AchillesC. M. (1994). Searching for the golden fleece: The epic struggle continues. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 6–26.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (2000). Preparing future program faculty. Available at http://www.aacu-edu.org.
4.
BantaT. W.LundJ. P.BlackK. E.OblanderF.W. (Eds.). (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BarnettB. G.BasomM. R.YerkesD. M.NorrisC. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 255–282.
6.
BasomM.YerkesD.BarnettB.NorrisC. (1996/1997). A backward glance: Cohorts in educational leadership programs. Record in Educational Leadership, 16/17(1/2), 55–60.
7.
BellamyG. T.FulmerC. L.MurphyM. J.MuthR. (2007). Principal accomplishments: How school leaders succeed.New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BilderA. E. C.CliftonF. (1996). Challenges in assessing outcomes in graduate and professional education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 92, 5–15.
9.
BlackJ. A.EnglishF. W. (1986). What they don't tell you in schools of education about school administration.Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
10.
BorkowskiN. A. (2006). Changing our thinking about assessment at the doctoral level. In MakiP. L.BorkowskiN. A. (Eds.), Assessment in doctoral education (pp. 11–51). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
11.
BoyanN. J. (1981). Follow the leader: Commentary on research in educational administration. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 6–13, 21.
12.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate.Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
13.
BredesonP. (2006). Integrated doctoral programs in educational leadership: The case for preparing practitioners and researchers together. UCEA Review, 20–23.
14.
BrentB. O. (1998). Should graduate training in educational administration be required for principal certification? Existing evidence suggests the answer is no. Teaching in Educational Administration Newsletter, 5(2), 1, 3–8.
15.
BrauseR. S. (2000). Writing your doctoral dissertation: Invisible rules for success.New York: Falmer Press.
16.
BrownG. C.MarkusF. W.LucasS. (1988–1989). Acquired administrative competence: A survey of national distinguished principals. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 58–66.
17.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2003). Effects of cohorts on learners. Journal of School Leadership, 13(6), 621–643.
18.
BridgesE. M. (1977). The nature of leadership. In CunninghamL. L.HackW. G.NystrandR. O. (Eds.), Educational administration: The developing decades (pp. 202–230). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
19.
BurnettP. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 46–52.
20.
CaffarellaR. S.BarnettB. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52.
21.
CalhounE. F. (1997). Action research: Three approaches. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 62–65.
22.
Caro-BruceC. (2000). Action research: Facilitator's handbook.Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
23.
CliffordG. J.GuthrieJ. W. (1988). Ed school: A brief for professional education.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
ConeJ. D.FosterS. L. (1993). Dissertations and theses from start to finish.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
CooperB. S.MuthR. (1994). Internal and external barriers to change in departments of educational administration. In MulkeenT.Cambron-McCabeN.AndersonB. (Eds.), Democratic leadership: The changing context of administrative preparation.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27.
CordieroP. A.KruegerJ.ParksD.RestineL. N.WilsonP. (1992). Taking stock: A study of the Danforth programs for the preparation of school principals.St. Louis, MO: Danforth Foundation.
28.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2004). PhD completion and attrition: Policy, number, leadership, and next steps.Washington, DC: Author.
29.
CyrT.MuthR. (2006). Portfolios in doctoral education. In MakiP. L.BorkowskiN. A. (Eds.), Assessment in doctoral education (pp. 215–237). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
30.
Darling-HammondL.WiseA. E.KleinS. P. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
DeneckeD. D.FrasierH. S. (2005November). Ph.D. completion project: Preliminary results from baseline data. CGS Communicator, 38(9), 1–2, 7–8.
32.
DornS. M.PapalewisR.BrownR. (1995). Educators earning their doctorates: Doctoral student perceptions regarding cohesiveness and persistence. Education, 116(2), 305–314.
33.
Educational Leadership and Innovation Doctoral Committee (2005–2006). Educational leadership and innovation doctoral degree student handbook (rev.). Denver, CO: Author, School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center.
34.
FirestoneW. A.RiehlC. (Eds.) (2005). Introduction. In FirestoneW.RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 1–11). New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
FitzpatrickJ.SecristJ.WrightD. J. (1998). Secrets for a successful dissertation.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
FurtwenglerC. B.FurtwenglerW. J.HurstD.TurkR. L.HolcombE. (1996). Preparing expert leaders: A fresh clinical model. Journal of School Leadership, 6(5), 512–539.
37.
GlanzJ. (1998). Action research: An educational leader's guide to school improvement.Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
38.
