Under the Shadow of Culture and Politics: Understanding LGBTQ Social Media Activists’ Perceptions,Concerns,and Strategies

Context: Turkish LGBTQ Community and Their Struggles

Turkey has a very conservative and religious society. According to Pew Research, more than half of the Turkish population holds negative views toward LGBTQ individuals and homosexuality, with 57% expressing opposition and nearly 25% considering homosexuality as a perversion. A survey conducted by a Turkish research company revealed that only 9% of the population described themselves as non-conservative (Konda, 2020). Moreover, the majority of Society believes that LGBTQ couples should not have the right to marry (Poushter & Kent, 2020).

The situation surrounding the Turkish LGBTQ community and their struggles is complex. While there is a strong conservative and religious element, it is crucial to acknowledge that there are also ambivalent attitudes toward LGBTQ issues in Turkey. Despite negative public opinions, there has been a growing movement of support for LGBTQ issues since the Gezi Protests, with local administrations and opposition political parties such as CHP and HDP openly advocating for LGBTQ rights. Although more than half of the Turkish population holds negative views toward LGBTQ individuals, with nearly 25% perceiving homosexuality as a perversion, it is important to recognize that there are pockets of progress in the country (Poushter & Kent, 2020).

Scholars have suggested that Turkish conservatism tends to resist social changes and opposes practices that contradict traditional values (Kalaycioğlu, 2007; Yildirmaz, 2003). Unfortunately, this conservatism often manifests as xenophobia and homophobia (Kalaycioğlu, 2007). In the early years of the Turkish Republic, the state promoted its own gender ideology, emphasizing heterosexuality and family values. Similarly, since the conservative AKP government came into power, it has prioritized reinforcing family values as a hegemonic discourse and constitutive element of Society (Baytok, 2021). However, despite the increasing authoritarianism and social conservatism, there has been an increase in LGBTQ organizations in Turkey since 2000 (Savcı, 2016).

To comprehend the present state of affairs, it is essential to understand the historical trajectory of the LGBTQ movement in Turkey. As early as the 1980s, some Turkish tabloids and mainstream magazines began to discuss previously taboo issues such as homosexuality and gender identity. During this period some LGBTQ individuals were able to declare that they were gay during this period openly. For example, Murathan Mungan, a prominent poet and writer, has achieved professional success while being open about his homosexuality throughout his career (Gay Identities, n.d.). During the same period of the 1980s, the Radical Democratic Green Party extended its support to the LGBTQ community’s fight for their rights. This included endorsing the efforts of a group of transgender individuals who staged protests against police brutality. However, these representations were often sensationalized and stereotypical, perpetuating negative attitudes toward the LGBTQ community (Cetin, 2016). In addition, LGBTQ individuals in Turkish media were often portrayed in flamboyant and caricatured ways, reinforcing the stigma and discrimination faced by this community (Cetin, 2016).

During the 1990s, state TV channels avoided gender-related issues and treated sexuality as a taboo until the emergence of private TV channels (Gorkemli, 2012). The first LGBTQ organizations were established around the 1990s in Istanbul and Ankara (Gorkemli, 2012). In addition, some LGBTQ college students formed online groups in the late 1990s (Yahoo groups). These online groups connected LGBTQ organizations throughout Turkey (Gorkemli, 2012). In the 2000s, there was a significant rise in the number of LGBTQ organizations and public activists. These groups made significant progress regarding LGBTQ rights, particularly through organizing public events such as Pride Marches (Muedini, 2018). The AKP and the Turkish public generally had a positive attitude toward Pride marches due to the European Union accession process. In particular, between 2003 and 2005, the conservative AKP government allowed these Pride marches to take place to be in line with the European Union (Cetin, 2016). While it is true that during its early years, the AKP government in Turkey implemented several positive human rights developments (such as the reform of the Turkish Penal Code in 2005, which abolished the death penalty and introduced new legal protections for freedom of expression and assembly) that were widely praised by international human rights organizations (Butler, 2012), there has been a noticeable decline in LGBTQ rights over the last decade in Turkey (Acconcia et al., 2022). Particularly, the 2013 Gezi movement marked a turning point where the once-positive environment took a negative turn, as even the participants in this study identified it as a moment when things started to get worse (Acconcia et al., 2022; Muedini, 2018). The active participation of the LGBTQ community in Gezi created the impression among conservative AKP voters that this group was dangerous and aimed to impose the West’s hidden agenda on Turkish Society. As a result, LGBTQ rights have rapidly declined in Turkey over the last decade, accompanied by an increase in hate speech against the LGBTQ movement and those who support it (Acconcia et al., 2022; Yackley, 2020). For instance, during the 2022 Pride month, the Turkish government banned 10 LGBT-related events and detained over 530 individuals following its withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention (Smallens, 2022).

