Prior Calf Strain as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Rupture in National Basketball Association Players: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

Background:

Achilles tendon ruptures are among the most debilitating injuries in professional basketball, often leading to prolonged absence and long-term performance decline. While calf strains are common among National Basketball Association (NBA) athletes, their role as a precursor to Achilles rupture remains poorly understood.

Hypothesis:

A previous calf strain would be associated with increased odds of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players and that affected players would experience significant post-injury performance declines.

Study Design:

Case-cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Publicly available data on NBA players from 1958 to 2024 were analyzed, with the data search conducted in June 2025. Players with Achilles ruptures (n = 60) were compared with players with calf strains who did not sustain a rupture (n = 258). Logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index, position, starter status, and workload. Pre- and postinjury performance was evaluated over 2 seasons using paired t tests. Descriptive analyses characterized injury laterality, game context, quarter, shoe type, and draft position. Video review assessed injury mechanisms.

Results:

Previous calf strain was associated with increased odds of Achilles rupture (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.16-5.22; P = .02). Among those with both injuries, 85.7% occurred on the same side, with a mean interval of 1.9 years. Of all players, a total of 75% returned to play. Postinjury declines were observed in player efficiency rating (−2.46), win shares (−3.23), games played (−260.3), and minutes per game (−5.19) (all P < .001). Return was more likely in younger players and those on multiyear contracts. Video analysis revealed a consistent “false step” mechanism in 95% of cases with footage. Most Achilles tendon ruptures occurred during in-game activity, while shoe type was evaluated descriptively and was not associated with player position or preinjury workload.

Conclusion:

Our study showed that previous calf strain is associated with an increased risk of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players and may serve as a clinically identifiable risk marker. Rupture leads to substantial and sustained performance decline, even among those who return. Targeted rehabilitation and movement retraining may help mitigate progression to rupture in high-risk athletes.

Keywords

Achilles tendon rupture calf strain NBA injury prevention performance outcomes

Achilles tendon ruptures are among the most devastating injuries in professional sports, particularly in the National Basketball Association (NBA), where explosive lower extremity strength and mobility are essential for peak performance.¹⁷ These injuries typically require surgical intervention and prolonged rehabilitation, and they have been associated with significant declines in player performance and shortened career longevity.¹⁶ Despite advances in operative techniques and postoperative care, a reliable return to preinjury form remains unpredictable.¹⁶

A growing body of literature has explored outcomes after Achilles tendon rupture in elite athletes.^1,13,16,17 Several studies have reported that a large proportion of NBA players are unable to return to preinjury levels of efficiency and playing time, even after clearance to return to sport.^1,13,17 These findings highlight the high personal and professional burden of this injury and underscore the need for improved strategies for risk identification and prevention.

While the consequences of Achilles tendon rupture have been well characterized, its risk factors remain poorly defined.^7,17,23 Tendon degeneration, overuse, and biomechanical overload have been proposed as contributing mechanisms, but clear clinical predictors remain limited in the elite athlete population.^17,23 One area of emerging interest is the potential link between calf muscle injuries and subsequent Achilles pathology. Given the anatomic and functional continuity between the gastrocnemius-soleus complex and the Achilles tendon, it has been hypothesized that calf strains may be associated with an increased risk of subsequent tendon injury.²⁷ Calf strains are common in the NBA and often result in missed playing time, yet their role as an independent risk factor for tendon rupture has not been evaluated.^11,19,27

To address this gap, the purpose of this study was to determine whether a history of calf strain is associated with an increased risk of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players. A secondary purpose was to examine the effect of Achilles tendon rupture on objective measures of player performance, playing time, and financial compensation using pre- and postinjury data over a standardized 2-season window. We hypothesized that players with previous calf strain would have significantly greater odds of sustaining an Achilles tendon rupture and would experience notable declines in performance after injury.

Methods

Study Design and Data Sources

This retrospective cohort study used publicly available data to evaluate whether a previous calf strain was associated with increased odds of Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players, with the data search conducted in June 2025. Secondary objectives included assessing changes in performance after return to play and characterizing the situational features and mechanisms of rupture. Because no protected health information or clinical records were used, institutional review board approval was not required.

