Abstract
Studies show a higher prevalence rate of Mental Health Problems among basic school students compared to students in higher educational levels in Ghana. While global evidence supports the effectiveness, accessibility, and feasibility of mental health school-based interventions, there is limited research on these interventions in Ghana. This qualitative study examined professionals’ perceptions of the nature and improvement needs of school-based interventions for students with mental health issues in selected basic schools in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. Nine mental health professionals who work with these students were selected through convenience and purposive sampling. Thematic analysis identified seven key themes: Four themes described the nature of school-based interventions in basic schools, while the remaining three highlighted challenges at various levels of the child’s environment as well as recommendations for improving school-based interventions in the study area. The findings in this study underscore the importance of implementing mental health interventions in Ghanaian schools, highlighting their feasibility despite lack of evidence-based practices. The study concluded that while professionals are dedicated to assisting students, current interventions are insufficient, necessitating the effective implementation of mental health school-based interventions in Ghana.
Introduction
Ghana, a developing country in West Africa, has an estimated population of 31 million, with about 35.3% aged 0 to 14 years (Ghana Statistical Service, 2022). School-aged children within this range typically attend 11 years of basic education, which comprises Kindergarten, Primary School (Grades 1–6), and Junior High School (Grades 7–9). This age group is particularly vulnerable to mental health problems (MHP), which can hinder their development, academic achievement, and overall well-being (Ame & Mfoafo-M’Carthy, 2016; Hess et al., 2011).
One of the earliest prevalence studies on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) problems in Ghana found a 7.25% rate of mental health issues among 303 sampled primary students (Kusi-Mensah et al., 2019). Ahorsu et al. (2020) also reported a higher rate of MHP, particularly depression, among junior high school students compared to those in senior high schools and universities. Junior high school students in their study also reported significantly higher rates of suicidal ideation than students at higher educational levels. Students in basic schools who were affected by MHP show a significantly poorer academic performance compared to their peers without MHP (Ahorsu et al., 2020; Kusi-Mensah et al., 2019). Despite the significant impact of MHP on wellbeing and academic performance, many students in Ghana and other low-income countries lack access to mental health services (Ame & Mfoafo-M’Carthy, 2016; Special Attention Project, 2011).
Factors contributing to the CAMH treatment gap in Ghana include stigma, low help-seeking behavior, limited funding, a shortage of trained professionals, and inadequate infrastructure for such services (Adu-Gyamfi, 2017; Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al., 2019). Leveraging existing educational structures and resources can help address accessibility barriers to CAMH services in limited-resource settings, such as Ghanaian basic schools (Grande et al., 2022; Mabrouk et al., 2022; Stephan et al., 2007).
Mabrouk et al. (2022) discussed that CAMH services in schools were the second most common interventions targeting children and adolescents with depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Interventions delivered in schools, known as School-based interventions (SBIs) are typically delivered by support staff, psychologists, counselors, social workers, teachers, and researchers in schools (Feiss et al., 2019). They often apply psychotherapeutic approaches, with the most common and effective ones utilizing mindfulness or cognitive-behavioral techniques (Feiss et al., 2019; Grande et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023; Zoogman et al., 2015). These interventions are commonly organized into three tiers in extant literature. Tier one, known as universal interventions, supports all students by promoting overall wellness and mental health awareness. Tier two, referred to as selective interventions, targets students at risk of developing MHP by providing structured, small-group preventive support (August et al., 2018; Paulus et al., 2016). The third tier, called indicated interventions, offers intensive, individualized therapeutic services to students already exhibiting early signs or symptoms of MHP (Paulus et al., 2016). Selective and indicated interventions are commonly categorized as forms of targeted interventions.
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of school-based universal and targeted interventions that address conditions such as suicide, self-harm, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and conduct disorders. For instance, a systematic review by Feiss et al. (2019) and a meta-analysis of clinical trials by Zhang et al. (2023) reported that selective and indicated interventions led to greater reductions in MHP compared to universal mental health programs in schools. Expanding on these findings, Grande et al. (2022) noted that while some systematic reviews of SBI studies in low-income countries reported reductions in MHP symptoms, others found no significant effects on depression, anxiety, or PTSD scores. Notably, the majority of these reviews mainly focused on universal SBIs, suggesting a gap in the implementation and evaluation of more targeted approaches in low-income countries like Ghana. Although universal interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa can help raise mental health awareness, there is a need for targeted interventions to address individualized MHP (Kutcher et al., 2019).