Overall, the situation for LGBTQ individuals has become increasingly dire in Turkey in recent years. The government’s hostile stance toward the LGBTQ community has resulted in a decline in LGBTQ rights and increased hate speech and discrimination (Acconcia et al., 2022). As a result, Turkey significantly lags behind many countries in Europe and other high-income nations in terms of LGBTQ rights. For instance, in a ranking of 49 European countries by the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans & Intersex Association (ILGA) in 2019, Turkey was positioned lower than all but one country, Azerbaijan (ILGA-Europe2019; Sansal, 2021). Furthermore, there are no laws in Turkey that protect individuals from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, except for the Istanbul Convention. Judicial institutions in Turkey also tend to target homosexuals as scapegoats (Sansal, 2021).

In addition to the lack of rights, the LGBTQ community in Turkey faces social oppression (Biçmen & Bekiroğulları, 2014; Yilmaz, 2022). LGBTQ groups are often accused of being immoral and damaging traditional Turkish family values (Ince-Yenilmez, 2021). The conservative AKP government encourages this hate speech through its policies and rhetoric. For instance, President Erdogan has stated that the LGBTQ community is incompatible with Turkish cultural values (BBC News Türkçe, 2022). Such rhetoric encourages radical Islamists and conservatives to engage in online bullying, attacks, and discrimination against LGBTQ individuals (Özbay & Öktem, 2021; Parks et al., 2017). Numerous cases have been reported where trolls have targeted and threatened members of these communities on social media platforms (Gorkemli, 2012; Parks et al., 2017).

According to prior research, the online discourse forms representations of reality while actively constructing reality for LGBTQ groups and for other marginalized groups (Korkut et al., 2020). Thus, online platforms such as social media are powerful tools for constructing reality and providing new opportunities for activists and marginalized groups. However, in countries like Turkey, apart from cyberhate, harassment, and threats, state surveillance and lateral surveillance make online spaces dangerous for LGBTQ activists (Andrejevic, 2004; Caliskan, 2021; Oz & Yanik, 2022; Medrado & Rega, 2021). In recent years, the Turkish government’s surveillance practices have increased dramatically, according to Freedom House Media (2019). In addition, due to the Gezi protests, the AKP government decided to take steps to control online communication (Deutsche Welle (www.dw.com), 2022). By using these laws, authorities can monitor users’ online activities and prosecute them for their posts (Deutsche Welle (www.dw.com), 2022). Some scholars argue that state surveillance contributes to self-censorship online in Turkey due to prosecution concerns (e.g., Oz & Yanik, 2022).

Moreover, media misrepresentation and the government’s anti-LGBTQ rhetoric intensify these challenges. For example, Eslen-Ziya (2022) demonstrated how anti-gender groups used social media platforms to threaten women and LGBTQ individuals online in Turkey. She argued that while social media platforms provide a space for these groups, they also offer a space for anti-feminist groups to portray the LGBTQ movement as a threat to Turkish cultural norms and the Turkish family (Eslen-Ziya, 2022). Similarly, a recent study found that social media activists in Turkey experience transmit-trap dynamics, where they are both empowered by and targeted within social media platforms (Parks et al., 2017).