Injury histories were compiled using Pro Sports Transactions (https://prosportstransactions.com), an open-access database that catalogs player injuries, roster moves, and transaction history. Injury events were verified using official press releases, team announcements, and reputable media reports. When discrepancies were identified, preference was given to accounts with team confirmation or independent source agreement. Demographic and performance data were obtained from Basketball Reference (https://www.basketball-reference.com). All data were manually extracted and independently verified by 2 study members (Z.E. and Y.L.) using a standardized template. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus and re-review of primary sources. Data were compiled in spreadsheets for analysis.

Cohort Identification

Players were included if they sustained a calf strain, Achilles tendon rupture, or both, resulting in missed NBA games between 1958 and 2024. Players with incomplete injury documentation or missing performance data were excluded. Injuries were classified based on publicly available reports using consistent terminology. Search terms included "Achilles tendon rupture," "Achilles tear," "Achilles injury," "calf strain," "calf injury," "posterior lower leg strain," and related phrases. Only injuries that resulted in missed NBA games were included, and vague or nonspecific entries (eg, "leg injury" without anatomic detail) were excluded unless the mechanism or diagnosis could be confidently inferred.

The calf strain–only cohort was selected as the comparison group because it represented a clinically relevant population with documented posterior lower extremity injury, NBA-level workload demands, and similar access to team medical care, while differing specifically by the absence of subsequent Achilles tendon rupture. This approach was chosen to reduce confounding related to injury surveillance, professional participation, and baseline exposure to high-load athletic activity.

Formal matching between cohorts was not performed. Instead, potential differences in player characteristics and role were addressed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, body mass index, playing position, starter status, and preinjury workload measures. Performance outcomes after Achilles tendon rupture were evaluated using within-player pre- and postinjury comparisons, which inherently control for baseline player quality and mitigate between-group differences in performance metrics.

Risk of Achilles Tendon Tear

The primary exposure was a history of calf strain. The primary outcome was a subsequent Achilles tendon rupture. Additional covariates included age at the time of injury, body mass index (BMI), number of games and minutes played before injury, playing position (based on most frequently listed position), and starter status (defined as the role held for the majority of a player's career). Draft position, draft round, and contract type (eg, multiyear deal) were also collected for descriptive analysis. For players with both a calf strain and subsequent rupture, the interval between injuries (in years) was calculated. Associations between draft position and rupture risk were also evaluated.

Performance Outcomes

To evaluate postinjury performance, we conducted a longitudinal within-patient analysis among players who returned to NBA play and had complete data for the 2 full seasons before and after their Achilles tendon rupture. Performance metrics included player efficiency rating, win shares, total games played, minutes per game, and annual salary. This self-controlled design compared a player’s postinjury metrics against one’s own preinjury baseline, inherently controlling for interplayer variability in skill level, role, and career trajectory and minimizing confounding from control group characteristics.

Injury Characterization

For players who sustained Achilles tendon ruptures, we recorded injury laterality (left vs right), timing relative to the NBA calendar (regular season vs offseason), context (in-game vs non-game), and quarter of play when available. Shoe type was evaluated descriptively, categorized as low-, mid-, or high-top based on visual confirmation from game footage or media sources, and analyzed for associations with player position and preinjury minutes played. These injury characterization variables were treated as exploratory and were not intended to assess causation or predictors of injury risk.

Injury mechanism was also assessed through video analysis. A total of 21 injury events were identified using publicly available game footage from platforms such as NBA.com and YouTube. Each video was independently reviewed to determine the movement pattern immediately preceding the rupture, with particular attention to explosive stepping motions.

Modern-Era Analysis

In addition to the primary analyses, we performed a modern-era sensitivity analysis to assess whether the association between previous calf strain and Achilles tendon rupture persisted under more contemporary training, surgical, and rehabilitation conditions. The modern era was defined as players whose NBA debut occurred on or after January 1, 2010, which allowed consistent classification of both cases and controls. Within this modern-era subset, we repeated the multivariable logistic regression and the paired pre- versus postinjury performance analyses described above.

Statistical Analysis

Univariate analyses were first conducted to identify variables of importance for inclusion in the multivariate logistic model. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between previous calf strain and subsequent Achilles tendon rupture. Both univariate and multivariate models were constructed, with odds ratios (ORs), 95% CI, and P values reported. Model assumptions, including linearity of the log-odds and absence of multicollinearity, were confirmed.

Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and postinjury performance metrics. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to analyze associations between categorical variables such as shoe type or game timing. Associations between shoe type and player position were assessed using chi-square tests, while differences in preinjury minutes played by shoe type were evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all analyses. All analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 2024.12.1) R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Cohort Summary and Demographic Comparison

A total of 60 NBA players who sustained Achilles tendon ruptures were included. Of these, 45 players (75%) returned to play, 10 (16.7%) did not return, and 5 players (8.3%) were still undergoing rehabilitation at the time of data collection. The comparison cohort included 272 players in the calf strain group, comprising 258 players who sustained a calf strain without a subsequent Achilles tendon rupture and 14 players who later went on to sustain a rupture.

BMI was similar between groups (24.94 vs 24.92; P = .94) (Table 1).

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Players With and Without Achilles Tendon Tears^a

Characteristic	No Tear (n = 258)	Tear (n = 60)	P
BMI, kg/m²	24.92 ± 1.64	24.94 ± 1.94	.94
Position	n = 208^b	n = 50^b	.78
PF	58 (27.9)	11 (22.0)
C	1 (0.5)	0 (0.0)
PG	45 (21.6)	12 (24.0)
SF	48 (23.1)	15 (30.0)
SG	56 (26.9)	12 (24.0)
Starter vs bench	n = 258^b	n = 56^b	.46
Starter	132 (51.2)	25 (44.6)
Bench	126 (48.8)	31 (55.4)
Age at tear, y	–	29.53 ± 11.97	–
Age at strain, y	28.25 ± 4.72	27.79 ± 3.49	.72

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. Dashes indicate values that were not applicable or could not be calculated. Specifically, age at tear was not applicable for players without an Achilles tendon tear, and corresponding P values were not calculated because no between-group comparison could be performed. BMI, body mass index; C, center; PF, power forward; PG, point guard; SF, small forward; SG, shooting guard.

Number of players with available data for given characteristic.

The mean overall draft pick among players who sustained an Achilles tendon rupture was 21.87. Eight of the 60 players (13.3%) were undrafted. Draft position was not significantly associated with risk of tendon rupture in either univariate or multivariate analysis.

Risk of Achilles Tendon Rupture

A calf strain was documented in 14 players (23.3%) before their Achilles tendon rupture. Of these, 12 players (85.7%) sustained tears on the same side as the earlier strain. The mean time between calf strain and subsequent rupture was 1.9 years (range, 6 days–5 years). Logistic regression analysis showed that a previous calf strain was significantly associated with increased odds of subsequent Achilles tendon rupture (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.16-5.22; P = .02). No other variables—including age, BMI, position, starter status, or preinjury minutes—were significantly associated with rupture risk (Table 2). These results are illustrated in the forest plot shown in Figure 1.

Table 2

Multivariate Logistic Regression Results: Predictors of Achilles Tendon Rupture^a

Predictor	OR	95% CI	P
Age, y	1.02	1.00-1.05	.08
BMI, kg/m²	1.07	0.88-1.29	.49
Preinjury games played	1.00	1.00-1.00	.13
Preinjury minutes played	1.00	0.93-1.06	.88
Starter	0.73	0.31-1.73	.48
Position
PF	0.97	0.36-2.66	.96
C	0.00	0.25-6.18	.99
PG	1.48	0.52-4.28	.46
SF	1.51	0.56-4.14	.42
SG	1.04	0.37-3.00	.94
Prior calf strain	2.49	1.16-5.22	.02

“Starter vs bench” indicates whether the player was a starter (1) or bench player (0) at the time of injury. “Prior calf strain” denotes the presence of a documented calf strain prior to Achilles rupture. ORs are presented with 95% CI in brackets. Position variables were modeled with SG as the reference group. Bold P value refers indicate statistical significance (P < .05). BMI, body mass index; C, center; PF, power forward; PG, point guard; SF, small forward; SG, shooting guard; OR, odds ratio.

Figure 1.

Forest plot of predictors for Achilles tendon rupture among National Basketball Association players. BMI, body mass index; C, center; PF, power forward; PG, point guard; SF, small forward; SG, shooting guard.

Return-to-Play and Postinjury Performance

Of the 60 players with Achilles tendon ruptures, 47 (78.3%) had sufficient data for longitudinal performance analysis. Players experienced statistically significant declines in multiple performance metrics after injury. Win shares declined significantly from 10.16 to 6.93 (P < .01). Players participated in significantly fewer total games (397.71 vs 137.4; P < .01) and averaged fewer minutes per game (23.5 vs 18.3; P < .01) after injury. Annual salary showed a nonsignificant decline from $6.93 million to $6.50 million (P = .61) (Table 3). These trends are visualized in Figure 2.