The mixed findings on the effectiveness of SBIs in low-income countries highlight the need for further research into factors that influence therapeutic outcomes. The effectiveness of SBIs may vary depending on factors such as fidelity issues, training and qualifications of facilitators, student and family involvement, availability of school resources, and the sustainability or duration of the intervention (Fox et al., 2022; Paulus et al., 2016). For low- and middle-income countries, these factors play a critical role, often influencing whether SBIs can be effectively implemented and sustained (Zhou et al., 2020).
SBIs in Ghana are reinforced by policies and programs in the Ghanaian educational system, therefore supporting their implementation and sustainability in basic school settings. For example, the Inclusive Education policy mandates the Ghana Education Service (GES) to develop an inclusive curriculum, employ trained staff, and conduct biennial universal screenings to identify and support students with special learning needs such as children with adverse childhood experiences, autism, emotional, and behavioral disorders, intellectual disabilities, learning disabilities, and speech disorders (Mantey, 2014; Ministry of Education, 2015).
Similarly, the Guidance and Counseling Program in Ghana, initially designed for senior high schools, offers mental health support to students. Despite the program’s effectiveness in Ghana, it faces several challenges, including mental health stigma, limited number of trained counselors, inadequate human resources, low self-disclosure during sessions, low awareness of the program’s benefits, scarce resources, and unclear policies (Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al., 2019; Mills, 2019). These challenges can be mitigated through the implementation of universal SBIs, which will promote mental health awareness among students, teachers, and parents. Although the School Health Education Program (SHEP), another SBI in basic schools, aims to improve student health, enrolment, and attendance, it lacks a focus on tiered mental health interventions (GES, 2019).
Moreover, research on CAMH in Ghana has not addressed existing mental health interventions in basic schools. For instance, while Ame and Mfoafo-M’Carthy (2016) explored rights and services provided for children under the Mental Health Act, they did not address schools’ roles in promoting mental health. Again, existing research on SBIs in basic schools primarily focuses on non-mental health interventions or those for students with diagnosable special learning needs. Thus, limited attention is given to younger students with less visible or undiagnosed MHP, highlighting a gap in mental health interventions for all students at this level. Additionally, no studies in Ghanaian basic schools outline the evidence-based practices mental health practitioners use to implement SBIs. Therefore, this research explored school-based mental health professionals’ perceptions of the nature of SBIs and how these interventions can be improved for students with MHP (whether they are diagnosable or not). The research questions that guided the study were: (1) How do school-based mental health professionals perceive the nature of SBIs for students with MHP in Ghanaian basic schools? (2) What are professionals’ insights about the need to improve SBIs in Ghanaian basic schools?
Methodology
Design
This study employed qualitative research that used a phenomenological approach. The methodology employed in this study captured participants’ subjective insights as they described their unique views, feelings, experiences, and perceptions of the nature and challenges of SBIs in their respective basic schools. As posited by Creswell and Poth (2018), phenomenological approach was ideal for exploring how participants perceive and make sense of their experiences with the shared phenomenon.
Participants
The study targeted professionals responsible for providing mental health services to students at the basic education level in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. This region was selected because it hosted two of the country’s three public psychiatric hospitals and served as the launch site for several Inclusive Education (IE) pilot programs (Mantey, 2014), suggesting relatively better access to mental health services for children.
In total, nine participants were selected using convenience and purposive sampling. Two participants were selected through social media, and six participants were directly contacted through their schools. The final participant was recruited with the help of the School Social Workers Association of Ghana (SSWAG). Recruitment stopped once data saturation was achieved (Kvale, 1996).
Participants’ Background
Five female and four male mental health professionals working in basic schools were interviewed for this study. All participants had at least a Bachelor of Arts (BA), with only one having a Master’s degree. One was trained as a special educator, and four of the participants had counseling certifications in addition to their undergraduate degrees. They all worked with basic school children, but most of them specifically worked with Junior High School (JHS) students. Pseudonyms were assigned to protect participants’ privacy, and verbal informed consent was obtained prior to data collection. A summary of participants’ qualifications, roles, and the population they served is presented in Table 1.
Participant qualifications, roles, and population served.
