Skill Development

Simulation-based training in forensic medicine can greatly benefit from the tea-steeping approach by gradually escalating complexity and fostering cognitive and procedural resilience. Rather than exposing students to high-stakes simulations early on, educators can design scaffolded simulations that allow learners to develop core competencies incrementally.

For example, early-stage simulations might focus on simple procedural skills such as scene preservation, documentation, and evidence labeling. As learners “steep” in foundational knowledge and gain confidence, more advanced simulations can be introduced, encompassing interdisciplinary collaboration, legal questioning, and ethical decision-making. This phased progression mirrors Vygotsky's ZPD, where learners benefit most from tasks that challenge but do not overwhelm them, with proper scaffolding provided by mentors.⁶

Simulation studies have shown that repeated, structured exposure over time enhances skill retention, situational awareness, and emotional preparedness, especially in high-pressure fields like forensic medicine.^23,24 This gradual enrichment supports competency-based medical education (CBME), where the focus is not only on knowledge acquisition but also on EPAs that require judgment, reliability, and integration of knowledge.²⁵

Enhanced Professional Identity Formation

The slow infusion of knowledge and values over time, as implied by the tea-steeping metaphor, also contributes to PIF in forensic medicine. Students are not merely learning procedural tasks; they are becoming forensic physicians—professionals entrusted with the ethical and scientific interpretation of death, trauma, and legal responsibility.

When learners are given time to process emotionally intense cases, reflect on their reactions, and see how their actions impact legal outcomes, they develop a deep-seated sense of responsibility and ethical awareness. Cruess et al describe PIF as a dynamic process involving internalization of values, behaviors, and roles, best supported by mentorship, reflection, and continuity of experience.²⁶ This transformation is not instantaneous but occurs slowly—like tea leaves infusing hot water under optimal conditions.

Promoting Assessment for Learning

Traditional assessments in forensic medicine often focus on rote recall or short-term performance. The tea-steeping approach, however, supports formative, reflective, and developmental assessments, where feedback becomes part of the learning journey. Portfolios, longitudinal feedback, and narrative evaluations allow learners to track their growth over time and reflect on the integration of technical skills with ethical decision-making.

Assessment models like programmatic assessment, which emphasize multiple low-stakes assessments over time, align well with the metaphor and have been shown to improve learner engagement and competency development.²⁷ In forensic education, this might include cumulative evaluations from autopsy observations, medico-legal report drafting, peer review of courtroom testimony simulations, and faculty feedback on inter-professional collaboration.

Discussion

The tea-steeping metaphor offers an intellectually and pedagogically robust framework for reimagining forensic medicine education. Its core premise—that time, immersion, and contextual richness are essential for meaningful learning—resonates with several established educational theories, including constructivism, experiential learning, transformative learning, and adult learning theory. By drawing parallels between the gradual diffusion of flavor in tea and the slow, reflective acquisition of professional competencies, this metaphor captures the essence of deep, integrative education in a complex domain such as forensic medicine.

Aligning with Competency-Based Medical Education

Forensic medicine, situated at the intersection of law, ethics, and medical science, demands more than technical acumen; it requires interpretive judgment, emotional resilience, and professional maturity. The shift from time-bound educational frameworks to CBME aligns seamlessly with the tea-steeping metaphor, which promotes learning as a cumulative and reflective journey rather than a race to meet predefined checkpoints. The CBME model emphasizes “readiness for responsibility” over mere time spent in training—an idea embodied in EPAs, where learners are entrusted with tasks based on observed competencies developed over time (not merely curriculum completion).¹⁶

Enhancing Reflective Capacity and Ethical Reasoning

One of the most compelling contributions of the tea-steeping metaphor is its support for reflective practice—an indispensable skill in forensic medicine. Reflection enables learners to navigate the emotional and ethical complexities inherent in activities such as autopsies, injury documentation, or court testimonies. The metaphor normalizes the notion that such understanding cannot be rushed and must be revisited repeatedly, aligning with Kolb's experiential learning cycle.¹³ Reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action processes, as described by Schön, are made more effective when learners are given time to synthesize experiences within safe and supportive environments.¹⁴

Impact on Professional Identity Formation

PIF is increasingly recognized as a fundamental outcome of medical education. The metaphorical “steeping” process allows for the internalization of forensic medicine's values, norms, and expectations. As learners move from peripheral observation to active participation, and eventually to autonomous responsibility, they gradually absorb the ethos of the forensic profession.²⁶ This aligns with theories of legitimate peripheral participation and social enculturation, emphasizing that learners evolve into professionals through long-term exposure and situated learning within communities of practice.