Table 3

Paired t Test Results Comparing Pre- and Postinjury Performance Metrics After Achilles Tendon Tear^a

Measure	Mean Preinjury	Mean Postinjury	Mean Difference	P
Salary, US$	6,930,058.14 ± 4,184,219.83	6,499,543.42 ± 4,051,882.16	–430,514.72	.61
PER	14.48 ± 3.62	12.03 ± 3.94	–2.46	<.001
Win shares	10.16 ± 6.31	6.93 ± 5.27	–3.23	<.001
Games played	397.71 ± 174.45	137.40 ± 98.12	–260.31	<.001
Minutes per game	23.50 ± 6.78	18.31 ± 7.03	–5.19	<.001

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Bold P values indicate statistical significance (P < .05). PER, player efficiency rating.

Figure 2.

Changes in player performance metrics before and after Achilles tendon injury. *P < .05. PER, player efficiency rating.

Among the 60 players with ruptures, 53 (88.3%) were signed to multiyear contracts at the time of injury. Multiyear contract status was significantly associated with return to play: players on multiyear contracts were more likely to return than those on single-year deals (75.5% vs 28.6%; P = .02). Age was also associated with return to play: players who returned were younger than those who did not (28.08 vs 30.90 years; P = .01). In contrast, BMI (24.97 vs 24.85; P = .84), position (guard, forward, center; P = .73), player role (starter vs bench; 75.0% vs 68.0%; P = .58), and in-season versus offseason injury timing (77.5% vs 62.5%; P = .27) were not significantly associated with return.

Injury Characterization

Among the 60 Achilles tendon ruptures, 25 occurred on the left side and 35 on the right (41.7% vs 58.3%; P = .20). A total of 44 injuries (73.3%) occurred during the NBA season, and 16 (26.7%) occurred during the offseason (P < .01). Of the in-season injuries, 37 (84.1%) occurred during official NBA games. The mean number of team possessions per game during the season in which the injury occurred was 102.65, compared with a leaguewide mean of approximately 97.65 possessions per game over the study period. There was no significant association between team pace (possessions per game) and risk of Achilles tendon rupture.

Among players with available in-game timing data (n = 28), most Achilles tendon injuries occurred in the fourth quarter or overtime (10 injuries; 35.7%), followed by the first (9 injuries; 32.1%), second (5 injuries; 17.9%), and third quarters (4 injuries; 14.3%) (P = .29). Among players injured during live game play, season-averaged preinjury minutes per game were not significantly associated with the timing of injury within the game (P = .73). Based on regular-season timing (n = 44), injuries were most frequent during the second quarter of the NBA season (18 injuries; 40.9%), followed by the first (12 injuries; 27.3%), third and fourth segments (5 injuries each; 11.4%), and the playoffs (4 injuries; 9.1%) (P < .01).

Shoe type at the time of injury was available for 30 players: 2 (6.7%) wore high-top shoes, 12 (40.0%) wore midtop shoes, and 16 (53.3%) wore low-top shoes (P < .01). However, shoe type was not significantly associated with player position (P = .84) or preinjury minutes played (P = .15).

Video footage was available for 21 Achilles tendon injuries. Of these, 20 injuries (95.2%) occurred during a characteristic “false step”—defined as a quick, forceful backward step involving dorsiflexion to initiate explosive forward movement.²³ Details regarding injury laterality, shoe type, and timing are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4

Characteristics of Tendon Cohort (n = 60)^a

Characteristic	n (%)
Shoe type, n = 30^b
High-top	2 (6.7)
Low-top	16 (53.3)
Midtop	12 (40.0)
Game quarter of injury, n = 27^b
Q1	8 (29.6)
Q2	5 (18.5)
Q3	4 (14.8)
Q4	10 (37.0)
Season quarter of injury, n = 47^b
Q1	15 (31.9)
Q2	18 (38.3)
Q3	5 (10.6)
Q4	5 (10.6)
Playoffs	4 (8.5)

Data are presented as n (%).

Number of players with available data for given characteristic.

