Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy After Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract

Background:

To evaluate the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) after the initiation of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods:

In this longitudinal study with 152 adults, retinal exams and clinical variables were collected before and after AID initiation up to 2.7 years. The DR worsening was defined as an increase in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores or qualitative retinal exam.

Results:

A total of 152 adults with mean age of 42 years (57% female), 26 years of T1D duration, and mean baseline HbA_1c of 7.6% (60 mmol/mol) were included in this analysis. Of 152 adults with T1D, 42 (28%) adults had DR worsening after AID initiation. After adjusting for age, diabetes duration, and sex, baseline HbA_1c (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1 [1.34-3.04]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >100 mg/dL with HbA_1c >8% (OR = 3.33 [1.12-9.91]) were associated with two- and three-fold increased risk for DR worsening, respectively. The decline of HbA_1c with AID initiation between DR worsening and no-DR worsening groups was not significant (−0.38 ± 1.2% vs −0.47 ± 0.9%; P = .6).

Conclusions:

Higher baseline HbA_1c with LDL-C >100 mg/dL may be associated with DR worsening after initiation of AID systems in T1D. Those with elevated HbA_1c should get periodic ophthalmic examination after AID initiation to detect progression of DR. Prompt diagnosis may result in timely treatment.

Keywords

automated insulin delivery diabetic retinopathy early worsening type 1 diabetes

Introduction

Rapid improvement in HbA_1c in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes has been shown to worsen diabetic retinopathy (DR).^1,2 In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the intensive treatment group had a two-fold increase in early worsening of DR compared with the conventional therapy group at 6- and/or 12-month visit.³ In a recent study, rapid reduction in HbA_1c with weekly glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor-agonist semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes was also associated with a two-fold increased risk of DR worsening (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.11-2.78]; P = .02).⁴ Although the rapid reduction in HbA_1c possesses risk of early DR worsening, long-term benefits of HbA_1c reduction outweigh that risk.⁵

Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have been shown to improve HbA_1c without increasing hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes.^6-9 The improvement in HbA_1c is fast with the use of AID systems mainly due to rapid improvement in nocturnal glucose. To our knowledge, DR worsening after initiation of AID system in relation to change in HbA_1c has not been studied. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the DR progression after AID initiation in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods

Subjects and Study Design

In this longitudinal, retrospective cohort study, adults with type 1 diabetes at the Barbara Davis Diabetes Center who initiated Tandem Control-IQ between January 17, 2020, and January 20, 2022, and had at least one retinal examination before and after AID initiation were included in this study. Patients who were pregnant during the study were excluded.

For the AID systems, Tandem t:slim X2 Control-IQ system was selected for this study because it was the only FDA-approved advanced hybrid closed-loop system that provides auto corrections in addition to basal modulation during the study. It has been shown to improve glycemic outcomes in youth, adults, and older adults with type 1 diabetes.^7,10,11 The Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology (referred to as AID onwards) was commercially released in the United States in January 2020, and the release date was taken as the midpoint of the data collection period. The AID initiation date, HbA_1c values with measurement dates, and eye examination results with exam dates were collected longitudinally before and after AID initiation between June 2017 and June 2022.

The following clinical variables were collected up to 2.7 years (till June 2022) from baseline, determined as the most recent record before AID initiation; demographics, age, sex, diabetes duration, body mass index (BMI) and race/ethnicity, insurance type, estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR), albumin/creatinine ratio, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hypertension status (yes/no; based on ICD-codes), smoking status (yes/no), and prescription of anti-hypertension drugs (yes/no; including angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors). Two investigators (H.K.A. and K.E.K.) manually crosschecked electronic medical reports retrieved data for accuracy.

Qualitative (eg, no retinopathy, mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy [NPDR], mild-to-moderate NPDR, moderate NPDR, moderate-to-severe NPDR, severe NPDR, and proliferative DR) as well as quantitative reports (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] scores)¹² of retinal exam for each eye were collected. This study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB).

