Perceived stress,diet,and medication use associated with GERD symptoms in Lebanese adults: A cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition influenced by lifestyle, clinical, and psychosocial factors. This study examined the relationship between GERD symptoms and perceived stress among Lebanese adults, while accounting for key demographic, dietary, and clinical variables.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted among Lebanese adults between January and September 2024 using an online self-administered questionnaire. GERD symptoms and perceived stress were assessed using the GERDQ and PSS-10 scales. Bivariate analyses followed by multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors independently associated with GERD symptoms.

Results

A total of 440 participants were included (mean age of 36.4 ± 16.96 years), of whom 28.4% had probable GERD symptoms. Most participants (83.2%) reported moderate stress levels with a mean PSS score of 19.74±5.05. Higher perceived stress was independently associated with increased odds of GERD symptoms (ORa=1.110). Additional correlates included dietary factors (frequent intake of fatty/fried foods, carbonated beverages, and caffeinated drinks), medication-related factors (NSAIDs, bisphosphonates, and iron supplements), former smoking, and a personal or family history of gastrointestinal disease. Being married was associated with lower odds of GERD symptoms.

Conclusion

Probable GERD symptoms were independently associated with perceived stress, dietary habits, smoking history, medication use, and gastrointestinal disease history. These findings support a biopsychosocial understanding of GERD symptom burden and provide further evidence that psychosocial factors should be considered when investigating gastrointestinal health in vulnerable populations.

Keywords

GERD perceived stress lifestyle factors dietary habits clinical factors Lebanon

Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux Disease (GERD) is highly prevalent worldwide, affecting approximately 14% of adults, with marked geographical variation and particularly high rates reported in the Middle East.^1–3 GERD symptoms primarily include heartburn and regurgitation and may also involve atypical chest discomfort, respiratory manifestations, or laryngeal symptoms.⁴

GERD is a multifactorial condition influenced by a complex interaction of physiological, lifestyle, and environmental factors.⁵ Established contributors include obesity, smoking, dietary habits, alcohol consumption, and medications that affect lower esophageal sphincter tone or esophageal mucosal integrity.^3,6–8 These factors may impair esophageal motility, delay gastric emptying, or increase intra-abdominal pressure, thereby facilitating reflux events.⁹ Beyond these traditional risk factors, increasing attention has been directed toward psychosocial determinants that may modulate gastrointestinal symptom severity and perception.¹⁰

Psychological stress has emerged as an important factor influencing both the development and perception of GERD symptoms.¹¹ Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that stress can alter esophageal motility, increase transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, and enhance visceral hypersensitivity, thereby amplifying symptom perception even in the absence of significant acid exposure pathways.^12,13 In addition, stress-related neuroendocrine responses may influence gastrointestinal function through autonomic dysregulation and altered gut-brain signaling pathways.¹⁴ Importantly, the relationship appears bidirectional, as chronic GERD symptoms may also contribute to increased psychological distress, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of symptom exacerbation.¹⁵

In Lebanon, GERD represents a significant health concern, with previous research reporting a prevalence of approximately 24.8% among adults.¹⁶ This burden may be further compounded by the country’s unique sociopolitical and economic context. Over the past decade, Lebanon has experienced multiple overlapping crises, including economic collapse, political instability, and major traumatic events, all of which have been associated with elevated levels of psychological stress in the population.^17–19 Although previous Lebanese studies have reported the prevalence of GERD and its association with various lifestyle and clinical factors, limited evidence has explored the role of perceived stress using validated psychometric instruments or examined whether stress independently contributes to GERD symptoms after controlling for dietary, behavioral, and medication-related factors.

We hypothesized that higher perceived stress would be associated with increased odds of GERD symptoms independent of traditional risk factors. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between perceived stress and GERD symptoms among Lebanese adults while accounting for relevant demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors.

Design and methods

Study design and sampling

The study was conducted between January and September 2024. It employed an observational cross-sectional design, which limits the establishment of temporal or causal relationships between perceived stress and GERD symptoms. The target population consisted of Lebanese adults residing across all six administrative governorates (Beirut, Mount Lebanon, North, South, Bekaa, and Nabatieh). Data were collected using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed through social media platforms and personal networks. Recruitment followed a non-probability snowball-sampling strategy, whereby initial respondents shared the survey link with others to facilitate broader geographic reach across Lebanese governorates. This approach was selected because of its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to rapidly recruit participants from different regions during ongoing socio-economic challenges in Lebanon. However, this method may have introduced selection bias by disproportionately recruiting younger, more digitally connected, more educated, and potentially more health-aware individuals, thereby limiting the representativeness of the sample and generalizability of the findings.

Lebanese individuals aged 18 years or older were eligible for inclusion. Participants were excluded if they reported peptic ulcer disease, a history of gastric surgery, systemic disorders affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract, or alarm symptoms such as unintentional weight loss, severe or progressive dysphagia, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Individuals currently using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H2-receptor blockers were also excluded because acid-suppressive therapy may mask or reduce reflux symptoms, potentially affecting the accuracy of GERDQ-based symptom assessment and participant classification. Information regarding medication use, including PPIs and H2 blockers, was obtained through self-report within the questionnaire. Although this exclusion may have omitted some clinically relevant GERD cases, it was intended to minimize symptom misclassification related to ongoing pharmacological treatment.