Brand information was available for 32 of the 60 players who sustained an Achilles tendon rupture. Of these, 22 players (68.8%) were wearing Nike, 2 wore Adidas, and the remaining players wore Anta (1), ASICS (1), New Balance (1), Puma (2), Reebok (2), and Under Armour (1). Leaguewide estimates suggest the following brand distribution among NBA players: Nike (65.1%), Adidas (10.8%), Jordan (7.4%), Puma (3.3%), Under Armour (2.8%), New Balance (2.3%), Anta (2.1%), Li-Ning (1.8%), Converse (1.8%), and Reebok (0.8%).⁸ The observed brand distribution in our injury cohort generally mirrored overall usage patterns in the league, with no statistically significant association with Achilles tendon tear (P = .89).

Modern Era Sensitivity Analysis (NBA debut ≥2010)

The modern-era cohort included 118 players (21 Achilles tendon ruptures and 97 controls). In this subset, multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that a previous calf strain was independently associated with increased odds of subsequent Achilles tendon rupture (OR, 11.17; 95% CI, 1.94-80.65; P = .01) (Table 5). No other covariates were significantly associated with rupture risk.

Table 5

Multivariate Logistic Regression Results: Predictors of Achilles Tendon Rupture (modern era analysis [NBA debut ≥2010])^a

Predictor	OR	95% CI	P
Age, y	1.10	1.00-1.30	.23
BMI, kg/m²	0.76	0.48-1.14	.21
Preinjury games played	1.00	1.00-1.00	.80
Preinjury minutes played	0.95	0.83-1.09	.50
Starter	0.43	0.06-2.62	.37
Position
PF	0.30	0.03-1.86	.23
PF/C	0.00	NR; >100.00	.99
PG	1.15	0.21-6.10	.87
SF	1.32	0.27-6.53	.73
Prior calf strain	11.17	1.94-80.65	.01

Bold P values indicate statistical significance (P < .05). “Starter vs bench” indicates whether the player was a starter (1) or bench player (0) at the time of injury. “Prior calf strain” denotes the presence of a documented calf strain prior to Achilles rupture. ORs are presented with 95% CI in brackets. Position variables were modeled with shooting guard as the reference group. BMI, body mass index; C, center; NBA, National Basketball Association; NR, not reported; PF, power forward; PG, point guard; OR, odds ratio; SF, small forward.

Among modern-era players who sustained an Achilles tendon rupture, returned to NBA play, and had complete longitudinal data (n = 9), paired pre- versus postinjury comparisons demonstrated significant declines in player efficiency rating, total games played, and mean minutes per game (Table 6). Player efficiency rating decreased from 14.61 to 11.80 (P = .01), total games played decreased from 343.00 to 109.00 (P < .01), and mean minutes per game decreased from 24.50 to 19.50 (P < .01). Win shares trended downward but did not reach statistical significance (2.01 to 0.91; P = .09), while annual salary did not significantly change in this modern-era subset (P = .95).

Table 6

Paired t Test Results Comparing Pre- and Postinjury Performance Metrics After Achilles Tendon Tear (modern era analysis [NBA debut ≥2010])^a

Measure	Mean Preinjury	Mean Postinjury	Mean Difference	P
Salary, US$	10,995,183.00 ± 5,412,891.33	11,202,742.00 ± 5,674,208.74	207,559.11	.95
PER	14.61 ± 3.12	11.80 ± 3.46	–2.81	.01
Win shares	2.01 ± 1.48	0.91 ± 1.24	–1.10	.09
Games played	342.78 ± 112.45	108.78 ± 71.19	–234.00	<.001
Minutes per game	24.49 ± 6.31	19.47 ± 6.84	–5.02	<.001

Data presented as mean ± SD. Bold P values indicate statistical significance (P < .05). NBA, National Basketball Association; PER, player efficiency rating.

Discussion

The major findings of our study demonstrated that previous calf strain was associated with a substantially increased likelihood of subsequent Achilles tendon rupture in NBA players. Approximately one-quarter of players who sustained an Achilles rupture had a documented previous calf strain, with most injuries occurring on the same side and a mean interval of nearly 2 years between events. After rupture, only 75% of players returned to NBA play, and those who did experienced marked declines in player efficiency rating, win shares, games played, and minutes per game. Together, these findings highlight the significant performance and availability consequences of Achilles tendon rupture and identify previous calf strain as a clinically relevant risk marker.