GreenwoodD. J.LevinM. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
GroganM.DonaldsonJ.SimmonsJ. (2007). Disrupting the status quo: The action research dissertation as a transformative strategy. Retrieved June 26, 2007 from: http://cnx.org/content/m14529/latest/.
40.
GuskeyT. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41.
GuzmánN.MuthR. (1998). Evolution, revolution, and collaboration: Creating new programs and paradigms in doctoral studies for educational leaders. In MuthR.MartinM. (Eds.), Toward the year 2000: Leadership for quality schools (pp. 214–231). Sixth Annual Yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
42.
GuzmánN.MuthR. (1999Fall). Building blocks: Structures and processes for PhD student success. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 11, 83–99.
43.
HallerE. J. (1979). Questionnaires and the dissertation in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(1), 47–66.
44.
HallerE. J.BrentB. O.McNamaraJ. F. (1997). Does graduate training in educational administration improve America's schools? Another look at some national data. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(3), 222–227.
45.
HellerR. W.ConwayJ. A.JacobsonS. L. (1988, September). Here's your blunt critique of administrator preparation. Executive Educator, 18–21, 30.
46.
HerbertF. T.ReynoldsK. C. (1992). Cohort groups and intensive schedules: Does familiarity breed learning? Unpublished manuscript.
47.
HerrK.AndersonG. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
HillM. S. (1995). Educational leadership cohort models: Changing the talk to change the walk. Planning and Changing, 26(3/4), 179–189.
50.
HollingsworthS. (Ed.) (1997). International action research: A casebook for educational reform.London: Falmer Press.
51.
HornR. A.Jr. (2001). Promoting social justice and caring in schools and communities: The unrealized potential of the cohort model. Journal of School Leadership, 11(4), 313–334.
52.
HubaM.SchuhJ.ShelleyM. (2006). Recasting doctoral education in an outcomes-based framework. In MakiP. L.BorkowskiN. A. (Eds.), Assessment in doctoral education (pp. 239–272). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
53.
IrbyB. J.LunenburgF. C. (2006). Doctoral program issues: Accreditation of programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Lexington, KY.
54.
JenlinkP. M. (2001a). Beyond the knowledge base controversy: Advancing the ideal of scholar practitioner leadership. In KowalskiT. J.PerreaultG. (Eds.), 21st century challenges for educational administration (pp. 65–88). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
55.
JenlinkP. M. (2001b, August). The school leader as “bricoleur”: Scholarly practitioners for our schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
56.
JohnsonA. P. (2003). A short guide to academic writing.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
57.
KemmisS. (1988). Action research in retrospect and prospect. In KemmisS.McTaggartR. (Eds.), The action research reader (pages 27–34). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
58.
KlueverR. C. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward the responsibilities and barriers in doctoral study. In GoodchildL. F.GreenK. E.DatzE. L.KlueverR. C. (Eds.), Rethinking the dissertation process: Tackling personal and institutional obstacles. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 99. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60.
KoncelM. A.CarneyD. (1992). When worlds collide: Negotiating between academic and professional discourse in a graduate social work program. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Cincinnati, OH.
61.
LeesK. A. (1996). Understanding how female doctoral students’ interactions with their chairpersons during the dissertation process affect doctoral persistence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
62.
LeithwoodK.JantziD.CoffinG. (1995). Preparing school leaders: What works.Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
63.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders.Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
64.
LoackerG. (2000). Self-assessment at Alverno College.Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College Institute.
65.
LovittsB. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
66.
LovittsB. E. (2006). Making the implicit explicit. In MakiP. L.BorkowskiN. A. (Eds.), Assessment in doctoral education (pp. 163–196). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
67.
MacdonaldR.WisdomJ. (Eds.). (2002). Academic and educational development, research, evaluation, and changing practice in higher education. Staff and Educational Development Series. London: Kogan Page.
68.
MartinW. M.FordS.MurphyM.RehmR.G.MuthR. (1997). Linking instructional delivery with diverse learning settings. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 386–408.
69.
McCarthyM. M.KuhG. D.NewellL. J.IaconaC. M. (1988). Under scrutiny: The educational administration professoriate.Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
70.
MetzM. H. (2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 12–18.
71.
Milstein, M. M., & Associates (1993). Changing the way we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth experience.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
72.
MurphyJ. (Ed.). (1993). Preparing tomorrow's school leaders: Alternative designs.University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
73.
MurphyJ. (2006). Preparing school leaders: Defining a research and action agenda.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
74.