Data collection tool

A structured questionnaire was designed using evidence from previously published literature and established assessment tools. Items assessing socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, dietary habits, smoking status, medication use, and clinical history were developed based on prior studies and refined through expert evaluation, although they did not represent a formally validated composite instrument.^4,5,7 Conversely, the GERDQ and PSS-10 consisted of standardized validated scales with well-established psychometric validity and reliability.^20–22 The survey was prepared and administered in both English and Arabic. The questionnaire was initially written in English, translated to Arabic following standard cross-cultural adaptation guidelines, then independently back translated to English. The questionnaire was reviewed by two faculty members with expertise in public health and pharmacy practice. A pilot test involving five individuals was conducted to assess questionnaire clarity, comprehensibility, and usability prior to data collection. Minor modifications were made accordingly, and pilot responses were excluded from the final analysis. However, the small pilot sample was intended for preliminary usability assessment rather than formal psychometric validation of the overall questionnaire.

The data collection sheet consisted of four main sections. The first section retrieved data regarding socio-demographic characteristics, whereas the second section collected information about the risk factors of GERD such as comorbidities, alcohol consumption, diet, hours of sleep, personal or family history of GI diseases and medications associated with GERD. Smoking status was categorized into current smokers (individuals who used any tobacco product within the past 30 days), former smokers (individuals who previously smoked but had abstained for at least 30 days prior to completing the survey), and non-smokers (individuals who had never smoked). This classification is consistent with commonly used epidemiological smoking classifications.²³ The third part included the 6-item GERDQ questionnaire, a standardized self-administered screening tool used to assess the frequency and severity of GERD-related symptoms.²² Participants reported the number of days (0-7) with typical symptoms and use of over-the-counter remedies during the preceding week. Four symptom items were scored on a 0-3 scale, while two items (epigastric pain and nausea) were reverse-scored, yielding a total score between 0 and 18. A GERDQ cutoff score of ≥8 was used to classify participants as having probable GERD symptoms, in accordance with prior validation studies reporting acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and utility for symptom-based GERD screening in epidemiological and primary care settings.²⁴ The GERDQ scale displayed high internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.86. The fourth section comprised the perceived stress (PSS) scale,²⁰ a widely used psychological instrument for measuring perceived stress. The Arabic version of the PSS-10, utilized in this study, has previously been validated in a Lebanese population, and demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.74).²¹ This 10-item scale assesses the thoughts and feelings of the participants over the past month by asking how frequently they experienced certain emotional and cognitive states. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4), with total scores ranging from 0 to 40 and categorized into low (0-13), moderate (14-26), or high stress (27-40). The PSS scale displayed acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.79.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Lebanese International University Ethical and Research Committee (approval number: 2024ERC-014-LIUSOP). Participation was entirely voluntary. Written electronic consent was obtained prior to accessing the questionnaire, and no identifying data were collected. The study complied with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample size calculation

The minimum required sample size was estimated using Epi-Info (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) for a cross-sectional prevalence study.²⁵ Assuming a prevalence of 50%, a margin of error of 5%, and a 95% confidence level, the minimum required sample size was 384 participants. A prevalence estimate of 50% was selected because it produces the largest sample size requirement when the true prevalence is uncertain, representing the most conservative approach for cross-sectional sample size calculation. Although previous Lebanese studies reported a GERD prevalence of approximately 24.8%,¹⁶ the 50% assumption was retained to provide a conservative sample size estimate and minimize the risk of underestimating the required sample size. Furthermore, the final sample included 125 participants with probable GERD symptoms, providing a sufficient number of outcome events for multivariable logistic regression according to commonly recommended events-per-variable considerations.²⁶

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and means with standard deviations for continuous variables. Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test in combination with visual inspection of histograms and Q-Q plots prior to applying parametric analyses. Internal consistency of the scales was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Associations between GERD symptom status and independent variables were initially explored through bivariate analyses. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were applied to categorical variables, while independent-sample t-tests were used for continuous measures such as age, BMI, and PSS score. Variables showing p<0.20 in the bivariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, with probable GERD symptom status (GERDQ ≥8) as the dependent variable. A liberal threshold of p<0.20 was used during bivariate screening to minimize the risk of excluding potentially important explanatory variables or confounders prior to multivariable adjustment. Multicollinearity among independent variables was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIFs) and tolerance statistics prior to conducting the multivariable logistic regression analysis, and no evidence of problematic multicollinearity was identified. Linearity in the logit for continuous variables was assessed using the Box-Tidwell procedure, and no evidence of violation was identified for continuous variables included in the model. The final logistic regression model demonstrated acceptable fit according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p>0.05), with a Nagelkerke R² of 0.28, indicating moderate explanatory capacity. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

The study included 440 participants with a mean age of 36.4 ± 16.96 years and a mean BMI of 24.68 ± 4.18 kg/m². Most participants were younger than 50 years and had a normal or overweight BMI range. Participants were predominantly female (58.4%), and nearly half were married (47.0%). Respondents were recruited from all Lebanese governorates, with the highest representation from North Lebanon (34.5%). Most participants reported a medium monthly income (64.3%), while hypertension was the most commonly reported comorbidity (21.4%). Additional socio-demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.