Statistical Analysis

In this retrospective feasibility study, no formal sample size calculation was performed. Continuous data were presented as mean and standard deviation, and categorical data were presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Retinal exams and HbA_1c measurements were separated into time periods before and after the initiation of AID as baseline to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and >24 months. For the multiple HbA_1c and ETDRS values in the same period, the mean value was used. An increase in ETDRS score or progression in qualitative retinal exams in either eye after AID initiation compared with baseline was categorized as DR worsening. Patients were separated into two groups (DR worsening vs no-DR worsening) based on the progression of DR in either eye. Student’s t-test was used to compare the continuous baseline characteristics of two groups, whereas a Chi-square test was used to compare categorical baseline characteristics. Linear mixed models were used to examine DR levels by time points and by HbA_1c values, adjusted for diabetes duration, age, and gender. Logistic regression models were used to examine the odds of worsening retinopathy following AID initiation. Qualitative DR stepwise changing was numbered in a stepwise fashion according to severity, Pearson’s correlation test was performed between the change in HbA_1c and the number of steps in the worsening of DR grading. SAS software was used for statistical analysis, and P-values <.05 were considered significant.

Results

Of 683 adults with type 1 diabetes who initiated the AID system, 152 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the analysis (Supplementary Figure 1). The mean age of participants was 42 ± 14 years with 26 ± 13 years of diabetes duration; 57% were female and 85% were non-Hispanic White (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Population and Separated Groups by Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy.

	Overall (n = 152)^a	No-DR worsening (n = 107)	DR worsening (n = 42)	P ^b
Mean age (years)	42 ± 14	43 ± 14	41 ± 14	.5
Diabetes duration (years)	26 ± 13	26 ± 14	26 ± 14	.7
Females (n [%])	86 (57)	64 (60)	22 (52)	.4
Mean HbA_1c (%)
Baseline	7.6 ± 1.3	7.4 ± 1.1	8.0 ± 1.5	.02
After AID initiation	7.2 ± 1.1	7.0 ± 0.9	7.7 ± 1.5	.003
Change in HbA_1c	−0.43 ± 1.0	−0.47 ± 0.9	−0.38 ± 1.2	.6
Insurance, private (n [%])	132 (87)	96 (90)	33 (79)	.08
Race/ethnicity NHW (n [%])	129 (85)	92 (86)	35 (83)	.7
ACR (median, IQR), (mg/g)	5.8 (3, 10.1)	6 (3, 11)	5 (3, 10)	.3
Baseline ETDRS score
Right eye	27 ± 16	26 ± 16	27 ± 15	.9
Left eye	27 ± 16	27 ± 15	27 ± 17	.9
LDL-C (mg/dL)	87 ± 26	82 ± 24	95 ± 28	.008
BMI (kg/m²)	28.0 ± 5.6	27.6 ± 5.5	28.9 ± 6.0	.2
eGFR (mL/min/1.73m²)	97 ± 18	95 ± 19	102 ± 16	.048
Smoking (n [%])	6 (4.0)	3 (2.8)	3 (7.1)	.4
Hypertension, yes (n [%])	10 (6.6)	6 (6)	4 (10)	.5

Abbreviations: DR, diabetic retinopathy; NHW, non-Hispanic Whites; ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; ETDRS, early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study score; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein–cholesterol; BMI, body mass index (kg/m²); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Three subjects could not be classified because of missing retinopathy data in one eye at one of the time points.

P-value between DR worsening and no worsening of DR groups.

Of 152 participants, 42 (28%) had DR worsening over a mean of 1.6 years after an AID initiation. Most of these progressions were from no DR to mild non-proliferative DR. The baseline characteristics of participants by two groups (DR worsening and no-DR worsening) are shown in Table 1. Baseline HbA_1c was significantly higher in the DR worsening group compared with no-DR worsening group (8.0 ± 1.5 vs 7.4 ± 1.1; P = .02). Participants with DR worsening had higher HbA_1c after AID initiation (7.7 ± 1.5 vs 7.0 ± 0.9; P = .003), higher LDL-C (95 ± 28 vs 82 ± 24; P = .008), and higher eGFR (102 ± 16 vs 95 ± 19; P = .048) compared with no-DR worsening group. Mean age, diabetes duration, gender, insurance type, race/ethnicity, smoking status, presence of hypertension, BMI, ETDRS scores, and albumin/creatinine ratio did not differ (P > .05) between two groups at baseline. Although HbA_1c was significantly higher in the DR worsening group, both at baseline and after starting the AID system, the difference in the HbA_1c improvement with AID initiation between two groups was not significant (−0.38 ± 1.2 vs −0.47 ± 0.9; P = .6).