Beyond this observed association, the predominance of same-side injuries suggests a localized vulnerability linking previous calf strain to subsequent Achilles tendon rupture. This side-specific pattern, coupled with the significant association found in our regression analysis, reinforces the idea that calf strain may serve as an early indicator of biomechanical overload or tissue vulnerability.¹¹ Mechanistically, this may reflect persistent neuromuscular deficits, altered motor patterns, or incomplete recovery after the initial strain, which may shift load to the Achilles tendon over time.^5,9,22 Compensatory biomechanical changes—such as diminished gastrocnemius activation or asymmetric push-off mechanics—may chronically overload the tendon and contribute to degeneration.⁶ These observations support the concept of a muscle-tendon injury continuum described in previous studies,^2,16,26,30 in which inadequate recovery or compensation after calf strain may predispose athletes to more severe tendon injury over time.

The interval between calf strain and Achilles rupture in our cohort ranged from as short as 6 days to as long as several years, indicating that elevated risk may persist well beyond the initial recovery period. This variability underscores the importance of rehabilitation protocols that restore neuromuscular control, ensure symmetry in push-off mechanics, and build sufficient load tolerance in the gastrocnemius-Achilles complex.²² This association persisted after adjustment for season-level workload measures, and no clear relationship was observed between a player’s typical minutes per game and the timing of injury within a game. Together, these findings suggest that calf strain is not simply a surrogate for greater playing time or late-game fatigue, but rather may represent a distinct marker of tissue vulnerability that extends beyond traditional workload measures.

The postinjury declines observed across several performance metrics—including player efficiency rating, win shares, and minutes played—point to a broader effect on player role and utility. Many athletes who return may do so in a reduced capacity, with lower efficiency and shorter stints on the court. These patterns are consistent with previous studies reporting diminished performance after Achilles rupture in professional basketball players, particularly in metrics such as games played and minutes per game.^16,17 Our findings build on this work by offering a more granular, longitudinal assessment of postinjury performance across commonly reported basketball performance metrics.

Interestingly, despite measurable declines in performance, player salaries remained stable in the seasons after injury. This is likely due in part to the high prevalence of multiyear contracts (88.3%) at the time of rupture, which may buffer athletes from immediate financial consequences. Additionally, teams may be incentivized to retain or invest in previously high-performing players based on perceived recovery potential or market value. This suggests that financial indicators alone may not fully capture the professional consequences of Achilles injuries in elite athletes.^13,17

Beyond performance outcomes, our data also shed light on contextual patterns surrounding injury timing. Most Achilles ruptures occurred during live in-game play—reflecting the tendon’s vulnerability to high-force eccentric loading during jumping, sprinting, and rapid direction changes.^16,17,19,28 Injuries were especially common in the first and fourth quarters of a game, potentially implicating warm-up adequacy, fatigue, or load ramp-up as contributing contextual factors.^18,23 These observations were not intended to identify predictors of injury risk, but rather to characterize common circumstances under which ruptures occur and to generate hypotheses for future prevention strategies. Additionally, the second quarter of the season saw the highest concentration of injuries, suggesting that early-season conditioning and progressive load ramp-up may be insufficient to mitigate cumulative tendon stress.^17,21 Together, these patterns suggest actionable opportunities for prevention, including load management strategies (eg, limiting explosive movements during back-to-back games or adjusting training loads based on workload monitoring), neuromuscular readiness assessments, and targeted conditioning in the preseason.

Video analysis revealed that 20 of 21 players with available footage sustained their rupture during a characteristic false step—a rapid backward step that heavily dorsiflexes the ankle as players prepare to explode forward.²³ This movement pattern has been previously described as a key mechanism in Achilles tendon rupture in NBA athletes. Incorporating training cues and rehabilitation protocols that minimize reliance on the false step—particularly in players with a history of calf strain—may offer a practical avenue for reducing tendon load and lowering injury risk.

Footwear patterns were evaluated descriptively. While these observations do not imply causation, they provide contextual insight into rupture circumstances. Among players with available data, low-top shoes were more commonly worn at the time of injury than mid- or high-tops. While this observation does not establish causation, it aligns with ongoing debate around whether lower-cut shoes offer adequate support for dynamic, high-load movements. Previous biomechanical research has suggested that shoe design can influence ankle stability and loading patterns during jumping, cutting, and deceleration.^10,17,24,25 In our analysis, however, shoe type was not significantly associated with player position or preinjury workload, suggesting that individual preference—rather than role or minutes played—may drive footwear selection. Brand distribution among injured players generally reflected overall NBA trends, with a predominance of Nike usage, suggesting that injury incidence may be more closely linked to shoe design and movement patterns than brand affiliation. Future biomechanical studies should evaluate the relationship between shoe design, player movement profiles, and tendon loading.