Variable	Mean ± SD or N (%)
Variable	N=440
Age (years)	36.40 ± 16.96
Age groups:
• 18-29 years	173 (39.3)
• 30-49 years	162 (36.8)
• ≥ 50 years	105 (23.9)
BMI (kg/m²)	24.68 ± 4.18
BMI Categories
• Underweight (<18.5)	18 (4.1)
• Normal weight (18.5-24.9)	242 (55.0)
• Overweight (25-29.9)	129 (29.3)
• Obese (≥30)	51 (11.6)
Gender
• Male	183 (41.6)
• Female	257 (58.4)
Marital Status
• Single	198 (45.0)
• Married	207 (47.0)
• Widowed/divorced	35 (8.0)
Residence
• Beirut	110 (25.0)
• Mount Lebanon	61 (13.9)
• Beqaa	79 (18.0)
• North	152 (34.5)
• South	38 (8.6)
Occupation
• Employed	215(48.8)
• Unemployed	198 (45.0)
• Retired	27 (6.1)
Education Level
• School level	136 (30.9)
• University	251 (57.0)
• Post Graduate	53 (12.0)
Monthly Income
• Low	105 (23.9)
• Medium	283 (64.3)
• High	52 (11.8)
Morbidities
• Hypertension	94 (21.4)
• Diabetes Mellitus	59 (13.4)
• Heart Diseases	54 (12.3)
• Respiratory Diseases	45 (10.2)
• Cancer	7 (1.6)
• Mental Health Disorders	16 (3.6)
• Neurological Diseases	14 (3.2)
• Any Other Disease	35 (8.0)

SD: Standard deviation; N: Number of participants; kg/m²: Kilograms per square meter.

Prevalence and frequency of GERD symptoms

Based on the GERDQ cutoff score, 28.4% of participants were classified as having probable GERD symptoms. The mean GERDQ score was 6.20 ± 4.14. Heartburn and regurgitation were the most commonly reported typical reflux symptoms, while sleep disturbances related to reflux symptoms and use of over-the-counter medications for symptom relief were also frequently reported. In addition, upper abdominal pain and nausea were commonly experienced among participants. Detailed frequencies of GERD-related symptoms are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Frequency of GERD symptoms among the participants based on GERDQ.

Symptom	N (%)
Symptom	None	1 day	2-3 days	4-7 days
How often did you have a burning feeling behind your breastbone (heartburn)?	116 (26.4)	180 (40.9)	129 (29.3)	15 (3.4)
How often did you have stomach contents (liquid or food) moving upwards to your throat or mouth (regurgitation)?	111 (25.20)	185 (42.0)	125 (28.4)	19 (4.3)
How often did you have pain in the center of the upper stomach?	40 (9.1)	123 (28.0)	166 (37.7)	111 (25.2)
How often did you have nausea?	35 (8.0)	106 (24.1)	164 (37.3)	135 (30.7)
How often did you have difficulty getting a good night’s sleep because of your heartburn and/or regurgitation?	185 (42.0)	153 (34.8)	83 (18.9)	19 (4.3)
How often did you take additional medication for your heartburn and/or regurgitation, other than what the physician told you to take (such as Maalox)?	209 (47.5)	127 (28.9)	74 (16.8)	30 (6.8)
GERDQ Score
M±SD	6.20±4.14
Range (min-max)	0-18

N: Number of participants; GERDQ: Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire; M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; min: Minimum; max: Maximum.

Prevalence of GERD symptoms risk factors

Current smoking was reported by 39.3% of participants, while nearly half (49.3%) reported no regular physical activity. Short sleep duration was also relatively common, with 26.8% of participants reporting fewer than 6 hours of sleep per night. Frequent consumption of potential dietary reflux triggers was also highly prevalent, particularly fatty or fried foods (74.5%), caffeinated drinks (74.1%), and citrus fruits or juices (69.8%). In addition, 45.5% of participants reported a personal or family history of gastrointestinal diseases. Table 3 demonstrates the prevalence of GERD-associated behavioral risk factors among the studied participants.

Table 3.

Dietary and lifestyle GERD-associated risk factors among the studied participants.