During the Istanbul Convention movement, government supporters and conservative groups made active use of social media to spread media misrepresentation and promote the government’s rhetoric against the Istanbul Convention. This dissemination was carried out through the government’s online troll army: AKtrolls (Akca et al., 2021). Essentially, these groups portrayed the Istanbul Convention as a Trojan horse used by Western countries to impose sexual abnormality while using women’s rights as a cover. This rhetoric suggests that the Istanbul Convention and its online movement are an attack against the sacred values of the traditional Turkish family and an attempt to take men’s rights (Flood, 2004). President Erdogan created this rhetoric, which was then disseminated by his online supporters (Image 1).

OPEN IN VIEWER

Image 1.

An Internet meme portraying the Istanbul Convention as a Trojan horse.

Consequently, organized online threats, harassment, and violence against LGBTQ groups have significantly increased (Amnesty International, 2021). Recently, government supporters have launched an online movement called #LGBTdayatmasi (imposition of LGBTQ) to demand a new law from the Turkish parliament banning what they call LGBTQ propaganda. In addition, thousands marched in Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir to protect their families from what they perceive as “LGBTQ perversion” (The Associated Press, 2022).

Recent research on LGBTQ issues in Turkey has shed light on the multifaceted nature of the challenges faced by LGBTQ activists and the underlying mechanisms that contribute these challenges. For example, Savcı’s work titled Queer in Translation: Sexual Politics under Neoliberal Islam provides an analysis of the rise of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party, offering insights into the factors that contribute to the difficulties experienced by LGBTQ individuals. Particularly, Savcı exposes the strategic utilization of religion, morality, and capitalism by the Turkish government as mechanisms to preserve national stability and suppress opposition (including marginalized communities). Consequently, LGBTQ activists in Turkey face significant obstacles in advocating for their rights and challenging societal norms (Savcı, 2020). Kocabıçak (2023) similarly argues that the alliance between patriarchal actors and the discriminatory agenda of the government contributes to the ongoing marginalization and exclusion of LGBTQ communities. In particular, the absence of women from decision-making processes intensifies the oppression experienced by queer individuals, as it curtails the representation and influence of voices advocating for LGBTQ rights (Kocabıçak, 2023).

Further exploration of the socio-political dynamics by Özbay and Candan (2023) in their study highlights how an intersectional framework shapes feminist and queer political subjectivity and activism. They argued that the increasing number of queer/feminist activists face difficulties in mobilizing around single-issue politics. Instead, they embrace a comprehensive notion of social justice, forging connections across different forms of oppression and resistance. Their political consciousness and feminist/queer subjectivity foster a predisposition toward intersectional understandings. By adopting an intersectional lens, these queer/feminist activists consciously and vehemently reject the governmentality imposed by the nation-state.

Moreover, recent studies have shown that these multifaced challenges extend beyond the realm of online/offline activism. Aslan and Gurdogan (2021) reveal the negative attitudes held by the nursing community toward LGBTQ individuals, which hinder their access to healthcare services. LGBTQ youth in Turkey also report negative experiences when seeking health care, as highlighted by Apalı et al. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these difficulties, with LGBTQ individuals navigating political homophobia and discrimination (Altay, 2022). However, despite the growing presence of discriminatory and authoritarian pressures, LGBTQ individuals in Turkey persist in developing and utilizing strategies to empower queer community members, enabling them to organize and actively resist such forms of discrimination (Özbay & Öktem, 2021; Parks et al., 2017). Overall, recent studies reinforce the notion that LGBTQ individuals in Turkey face discrimination and marginalization across different facets of their lives, and the situation of LGBTQ individuals in Turkey is complex as they navigate cultural, legal, and free speech hurdles.