Note. Most participants had Bachelors of Arts (BA) degrees, and experience in various educational positions within public and private basic schools in Ghana. While some served all educational levels in their schools, others primarily worked with students’ at the Junior High School (JHS) level.
Data Collection
A semi-structured guide with open-ended questions was used to interview the nine (9) participants. The guide included open-ended questions across five key domains: participant background, population served, interventions utilized, perceived effectiveness, and systemic factors (see Supplemental Material for the full interview guide). Questions on participants’ background, student population, interventions used, and their effectiveness addressed the first objective by exploring the nature of SBIs in basic schools. Concluding questions focused on systemic challenges and recommendations, aligning with the second objective on the need to improve SBIs. The average session duration was 50 min, with the longest lasting over an hour and the shortest lasting 28 min. The more professionals engaged with students with MHP, the longer they spent discussing their interventions. To maintain confidentiality, no identifiable information was collected, and any sensitive details shared by participants were either paraphrased or redacted. Interviews were scheduled at participants’ convenience, with most opting for phone interviews. The sessions were recorded on a password-protected laptop.
Data Analysis
While interviewing participants, notes and memos were taken on recurring themes in their responses which later aided the analysis. The recorded interviews were transcribed with Otter.ai technology and the recordings were deleted after a second researcher confirmed the accuracy of the transcripts. The transcripts were meticulously reviewed line by line for familiarization, error correction, and manual transcription of words not detected by the Otter.ai technology. The transcribed data were carefully examined to remove any identifiable information, and each transcript was read again for familiarization and cleaning. Each transcript was then color-coded to capture recurring meanings related to treatment, interventions, approaches, suggestions on improving SBI, characteristics of students served, risk factors, involvement of stakeholders, parental influence, assessment, engagement, and impact of mental health.
This process followed the coding techniques of organizing and differentiating, as described by Miles and Huberman (1994). The research team organized recurring codes and used a data analysis table to guide the development and refinement of initial themes. The preliminary themes, initially generated by the principal investigator, were subsequently reviewed by a second researcher, who proposed additional refinements to improve thematic clarity. Finally, two researchers collaboratively finalized the themes to enhance coherence and ensure stronger alignment with the study’s objectives. After developing the adjusted themes, the participants, a non-involved professional peer, and the supervising researcher were consulted to verify accuracy and ensure alignment with the data shared. No major changes were made during this stage, aside from addressing any ethical concerns raised by participants. The cross-checking process enhanced the trustworthiness of the data, as Miles and Huberman (1994) asserted that revising codes and concepts based on feedback from participants, colleagues, and supervisors promotes accountability and supports analyst triangulation
Results
The study identified seven key themes aligned with the two research objectives. Four themes addressed the first research question, which explored the types of SBIs implemented in Ghanaian basic schools and their modes of delivery. The remaining three themes emerged from the second research objective, which highlighted challenges and recommendations for improving SBIs at the basic education level. These themes are clearly presented in Table 2. On the other hand, the definitions of each theme with examples of recurring codes and notes on theme refinement are detailed in Table 3. Table 3 also features abbreviated versions of the following participant quotes, along with additional condensed quotes that are not included in this section.
Themes identified from the study.
Summary of themes development.
Objective 1 : The Nature of SBIs in Ghanaian Basic Schools
This section presents the first objective which was to explore the nature of SBIs in Ghanaian basic schools by examining how mental health needs are identified, addressed, and supported within the school system. It examined how mental health needs among students are identified for intervention, the processes through which support is provided, and the structural or contextual elements in the implementation of SBIs within these educational settings. The goal for this objective was to provide an in-depth understanding of the current practices and capacities surrounding mental health support in basic schools across Ghana.
Theme 1: Risk Factors Contributing to Mental Health Symptoms
Participants unanimously discussed various risk factors (such as abuse and parental neglect, bullying, academic stress, loss/grief, and poverty) that contributed to internalizing and externalizing mental health symptoms among Ghanaian basic school students, requiring interventions and support. One participant discussed that his intervention targets students experiencing mood disturbances (e.g. loneliness, mood problems), and behavioral issues (e.g. troublesome) resulting from negative peer interactions.