Risk factors	N (%)
Smoking Habits
• Never smoked	210 (47.7)
• Former smoker	57 (13.0)
• Current smoker	173 (39.3)
Alcoholic Beverages
• Never	323 (73.4)
• Occasionally (1-2 times per month)	89 (20.2)
• Regularly (1-2 times per week)	28 (6.4)
Exercise
• None	217 (49.3)
• 2-3 times per week	179 (40.7)
• On daily basis	44 (10.0)
Sleep hours
• Less than 6 hours	118 (26.8)
• 6-8 hours	261 (59.3)
• More than 8 hours	61 (13.9)
Diet (3 or more times weekly)
• Spicy foods
No	167 (38.0)
Yes	273 (62.0)
• Fatty or fried foods
No	112 (25.5)
Yes	328 (74.5)
• Citrus fruits or juices
No	133 (30.2)
Yes	307 (69.8)
• Carbonated drinks
No	236 (53.6)
Yes	204 (46.4)
• Caffeinated drinks
No	114 (25.9)
Yes	326 (74.1)
Personal or Family History of GI diseases
• No	240 (54.5)
• Yes	200 (45.5)

N: Number of participants; GI: Gastrointestinal.

Figure 1 illustrates the prevalence of medications potentially associated with GERD symptoms among the studied participants. Among the listed drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the most commonly utilized (35.5%), followed by iron supplements (30.9%) and aspirin (21.6%). The least frequently reported medications were bisphosphonates (5.9%) and antidepressants (5.2%).

Figure 1.

Utilization of GERD-associated medications among the studied participants.

Perceived stress and stress levels among the participants

The mean PSS score was 19.74±5.05 with scores ranging from 0 to 40. Most participants (83.2%) were classified as experiencing moderate perceived stress. Both low and high stress levels were observed in equal proportions (8.4%). Feelings of nervousness and stress, inability to cope with responsibilities, and difficulties related to uncontrollable situations were among the most commonly reported stress-related experiences. While some participants (76.0%) said they felt confident in handling personal problems, the majority felt they were on top of things and had difficulty controlling irritations and anger due to uncontrollable situations. Table 4 summarizes the distribution of PSS responses among the participants.

Table 4.

Perceived stress among the participants based on PSS scale.

	N (%)
	Never	Almost never	Sometimes	Fairly often	Very often
In the last month, how often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly?	57 (13.0)	81 (18.4)	174 (39.5)	90 (20.5)	38 (8.6)
In the last month, how often have you felt that you were unable to control the important things in your life?	69 (15.7)	91 (20.7)	153 (34.8)	87 (19.8)	40 (9.1)
In the last month, how often have you felt nervous and stressed?	28 (6.4)	60 (13.6)	163 (37.0)	112 (25.5)	77 (17.5)
In the last month, how often have you felt confident about your ability to handle your personal problems?	37 (8.4)	69 (15.7)	150 (34.1)	123 (28.0)	61 (13.9)
In the last month, how often have you felt that things were going your way?	47 (10.7)	73 (16.6)	161 (36.6)	119 (27.0)	40 (9.1)
In the last month, how often have you found that you could not cope with all the things that you had to do?	47 (10.7)	110 (25.0)	159 (36.1)	94 (21.4)	30 (6.8)
In the last month, how often have you been able to control irritations in your life?	34 (7.7)	89 (20.2)	169 (38.4)	112 (25.5)	36 (8.2)
In the last month, how often have you felt that you were on top of things?	37 (8.4)	87 (19.8)	166 (37.7)	113 (25.7)	37 (8.4)
In the last month, how often have you been angered because of things that happened that were outside of your control?	32 (7.3)	86 (19.5)	163 (37.0)	100 (22.7)	59 (13.4)
In the last month, how often have you felt difficulties were piling up so high that you could not overcome them?	36 (8.2)	98 (22.3)	185 (42.0)	73 (16.6)	48 (10.9)
PSS
M±SD	19.74±5.05
Range (min-max)	0-40

N: Number of participants; PSS: Perceived stress scale; M: Mean; SD: Standard deviation; min: Minimum; max: Maximum.

Factors associated with GERD symptoms

Bivariate analyses examining the associations between probable GERD symptoms and participants’ socio-demographic, lifestyle, dietary, clinical, medication-related, and stress-related variables are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Bivariate analyses demonstrated that participants with probable GERD symptoms were significantly older and had higher perceived stress scores compared with participants without GERD symptoms. Significant associations were also observed for marital status, smoking habits, several comorbidities, dietary factors, personal or family history of gastrointestinal diseases, and use of multiple medications including NSAIDs, oral contraceptives, bisphosphonates, and iron supplements.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified several factors independently associated with probable GERD symptoms (Table 5). Higher perceived stress scores were significantly associated with increased odds of GERD symptoms (ORa=1.110, p<0.001). Among lifestyle-related factors, former smoking (ORa=1.540, p=0.002), frequent consumption of fatty or fried foods (ORa=2.129, p=0.028), carbonated beverages (ORa=2.712, p=0.001), and caffeinated drinks (ORa=1.140, p=0.030) were significantly associated with GERD symptoms. Clinical and medication-related factors including a personal or family history of gastrointestinal diseases (ORa=1.174, p=0.031), use of NSAIDs (ORa=1.767, p=0.027), bisphosphonates (ORa=3.767, p=0.032), and iron supplements (ORa=2.581, p=0.007) also remained significant in the adjusted model. Conversely, being married was associated with lower odds of probable GERD symptoms (ORa=0.265, p=0.009).

Table 5.

A multivariable logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with GERD symptoms.