Online Activism and Social Media

Social media has transformed information delivery, particularly in relation to social movements, as popular platforms have become increasingly influential (Murthy, 2018). In the past decade, hashtag campaigns have gained popularity worldwide and have become crucial tools for protests and emergency response (Goswami, 2018). Online activism, as a social phenomenon, typically involves the expression of contentious ideas, collective action, the formation of collective identity, and the use of communication to address issues (Chon & Park, 2019). Specifically, online activism refers to activism that utilizes online platforms to pursue social or political goals (Murthy, 2018). In that sense, online activism is at the “intersection between social context, political purpose, and technological possibility” (Gillan et al., 2008, p. 151). Social media platforms offer an alternative space for marginalized groups to express themselves, especially for those who are excluded from public discussions (Matsick et al., 2020). Platforms like Facebook and Twitter provide users with tools to exchange messages, organize protests, and voice their opinions (Matsick et al., 2020). Consequently, these platforms have played a crucial role for marginalized groups living under repressive regimes, enabling them to challenge official rhetoric, construct and reconstruct their identities, and engage in civic life (Liao, 2019).

From movements like #BlackLivesMatter to #MeToo, social media has provided marginalized groups with a space to gain visibility (Shahin et al., 2021). However, critics argue that social media activism can also lead to what is often referred to as “slacktivism” (Morozov, 2009, p. 7), “clicktivism” (Halupka, 2018), or “pictivism” (Oeldorf-Hirsch & McGloin, 2017). Instead of generating meaningful participation, social media may result in superficial and unhelpful forms of engagement (Morozov, 2009). Moreover, although social media platforms can foster a sense of community, they present challenges for movements due to the lack of precise organizational structures, government surveillance, and the substantial time and resources required to sustain them (Murthy, 2018). Furthermore, critics argued that even though social media activism sometimes may impact societies, it mostly stays as online protests and mostly does not translate into offline movements (Morozov, 2009).

Despite the noted shortcomings of online activism, the relatively new act of building groups of public support on social media for a cause, also known as hashtag activism, has been an increasingly popular method to highlight wanted changes in socio-political topics across the globe (Goswami, 2018). Research indicates that individuals who are motivated by a particular cause are more likely to engage in both forms of activism (Halupka, 2018). Furthermore, in response to social activism, individuals participate in social media activism and engage in participatory behaviors when collaboratively working toward problem-solving (Chon & Park, 2019a). For example, a recent study on anti-racist, feminist, and queer activism by Jackson et al. (2020) found that hashtags can help foster relationships between diverse networks of marginalized communities, online and offline. Similarly, Bennett and Segerberg (2015) propose that social media and online spaces provide avenues for marginalized groups to share their personal stories, which can effectively inform the public and inspire collective action. In some cases, such as the Gezi movement in Turkey, social media has played a crucial role in mobilizing people and inspiring actions for social change (Bennett and Segerberg, 2015; Oz, 2016).

In addition to its broader applicability in activism, social media has emerged as a vital platform for sexual politics (Jenzen, 2015). Jenzen (2015) explains that social media provides a space for individuals to express themselves creatively, particularly within LGBTQ subcultures, encompassing political satire, celebration, and activism. Beyond activism, LGBTQ individuals have already gravitated toward social media as an informal learning platform where they can obtain knowledge from friends, celebrities, and like-minded individuals (Fox & Ralston, 2016). Given that many members of the LGBTQ community often feel stigmatized, the ability to maintain anonymity online becomes crucial. Fox and Ralston (2016) highlight that LGBTQ individuals utilize social media and the Internet to engage in online discussions, support others facing harassment, and share LGBTQ-related educational content as a means to express various aspects of their identity. Furthermore, Fox and Ralston (2016) suggested that LGBTQ members would often take relationships offline, attend awareness events, and meet others they had befriended online, similar to other studies that note those motivated by a topic would often move their activism offline.

In relation to LGBTQ subcultures, activists utilize social media platforms not only to explore identity and the “coming out” process but also to recruit others in the fight against political oppression, aiming for change at a national or global level. Research suggests that social media provides a way for marginalized groups to overcome censorship and resist surveillance (Dencik et al., 2016). Moreover, social media activism campaigns could carry geographical issues beyond their in-person limits and contribute to the diverse population while standing up to oppression worldwide (Kilic, 2021). Recent studies have shown that social media campaigns, including hashtag activism, are becoming increasingly prevalent in large groups, attracting mainstream attention (Wonneberger et al., 2021). This is particularly relevant for LGBTQ groups, as they can utilize online spaces to foster collective consciousness and transform social media platforms into spaces for action (Caliskan, 2021).