The children we encounter are those that have mood problems and those that are a little more troublesome than their peers. You find that almost everybody in the class sort of antagonizes these children with MHP. Also, because of the bullying that they face, they are probably more likely to be aggressive. . . . So, as mental health workers, we have to encourage healthier interaction among the classmates Some of them are reserved, all the time they keep to themselves and do not play like the other children . . . They will be down. They get sad and overthink as some are trauma survivors, they are withdrawn, and their academics suffer. Without our help, things could get worse
This participant described how abuse and neglect contribute to mental health symptoms (e.g. fright, scared, afraid, and crying), which require her intervention due to their negative impact on well-being and academic performance.
A student will be crying the whole day because they are experiencing issues at home and unfortunately some of them are afraid of their guardians and they would not want to tell you the problem affecting them. For example: some of them get abused by their guardians, their guardian’, children or husbands which affects them mentally, psychologically, and physically. Again, some of them have issues with their studies and have low academic performance because they get scared and frightened of some teachers in the classroom.
Theme 2: Observation and Engagement for Assessment
All participants noted that interventions began with their observation, class teacher’s observation and reports, responses from questioning and talking to students. The following quotes illustrate how some participants selected and assessed students for interventions.
Participants discussed that they often looked out for “unusual” behaviors and a decline in academic performance before selecting students for intervention. Kojo was one of the three participants who reported that students voluntarily sought his support.
What I typically do is, I watch and observe them for behaviors that are abnormal or unusual. Sometimes I notice them from their poor academic performance. Some of the students voluntarily come to me even if I do not approach them. They open up to me and usually we find solutions for their problems. ( Usually, we counsel the students after identifying them from the way they behave. We are there with them, so we are able to figure out when there is a problem, then we single them out when their behavior is going differently from the norm. . . Sometimes, they will not open-up, but then we try our best to just counsel them on what they ought to do. (
Theme 3: Feasible and Cost-Effective Approaches
The nine participants emphasized that their interventions employed feasible and cost-effective approaches. They mentioned techniques like guiding/advising, caring, offering academic support, engaging in conversations, providing motivation/encouragement, implementing practical solutions, and using simple counseling methods. Below is a narration from a participant using cost-effective intervention
Basically, we have to find a way to mediate the issues at the minimum cost to both the school and parents. I think what informs these interventions is the support and cost involved . . . We seek the well-being of the individual which is more important to us. Professional help is costly so we just use simple methods
Most participants like Amina discussed caring, advising, and chatting with students as well as helping others find practical solutions to their problems.
For those with emotional problems, we have a chat with them and they are able to come out clearly with their problems and we help them find solutions to them. When they realize their problems through my questions, they will at the end of it all come out with practical solutions that will help them. . . .I do that emotional caring to stabilize them . . . Generally, we advise them
Furthermore, most participants, like Daniel, mentioned observing changes in students, and positive feedback from students, parents and teachers helped to determine the effectiveness of their interventions.
The results of my intervention are seen from changes in the chil’,s behavior. They go back to their former selves or their parents will come to school and thank you for helping their child. Sometimes teachers will tell you how the student is doing when you ask them . . . (
Theme 4: Assistance of Other Stakeholders in the Child’s System
Every participant highlighted the essential role of various stakeholders in SBIs for students with MHP. These stakeholders included parents, doctors, community mental health workers, and teachers. The following quotes demonstrate how a participant works with parents:
My agency advises us to work with parents when necessary. If there is a problem, we talk to the parents. Some parents are always ready to support and we discuss their child’s problem. Other parents are not supportive because of the stigma . . . for instance, I suggested to a parent to seek counseling and psychiatric help for their sexually abused child. But they rejected it and refused such services because of what others would think and say about them. ( I invite parents to a particular workshop we run for them. I pre-inform them, so getting them to come is easy. We have a program we run with them at the workshop to help them identify some of the mental health needs of their children and find solutions to them . . . Also, sometimes we take the child to the health facility if we identify that their mental health problem has a medical condition which necessitates medical or psychiatric attention.
Other participants also mentioned referring students to professionals like doctors and psychologists in community health facilities when needed.