Our findings carry important clinical implications. If calf strain may serve as a clinical warning sign for increased vulnerability to future rupture, then recovery protocols must move beyond symptom resolution.^7,11,15 Emphasis should be placed on restoring symmetrical strength, tendon load tolerance, and neuromuscular coordination.^4,12,20,31 Recommended strategies may include eccentric heel-drop exercises, side-to-side isokinetic strength assessments, and wearable sensor-based load tracking to guide safe progression.^3,14,29 Screening players with strain history and adjusting workloads accordingly could serve as a proactive approach to injury mitigation. These interventions may be particularly useful in the preseason, when monitoring readiness and tendon reconditioning could offset early-season injury spikes.^3,14

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the absence of clinical records limits the granularity of injury characterization and may introduce some risk of misclassification. Details regarding injury severity, specific muscle involvement, imaging confirmation, tendon morphology, and rehabilitation protocols were not consistently available. As a result, calf strains were treated as a single clinically identifiable exposure rather than stratified by anatomic subtype or severity, and mechanistic conclusions cannot be drawn. These findings should therefore be interpreted at the population level rather than as evidence regarding specific calf strain patterns. Second, although multivariable regression was used to adjust for relevant covariates including age, body mass index, position, starter status, and workload measures, residual confounding from unmeasured factors such as individual skill trajectory, team context, or training practices remains possible. Season-averaged workload measures such as minutes per game may inadequately capture acute fatigue states, warm-up adequacy, or cumulative neuromuscular stress that are more likely to influence injury risk during high-intensity movements. Formal matching between cohorts was not performed, which may limit comparability between groups despite statistical adjustment. Third, the data set captures only injuries that resulted in missed NBA games and were reported during an athlete’s professional career. Minor calf strains managed without missed games may not have been recorded, potentially underestimating the true prevalence of previous strain. Additionally, calf strains sustained before entry into the NBA, including those occurring during amateur, collegiate, G League, or international play, were not included. Fourth, compensation data were limited to reported salary figures and may not reflect total earnings, incentives, or endorsement income, limiting interpretation of financial outcomes. Finally, the modest sample size, particularly within subgroup analyses, may limit statistical power for certain comparisons. We attempted era-stratified analyses using earlier calendar periods; however, the pre-2010 cohort contained limited events and incomplete index dates for controls, resulting in unstable estimates and limiting interpretability. Larger, prospectively collected data sets incorporating detailed clinical, biomechanical, imaging, and workload information will be necessary to further clarify the mechanisms underlying the observed association between calf strain and subsequent Achilles tendon rupture.

Conclusion

Footnotes

Final revision submitted February 8, 2026; accepted March 14, 2026.

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: N.N.H. is a paid presenter or speaker for Arthrex Inc. A.A. reports professional activities with Vilex LLC, Wolters Kluwer, Elsevier, DJO LLC, and GLW; serves as a member-at-large on the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) nominating and abstract review committees; and serves as deputy editor for the education section of Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J.M.T. reports IP royalties from Springer Nature, serves on the practice management committee of the AOFAS, and is section editor for the Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (Foot and Ankle section).

Ethical approval was not required for the current study.

ORCID iDs

Zaid Elsabbagh

George Bcharah

David Ryu

References

Amin

Old

Tabb

Garg

Toossi

Cerynik

. Performance outcomes after repair of complete Achilles tendon ruptures in National Basketball Association players. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(8):1864-1868. doi:10.1177/0363546513490659

Bak

Seow

Teo

YZE

Hasan

Pearce

. Return to play and functional outcomes following treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2024;63(3):420-429. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2023.12.008

Baxter

Corrigan

Hullfish

O’Rourke

Silbernagel

. Exercise progression to incrementally load the Achilles tendon. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(1):124-130. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002459

Brumann

Baumbach

Mutschler

Polzer

. Accelerated rehabilitation following Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture—development of an evidence-based treatment protocol. Injury. 2014;45(11):1782-1790. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.022

Chang

Wang

Zhang

. Stiffness of the gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex between amateur basketball players and the non-athletic general population. Front Physiol. 2020;11:606706. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.606706

Chang

Kulig

. The neuromechanical adaptations to Achilles tendinosis. J Physiol. 2015;593(15):3373-3387. doi:10.1113/JP270220

Claessen

FMAP

de Vos

Reijman

Meuffels

. Predictors of primary Achilles tendon ruptures. Sports Med. 2014;44(9):1241-1259. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0200-z

Curcic

. Basketball shoe statistics. RunRepeat.com . Published September 16, 2023. Accessed July 14, 2025. https://runrepeat.com/basketball-shoe-statistics

Epro

Suhr

Karamanidis

. Human muscle-tendon unit mechanobiological responses to consecutive high strain cyclic loading. J Exp Biol. 2023;226(20):JEB246507. doi:10.1242/jeb.246507

10.