Variable	ORa	p-value	Confidence interval
Variable	ORa	p-value	Lower bound	Upper bound
PSS	1.110	<0.001	1.049	1.174
Marital status: Married Vs Single	0.265	0.009	0.097	0.722
Smoking: Former smoker Vs. nonsmoker	1.540	0.002	1.172	2.023
Fatty or fried foods	2.129	0.028	1.083	4.185
Carbonated drinks	2.712	0.001	1.506	4.883
Caffeinated drinks	1.140	0.030	1.012	2.544
Personal or family history of GI diseases	1.174	0.031	1.027	1.816
NSAIDs	1.767	0.027	1.009	3.094
Bisphosphonates	3.767	0.032	1.123	12.638
Iron supplements	2.581	0.007	1.340	2.994

ORa: Adjusted odds ratio; PSS: Perceived stress scale; GI: Gastrointestinal; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Bold p-values are significant (P<0.05).

Discussion

This study examined the prevalence and factors associated with GERD symptoms among Lebanese adults, with particular emphasis on the role of perceived stress alongside lifestyle and clinical factors. Around 28.4% of participants met the GERDQ threshold, aligning with previous Lebanese data.¹⁶ This prevalence appears higher than estimates reported in several regional and international studies, which generally range between 10% and 20% in Western countries and fall below 10% in several Asian and Middle Eastern populations.^1,9 The findings may reflect the wide health consequences of chronic societal stress exposure in Lebanon, where prolonged economic instability and uncertainty have influenced dietary habits, healthcare access, sleep quality, and health-related behaviors. These interconnected stressors may collectively contribute to increased gastrointestinal symptom burden within the population.

Participants predominantly exhibited moderate perceived stress levels, aligning with recent Lebanese data documenting widespread psychological distress amid prolonged economic, political, and social instability.^18,27 However, the distribution of stress levels was highly concentrated within the moderate stress category, with relatively few participants classified as having either low or high stress levels. Such a restricted distribution may have resulted in range restriction, a phenomenon whereby limited variability in an independent variable attenuates observed associations and reduces the ability to fully characterize dose-response relationships.²⁸ Consequently, the magnitude of the association between perceived stress and GERD symptoms observed in this study may underestimate the true relationship that could be observed in populations exhibiting greater heterogeneity in stress exposure. Similar attenuation of regression coefficients and effect estimates due to restricted variability in predictor variables has been widely recognized in regression and behavioral science research.²⁹ Although perceived stress was analyzed as a continuous variable in the multivariable model to preserve statistical information and maximize statistical power, caution is warranted when generalizing these findings to populations with substantially different stress distributions. Future studies involving more diverse stress profiles and longitudinal designs are needed to better characterize the relationship between stress severity and GERD symptom burden. Notably, despite the elevated stress burden, many respondents reported some confidence in managing daily challenges, indicating elements of adaptive resilience despite ongoing adversity.³⁰

Perceived stress emerged as a significant independent factor associated with GERD symptoms. This finding supports growing evidence implicating the gut-brain axis in the modulation of reflux symptom perception and gastrointestinal function.³¹ Psychological stress may contribute to heightened visceral hypersensitivity, altered esophageal motility, and autonomic dysregulation, thereby amplifying reflux symptom perception even in the absence of substantial acid exposure.³² Importantly, psychological stress may influence not only the occurrence of reflux symptoms but also symptom perception and reporting behavior. Consequently, individuals with elevated stress levels may perceive reflux symptoms as more severe or bothersome despite similar levels of physiological reflux exposure. This observation further supports the concept that GERD symptom burden may not depend solely on acid exposure but may also involve central pain processing and stress-related hypervigilance. Similar associations have been observed across diverse populations, including studies from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Korea, and the United States.^12,33–35 Nevertheless, the cross-sectional design precludes establishing directionality, and reverse causation remains possible, as persistent reflux symptoms themselves may contribute to psychological distress and elevated stress perception. In a setting such as Lebanon, where population-level stress remains persistently elevated,¹⁸ these findings highlight the potential value of incorporating psychosocial assessment into GERD symptom treatment. Collectively, these findings support a more biopsychosocial approach to GERD symptom management that extends beyond acid suppression alone and incorporates psychological wellbeing, lifestyle modification, and behavioral counseling.

Dietary behaviors also contributed significantly to GERD symptoms. The results of our study revealed higher odds of having GERD symptoms among individuals with frequent consumption of high-fat or fried foods, caffeinated and carbonated drinks. High-fat meals reduce lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and delay gastric emptying, whereas caffeine and carbonated beverages promote transient LES relaxations and increase gastric distension.^36,37 Our findings are consistent with previous reviews demonstrating that energy-dense foods and high caffeine intake increase the likelihood of GERD symptoms.⁶ The observed associations between dietary factors, smoking history, and GERD symptoms likely reflect clustering of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors rather than isolated exposures alone. Such behavioral clustering may partially explain the persistence of reflux symptoms within high-stress populations. Considering that Lebanese dietary habits have increasingly shifted toward fried foods, sweetened beverages, and café culture, dietary modification should remain a key component of strategies aimed at reducing GERD symptom burden. Although caffeinated drink consumption remained statistically significant in the adjusted model, the association should be interpreted cautiously. The confidence interval was relatively wide and its lower bound was close to unity, indicating considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the effect. Consequently, this finding may represent a statistically fragile association and requires confirmation in larger studies before firm conclusions regarding the role of caffeine in GERD symptom development can be drawn.