So, most of the cases I handle at the school but if it turns out the person needs more professional help, I’m supposed to refer them. The place where I received my training also functions as a health clinic, so I usually refer them to the head of the clinic. He’s my professor, a psychologist and the owner of the clinic. . . We refer the student to my boss when w’,ve tried everything we can, but it’s just not working. That’s when we know she needs more support. My boss is a psychologist and a white lady. She also tries different ways to help. We do consider it an intervention when we take the child to health professionals. Sometimes, the child may need medical attention, so we refer them to a hospital. At the hospital . . . they have their own ways of assessing the child and deciding on the appropriate care, whether i’,s oral medication or an injection. This could be for conditions like depression, psychosis, or other mental health disorders. Personally, I don’t administer any medication. But I’ve seen children we referred being assessed and sometimes placed on medication for a specific period . . .
Objective 2 : The Need for Improving SBIs During Basic Education in Ghana
This section addressed the second objective of the study: to explore the need for improving SBIs within Ghana’s basic education system. It investigated the existing gaps and systemic barriers that hinder the effective delivery of mental health services in schools and considers areas where current practices can be strengthened. The objective also sought to capture insights on how interventions might be enhanced to better support students’ mental health and well-being in both school and national contexts.
Theme 5: Challenges From Schools and Families
All the participants identified several challenges that hinder effective interventions in their respective basic schools. These challenges included: limited mental health professionals, insufficient training and support for school staff, excessive workloads, low parental/family involvement, and limited resources and facilities in schools. For example, like Alison, all the participants highlighted the lack of trained counselors and psychologists in their schools.
In our school, we don’t have facilities, and we don’t have trained counselors. At times, it is difficult for us to refer students due to financial constraints and scarcity of professional psychologists and counselors. We should get more counselors in schools so that when we are teaching, they can also work on the mental health of the children. (
Also, other participants added that most of them have to play multiple roles, which affects their availability for SBIs. When a qualified mental health professional is assigned to a school, they are often responsible for several duties, as highlighted by the voices below.
Most of the schools are without psychologists, even the counselors who are responsible for counselling are also teaching at the same time. Also, a psychologist should be around to take care of the mental health issues among students. There are so many problems with services rendered in the schools. Some of the teachers have so many kids, so they have no patience with those with behavior problems so they do not even understand them. The counselor in the school has too many jobs at once and does not have the resources to do her work . . . We have five schools in one district. . . So at least in all the clusters in the regions, at least each area should have a guidance and counseling representative who is stationed to help the children with MHP
Additionally, as exemplified below, some participants like Daniel mentioned that the barriers to students receiving mental health support are due to parental neglect and lack of emotional support.
. . . As for the children themselves I do not have problems with them . . . The issue is with the parents; some of these parents do not care about their childre’,s mental health well-being. The children do not get any love at home and they see it when we take the children in to help them the parent will be acting annoyed. (
Theme 6: Challenges at the National Level
Many participants, especially those in public schools, expressed frustration with the government’s perceived indifference toward mental health issues. They also cited a lack of proactive measures and funding for mental health initiatives in basic schools. Moreover, they noted poor implementation of existing mental health policies, identifying these systemic challenges as significant barriers to effectively addressing MHP in schools.
Ghana government does not really take the issue of mental health seriously. The inclusive education policy is there but those who should implement it do not understand what they should do. We do not have trained counselors in all schools, and some of us have to work as the only ones in the whole municipality. ( The government does nothing to help . . . . The government has the policies but the implementation is what is lacking. The department will give us children but they do not have the resources. The policymakers think that children must be taught but ignore their mental issues. They do not see that their academic performance is related to their mental well-being. They simply do’,t care . . . We also don’t have trained professionals like clinical psychologists working with us. Also, we don’t have trained counselors or teachers who are trained to do mental work.
Participants also described how stigma and discrimination against those with MHP affect SBIs. For instance, Kojo said:
This country has a negative attitude towards MHP. People see those with severe mental problems walking around naked in town; so nobody wants their children to be labelled with similar characteristics. Parents do not understand our services . . . If everyone has negative thoughts or stigma about what you do, how can it become successful? (
Theme 7: Recommendations for Improving Service Delivery
Participants unanimously offered several recommendations, including raising mental health awareness and training, increasing the number of mental health professionals, improving policy implementation, allocating more resources for schools, and ensuring greater government support. The following narratives highlight some of these suggestions:
First, the training of staff is needed . . . Second, there should be a public education for parents to understand that their child is not mad because he or she has a mental health problem . . . Third, we need to have the implementation of inclusive education policies and services in all schools. With this we can have more resources in our school to do what we do Most of the challenges come from the government and lack of mental health education. So, the government needs to do more to create awareness about mental health issues and support our work. We also need training and education for parents and staff.