As argued by Ozban (2022), the LGBTI ban imposed by the Turkish government has become an oppressive mechanism, sparking new forms of resistance and leading to the emergence of fresh avenues in digital LGBTQ activism that unite LGBTQ communities in Turkey. In this context, other studies suggest that perceived affordances and network architecture can influence the decision of LGBTQ activists in selecting specific social media platforms for their activism, enabling them to develop effective strategies based on their understanding of affordances and their intended audience (Ellison & Vitak, 2015; Fox & Ralston, 2016).

Overall, scholars have already examined different aspects of social media activism. However, many of these examinations focused on the United States and other Western countries. Therefore, cultural contexts must be considered when examining social media activism (Liao, 2019), particularly in the context of social media activism and LGBTQ groups. Mainly, social media activism and LGBTQ groups should be closely examined in their social and political context because understanding how social media activists navigate in distinct cultural and political contexts may provide a better understanding of social media activism and gender struggles in that specific context.

Methodology

This study employed semi-structured interviews conducted in Turkish, which the authors later translated into English. The participants consisted of LGBTQ social media activists, defined as individuals who had previously engaged in online movements to achieve social or political objectives (Murthy, 2018). Specifically, we reached people who actively participated in the #IstanbulSözleşmesiYaşatır (#istanbulConventionSavesLives) movement in 2021.

The data collection procedures for this study commenced in December 2021, and it took approximately one month to secure the participation of our initial participants. Due to perceived risks, our initial attempts to solicit interview volunteers were unsuccessful on multiple occasions. Therefore, we had to take extra precautions to ensure the safety and anonymity of our participants during the research process. Before conducting the interviews, the authors conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify potential risks to participants’ safety. This includes assessing the political and social climate in the research context, understanding possible consequences for participants, and developing strategies to mitigate risks. To safeguard the confidentiality of participant data, encryption techniques were employed. These techniques involved encoding the digital data using cryptographic algorithms, rendering it inaccessible and unreadable without the corresponding encryption key. In addition, measures were taken to ensure participant anonymity throughout the study. Specifically, personally identifiable information was carefully removed from the collected data. Pseudonyms were assigned to participants, and any identifying details in interview transcripts were redacted to prevent the disclosure of participants’ identities. Careful attention was given to avoid including any information that could potentially lead to the identification of individuals involved in the study. These precautions were implemented to protect the privacy and safety of the participants and to maintain the ethical integrity of the research. Participants were provided with detailed information regarding the safety measures and precautions that would be implemented before they agreed to participate in the interviews. Subsequently, the snowball sampling technique was employed to identify and recruit additional participants. The final interview was conducted on 25 June 2022.

The participants of this study were active participants of the Istanbul movement. For example, some of them were the admins of LGBTQ pages on social media, members of LGBTQ organizations, and gender-based groups or content creators for these groups. We reached a total of 22 LGBTQ activists and invited them to the interview. However, two participants did not attend the scheduled interview, resulting in a total of 20 LGBTQ activists being interviewed for this study.

The researchers asked the participants several questions about society’s perception of LGBTQ members, freedom of speech, concerns, and risks related to being LGBTQ social media activists, and state and lateral surveillance. Throughout the interviews conducted, the subjects were probed regarding diverse issues that pertained to the research objectives. The following questions are some examples of the inquiries made: To what extent do you perceive the deterioration in the freedom of expression in Turkey? Could you elaborate on the factors that contribute to this deterioration? What apprehensions and dangers do you face as an LGBTQ social media activist in Turkey? In what ways do you evaluate the government’s stance on LGBTQ members, and how do you think this affects the public’s perception of this community? Finally, we asked about how they navigate these challenges, freedom of speech, and cultural challenges.

Findings

Discussion

This study examined what concerns and risks Turkish LGBTQ activists face and why and how they use social media and other technologies for activism purposes. The findings provide valuable insights into LGBTQ social media activism in repressive regimes and the Global South.