MuthR. (1989October). Reconceptualizing training for educational administrators and leaders: Focus on inquiry. Notes on Reform, 2, 1–20 (Charlottesville, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration).
75.
MuthR. (1990, October). Developing a field-based, applied inquiry doctoral program. Symposium presentation at the meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
76.
MuthR. (1997, March). Alternatives to learning research in the classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
77.
MuthR. (2000). Toward a learning-oriented instructional paradigm: Implications for practice. In JenlinkP.KowalskiT. (Eds.), Marching into a new millennium: Challenges to educational leadership (pp. 82–103). Eighth Annual Yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
78.
MuthR. (2002). Scholar-practitioner goals, practices, and outcomes: What students and faculty need to know and be able to do. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 1(1), 67–87.
79.
MuthR.BanksD.BonelliJ.GaddisB.NapierkowskiH.WhiteC.WoodV. (2001). Toward an instructional paradigm: Recasting how faculty work and students learn. In KowalskiT. J.PerreaultG. (Eds.), Twenty-first century challenges for school administrators (pp. 29–53). Ninth Annual Yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
80.
MuthR.BarnettB. (2001). Making the case for professional preparation in cohorts: Using research for program improvement and political support. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 13, 109–120.
81.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (1998). NCATE curriculum guidelines: Advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors. In National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (Ed.), NCATE curriculum guidelines (pp. 183–204). Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
82.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2002). Standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors.Arlington, VA: Author.
83.
National Research Council. (1996a). The path to the PhD: Measuring graduate attrition in the sciences and the humanities.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
84.
National Research Council (1996b). Summary report 1995. Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
85.
NortonM. S. (1995, October). The status of student cohorts in educational administration preparation programs. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Salt Lake City, UT.
PageR. N. (2001). Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school's experience. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 19–25.
88.
PallasA. M. (2001). Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 6–11.
89.
PalombaC. A.BantaT. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
90.
QuigleyB. A. (1996). The role of research in the practice of adult education. In QuigleyB. A.KuhneG. W. (Eds.), Creating practical knowledge through action research: Posing problems, solving problems, and improving daily practice (pp. 3–22). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 73. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
91.
QuigleyB. A.KuhneG. W. (Eds.). (1996). Creating practical knowledge through action research: Posing problems, solving problems, and improving daily practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 73. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
92.
RappD.XSilentSilentY. (2001). The implications of raising one's voice in educational leadership doctoral programs: Women's stories of fear, retaliation, and silence. Journal of School Leadership, 11(4), 279–295.
93.
SagorR. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
94.
SandersN.MuthR. (2005, May 5). Dissertation guidelines (rev.). Denver: Administrative Leadership and Policy Studies, Educational Leadership and Innovation PhD Program, School of Education and Human Development, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center.
95.
SchönD. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology: Knowing in action. Change, 27(6), 26–34.
96.
SchönD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
97.
SheridanJ.ByrneA. C.QuinaK. (1989). Collaborative learning: Notes from the field. College Teaching, 37(2), 49–53.
98.
StringerE. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99.
StringerE.AgnelloM. F.BaldwinS. C.McFaydenL.ChristensenD.HenryL. P. (1997). Community-Based ethnography: Breaking traditional boundaries of research, teaching, and learning.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
100.
TeitelL. (1997). Understanding and harnessing the power of the cohort model in preparing educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 66–85.
101.
TorranceM. S.ThomasG. V. (1994). The development of writing skills in doctoral students. In BurgessR. G. (Ed.), Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences. Processes and products. (pp. 105–123). London: Jessica Kingsley.
102.
TownsendB. K. (2002). Rethinking the Ed.D., or what's in a name? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.
103.
University Planning & Analysis. (2006). Internet resources for higher education outcomes assessment.Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Retrieved December 11, 2006, from http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/UPA/assmt/resource.htm.
104.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education.Washington, DC: Author.
105.
Van MeterE.MurphyJ. (1997). Using ISLLC standards to strengthen preparation programs in school administration.Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
106.
WhitakerK. S.BarnettB. G. (1999). A partnership model linking K-12 school districts and leadership preparation programs. Planning and Changing, 30(3/4), 126–143.
107.
YerkesD. M.BasomM.BarnettB.NorrisC. (1995). Cohorts today: Considerations of structure, characteristics, and potential effects. Journal of CAPEA, 7, 7–19.
108.
YoungL. J. (2001). Border crossings and other journeys: Re-envisioning the doctoral preparation of educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 3–5.
109.
ZerubavelE. (1999). The clockwork muse: A practical guide to writing theses, dissertations, and books.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.