Other participants highlight that training and educating parents and staff on MHP will aid referrals and also encourage early interventions.
We need a lot more professionals to work on this, because there are a lot of children with MHP. Parents need to be trained to help us and more teachers should be trained on what to look out for in identifying children with mental health issues for us to assist fast.
Discussions
This study examined professionals’ perceptions on SBIs for students with MHP in Ghanaian basic schools by focusing on two main objectives. The first objective was to understand the nature of existing SBIs, which revealed four themes: risk factors contributing to mental health symptoms, observation and engagement for assessment, feasible and cost-effective approaches, as well as assistance of other stakeholders in the child’s system. The second objective explored ways to improve interventions by identifying challenges while offering recommendations to enhance SBIs delivered to children with MHP in basic schools.
The Nature of SBIs in Ghanaian Basic Schools
Participants unanimously emphasized the importance of SBIs to address MHP among students. Their interventions helped to mitigate the impact of mental health risk factors (like academic stress, negative peer interactions, parental financial difficulties, and abuse or neglect) that exacerbate the symptoms of MHP. This finding corroborated Ghanaian research about the socio-environmental impacts on psychological distress (Ame & Mfoafo-M’Carthy, 2016; Baidoo-Anu & Acquah, 2021; Mnookin, 2016).
Participants in this study supported students who exhibit internalizing and externalizing MHP, which they described with symptom-based language (e.g. crying, scared, frightened, troublesome, afraid, and aggressive), rather than clinical terminology. As asserted by Kleinman (1988), such local expressions of MHP show how symptoms are perceived in a society. These shapes help-seeking behaviors and ultimately the nature of interventions in that society. For instance, many Ghanaians interpret mood-related issues as personal or spiritual weakness, which can hinder them from seeking assistance from mental health professionals who are not faith-based counselors (Addy et al., 2021; Osei-Tutu & Affram, 2024). Also, behavioral problems of students in Ghana are often labeled as disobedience or truancy, leading to punitive responses rather than supportive interventions (Gyansah et al., 2015). Nonetheless, participants in this study did not report using punitive measures in response to students’ behavioral challenges, even when they labeled such students as “troublesome.”
Additionally, participants’ responses reflected an awareness of how MHP affects academic achievement and recognized such struggles as warning signs that prompted the need for their support. Scholars like DeSocio and Hootman (2004) have discussed that addressing MHP improves students’ concentration, participation, and overall well-being, which directly affects academic performance. This corresponds with evidence that MHP, if left untreated, can undermine cognitive function and learning abilities, which will lead to poor academic performance of students (DeSocio & Hootman, 2004; Durlak et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2023).
Participants identified students with MHP through selective methods and relied mostly on teachers as primary referral sources. Gyansah et al.’s (2015) findings indicated that teachers were likely to refer students for counseling in Ghanaian schools. Selecting students for SBIs only through observation and referrals from teachers can inadvertently fail to notice students with less observable symptoms or those at risk of developing mental health disorders. Such selective procedures can further reinforce disparities in access to mental health support among children and young adolescents.
Instead of systematic screening processes, most participants used informal conversations to assess students’ problems. Though such a method of assessing students by the participants is easily accessible and cost-free, it lacks the rigor required for precise assessment. The underutilization of standardized assessment tools by participants may lead to unreliable assessments that can affect the appropriateness and effectiveness of interventions (Connors et al., 2022).
Furthermore, a few participants reported involving parents and teachers to gain a more comprehensive understanding of students’ problems. Although most participants did not include these stakeholders in their assessments, it is encouraging that some practitioners recognized the importance of incorporating other members of the child’s support system. This is notable, given that the exclusion of such stakeholders has been a primary criticism of SBIs globally (Chodkiewicz & Boyle, 2016; Cossu et al., 2015). The variation in assessment procedures across schools reflects the absence of a standardized assessment protocol for school-based counseling in the country.