In general, LGBTQ activists in Turkey hold a negative view of the current situation, perceiving that Society aligns with the government’s rhetoric and considers LGBTQ individuals as threats to their values. Therefore, LGBTQ activists in Turkey target the “moveable middle” with their messages and create strategies around it. For example, some participants mentioned blocking people with strong anti-LGBTQ views. On the contrary, they stated that they use social media to gain new allies, such as gaining the support of some heterosexual people. Previous research supports the notion that activists target the “moveable middle” since they are more receptive to listening to activists than those with firmly entrenched views (Buerger, 2021, p. 8; GLAAD and Them, 2019). Similarly, Turkish LGBTQ activists target the “moveable middle,” hoping these individuals may help them change the overall societal view of LGBTQ. For example, one participant said,

I think if we want to change something, then we should communicate with moderates on these issues (LGBTQ rights) on social media. They can help us share our stories with the rest of society. Their role can be that of a middleman.

LGBTQ social media activists also consider the affordances of social media platforms when choosing where and what to share. For example, some participants stated that they feel highly visible on Facebook, and their activities, such as likes, can be seen by their network; therefore, they do not use Facebook for activism purposes. Consequently, they avoid using Facebook for activism. In contrast, when they need to reduce their visibility, they prefer encrypted messaging apps or private social media groups to share information related to activism. Existing literature indicates that marginalized groups can be “forced to invisibility,” particularly after uprisings (Acconcia et al., 2022, p. 5). For example, several participants mentioned that they started seeing the opinion climate as hostile after the Gezi protests. Thus, they decided to reduce their visibility online. Furthermore, in the countries like Turkey, using the Internet as a “digital closet” may provide security to the members of the LGBTQ community (Gorkemli, 2012, p. 79). Thus, social media in Turkey serves the dual purpose of increasing LGBTQ activists’ visibility while providing safe spaces when visibility needs to be reduced.

The design of social media platforms can influence the visibility of content and attract unintended audiences, although user behavior is shaped by platform affordances rather than determined by them, as argued by Ellison & Vitak (2015) Boyd. Thus, the architecture of a social media platform can impact the practices that occur on it. Recent research on digital social movements has shifted from focusing on “slacktivism” to examining the reasons why online platforms enable or constrain “hashtag activism” (Greijdanus et al., 2020). Our study indicates that their perceived affordances and network architecture influence activists’ decisions to use particular platforms for activism. In addition, participants reported developing strategies on social media platforms based on their perception of affordances and their intended audience.

These findings have practical implications for LGBTQ activists and social media platform designers. Activists can benefit from understanding the affordances of different social media platforms and how they can use them to their advantage in their activism. For example, Twitter’s hashtag-enabled communication has enabled marginalized groups to establish connections with news media, promote alternative narratives, and foster diverse networks of dissent (Jackson et al., 2020). These insights have direct implications for LGBTQ activists and social media platform designers. By recognizing the unique features and capabilities of various social media platforms, activists can leverage them effectively to support their advocacy efforts. Moreover, by considering the platform’s affordances and intended audience, activists can develop effective strategies to reach their target audience and achieve their goals. Platform designers can also benefit from these findings by considering the affordances of their platforms and how they can shape user engagement (Oz et al., 2018). They can design platforms that encourage positive practices and discourage negative ones, ultimately creating a safer and more supportive environment for LGBTQ activism. This knowledge can contribute to the creation of a more inclusive and supportive online environment where marginalized groups can voice their concerns and empower themselves to bring about positive social change. In addition, through the utilization of anonymous profiles, LGBTQ individuals experience a sense of liberation from societal expectations and the constraints placed upon them in their daily lives (Altay, 2022). Furthermore, our findings indicate that LGBTQ activists utilize social media as a means to establish alliances with individuals across the globe. Notably, social media platforms such as Twitter position themselves as inclusive global communities, emphasizing the interchangeable nature of geographical location and national origins. However, despite the enticing prospect of attaining global outreach and connectivity, certain studies have suggested that users frequently experience a sense of invisibility and detachment within the vastness of the online global sphere (Robinson, 2022). Consequently, platform designers can be mindful of this phenomenon during the development process. Incorporating this understanding can contribute to the creation of a more comprehensive and supportive online environment.