Addressing Cognitive Load and Over-Saturation

Despite its advantages, the metaphor is not without critique. Just as over-steeped tea becomes bitter and overwhelming, poorly designed learning environments can lead to cognitive overload. Cognitive load theory cautions against overburdening the learner's working memory with excessive or disorganized information.¹⁶ The metaphor thus mandates careful instructional design that scaffolds complexity and provides timely feedback to prevent disorientation or disengagement. Simulation-based learning, particularly when scaffolded over time, serves as an ideal application of this balance, allowing learners to develop procedural fluency and critical thinking at a manageable pace.¹⁶

Limitations in Resource-Constrained Settings

Implementation challenges remain, particularly in resource-limited institutions. Effective “steeping” requires sustained faculty engagement, access to diverse forensic cases, and longitudinal mentoring—all of which may be constrained by faculty shortages, curricular rigidity, and institutional pressures to meet accreditation benchmarks.²¹ Moreover, the success of this metaphor depends heavily on psychological safety and learner-centered environments, which may not be uniformly present across forensic medicine departments. Thus, while conceptually appealing, operationalizing the tea-steeping approach requires strategic institutional support, including faculty development, curricular reform, and infrastructural investment.

Strategic Integration into Curriculum and Assessment

The metaphor's potential is maximized when integrated into curriculum design and assessment frameworks. For instance, longitudinal CBL offers opportunities for learners to follow complex medico-legal cases across temporal and disciplinary boundaries, deepening their analytical skills and fostering a holistic view of forensic investigation.²² Similarly, programmatic assessment—a model that emphasizes multiple, low-stakes assessments—offers a way to track learner growth over time, in line with the metaphor's emphasis on gradual development.²⁷ Narrative assessments, portfolios, and faculty mentoring can complement traditional examinations to offer a richer picture of learner progression.

Footnotes

CONTRIBUTION TO EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP

The tea-steeping metaphor contributes to the educational scholarship by offering a unifying narrative that connects educational theory with real-world pedagogical strategies. Its application extends beyond forensic medicine and may serve as a valuable framework across other specialties requiring reflective judgment, ethical engagement, and professional formation, such as psychiatry, palliative care, and medical ethics. Future research could examine the longitudinal outcomes of curricula informed by this metaphor, including effects on learner satisfaction, retention, professional behavior, and clinical performance.

CONCLUSION

The tea-steeping metaphor offers a compelling, multidimensional framework for transforming forensic medicine education by emphasizing time, reflection, context, and continuity. When thoughtfully applied, it supports the development of competent, reflective, and ethically grounded practitioners, despite challenges in implementation.

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Pragnesh Parmar

Gunvanti Rathod

Authors

Pragnesh Parmar, MD, Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Bibinagar, Telangana, India

Roles: A,B,C,D,E,1

Gunvanti Rathod, MD, Pathology and Lab Medicine, AIIMS, Bibinagar, Telangana, India

Roles : A,B,C,D,E,1

Roles : Manuscript Creation, Revision and accountable for all aspects of the work

References

Hauer

ten Cate

Boscardin

Irby

Iobst

O’Sullivan

. Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(3):435–456. doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9474-4

Sandars

. It’s time to say goodbye to ‘learning styles’. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):486–487. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.570318

Kolb

. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd edition. Pearson FT Press; 2015.

Piaget

. The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge; 1950.

Eva

. The aging physician: Changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 Suppl):S1–S6. doi:10.1097/00001888-200210001-00001

Vygotsky

. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.

Marton

Säljö

. On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. Br J Educ Psychol. 1976;46(1):4–11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Mezirow

. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions Adult Continuing Educ. 1997;1997(74):5–12. doi:10.1002/ace.7401

Hirsh

Ogur

Thibault

Cox

. “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(8):858–866. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb061660

10.

Bloom

. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company; 1956.

11.

Harden

Laidlaw

. Essential skills for a medical teacher: An introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. 2nd edition. Elsevier; 2017.

12.

Irby

Cooke

O’Brien

. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220–227. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449

13.

Kolb

. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall; 1984.

14.

Schön

. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books; 1983.

15.

Mann

Gordon

MacLeod

. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(4):595–621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2

16.

ten Cate

. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):157–158. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00380.1

17.

Dyrbye

Thomas

Shanafelt

. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among US and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006;81(4):354–373. doi:10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009

18.

Hafferty

. Professionalism - the next wave. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2151–2152. doi:10.1056/NEJMp068217

19.

Knowles

Holton

Swanson

. The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 8th edition. Routledge; 2015.

20.

Frenk

Chen

Bhutta

, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–1958. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5

21.

Sweller

van Merriënboer

JJG

Paas

FGWC

. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev. 1998;10(3):251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205

22.

Thistlethwaite

Davies

Ekeocha

, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421–e444. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939

23.

Okuda

Bryson

DeMaria

Jr , et al.

The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the evidence?

Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–343. doi:10.1002/msj.20127

24.

Issenberg

McGaghie

Petrusa

Gordon

Scalese

. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28. doi:10.1080/01421590500046924

25.

ten Cate

. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–1177. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x

26.

Cruess

Boudreau

Snell

Steinert

. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1446–1451. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427

27.

van der Vleuten

Schuwirth

Driessen

, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205–214. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239