The interventional approaches participants used in their resource-limited schools reveal both strengths and limitations. The preference for cost-effective, targeted interventions aligns with the practical realities of implementing mental health support in schools with limited resources (Mabrouk et al., 2022). However, the lack of universal interventions and the reliance on unstructured but practical interventions resulted in implementation variations of SBIs across basic schools. This inconsistency points to a significant gap in uniformity and evidence-based approaches that diminishes the quality of interventions delivered in schools. Moreover, the reliance on anecdotal feedback and observations as the main method of determining the effectiveness of interventions further restricts the reliability of SBIs outcomes in Ghanaian basic schools. Nevertheless, participants’ recognition of their professional limitations and the need to refer complex cases to other mental health experts highlights their commitment to providing students with appropriate CAMH care.
The Need for Improving SBIs in Ghanaian Basic Schools
The research identified various structural and systemic issues affecting the effectiveness of SBIs in Ghanaian basic schools, which calls for fundamental improvements. The challenges mentioned by the participants emanated from the family, school, and national level. Findings on challenges align with previous findings of Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al. (2019) and the Ghana Education Service (GES, 2019). They reported ongoing challenges in implementing mental health programs such as the Guidance and Counseling Program and the SHEP to promote students’ mental well-being. The challenges raised by participants mirror those highlighted by other researchers over the past decade, yet little progress seems to have been made in addressing these issues within basic schools. Participants in this study also highlighted the need to adopt a multi-level approach to address these barriers and enhance the overall quality and accessibility of mental health care in basic schools.
Consistent with findings in pre-tertiary institutions in Ghana (eg, Gyansah et al., 2015; Mills, 2019; Special Attention Project, 2011), educators who assume multiple roles have limited availability to address mental health concerns of students since these school-based professionals are already overburdened with other educational tasks. They also reported having insufficient mental health training, confirming the findings of Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al. (2019), who asserted that most pre-tertiary schools in Ghana lack trained counselors. Although a more recent study by Panford-Quainoo et al. (2024) found that most senior high school counselors held master’s degrees in psychology or counseling, this finding does not extend to basic schools. The lack of specialized staff was compounded by GES’s poor allocation of professionals who could effectively deal with students with special needs, thereby confirming concerns earlier voiced by Mills (2019).
Since the professional competence gap has a direct impact on the quality of SBIs, participants stressed the need for ongoing professional development and mental health training of all school staff. This would enhance their capacity to identify early warning signs of MHP, respond appropriately, and refer students to relevant CAMH services. Increasing mental health awareness facilitates early detection and prompt intervention, both of which are essential to promoting students’ academic performance (Connors et al., 2022).
Inadequate funding and limited resources are reported as major barriers to the effective implementation of mental health programs in Ghanaian schools (Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al., 2019). Most recommendations from participants reflect a recognition of systematic investment in SBIs that ensures sustainable and quality mental health interventions. Their recommendations call for increased funding allocation for mental health programs, the recruitment and retention of qualified mental health professionals, and the enhancement of resources necessary for delivering effective SBIs within private and public primary schools. The absence of sustainable investment in school-based mental health services nationwide underscores systemic apathy since educators and mental health professionals are left to navigate the challenges of implementing SBIs with minimal institutional support.
Moreover, national-level challenges such as cultural stigma of MHP created barriers to seeking help and open communication about mental health within schools. This finding is consistent with other Ghanaian studies (e.g. Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al., 2019). Participants highlighted that cultural stigma often prevents families from acknowledging their children’s mental health needs and seeking appropriate support. Mental health stigma not only discourages parental involvement and help-seeking behaviors among students but also creates barriers to the development of quality mental health interventions in basic schools. This stigma is deeply rooted in societal attitudes and beliefs that regard MHP as a source of shame or weakness (Barke et al., 2011). Participants believed that addressing MHP stigma through targeted education campaigns and awareness initiatives at both community and national levels would encourage more families to seek help and engage with mental health services. This perspective aligns with existing research (Kirmayer et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2023), which emphasized the importance of mental health literacy in reducing stigma and encouraging help-seeking behaviors.
Although Ghana has health policies and legislation to support the delivery of SBIs, the challenges discussed pose significant barriers to their effective implementation. Bridging the chronic treatment gap for MHP in Ghana depends on the effective implementation of existing policies, which foster school-based mental health programs. Although Ghana’s mental health policies align with global standards (Ame & Mfoafo-M’Carthy, 2016), the World Health Organization’s (WHO, 2022) situation analysis reported a 98% treatment gap for mental health conditions. Policy directives alone are insufficient without tangible actions such as investment of resources, and systematic implementation of feasible, cost-effective CAMH services in the country. By addressing the multi-level barriers to SBIs, a more supportive and inclusive environment can be created for basic school students with mental health needs, ultimately enhancing both their well-being and academic outcomes.