The time course of mean HbA_1c and ETDRS scores before and after AID initiations were shown in Figure 1. After the AID initiation, HbA_1c decreased significantly over time (P < .0001). In mixed models, there was no significant change in ETDRS score in either eye by time interval (P = .3 for Left Eye [OS], P = .4 for Right Eye [OD]), and no association between ETDRS score and HbA_1c over time (P = .8 for OS, P = .5 for OD). However, in logistic regression adjusted for age, diabetes duration, and sex, higher baseline HbA_1c was associated with a two-fold increase in risk for DR worsening (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, 95% CI = [1.34-3.04], P = .0008) and independently, a 1% (11 mmol/mol) higher baseline HbA_1c was associated with a nearly two-fold higher risk for DR worsening (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = [1.1-2.88], P = .02). Patients meeting a composite variable of LDL>100 mg/dL and baseline HbA_1c >8% (>64 mmol/mol) (n = 16) had a three-fold increased risk for DR worsening (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = [1.12-9.91], P = .03).

Figure 1.

Mean HbA_1c and retinopathy grade (ETDRS scores) for both eyes before and after AID initiation.

There was no correlation between the change in HbA_1c and the worsening of DR stepwise changing (r = −0.006, P = .9). There was no significant difference in DR stepwise change between DR worsening and no-DR worsening groups for either OS (P = .3) or OD (P = .2) at baseline, whereas it differed significantly between two groups after AID initiation OS (P < .001) or OD (P < .001). Changes in severity of retinopathy among DR worsening group are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Qualitative eye examinations of DR worsening (n = 42) group at baseline and after AID initiation.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated DR progression after AID initiation in adults with type 1 diabetes. Prior studies have suggested a rapid decline in HbA_1c as one of the major reasons for DR worsening.^1-5,^13-15 In addition, we found that LDL >100 mg/dL as one of the risk factors for DR worsening. Hyperlipidemia is a known risk factor for diabetic microvascular complications.^16-19 Therefore, adequate treatment of lipids with the goal of LDL <70 mg/dL as recommended by the American Diabetes Association should be achieved in adults with type 1 diabetes¹⁶ especially in the presence of microvascular complications. High HbA_1c and high cholesterol are also acknowledged as risk factors for DR by the National Health Service (NHS).²⁰ The NHS established a 5-year AID implementation strategy for almost all people with type 1 diabetes to improve their glycemic control, quality of life, and reduce mental burden.²¹ However, there is no guidance on monitoring retinopathy after initiating AID. Based on our research, more frequent DR screening and monitoring should be considered for those who may be at high risk for proliferative retinopathy.

The HbA_1c reduction in our cohort was similar to what was reported in randomized controlled trials suggesting AID system have a great potential to improve glycemic control in the real world in type 1 diabetes.^6-9 Although people with higher baseline HbA_1c may have worsening of DR after initiation of AID, we expect to have overall better glycemic control and reduction in long-term microvascular complications with AID use as reported in prior studies.^1,3,5,13 Therefore, high-risk individuals for DR worsening should not be discouraged for AID system. As there is no guidance on the frequency of eye exam after AID initiation, our study calls for adding frequent eye examination after AID initiation as a part of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care.

Large sample size and 2.7-year follow-up of AID use are major strengths of this study. Retrospective design and relatively infrequent eye examinations are major limitations. Majority of the patients who started AID therapy had to be excluded from the analysis for not having retinal exam before and/or after AID initiation (Supplementary Figure 1). Pandemic may play a role in missing retinal exams. Most of our patients were non-Hispanic White; therefore, these findings may have limited generalizability for other race and ethnicities. Moreover, majority of retinopathy worsening were mild (from no retinopathy to mild non-proliferative changes) and may not require significant changes in treatment. However, we also saw a modest increase in progression from mild non-proliferative retinopathy to proliferative retinopathy, which would require treatment to prevent progression and vision loss. Owing to the retrospective nature of the study and variable HbA_1c measurement intervals, the rate of decline in HbA_1c could not be estimated.