Finally, government surveillance was one of the most significant concerns of the participants. They seem to be aware of some tactics used by the Turkish government. Lyon (2017) suggests that citizens accept government surveillance as a part of everyday life due to its widespread nature. As a concept, surveillance culture helps explain why the responses to surveillance, in general, are so diverse. For instance, our findings indicated that while some activists opt for safer alternatives, such as avoiding Facebook and Twitter while using encrypted messaging apps, others employ technical strategies like using a VPN when engaging in activism on social media. Turkish social media activists are conscious of state surveillance and carefully navigate the risks and benefits associated with it. Depending on how they perceive the consequences of surveillance, they employ different strategies (Lyon, 2017). The activists are also concerned about lateral surveillance. In the Turkish context, lateral surveillance goes beyond being a privacy issue. As other scholars have suggested, state-driven lateral surveillance in Turkey appears to be “the latest manifestation of an authoritarian government’s attempt to suppress public opposition” (Yesil & Sozeri, 2017, p. 547).

According to our findings, surveillance concerns are closely tied to increased visibility. For example, some participants discussed the risks of being overly visible (hypervisibility) (Gorkemli, 2012, p. 79). Despite the fact that most LGBTQ participants wish to increase their visibility online, increased visibility may be problematic due to increased vulnerability (Wilkinson, 2020). Particularly, using social media for activism purposes may increase marginalized groups’ visibility. In turn, increased visibility might cause serious consequences such as threats, cyberbullying, and even physical attacks. Also, governments may be able to monitor and control dissents and marginalized groups more effortlessly with increased visibility (De Backer, 2019). Concerns regarding lateral surveillance among LGBTQ activists in Turkey have various policy, practical, and social implications. First, the government’s use of troll armies and surveillance tactics could lead to the arrest and prosecution of LGBTQ activists, which violates their fundamental human rights. It also restricts their freedom of expression and association, limiting their ability to organize and advocate for their rights. In addition, the fear of lateral surveillance and the possibility of being targeted by trolls or even family members can lead to self-censorship among activists, hindering their ability to create meaningful change. Practically, these concerns might also result in a lack of trust among activists, limiting their ability to collaborate and work together effectively.

Furthermore, the fear of persecution and isolation can contribute to a decline in the number of activists and a decrease in public support for the LGBTQ community. Thus, these concerns highlight the need for policy reform and increased support for LGBTQ activists in Turkey to protect their safety and human rights. The situation in Turkey forces LGBTQ activists to weigh the benefits and risks of engaging in online activism. When they perceive high risks, they employ strategies to reduce their visibility (Gorkemli, 2012, p. 80). In this way, they can protect themselves when they feel unsafe. Overall, the concept of lateral surveillance highlights the complex challenges facing activists in Turkey and other contexts where state and societal pressures converge to suppress dissent and marginalize minority groups. By understanding the tactical and technical strategies that activists use to navigate these challenges, we can better support their efforts to promote social justice and create a more inclusive and equitable society.

Conclusion

In summary, the findings suggest that LGBTQ members in Turkey are trying to balance the risks and benefits of being online activists. On one hand, social media platforms offer LGBTQ and minority groups the opportunity to communicate and amplify their voices. On the other hand, they also enable the government to surveil, punish, and marginalize them. In addition, social media and tools like WhatsApp provide safe spaces for the LGBTQ community when they feel unsafe in public.

Overall, besides examining social and political factors that affect LGBTQ social media activism, this study examined these factors within a particular cultural context. Consequently, it fills a gap in the existing literature by addressing the interactions between social, cultural, and political influences on online activism in repressive regimes. Furthermore, as networked authoritarianism is on the rise globally (Cebul & Pinckney, 2021), future studies should investigate these forces in other countries and contexts. In addition, it would be valuable to explore social media activism in other Global South countries in future research.