Interestingly, current smoking demonstrated a strong crude association with GERD symptoms but lost statistical significance after multivariable adjustment, whereas former smoking remained independently associated. This pattern suggests that the relationship between current smoking and GERD symptoms may be partially explained by other lifestyle and dietary factors included in the model, several of which remained independently associated with GERD symptoms after adjustment. In contrast, the persistence of former smoking may reflect cumulative effects of prior tobacco exposure or reverse causation, whereby individuals experiencing reflux symptoms may have reduced or discontinued smoking because of symptom aggravation. Previous research has demonstrated improvement in GERD symptoms following smoking cessation, supporting the plausibility of this explanation.³⁸ Given the cross-sectional design, the precise mechanism underlying this finding cannot be determined and warrants further longitudinal investigation.

Medication use also showed a significant association with GERD symptoms, particularly NSAIDs, bisphosphonates, and iron supplements. These agents are well-established esophageal irritants and can induce mucosal injury, impair mucosal defenses, or cause delayed esophageal transit.^39,40 These findings are particularly clinically relevant because many of these medications are frequently used in community settings and may contribute to symptom aggravation when taken without adequate counseling regarding administration timing, posture, or gastrointestinal precautions. The observed associations reinforce the importance of careful medication review and patient counseling regarding appropriate administration practices in individuals presenting with reflux symptoms. Several other medications, including oral contraceptives, antidepressants, calcium channel blockers, aspirin, and anti-asthmatic agents, demonstrated significant associations with GERD symptoms in the bivariate analyses but did not remain significant after multivariable adjustment. This attenuation suggests that their crude associations may have been influenced by underlying demographic, clinical, or lifestyle characteristics rather than representing independent predictors of GERD symptoms. In particular, oral contraceptive use exhibited one of the strongest bivariate associations but lost significance after adjustment, indicating that the observed relationship may have been confounded by other factors included in the model. These findings underscore the importance of multivariable analyses in distinguishing independent risk factors from variables that primarily reflect broader clinical or behavioral profiles.

Marital status demonstrated the strongest protective association observed in the adjusted model, with married participants exhibiting substantially lower odds of GERD symptoms. Several mechanisms may explain this finding. Marriage may provide emotional support, social stability, and stress-buffering effects that reduce psychological distress and physiological stress responses implicated in gastrointestinal symptom perception.⁴¹ Greater social support has been associated with improved coping capacity, lower perceived stress, and better gastrointestinal health outcomes in previous studies.^32,42 Furthermore, married individuals may be more likely to engage in healthier daily routines, regular meal patterns, and appropriate healthcare-seeking behaviors, which could indirectly reduce GERD symptom burden.⁴³ Nevertheless, alternative explanations should also be considered. The observed association may partially reflect residual differences in socioeconomic stability, employment status, or other unmeasured psychosocial factors that were not fully captured in the regression model. Given the magnitude of the association, further studies are needed to determine whether marital status itself exerts a protective effect or serves as a marker of broader psychosocial advantages.

Several variables that demonstrated significant associations with GERD symptoms in bivariate analyses, including current smoking, spicy foods, citrus products, and certain medications and comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart disease, did not remain significant after multivariable adjustment. This finding suggests that these associations may have been influenced by confounding or mediated through other interrelated behavioral, dietary, psychosocial, or clinical factors. For example, although spicy foods and citrus products were initially associated with GERD symptoms, these effects were no longer independent after adjustment for stress and other dietary exposures. Similarly, the attenuation of associations involving chronic comorbidities may reflect the influence of shared lifestyle and medication-related factors rather than direct independent effects.

The high frequency of over-the-counter medication use observed among participants may additionally indicate substantial self-management of reflux symptoms within the community. This may potentially reflect normalization of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms or barriers to healthcare access. Although multivariable adjustment was performed, residual confounding related to unmeasured dietary, psychological, or socioeconomic factors cannot be entirely excluded. Overall, the findings suggest that GERD symptom burden within the Lebanese population may reflect a complex interaction between psychosocial stress, lifestyle behaviors, dietary patterns, medication exposure, and broader societal challenges.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several strengths. It represents one of the few investigations exploring the association between GERD symptoms and stress within the Lebanese population using validated instruments, GERDQ and PSS, both of which showed high internal consistency. The inclusion of participants from all Lebanese districts enhances the geographical representation and generalizability of our findings. The study also included a relatively large sample size which improves its statistical power. However, several limitations must be acknowledged. The cross-sectional design precludes establishing temporal or causal relationships between perceived stress, lifestyle factors, medication use, and GERD symptoms. Therefore, reverse causation cannot be excluded, as GERD symptoms themselves may contribute to elevated stress perception. In addition, recruitment through social media platforms and the use of snowball sampling may have resulted in a non-representative sample by disproportionately capturing individuals with greater digital connectivity, higher health awareness, or education thereby limiting generalizability to the broader Lebanese population. Furthermore, several variables including dietary habits, smoking status, medication use, comorbidities, stress perception, and GERD symptoms were self-reported and therefore may be subject to recall bias, reporting inaccuracies, and social desirability bias. Moreover, the absence of clinical or endoscopic confirmation of reflux disease limits the ability to objectively verify reflux disease, as GERDQ is a symptom-based screening instrument rather than a definitive diagnostic tool. Additionally, perceived stress was assessed using the PSS-10, a validated subjective measure of psychological stress, without incorporation of objective biological stress markers such as cortisol levels. Also, the PSS-10 evaluates perceived stress over the preceding month, whereas the GERDQ assesses reflux symptoms during the previous week, resulting in a slight temporal mismatch between the evaluated constructs. In addition, physical activity was assessed using a simplified self-reported measure rather than a validated instrument such as the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to minimize questionnaire length and participant burden within the online survey format. This may have limited the precision of physical activity assessment. Finally, data collection occurred between January and September 2024, and potential seasonal variations in dietary behaviors, environmental conditions, or symptom patterns could not be excluded. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable epidemiological insight into the psychosocial and behavioral risk factors of GERD in Lebanon and serves as an important foundation for future longitudinal and interventional research.

Practical implications

The study findings have important clinical and public health implications in Lebanon. The high prevalence of GERD symptoms and its significant association with stress, unhealthy dietary habits, smoking, and certain medications highlight the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to prevention and management. Integrating psychosocial screening and stress management into GERD care alongside promoting dietary modifications and smoking cessation could substantially reduce symptom burden. Healthcare providers should also review medication use carefully, particularly NSAIDs, bisphosphonates and iron salts to minimize esophageal irritation. At the population level, awareness campaigns and lifestyle education targeting stress resilience and healthy eating are essential to mitigate GERD symptoms amid Lebanon’s ongoing social, political and economic challenges.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a considerable burden of probable GERD symptoms among Lebanese adults. GERD symptoms were independently associated with perceived stress, dietary habits, smoking history, medication use, and gastrointestinal disease history. These findings support a biopsychosocial model of GERD symptom burden, in which psychological, behavioral, and clinical factors interact to influence symptom occurrence and perception. Given the prolonged societal stress experienced in Lebanon, the results provide further evidence that psychosocial factors should be considered when investigating gastrointestinal health in vulnerable populations. Future prospective studies are warranted to establish temporal relationships and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeting psychosocial and behavioral risk factors in reducing GERD symptom burden and improving gastrointestinal health outcomes.

Supplemental material

Supplemental material - Perceived stress, diet, and medication use associated with GERD symptoms in Lebanese adults: A cross-sectional study

Supplemental material for Perceived stress, diet, and medication use associated with GERD symptoms in Lebanese adults: A cross-sectional study by Iqbal Fahs, Jana Hayek, Seham Kanaan, Faten Hamed, Mariam Dabbous, Jihan Safwan, Mohamad Rahal, Fouad Sakr in Journal of Public Health Research

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Iqbal Fahs

Fouad Sakr

Ethical considerations

This research was conducted in full accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Life Science and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The study was observational and cross-sectional in nature and did not involve any invasive procedures or interventions. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical and Research Committee at the Lebanese International University (LIU) under approval number 2024ERC-014-LIUSOP.

Consent to participate

Electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study enrollment, and survey access was granted only after participants confirmed their willingness to participate.

Author Contributions

IF conceptualized the study, had the responsibility of the project administration, planned the methodology, and carried out the statistical analyses. IF, MD, JS, FS and MR supervised the project. IF, JH, FH, and SK wrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed and edited the text, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.*

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Appendix

References

El-Serag

Sweet

Winchester

, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014; 63: 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269

Yang

W-L

Cai

M-H

, et al. Burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health 2023; 23: 582. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15272-z

Nirwan

Hasan

Babar

Z-U-D

, et al. Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD): Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 5814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62795-1

Clarrett

Hachem

. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Mo Med 2018; 115: 214–218.

Argyrou

Legaki

Koutserimpas

, et al. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and analysis of genetic contributors. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6: 176–182. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i8.176

Heidarzadeh-Esfahani

Soleimani

Hajiahmadi

, et al. Dietary Intake in Relation to the Risk of Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review. Prev Nutr Food Sci 2021; 26: 367–379. https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2021.26.4.367

Taraszewska

. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms related to lifestyle and diet. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 2021; 72: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.32394/rpzh.2021.0145

Mungan

Pinarbasi Simsek

. Which drugs are risk factors for the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease? Turk J Gastroenterol 2020; 28: S38–S43. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2017.11

Eusebi

Ratnakumaran

Yuan

, et al. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis. Gut 2018; 67: 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589

10.

Niazi

Butt

Adil

, et al. Psychosocial Predictors of Gastrointestinal Symptomology in Adults. In: Handbook of the Biology and Pathology of Mental Disorders. Springer, pp. 1–20.

11.

Sharma

Saini

Joy

, et al.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Psychological Factors: A Potential Cause or Effect?

Indian J Health Sci Care 2024; 11: 24.

12.

Wickramasinghe

Thuraisingham

Jayalath

, et al. The association between symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and perceived stress: A countrywide study of Sri Lanka. PLOS ONE 2023; 18: e0294135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294135

13.

Cho

. Can Acute Stress Cause Esophageal Hypersensitivity in Healthy Individuals? J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 23: 483–484. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm17118

14.

Stengel

Taché

. Gut-Brain Neuroendocrine Signaling Under Conditions of Stress—Focus on Food Intake-Regulatory Mediators. Front Endocrinol 2018; 9: 498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00498

15.

Wang

Yao

, et al. Association Between Psychosocial Disorders and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 28: 212–221. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm21044

16.

Awada

Rachidi

Al-Hajje

, et al. Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease in Lebanese Adults: Effects on Quality of Life and Correlates. Pharmacologia 2014; 5: 339–350. https://doi.org/10.5567/pharmacologia.2014.339.350

17.

Nuwayhid

Zurayk

. The political determinants of health and wellbeing in the Lebanese uprising. The Lancet 2019; 394: 1974–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32907-1

18.

Farran

. Mental health in Lebanon: Tomorrow’s silent epidemic. Ment Health Prev 2021; 24: 200218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2021.200218

19.

Karam

El-Jamal

Osman

, et al. The aftermath of multiple trauma on a nation: unraveling Lebanon’s unique mental health struggle. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15: 1444245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1444245

20.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385–396.

21.

Chaaya

Osman

Naassan

, et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10: 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-111

22.

Jones

Junghard

Dent

, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 30: 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04142.x

23.

Ryan

Trosclair

Gfroerer

. Adult Current Smoking: Differences in Definitions and Prevalence Estimates—NHIS and NSDUH, 2008. J Environ Public Health 2012; 2012: 918368. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/918368

24.

Dent

Vakil

Jones

, et al. Accuracy of the diagnosis of GORD by questionnaire, physicians and a trial of proton pump inhibitor treatment: the Diamond Study. Gut 2010; 59: 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.200063

25.

Epi Info^TM | CDC, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/index.html (accessed 29 July 2024.

26.

Peduzzi

Concato

Kemper

, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3

27.

Iaali

Eid

El Darzi

, et al. Population under Stress: The Coping Mechanisms of Lebanese Adults in Times of Intermingling Crises and Their Relationship with Stress. ScientificWorldJournal 2024; 2024: 7281288. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7281288

28.

Sackett

Yang

. Correction for range restriction: an expanded typology. J Appl Psychol 2000; 85: 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.112

29.

Cohen

West

, et al. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441. Epub ahead of print 17 June 2013.

30.

Hermans

Hendler

Kalisch

. Building Resilience: The Stress Response as a Driving Force for Neuroplasticity and Adaptation. Biol Psychiatry 2025; 97: 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.016

31.

Konturek

Brzozowski

Konturek

. Stress and the gut: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol Off J Pol Physiol Soc 2011; 62: 591–599.

32.

Oudenhove

Levy

Crowell

, et al. Biopsychosocial Aspects of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: How Central and Environmental Processes Contribute to the Development and Expression of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 1355–1367.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.027

33.

Alsaleem

Awadalla

Shehata

, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease among primary health care attendants at Abha city, southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J 2021; 29: 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.020

34.

Sadeghi

Boustani

Mehrpour

, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Iran: A cross-sectional analysis from the PERSIAN cohort. PLOS ONE 2024; 19: e0306223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306223

35.

Song

Jung

H-K

Jung

. The Association Between Reflux Esophagitis and Psychosocial Stress. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2377-z

36.

Mehta

Song

Staller

, et al. Association Between Beverage Intake and Incidence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 2226–2233.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.040

37.

Özenoğlu

Anul

Özçelikçi

. The relationship of gastroesophageal reflux with nutritional habits and mental disorders. Hum Nutr Metab 2023; 33: 200203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2023.200203

38.

Kohata

Fujiwara

Watanabe

, et al. Long-Term Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0147860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147860

39.

Sunkara

Caughey

Nigar

, et al. Iron Pill Gastritis: An Under Diagnosed Condition With Potentially Serious Outcomes. Gastroenterol Res 2017; 10: 138–140. https://doi.org/10.14740/gr804w

40.

Tolkien

Stecher

Mander

, et al. Ferrous Sulfate Supplementation Causes Significant Gastrointestinal Side-Effects in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0117383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117383

41.

Ditzen

Heinrichs

. Psychobiology of social support: The social dimension of stress buffering. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2014; 32: 149–162. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-139008

42.

Acoba

. Social support and mental health: the mediating role of perceived stress. Front Psychol 2024; 15: 1330720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330720, Epub ahead of print 21.

43.

Cohen

Bolus

Khanna

, et al. GERD Symptoms in the General Population: Prevalence and Severity Versus Care-Seeking Patients. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 2488–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3181-8

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.59 MB

0.00 MB