Firminger

Bruce

Wannop

Stefanyshyn

Edwards

. Effect of shoe and surface stiffness on lower limb tendon strain in jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(9):1895-1903. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002004

11.

Green

Pizzari

. Calf muscle strain injuries in sport: a systematic review of risk factors for injury. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(16):1189-1194. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097177

12.

Huang

Wang

Zhang

Chen

. Rehabilitation regimen after surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):1008-1016. doi:10.1177/0363546514531014

13.

Johns

Walley

Seedat

Thordarson

Jackson

Gonzalez

. Career outlook and performance of professional athletes after Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(4):495-509. doi:10.1177/1071100720969633

14.

Kakavas

Forelli

Korakakis

Malliaropoulos

Maffulli

. Neuroplastic periodization in tendinopathy. Br Med Bull. 2025;154(1):LDAF006. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaf006

15.

Kjær

Petersen

Dünweber

Andersen

Engebretsen

Magnusson

. Dilemma in the treatment of sports injuries in athletes: tendon overuse, muscle strain, and tendon rupture. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025;35(2):e70026. doi:10.1111/sms.70026

16.

LaPrade

Chona

Cinque

, et al. Return-to-play and performance after operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture in elite male athletes: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(9):515-520. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104835

17.

Lemme

Kleiner

Tan

DeFroda

Owens

. Epidemiology and video analysis of Achilles tendon ruptures in the National Basketball Association. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2360-2366. doi:10.1177/0363546519858609

18.

Lewis

. It’s a hard-knock life: game load, fatigue, and injury risk in the National Basketball Association. J Athl Train. 2018;53(5):503-509. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-243-17

19.

Lian

Sewani

Dayan

, et al. Systematic review of injuries in the men’s and women’s National Basketball Association. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(5):1416-1429. doi:10.1177/03635465211014506

20.

Liu

Dai

Zheng

Liu

. Early functional rehabilitation compared with traditional immobilization for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(6):1021-1030. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1890.R1

21.

Martin

Arundale

AJH

Kluzek

Ferguson

Collins

Bullock

. Characterization of rookie season injury and illness and career longevity among National Basketball Association players. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2128199. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28199

22.

Martin

Chimenti

Cuddeford

, et al. Achilles pain, stiffness, and muscle power deficits: midportion Achilles tendinopathy revision 2018. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(5):A1-A38. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.0302

23.

Petway

Jordan

Epsley

Anloague

. Mechanisms of Achilles tendon rupture in National Basketball Association players. J Appl Biomech. 2022;38(6):398-403. doi:10.1123/jab.2022-0088

24.

Rice

Patel

. Manipulation of foot strike and footwear increases Achilles tendon loading during running. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(10):2411-2417. doi:10.1177/0363546517704429

25.

Rowson

McNally

Duma

. Can footwear affect Achilles tendon loading? Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20(5):344-349. doi:10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181ed7e50

26.

Taberner

Spencer

Murphy

Antflick

Cohen

. Progressing on-court rehabilitation after injury: the control-chaos continuum adapted to basketball. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(9):498-509. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11981

27.

Toumi

Larguech

Cherief

, et al. Implications of the calf musculature and Achilles tendon architectures for understanding the site of injury. J Biomech. 2016;49(7):1180-1185. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.004

28.

Trofa

Miller

Jang

Woode

Greisberg

Vosseller

. Professional athletes’ return to play and performance after operative repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2864-2871. doi:10.1177/0363546517713001

29.

Yeh

Calder

Antflick

Bull

AMJ

Kedgley

. Maximum dorsiflexion increases Achilles tendon force during exercise for midportion Achilles tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(8):1674-1682. doi:10.1111/sms.13974

30.

Zellers

Carmont

Silbernagel

. Return to play post Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(21):1325-1332. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096106

31.

Zhao

Meng

Liu

Zeng

Kan

. Early functional rehabilitation versus traditional immobilization for surgical Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39871. doi:10.1038/srep39871