Implication for Counselors and Psychologists in Schools
Psychologists, school counselors, educators, and school social workers are crucial to the well-being of basic school students. Therefore, it is essential to improve their skills, enabling them to effectively serve as mental health practitioners in their roles. School counselors in Ghana primarily focus on academic and career guidance rather than mental health or counseling services, as they do not receive specialized training in psychological interventions like their counterparts in Western countries (Asiedu-Yirenkyi et al., 2019). With specialized training, they will have the competencies and ethical mandate to provide mental health support or make appropriate referrals. Additionally, CAMH and SBIs should be integrated into undergraduate curricula, particularly in Psychology, Education, and Social Work programs, to ensure the availability of competent on-site mental health professionals in basic schools. Basic schools can leverage the expertise of students in such programs by recruiting interns who have received training in SBIs. This approach offers a practical and cost-effective way to expand mental health support for students in basic schools.
Since school mental health practitioners in Ghana rarely use evidence-based practices, research on this topic in psychology and counseling can focus on the adaptation of evidence-based interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which has been proven effective with different student populations worldwide (Feiss et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2023). Adapting CBT in schools is crucial for developing culturally responsive and sustainable SBIs that will enhance early access to mental health care, foster emotional resilience and regulation, and address the psychological needs of children in Ghana (Jopling et al., 2025). Therefore, future studies could use an evidence-based cultural adaptation framework to inform the development and piloting of a contextually appropriate and feasible CBT-based intervention in basic schools across the country.
Limitations
The qualitative design utilized in this study limits the generalizability of findings to all basic schools in Ghana (Creswell & Poth, 2018). The use of a small, purposively selected sample of nine mental health workers from the Greater Accra Region limits the geographical diversity represented in the data. Additionally, all data were based on self-reported perceptions, which may be subjected to recall errors, selective memory, and social desirability biases (Krumpal, 2013). While member checking and peer review supported the trustworthiness of the themes, the study’s scope may be limited by the lack of student perspectives to corroborate professional viewpoints.
Conclusion
The mental health professionals interviewed for this study demonstrated a strong commitment to supporting students with MHP through various supportive interventions in basic schools. Students displaying internalizing and externalizing symptoms are typically identified and assisted by teachers, school social workers, guardians, and counselors in basic schools who act in the capacity of mental health professionals. They provided support through targeted interventions that are generally feasible, cost-effective, and do not require specialized training in SBIs. Although they recognized the importance of their services, the participants also noted challenges that hindered effective implementation and offered recommendations to ensure that more students received adequate mental health support.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-spc-10.1177_20556365251383646 – Supplemental material for School Based Interventions for Students With Mental Health Problems in Ghanaian Basic Schools
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-spc-10.1177_20556365251383646 for School Based Interventions for Students With Mental Health Problems in Ghanaian Basic Schools by Marigold Cobbina, Dianne Green-Smith and Efua E. Mantey in Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the agencies that referred participants for this study, including the Society of Social Work Association, Ghana. We also extend our appreciation to the schools that facilitated our access to participants, as well as to all the individuals who participated in this research.
Author Note
This article draws on data from an independent study at Grand Valley State University (GVSU), titled ‘‘Perceptions of Professionals on School-Based Interventions for Students with Mental Health Problems in Ghanaian Basic Schools’’.
Ethical Considerations
This study was reviewed and approved as Exempt by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Grand Valley State University (GVSU), in accordance with federal regulations for research involving minimal risk to participants (IRB Protocol #: 21-186-H)
Author Contributions
Marigold Cobbina served as the Principal Investigator. She led the student research during the initial study, conceptualized the research design, collected and analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. Dr. Dianna Green-Smith provided academic supervision as the faculty advisor, ensuring methodological rigor and alignment with institutional standards. Dr. Efua E. Mantey contributed to the final stages of analysis and manuscript development, offering critical cultural insights that strengthened thematic interpretation and contextual relevance.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting this study is publicly available in the Harvard Dataverse. For access details or further information, please contact the corresponding author.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