Conclusions

In conclusion, higher baseline HbA_1c and LDL-C >100 mg/dL are associated with a three-fold increased risk of worsening DR after initiation of AID systems in type 1 diabetes. Patients with a higher risk for DR worsening should be screened for DR before and frequently after AID initiation. Future prospective studies with longer follow-up duration are needed to evaluate factors affecting DR progression after initiation of the AID system in people with type 1 diabetes.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-dst-10.1177_19322968251318740 – Supplemental material for Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy After Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-dst-10.1177_19322968251318740 for Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy After Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes by Kagan E. Karakus, Halis K. Akturk, Janet K. Snell-Bergeon and Viral N. Shah in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Footnotes

Abbreviations

AID, automated insulin delivery; BMI, body mass index; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; DR, diabetic retinopathy; ETDRS, Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein–cholesterol; NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; T1D, type 1 diabetes.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: K.E.K and J.K.S.-B. have no conflict of interest. H.K.A. received through University of Colorado research support from Dexcom, Medtronic, Tandem Diabetes, Eli Lilly, Senseonics, IM Therapeutics, REMD Biotherapeutics, and IAFMS and honoraria from Mannkind and Senseonics for advisory board attendance. V.N.S.’ employer, Indiana University, has received research support from NovoNordisk, Dexcom, Enable Bioscience, and Zucara Therapeutics. V.N.S. has also received honoraria from Dexcom, Insulet Tandem Diabetes Care, Sequel Medtech, Sanofi, NovoNordisk, Lilly, Embecta, Genomelink, and Lumosfit for consulting, speaking, or advising.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Kagan E. Karakus

Halis K. Akturk

Janet K. Snell-Bergeon

Viral N. Shah

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Bain

Klufas

Matthews

. Worsening of diabetic retinopathy with rapid improvement in systemic glucose control: a review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(3):454-466.

Vilsbøll

Bain

Leiter

, et al. Semaglutide, reduction in glycated haemoglobin and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(4):889-897.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(7):874-886.

Marso

Bain

Consoli

, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834-1844.

Akil

Burgess

Nevitt

Harding

Alam

Burgess

. Early worsening of retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes after rapid improvement in glycaemic control: a systematic review. Diabetes Ther. 2022;13(1):1-23.

Bionic Pancreas Research Group. Multicenter, randomized trial of a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(13):1161-1172.

Brown

Kovatchev

Raghinaru

, et al. Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1707-1717.

Brown

Forlenza

Bode

, et al. Multicenter trial of a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets in pediatric and adult participants with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(7):1630-1640.

Bergenstal

Garg

Weinzimer

, et al. Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1407-1408.

10.

Breton

Kanapka

Beck

, et al. A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(9):836-845.

11.

Bisio

Gonder-Frederick

McFadden

, et al. The impact of a recently approved automated insulin delivery system on glycemic, sleep, and psychosocial outcomes in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022;16(3):663-669.

12.

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5 suppl):786-806.

13.

Feldman-Billard

Larger

Massin

; Standards for Screening and Surveillance of Ocular Complications in People With Diabetes SFD Study Group. Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy after rapid improvement of blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(1):4-14.

14.

Kroc Collaborative Study Group. Blood glucose control and the evolution of diabetic retinopathy and albuminuria. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(6):365-372.

15.

Bourry

Courteville

Ramdane

, et al. Progression of diabetic retinopathy and predictors of its development and progression during pregnancy in patients with type 1 diabetes: a report of 499 pregnancies. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):181-187.

16.

ElSayed

Aleppo

Aroda

, et al. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care. 2022;46(suppl 1):S158-S190.

17.

ElSayed

Aleppo

Aroda

, et al. 12. Retinopathy, neuropathy, and foot care: standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care. 2022;46(suppl 1):S203-15.

18.

Eid

Sas

Abcouwer

, et al. New insights into the mechanisms of diabetic complications: role of lipids and lipid metabolism. Diabetologia. 2019;62(9):1539-1549.

19.

Andersen

Witte

Dalsgaard

, et al. Risk factors for incident diabetic polyneuropathy in a cohort with screen-detected type 2 diabetes followed for 13 years: addition-Denmark. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):1068-1075.

20.

NHS. Diabetic retinopathy. Accessed December 4, 2024. Published 2021. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/diabetic-retinopathy/

21.

NHS England. Hybrid closed loop technologies: 5-year implementation strategy. Published 2024. Accessed December 4, 2024. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/hybrid-closed-loop-technologies-5-year-implementation-strategy/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB