Roles of Entrepreneurial Resource Acquisition and Family Support in Internet Use and Women’s Entrepreneurial Competence

Abstract

Women have become an increasingly important force in entrepreneurship, and their relatively low entrepreneurial competence has aroused widespread attention from the academia. Drawing from the resource-based theory and the social support theory, this study aims to explore the impact of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial competence and the roles of entrepreneurial resource acquisition and family support in this relationship. After collecting a sample of 328 women entrepreneurs in China, this study demonstrates that Internet use is positively related to women’s entrepreneurial competence, and this relation is partially mediated by entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Moreover, family support moderates the relation between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition as well as the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition. The results of the current study contribute to revealing how Internet use affects women’s entrepreneurial competence, including its direct and indirect effects and boundary conditions. Practical implications for policy-makers and female entrepreneurs are also provided.

Plain Language Summary

Purpose: How to enhance women’s entrepreneurial competence has always been a hot topic in entrepreneurship research; however, the mechanism through which Internet use affects women’s entrepreneurial competence remains to be fully understood. To address this gap, the present study aims to explore the mediation effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition and the moderation effect of family support in the relationship between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. Methods: The theoretical model was tested empirically using questionnaire data collected from a sample of 328 female entrepreneurs in China. Conclusions: Internet use has a positive impact on women’s entrepreneurial competence, which is partially mediated by entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Moreover, family support strengthens the relation between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition as well as the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Implications: This study provides suggestions for both policy-makers and female entrepreneurs to improve their entrepreneurial competence, such as how to make full use of Internet technology and family support. It also provides suggestions for policy-makers to promote women’s entrepreneurial competence, such as integrating educational resources to provide training courses on Internet entrepreneurship skills for female entrepreneurs. Limitations: This study collected questionnaire data in China, which may limit the generalization of research conclusions.

Keywords

women entrepreneurs Internet use entrepreneurial competence entrepreneurial resource acquisition family support

Introduction

Female entrepreneurship is not only closely related to their own economic interests and the realization of personal value (Cardella et al., 2020), but can also contribute to the well-being of societies by generating employment opportunities, innovations and wealth (Chatterjee et al., 2018). Over the past few decades, female entrepreneurial activities are booming in Asian countries such as China. However, exiting studies have shown that women are confronted with more obstacles than men in the process of entrepreneurship, including financing difficulties, work-family conflicts, gender discrimination, lack of entrepreneurial resources and abilities (Brindley, 2005; Shakeel et al., 2020). In particular, women in Asia are expected to shoulder the responsibility of housework and childcare (Shakeel et al., 2020). These barriers will restrict the development of female entrepreneurship to a large extent (Fairlie & Robb, 2009; Jamali, 2009; Wu et al., 2019). Therefore, compared with their male counterparts, women-owned businesses tend to have slower growth, smaller scale, lower technology content, and relatively limited social influence (Thebaud, 2015). Considering that the potential of female entrepreneurship has not been fully exploited, it is of great significance to promote the high-quality development of female entrepreneurship, and Internet-based digital technologies are likely to help female entrepreneurs break through the above obstacles.

The popularity of the Internet has not only unprecedentedly promoted women entrepreneurship, but also made the empowering effect of Internet use on women entrepreneurship widely concerned by the academic community (McAdam et al., 2020). First, the Internet is characterized by low threshold and low risk, making it possible for women who are originally in a disadvantaged position to equally participate in entrepreneurial activities as men (Martin & Wright, 2005). Second, the Internet provides favorable conditions for female entrepreneurship by providing channels for disseminating entrepreneurial information and resources, reducing the cost and threshold of entrepreneurship (Dy et al., 2017). Third, the Internet can effectively expand the range of interpersonal communication through social media technology (e.g., Facebook), thereby enhancing women’s social capital and promoting their micro-entrepreneurship activities on the platform (Delacroix et al., 2019). Although existing research has illustrated the impact of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial choices or intentions, few studies have delved into the effect of Internet use on their entrepreneurial competence. Given the fact that entrepreneurial competence can contribute to the sustainable growth of enterprises, the research on how to enhance women’s entrepreneurial competence from the perspective of Internet use has important theoretical and practical significance.

The resource-based theory asserts that resources are the basis for the survival and development of businesses (Erikson, 2002). The success of entrepreneurship largely depends on whether entrepreneurs can identify and utilize the heterogeneous resources in the entrepreneurial environment (Alvarez & Busenitz, 2001). We believe that Internet use can offer female entrepreneurs various tangible or intangible entrepreneurial resources, and then affect their entrepreneurial competence. Based on this, this study will explore whether resource acquisition acts as a mediator between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. Moreover, according to the social support theory, the success of entrepreneurship cannot be separated from external support (Cabrera & Mauricio, 2017). Studies have suggested that family support is more significant for female entrepreneurs, especially the support from important family members such as parents and spouses, which can help female entrepreneurs obtain start-up funds and necessary emotional support (Aldrich & Cliff, 2003; Mari et al., 2016). Women have long been regarded as socially disadvantaged and have limited resources to engage in entrepreneurial activities (Panda, 2018). Compared with other external environmental factors such as policy and cultural support, family support has the most direct impact on women entrepreneurs’ access to entrepreneurial resources (D. H. Welsh et al., 2014). Therefore, this study will also examine whether family support serves as a moderator in the link between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence.

To resolve the above-mentioned propositions, we aim to survey a sample of female entrepreneurs in the context of China, examining the mediation effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition and the moderation effect of family support in the relationship between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. It is hoped that the results of this research will shed light on whether and how Internet use can affect women’s entrepreneurial competence.

Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development

With the popularization of Internet information technology, a growing number of entrepreneurs carry out entrepreneurial activities through the Internet (Chen et al., 2018). Wang and Gao (2021) pointed out that the Internet is an important context for the growth of current start-ups. They believe that Internet use reflects the frequent contact between entrepreneurs and the external world, which can help nascent enterprises obtain various resources and achieve sustainable development. Poon and Swatman (1997) conducted multiple case studies on 23 small and medium-sized companies in Australia and found that entrepreneurs maintain and expand their relationship networks with customers and business partners via the Internet. As such, Internet use in the present study mainly refers to information acquisition and social communication.

Entrepreneurial competence refers to knowledge and skills possessed by entrepreneurs to be competent for various entrepreneurial tasks, and is directly related to the development of their enterprises (Amit et al., 1990). Generally speaking, having high entrepreneurial competence helps entrepreneurs find valuable business opportunities in time and rationally allocate internal and external resources to carry out their entrepreneurial activities (Bayon et al., 2015). Although some women entrepreneurs have accumulated wealth, skills and experience from their previous jobs, they are still at a disadvantage in terms of overall ability (Xavier et al., 2011). Therefore, how to improve women entrepreneurial competence is the main focus of the current study.

Considering that resources play a critical role in entrepreneurial activities (Brush et al., 2001), resource acquisition has been widely concerned by the academic community. In early studies, resources were defined as unique resources within an organization and abilities to acquire external resources (J. B. Barney, 1991; Chandler & Hanks, 1994). Later, Greco et al. (2013) divided resources into tangible asserts (e.g., technical equipment, production materials, etc.) and intangible asserts (e.g., relationship, knowledge, information, patent, etc). Based on these studies, Wiklund and Shepherd (2003) divided resource acquisition into asset resource acquisition and knowledge resource acquisition. The former refers to the acquisition of tangible resources such as capital, material and talent, while the latter refers to the acquisition of intangible resources such as technical know-how and intellectual property rights. The operational definition of entrepreneurial resource acquisition by Wiklund and Shepherd (2003) was employed to carry out this research.

Family support is considered fundamental for the success of entrepreneurship (Powell & Eddleston, 2013). Family support refers to tangible and intangible support that entrepreneurs can obtain from their family members, and plays a vital role in their entrepreneurial cognition, behavior and performance (Welsh et al., 2014). Most studies have divided family support into financial support and emotional support (e.g., Mari et al., 2016). First, financial support refers to financial sponsorship given to entrepreneurs by family members, which is crucial for the survival and development of enterprises (Xu et al., 2020). Second, emotional support refers to the spiritual support from family members in the form of encouragement and understanding, which can motivate entrepreneurs to insist on their goals and maintain positive attitudes in the difficult period of entrepreneurship (Van Auken & Werbel, 2006).

Internet Use and Women’s Entrepreneurial Competence

Entrepreneurial competence is a set of skills and knowledge held by entrepreneurs that can contribute to entrepreneurial success (Gressgård & Hansen, 2015). If entrepreneurs desire to stand out in the fierce market competition, an effective way is to enhance their entrepreneurial competence (Rasmussen et al., 2011). According to the resource-based theory, the key to the success of entrepreneurial activities lies in the capability of entrepreneurs to integrate and allocate heterogeneous resources embedded in a specific entrepreneurial environment (Barney, 1991). In the era of digital economy, the Internet has become an important context for entrepreneurs to improve their entrepreneurial competence (Fischer & Reuber, 2014). In this context, entrepreneurs have more ways to acquire knowledge, resources and information, which is conducive to enhancing their entrepreneurial competence (Lancioni et al., 2000; Poon & Swatman, 1997; Shi et al., 2016). An empirical study has shown that Internet use has a significant positive impact on entrepreneurial competence of farmer entrepreneurs (Xie & Wang, 2021). Since women entrepreneurs face the same problems of lack of resources and abilities as farmer entreprenuers, we believe that Internet use can also help female entrepreneurs break through their own limitations in cognition, and enhance their capabilities. Hence, we propose the following hypothesis.

Hypothesis 1 (H1): Internet use positively affects women’s entrepreneurial competence.

Internet Use and Entrepreneurial Resource Acquisition

The resource-based theory asserts that the key resources that are scarce and difficult to imitate and replace are the basis for the development and expansion of enterprises (Alonso & Bressan, 2016), and lack of resources is often the main difficulty faced by female entrepreneurs (Jamali, 2009; Morris et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2019). Due to the limitations of their own resources, female entrepreneurs are confronted with the key challenge of obtaining entrepreneurial resources from the external environment (Guzman & Kacperczyk, 2019). The Internet is characterized by openness, borderlessness and strong interaction, which can provide important channel for entrepreneurs to obtain abundant entrepreneurial resources (Joo et al., 2017). Additionally, Internet platform can realize extensive link, personalized supply and precise matching of resources (Jome et al., 2006). This is particularly in line with the needs of female entrepreneurs since the lack of entrepreneurial resources and relevant experience virtually increases their dependence on the Internet (Pergelova et al., 2019). In particular, the use of social media platforms and online communities enables female entrepreneurs to establish a wide range of social relationships, thereby allowing them to obtain various resources at a lower cost and a higher pace (Ughetto et al., 2020). Hence, we propose the following hypothesis:

Hypothesis 2 (H2): Internet use positively affects entrepreneurial resource acquisition.

Entrepreneurial Resource Acquisition and Entrepreneurial Competence

Entrepreneurial competence is in essence the ability of entrepreneurs to utilize resources (Dawa et al., 2021; Thebaud, 2015). Entrepreneurial resources, such as knowledge, information, technology and so on, exert an important impact on the formation and improvement of entrepreneurial competence (Mishra & Zachary, 2014). It can be said that entrepreneurial resources are the basis of entrepreneurial competence, or that entrepreneurial competence is the result of developing and utilizing entrepreneurial resources (Gupta et al., 2019). Therefore, obtaining enough entrepreneurial resources is the premise for female entrepreneurs to improve their entrepreneurial competence. As such, the following hypothesis is proposed:

Hypothesis 3 (H3): Entrepreneurial resource acquisition positively affects women’s entrepreneurial competence.

The Mediation Role of Entrepreneurial Resource Acquisition

According to the resource-based theory, resources play a crucial role in the entrepreneurial process (Brush et al., 2001; Erikson, 2002). In this process, entrepreneurs need to obtain key resources from the external environment and integrate these resources effectively (Alvarez & Barney, 2007). Since the lack of resources restricts female entrepreneurial development, they need to obtain resources in the external environment to improve their entrepreneurial competence (L. Wu et al., 2021). However, as a relatively vulnerable group in society, it is difficult for female entrepreneurs to rely on the traditional offline environment for entrepreneurial resources, so the Internet is an important way to effectively address the lack of resources and improve their entrepreneurial capacity. Dy et al. (2017) pointed out that the use of the Internet can enable female entrepreneurs to obtain more up-to-date information at a lower cost and rapidly grasp the changes of the market, thus enhancing their ability to identify more entrepreneurial opportunities in the market. Ukpere et al. (2014) believed that female entrepreneurs can obtain abundant information and resources by using such Internet technology as social media, which can change their shortage of human and social capital and improve their entrepreneurial ability. Bernhard and Olsson (2021) suggested that the Internet, as a content platform, can enable female entrepreneurs to obtain a large number of learning resources, so as to effectively make up for their lack of knowledge, skills and experience. Additionally, the interaction with other stakeholders (e.g., suppliers) in the context of the Internet helps female entrepreneurs to obtain experiential resources, which in turn enables them to acquire new business ideas and the ability to innovate enterprise management mode (Shi et al., 2016). In sum, female entrepreneurs who use the Internet to carry out entrepreneurial activities are likely to obtain various resources, which will in turn enhance their entrepreneurial competence. As such, the following hypothesis is proposed:

Hypothesis 4 (H4): Entrepreneurial resource acquisition mediates the relation between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence.

The Moderation Role of Family Support

As suggested by the social support theory, family support is an effective channel for entrepreneurs to obtain external resources (Welsh et al., 2016). Berrone et al. (2014) claimed that entrepreneurs with more family support tend to be more successful. Family members can not only provide tangible resources for entrepreneurs, but also intangible resources that are hard to replicate, (Grande, 2011). Existing studies mainly focus on husband support to female entrepreneurs (Neneh, 2017). As the saying goes, every successful man has a virtuous wife behind him. In fact, the majority of successful female entrepreneurs are also dependent on their husbands’ support (Nikina et al., 2015). First, as women who opt to start ventures generally have difficulties in fund raising, the financial support provided by their husbands is a vital source of start-up funds for women (Mari et al., 2016). Additionally, emotional support from husbands is also very helpful for women entrepreneurs (Jennings & McDougald, 2007; Said & Enslin, 2020). This is because husband’s understanding and encouragement can help female entrepreneurs to obtain psychological resources such as self-efficacy so that they can deal with various challenges with a positive and optimistic attitude in the process of entrepreneurship (Powell & Eddleston, 2013). As a contextual resource that affects females’ resource acquisition in the process of entrepreneurship, family support is likely to be an important moderator between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition. In other words, if women entrepreneurs can receive more support from their family, they will have more time and energy to devote to Internet entrepreneurship, and in turn obtain more resources to run their businesses. As such, we propose the following hypotheses.

Hypothesis 5 (H5): Family support moderates the relation between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition, such that the relation is stronger among female entrepreneurs with higher level of family support than those with lower level of family support.

Just as Cardella et al. (2020) put it, if family members can solve the worries of female entrepreneurs and shoulder the responsibility of housework and childcare, then female entrepreneurs will have more time and motivation to devote to the Internet entrepreneurial activities, and are more likely to transform the entrepreneurial resources obtained in the Internet context into their own abilities. On the other hand, if women entrepreneurs receive less support from their families in terms of housework and caregiving, then their family roles are likely to prevent them from devoting themselves to Internet ventures. Moreover, the lack of financial, emotional and information support from family members will further restrict the development of female entrepreneurship (Xu et al., 2020). Therefore, we speculate that family support is likely to positively moderate the indirect impact of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial competence via entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Put another way, if family support is higher, it will strengthen the mediation effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition between Internet and women’s entrepreneurial competence. As such, we propose the following hypotheses.

Hypothesis 6 (H6): Family support moderates the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition in the relation between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence, such that the relation is stronger among female entrepreneurs with higher levels of family support than those with lower levels of family support.

Figure 1 is the research model which reflects the above hypotheses.

Method

Procedure and Samples

After designing all measurement items via an online platform for data collection called WJX (www.wjx.cn), we shared the survey link with the samples through social networking platforms. The respondents were told that the survey was targeted at female entrepreneurs and it was about how Internet use affected their entrepreneurial activities, so only self-employed women could participate in the survey. We also gave participants our promise that the data were only used for scientific research. Since it is difficult to directly approach a large number of female entrepreneurs, we adopted the snowball sampling method to collect our data. On the one hand, we sent the survey link to those women entrepreneurs whom we could approach directly. When they completed the questionnaire, they were asked to send the questionnaire link to other businesswomen they know. On the other hand, we relied on our social network relationships such as friends, teachers, alumni and so on to recommend female entrepreneurs to us. After these recommended subjects finished filling out the questionnaire, they were also required to share the questionnaire link with other appropriate subjects. In order to motivate participants to actively share our survey link, we promised that they would be given a free consultation service for their efforts. A total of 350 eligible women participated in the survey, and 22 responses were removed because of giving regular answers (e.g., “444” or “7676) or answering all items within 60 s. We finally obtained 328 valid responses with estimated response rate of 93.7%. According to Bagozzi and Yi (2012), the number of samples should preferably be 5 to 10 times the number of items. The ratio between the number of samples and the number of items in this study is around 17, meeting the threshold.

The respondents came from different parts of China, and were distributed in a variety of sectors such as e-commerce, medical beauty, education, etc. As far as marital status is concerned, married female entrepreneurs accounted for 53.7% while unmarried female entrepreneurs represented 44.8%. In terms of age, most subjects were between 25 and 35, making up 35.4%. Regarding educational level, 27.1% held an associate degree or less and 51.8% received a bachelor’s degree. Table 1 displays the demographic profile of the sample.

Table 1.

Demographics Characteristics of Sample.

Characteristics		Number	Percentage (%)
Age	<25	81	24.7
	25–35	116	35.4
	36–45	63	19.2
	>45	68	20.7
Marital status	Unmarried	147	44.8
	Married	176	53.7
	Others	5	1.5
Educational level	Associate degree or less	89	27.1
	Bachelor’s degree	170	51.8
	Master’s degree	63	19.2
	Doctor’s degree	6	1.8
Age of enterprises	Less than a year	42	12.8
	1–3 years	52	15.9
	4–6 years	67	20.4
	7–9 years	66	20.1
	10 years or more	101	30.8
Industry	Clothing and fashion	59	18.0
	E-commerce and the Internet	181	55.2
	Catering and hotel	14	4.3
	Education and training	6	1.8
	Medical beauty and make-up	68	20.7
Size of enterprises	1–10 employees	60	18.3
	11–20 employees	183	55.8
	21–50 employees	13	4.0
	51–100 employees	6	1.8
	Above 100 employees	66	20.1
Total		328	100.0

Measures

We referred to previous studies in related fields, and adopted scales with good reliability and validity. Since most scales were taken from international journals, we strictly followed the back-translation procedure as suggested by Brislin (1986). First, we invited a professor of management who is proficient in English to translate English measurement items into Chinese. We furthered discussed Chinese items with this professor to ensure that every item conforms to Chinese reading habits. Afterward, we translated Chinese items back into English to make a comparison between original version and back-translated version. After confirming that the translated version was almost identical to the original one, we finally established initial measurement items. We then sent an electronic link to the initial questionnaire to several female entrepreneurs and invited them to raise issues about the language or content of the questionnaire. Based on their feedback, we further revised the questionnaire to ensure that it could be accepted by the subjects. A 7-point Likert scale (1 = “strongly disagree”, 7 = “strongly agree”) was used for all the measurement items.

Internet Use

To measure Internet use, we adopted four items adapted from Joo et al. (2017) and Yang et al. (2017). Sample items were “A lot of my work needs to be done through the Internet,” and “I like to communicate with people through the Internet.” The Cronbach’s α of this scale was .888 in the current research.

Entrepreneurial Resource Acquisition

We measured entrepreneurial resource acquisition with a five-item scale adapted from Wiklund and Shepherd (2003). Sample items were “I can obtain raw material resources at a lower cost,” and “I can obtain information of new market development.” In the current study, the Cronbach’s α of the total scale was .858.

Family Support

Family support was measured by five items adapted from prior studies (Eddleston & Powell, 2012; Mari et al., 2016). Sample items were “I rely on the advice of my family to help me run my business,” and “When I am frustrated by my business, someone in my family tries to understand and comfort me.” In the current study, the Cronbach’s α of the total scale was .838.

Women’s Entrepreneurial Competence

We drew on the research by Man et al. (2002) and selected five items to measure women’s entrepreneurial competence. Sample items were “I can identify high-quality business opportunities through various means,” and “I can persevere in the course of business difficulties.” In the current study, the Cronbach’s α of the total scale was .846.

Control Variables

Similar to previous studies on female entrepreneurship (Mari et al., 2016), this study took female entrepreneurs’ age, marital status and educational level, as well as their enterprises’ age, industry and scale as control variables.

Results

Common Method Bias Testing

Regarding common method deviation, we carried out Harman’s single-factor test by putting all the items to load on a single unrotated factor (Podsakoff et al., 2003). This single factor explained 39.505% of the total variation, which was below the warning standard of 50%. Therefore, our data was free from serious common method bias and suitable for the following analyses.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

This study mainly measured four variables, namely Internet use, entrepreneurial resource acquisition, women’s entrepreneurial competence and family support. AMOS 21.0 was employed to conduct confirmatory factor analysis on the six models, and the results are shown in Table 2. It is clear that the fit indexes of the four-factor model (χ²/ df = 1.202, CFI = 0.990, TLI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.025, GFI = 0.947) were superior than those of the three-factor model, two-factor model and one-factor model. Thus, the proposed model has the best fit with the actual data.

Table 2.

Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Model	Factor	χ²/df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	GFI
Four-factor model	IU; ERA; FS; EC	1.202	0.990	0.988	0.025	0.947
Three-factor model	IU; ERA + FS; EC	3.610	0.869	0.850	0.089	0.800
Three-factor model	IU + ERA; FS; EC	3.099	0.895	0.879	0.080	0.830
Three-factor model	IU + FS; ERA; EC	3.995	0.850	0.827	0.096	0.783
Two-factor model	IU + ERA+FS; EC	5.525	0.770	0.739	0.118	0.721
One-factor model	IU + ERA+FS+EC	7.019	0.692	0.653	0.136	0.670
Suggestive value		<3	>0.90	>0.90	<0.08	>0.80

Note. IU = Internet use; ERA = entrepreneurial resource acquisition; FS = family support; EC = entrepreneurial competence.

As shown in Table 3, the convergent validity of the current variables was met with all items loading above 0.5 on their respective factors, composite reliability (CR) exceeding 0.7 and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) exceeding 0.5 (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). The discriminant validity was also satisfactory with the square roots of AVE exceeding the correlation coefficients between study variables (shown in Table 4).

Table 3.

The Convergent Validity of Constructs.

Construct	Factor loading	CR	AVE
Internet use	0.794–0.839	0.888	0.666
Entrepreneurial resource acquisition	0.696–0.825	0.859	0.549
Family support	0.669–0.755	0.839	0.511
Entrepreneurial competence	0.647–0.780	0.848	0.529

Table 4.

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis.

Variable	1	2	3	4
1. Internet use	.816
2. Entrepreneurial resource acquisition	.575**	.740
3. Family support	.392**	.426**	.714
4. Entrepreneurial competence	.573**	.555**	.305**	.727
M	5.306	5.121	4.574	4.645
SD	1.133	1.081	1.174	1.106

Note. Numbers in bold on diagonal are the square root of AVE of each variable.

p < .01.

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis

In this study, SPSS 21.0 was used for correlation analysis of all variables. Table 4 reflects mean values, standard deviations as well as the correlations among variables. The results showed that Internet use was positively correlated with Women’s entrepreneurial competence (r = .573, p < .01) and entrepreneurial resource acquisition (r = .575, p < .01). Entrepreneurial resource acquisition was also positively associated with women’s entrepreneurial competence (r = .555, p < .01).

Hypothesis Testing

We performed the structural equation mode to test the hypothesized relationships in the proposed research model. Given that the model showed an excellent fit to the data (χ²/ df = 1.329, GFI = 0.959, AGFI = 0.941, NFI = 0.959, TLI = 0.987, CFI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.032), we proceeded with the model path analysis. As shown in Table 5 about path analysis, Internet use positively affected women’s entrepreneurial competence (β = .396, p < .001) and entrepreneurial resource acquisition (β = .687, p < .001). Likewise, entrepreneurial resource acquisition positively affected women’s entrepreneurial competence (β = .356, p < .001). Therefore, hypotheses 1 to 3 were verified.

Table 5.

Model Path Analysis.

Hypotheses	Standardized Path Coefficient	SE	t-value
IU → EC	0.396***	0.073	5.394
IU → ERA	0.687***	0.063	10.813
ERA → EC	0.356***	0.072	4.942

Note. IU = Internet use; ERA = entrepreneurial resource acquisition; EC = entrepreneurial competence.

***

p < .001.

In order to further explore whether there is mediation effect in these significant paths, the bootstrap program was run in AMOS 21 in this study and repeated 5,000 times with the confidence interval standard set at 95%. As shown in Table 6, the indirect effect of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial competence via entrepreneurial resource acquisition was 0.247, and the 95% confidence interval was [0.112, 0.389], excluding 0, indicating that entrepreneurial resource acquisition had a significant mediating effect between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence, so hypothesis 4 was verified.

Table 6.

Mediation Effect.

Indirect effect	Estimate	p	LLCL	ULCL
IU → ERA → EC	0.247	**	0.112	0.389

Note. IU = Internet use; ERA = entrepreneurial resource acquisition; EC = entrepreneurial competence, LLCI = bias corrected lower limit of 95% confidence interval; ULCI = bias corrected upper limit of 95% confidence interval.

p < .01.

The moderation impact of family support was evaluated by multiple hierarchical regression. As displayed in Table 7, the interaction effect of Internet use and family support on entrepreneurial resource acquisition was significant (β = .286, p < .001). Moreover, a slope diagram was plotted to show the moderation effect of family support (Figure 2). It is clear that the positive relation between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition was strengthened when the level of family support was higher. As such, hypothesis 5 was verified.

Table 7.

Result of Multiple Hierarchical Regression Analysis.

		Entrepreneurial resource acquisition
Variables		Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Control variables	Age	0.051	0.051	0.051
	Marital status	−0.008	0.058	0.075
	Educational level	0.040	−0.006	−0.003
	Age of enterprises	0.152	0.061	0.080
	Industry	0.105	0.094*	0.079
	Scale of enterprises	0.147	0.111*	0.086*
Independent variable	Internet use		0.458***	0.560***
Moderator	Family support		0.245***	0.276***
Interaction effect	Internet Use × family support			0.286***
	R²	0.075	0.423	0.489
	Adjusted R²	0.058	0.408	0.475
	F	4.336***	29.176***	33.835***

p < .05. ***p < .001.

To evaluate the moderation effect of family support on the mediation effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition, this study applied the Process Program in SPSS 21.0 and selected Model 7 to conduct random sampling test with Bootstrap method for 5,000 times. According to the results in Table 8, the index of moderated mediation was pronounced (β = .066, 95% CI [0.032, 0.112]). Besides, the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition was more pronounced when the level of family support was high (β = .251, 95% CI [0.142, 0.376]) than when the level of family support was low(β = .097, 95% CI [0.042, 0.176]). Thus, family support had a moderating effect on the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition (hypothesis 6 was verified).

Table 8.

Moderated Mediation Effect of Family Support.

Index of moderated mediation			Conditional Indirect Effects
Index	LLCI	ULCI	Levels	Effect	LLCI	ULCI
0.066	0.032	0.112	−1 SD	0.097	0.042	0.176
0.066	0.032	0.112	+1 SD	0.251	0.142	0.376

Note. LLCI = bias corrected lower limit of 95% confidence interval; ULCI = bias corrected upper limit of 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

Drawing from the resource-based theory and the social support theory, this study is the first to explore how Internet use links to women’s entrepreneurial competence, as mediated by entrepreneurial resource acquisition and moderated by family support. All hypotheses were confirmed and shed light on whether and how Internet use might relate to women’s entrepreneurial competence. In the following sections, we discuss these findings by highlighting theoretical contributions and practical implications.

Theoretical Contributions

First, although prior studies have explored the impact of human capital, social network and traditional external environment on female entrepreneurship (Greve & Salaff, 2003; Jones & Tullous, 2010; Venugopal, 2016), whether the virtual external environment like the Internet can affect women’s entrepreneurial competence is unknown. Additionally, scholars have not reached a consensus on whether the Internet can empower female entrepreneurship. While Ughetto et al. (2020) believe that the Internet will promote the development of female entrepreneurship, Dy et al. (2017) argue that female entrepreneurs will face the same obstacles in the Internet context as in the offline entrepreneurial environment. However, this empirical study shows that Internet use has a positive effect on women’s entrepreneurial competence, thereby filling the gap of existing studies and resolving the above dispute. As such, this study not only proves that Internet use has an empowering value on women’s entrepreneurial competence, but also provides a new theoretical perspective for the research on the antecedents of women’s entrepreneurial competence.

Second, entrepreneurial resource acquisition is found to play a partial mediating effect between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. Although previous scholars have shown that Internet technology is predictive of entrepreneurial resource acquisition (Chen et al., 2018), and entrepreneurial resources acquisition can impact entrepreneurial competence (Wu et al., 2021), they have failed to include entrepreneurial resource acquisition in the relationship between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. However, our study shows that when female entrepreneurs integrate the Internet into their entrepreneurial activities, they are more likely to have access to various entrepreneurial resources, which will in turn enhance their entrepreneurial competence. So this study not only opens the “black box” of how the Internet enables female entrepreneurs to have greater competence, but also provides a new idea for re-understanding the role of resource acquisition in the process of female entrepreneurship in the context of the Internet.

Finally, although some scholars have proposed that family support can help women gain access to entrepreneurial resources and enhance entrepreneurial competence (Mari et al., 2016; Welsh et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2020), but few studies regard family support as an important moderating variable to carry out corresponding studies. The current study shows that family support serves as a moderator between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition, and also moderates the mediation effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition between Internet use and women’s entrepreneurial competence. More specifically, as the “support group” for female entrepreneurs, family can provide the most direct support for female entrepreneurs. Whether it is spiritual encouragement or voluntary undertaking of housework, family support can alleviate the worries of female entrepreneurs so that they have more time and energy to embed in the Internet and take advantage of the empowering value of the Internet for their entrepreneurship. Therefore, this study also makes a certain contribution to clarifying the boundary conditions of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial competence.

Practical Implications

To promote the sustainable development of women-owned enterprises, the findings of the current study can provide several implications for female entrepreneurs and governments. First and foremost, given the core role of Internet use in influencing women’s entrepreneurial competence, governments should encourage female entrepreneurs to use the Internet in their process of entrepreneurial activities. For example, governments should publicize stories of successful female entrepreneurs in the Internet field, providing female entrepreneurs with vivid learning materials, and stimulating their intrinsic motivation to make use of the Internet in entrepreneurial activities. Additionally, governments should adopt a series of measures to help female entrepreneurs use Internet technology in a scientific manner. For example, regular lectures on the Internet and female entrepreneurship should be conducted, and more educational resources should be integrated to provide training courses on Internet entrepreneurship skills for female entrepreneurs

Second, female entrepreneurs should realize the significance of entrepreneurial resource acquisition, and constantly obtain the tangible and intangible resources needed for entrepreneurial activities from the Internet in order to enhance their entrepreneurial competence. This is partially consistent with Ughetto et al.’s (2020) suggestion that female entrepreneurs need to make use of Internet technology for the sake of entrepreneurial resources. For example, female entrepreneurs should proceed from their own needs and actively communicate with other stakeholders through online platforms. This will not only make them obtain entrepreneurial resources that are beneficial to the development of enterprises, but also break through their own bottlenecks in experience and knowledge.

Third, women entrepreneurs should try their best to win the understanding and support of their family members. For example, women should actively communicate with their family before preparing to start a business, and strive to obtain the maximum support from their families in terms of financial and emotional resources. At the same time, female entrepreneurs should consider whether they can take the dual responsibilities of entrepreneurship and family because housework and childcare will largely prevent them from conducting entrepreneurial activities. Therefore, female entrepreneurs should actively seek family support in undertaking family responsibilities. Only in this way can they embed in the Internet context and carry out a series of entrepreneurial activities.

Conclusion

Based on a sample of Chinese female entrepreneurs, this study showcases that Internet use positively impacts women’s entrepreneurial competence, as partially mediated by entrepreneurial resource acquisition. Moreover, family support moderates the relation between Internet use and entrepreneurial resource acquisition as well as the mediating effect of entrepreneurial resource acquisition. From a theoretical perspective, these findings contribute to revealing how Internet use affects women’s entrepreneurial competence, including its direct and indirect effects and boundary conditions. Additionally, this study provides practical implications for policy-makers and female entrepreneurs.

Limitations and Future Directions

There are still some deficiencies in the current research which should be avoided in future studies. First, this study adopted cross-sectional data to explore the relationship between Internet use, entrepreneurial resource acquisition, women’s entrepreneurial competence and family support, ignoring that these four variables are likely to experience dynamic changes during the development of women-owned enterprises. Therefore, future research is encouraged to collect longitudinal data for empirical analysis. Second, although our measurement items were designed based on mature scales taken from famous journals at home and abroad, it is still likely that the measurement of some variables could not meet the objectives of this study. Therefore, it is suggested that future studies should combine the grounded theory method and empirical studies to develop the scale of key variables (e.g., Internet use). Third, since entrepreneurial competence is the result of multiple factors, relying on a single mediator may not fully explain the impact mechanism of Internet use on women’s entrepreneurial competence. Therefore, future studies should examine the mediating effect of other variables to gain a deeper insight into the underlying mechanism. Finally, due to limitations in time and resources, the regions and industries covered by our survey sample were relatively constrained. Therefore, follow-up research should further expand the scope of the sample to enhance the applicability of the relevant findings.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to all the subjects for participating in the survey.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics Statement

Due to the observational nature of the study, and in the absence of any involvement of therapeutic medication, no formal approval of the Institutional Review Board of the local Ethics Committee was required. Nonetheless, all subjects were informed about the study and participation was fully on a voluntary basis. Participants were ensured of confidentiality and anonymity of the information associated with the surveys. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

ORCID iD

Wei Wan

Data Availability Statement

The first author will supply the relevant data in response to reasonable requests.

References

Aldrich

H. E.

Cliff

J. E.

(2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00011-9

Alonso

A. D.

Bressan

(2016). A resource-based view of the firm and micro and small Italian wine firms. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 28(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-12-2015-0051

Alvarez

S. A.

Barney

J. B.

(2007). The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00721.x

Alvarez

S. A.

Busenitz

L. W.

(2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700609

Amit

Glosten

Muller

(1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Science, 36(10), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1233

Bagozzi

R. P.

(2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x

Barney

J. B.

(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4

Bayon

M. C.

Vaillant

Lafuente

(2015). Initiating nascent entrepreneurial activities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 21(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-11-2013-0201

Bernhard

Olsson

A. K.

(2021). Keeping up the pace of digitalization in small businesses–women entrepreneurs’ knowledge and use of social media. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 27(2), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-10-2019-0615

10.

Berrone

Gertel

Giuliodori

Bernard

Meiners

(2014). Determinants of performance in microenterprises: Preliminary evidence from Argentina. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12045

11.

Brindley

(2005). Barriers to women achieving their entrepreneurial potential: Women and risk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550510590554

12.

Brislin

R. W.

(1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. Sage Publications.

13.

Brush

C. G.

Greene

P. G.

Hart

M. M.

(2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251394

14.

Cabrera

E. M.

Mauricio

(2017). Factors affecting the success of women’s entrepreneurship: A review of literature. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-01-2016-0001

15.

Cardella

G. M.

Hernández-Sánchez

B. R.

Sánchez-García

J. C.

(2020). Women entrepreneurship: A systematic review to outline the boundaries of scientific literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01557

16.

Chandler

G. N.

Hanks

S. H.

(1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6

17.

Chatterjee

Dutta Gupta

Upadhyay

(2018). Empowering women and stimulating development at bottom of pyramid through micro-entrepreneurship. Management Decision, 56(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2017-0296

18.

Chen

Gong

Chu

C. C.

Cao

(2018). Access to the Internet and access to finance: Theory and evidence. Sustainability, 10(7), 2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072534

19.

Dawa

Namatovu

Mulira

Kyejjusa

Arinaitwe

(2021). Entrepreneurial competences and growth of female-owned enterprises: The mediation role of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-02-2020-0028

20.

Delacroix

Parguel

Benoit-Moreau

(2019). Digital subsistence entrepreneurs on Facebook. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.018

21.

A. M.

Marlow

Martin

(2017). A web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations, 70(3), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716650730

22.

Eddleston

K. A.

Powell

G. N.

(2012). Nurturing entrepreneurs’ work–family balance: A gendered perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00506.x

23.

Erikson

(2002). Entrepreneurial capital: The emerging venture’s most important asset and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00062-8

24.

Fairlie

R. W.

Robb

A. M.

(2009). Gender differences in business performance: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Small Business Economics, 33(4), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9207-5

25.

Fischer

Reuber

A. R.

(2014). Online entrepreneurial communication: Mitigating uncertainty and increasing differentiation via twitter. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.02.004

26.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104

27.

Grande

(2011). New venture creation in the farm sector – Critical resources and capabilities. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.02.003

28.

Greco

Cricelli

Grimaldi

(2013). A strategic management framework of tangible and intangible assets. European Management Journal, 31(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.10.005

29.

Gressgård

L. J.

Hansen

(2015). Knowledge exchange and learning from failures in distributed environments: The role of contractor relationship management and work characteristics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 133(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.010

30.

Greve

Salaff

J. W.

(2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00029

31.

Gupta

Qian

Bhushan

Luo

(2019). Role of cloud erp and big data on firm performance: A dynamic capability view theory perspective. Management Decision, 57(8), 1857–1882. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2018-0633

32.

Guzman

Kacperczyk

A. (

. (2019). Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 48(7), 1666–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.012

33.

Jamali

(2009). Constraints and opportunities facing women entrepreneurs in developing countries: A relational perspective. Gender in Management, 24(4), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410910961532

34.

Jennings

J. E.

McDougald

M. S.

(2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275510

35.

Jome

L. M.

Donahue

M. P.

Siegel

L. A.

(2006). Working in the uncharted technology frontier: Characteristics of women web entrepreneurs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-005-9019-9

36.

Jones

Tullous

(2010). Behaviors of pre-venture entrepreneurs and perceptions of their financial needs. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627x.00053

37.

Joo

Chang

(2017). Does social media use influence entrepreneurial opportunity? A review of its moderating role. Sustainability, 9(9), 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091593

38.

Lancioni

R. A.

Smith

M. F.

Oliva

T. A.

(2000). The role of the Internet in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00111-x

39.

Man

T. W. Y.

Lau

Chan

K. F.

(2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(00)00058-6

40.

Mari

Poggesi

De Vita

(2016). Family embeddedness and business performance: Evidences from women-owned firms. Management Decision, 54(2), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-07-2014-0453

41.

Martin

L. M.

Wright

L. T.

(2005). No gender in cyberspace? Empowering entrepreneurship and innovation in female-run ICT small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550510590563

42.

McAdam

Crowley

Harrison

R. T.

(2020). Digital girl: Cyberfeminism and the emancipatory potential of digital entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 55, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00301-2

43.

Mishra

C. S.

Zachary

R. K.

(2014). The theory of entrepreneurial competence. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371461_5

44.

Morris

M. H.

Miyasaki

N. N.

Watters

C. E.

Coombes

S. M.

(2006). The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2006.00165.x

45.

Neneh

B. N.

(2017). Family support and performance of women-owned enterprises: The mediating effect of family-to-work enrichment. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355717716762

46.

Nikina

Shelton

L. M.

LeLoarne

(2015). An examination of how husbands, as key stakeholders, impact the success of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-01-2012-0002

47.

Panda

(2018). Constraints faced by women entrepreneurs in developing countries: Review and ranking. Gender in Management, 33(4), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-01-2017-0003

48.

Pergelova

Manolova

Simeonova-Ganeva

Yordanova

(2019). Democratizing entrepreneurship? Digital technologies and the internationalization of female-led smes. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12494

49.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J. Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

50.

Poon

Swatman

P. M. C.

(1997). Small business use of the Internet: Findings from Australian case studies. International Marketing Review, 14(5), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339710184343

51.

Powell

G. N.

Eddleston

K. A.

(2013). Linking family-to-business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: Do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 261–280. http://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.02.007

52.

Rasmussen

Mosey

Wright

(2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university Spin-Off Venture Emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1314–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x

53.

Said

Enslin

(2020). Lived experiences of females with entrepreneurship in sudan: Networking, social expectations, and family support. Sage Open, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020963131

54.

Shakeel

Yaokuang

Gohar

(2020). Identifying the entrepreneurial success factors and the performance of women-owned businesses in pakistan: The moderating role of national culture. Sage Open, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919520

55.

Shi

Ding

Zuo

Zillante

(2016). Mobile internet based construction supply chain management: A critical review. Automation in Construction, 72(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.020

56.

Thebaud

(2015). Business as plan b: institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 671–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215591627

57.

Ughetto

Rossi

Audretsch

Lehmann

E. E.

(2020). Female entrepreneurship in the digital era. Small Business Economics, 55, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00298-8

58.

Ukpere

C. L.

Slabbert

A. D.

Ukpere

W. I.

(2014). Rising trend in social media usage by women entrepreneurs across the globe to unlock their potentials for business success. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 551.https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p551

59.

Van Auken

Werbel

. (2006). Family dynamic and family business financial performance: Spousal commitment. Family Business Review, 19(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00059.x

60.

Venugopal

(2016). Investigating women’s intentions for entrepreneurial growth. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-11-2014-0043

61.

Wang

X. B.

Gao

L. M.

(2021). The impact of organizational resilience on the growth of new ventures under Internet embeddedness. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 453(08), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2021.08.013

62.

Welsh

D. H.

Kim

Memili

Kaciak

(2014). The influence of family moral support and personal problems on firm performance: The case of Korean female entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 19(03), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1084946714500186

63.

Welsh

D. H. B.

Memili

Kaciak

(2016). An empirical analysis of the impact of family moral support on Turkish women entrepreneurs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 1(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.012

64.

Wiklund

Shepherd

(2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360

65.

Zhang

(2019). Identifying women’s entrepreneurial barriers and empowering female entrepreneurship worldwide: A fuzzy-set qca approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00570-z

66.

Liu

Wen

(2021). Does Rural female entrepreneurship have "digital dividend"?- Empirical analysis based on CGSS2015 data. World Agriculture, 508(08), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2021.08.006

67.

Xavier

S. R.

Ahmad

S. Z.

Perumal

Mohd Nor

Chandra Mohan

(2011). The transition from corporate careers to business ownership: The case for women entrepreneurs in Malaysia. International Journal of Business Administration, 2(3), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v2n3p148

68.

Xie

Wang

(2021). The influence of social media embeddedness on dynamic competence of entrepreneurial leaders. Leadership Science, 801(16), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.19572/j.cnki.ldkx.2021.16.021

69.

Kellermanns

F. W.

Jin

(2020). Family support as social exchange in entrepreneurship: Its moderating impact on entrepreneurial stressors-well-being relationships. Journal of Business Research, 120, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.033

70.

Yang

D. L.

Feng

(2017). Internet use and entrepreneurial performance: Mediating role of social capital. Technology Economics, 36(4), 53–62. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JSJI.0.2017-04-009