Abstract
The growth of the bi/multiracial American population has inspired a corresponding surge in scholarship on this historically understudied racial group. Simultaneously, a much-needed mainstream discussion has emerged about the unearned, often invisible privileges of being White in American society. In this article, I enrich the literature in both areas by elucidating how some bi/multiracial Americans benefit from, yet also pay a price for, whiteness and White privilege through the narratives of 30 participants from a variety of racially mixed backgrounds, all of whom have White ancestry. First, I explore how some participants experience traditional White privilege through their White-appearing features. Second, I examine an almost invisible iteration of White privilege that participants acquired through their white parent, irrespective of my respondents’ skin color. Third, I illuminate the price of appearing White (and light) for bi/multiracials in ways that are similar to but also different from monoracism. This article analyzes the paradoxical manifestation of White privilege in a growing cohort of Americans: bi/multiracials with White ancestry.
Since the turn of the century, three simultaneous factors have brought more attention to the expanding bi/multiracial 1 population in the United States. In the year 2000, the Census made history by permitting U.S. residents to choose more than one 2 racial background (Johnson 2003), which is noteworthy as the Census is a heavily referenced data set. Also, a mainstream conversation emerged about this population due, in part, to bi/multiracial public figures such as Alicia Keys, Tiger Woods, and Barack Obama (Waring 2013a). Concurrently, there has been an exponential rise in research on bi/multiracial individuals and more variety regarding the themes that have been explored. Whereas initial research concentrated on racial identity (Funderburg 1994; Rockquemore and Brunsma 2008; Root 1992), the field has evolved to examine family socialization and relationships (Atkin and Jackson 2021; Stone and Dolbin-MacNab 2017; Waring and Bordoloi 2019), dating and intimacy (Buggs 2017; Curington, Ken-Hou, and Lundquist 2015; Waring 2013b), educational experiences (Anderson 2015; Ford, Patterson, and Johnston-Guerrero 2019; Harris 2016), and much more. These concomitant factors have generated more interest in and recognition of the bi/multiracial American population, which is significant, considering that the multiracial reality has experienced “systematic erasure” (Ford et al. 2019:252) due to an “ever-present monoracial paradigm of race” (Harris 2016:797). This documented institutionalized inclination to stick to a single-race script for centuries, despite seismic racial shifts in American society, has profoundly shaped the public imagination about race. Furthermore, it reinforces whiteness, the reigning monoracial cohort, rather than questioning and complicating whiteness and its accompanied unmerited dominance. The adherence to a monoracial model obscures the reality of mixed whiteness by perpetuating the illusion of “purity” that whiteness rests upon. In this article, I explore the question: “How does White ancestry in the bi/multiracial population perpetuate, upset, and complicate our understandings of whiteness and White privilege?”
Due to groundbreaking social justice movements such as Black Lives Matter and #SayHerName, White privilege and systemic racism have become buzzwords on college campuses (Warren 2020), in news media (Abdullah 2020) and social media (Petray and Collin 2017). However, scholars have made it abundantly clear that merely spurting “diversity, equity and inclusion” will not eradicate racism (Beeman 2021). We need to consider the comprehensive dynamic of systemic racism, which includes intergenerational racial trauma and its unequal counterpart, intergenerational White privilege, to meaningfully reduce the radius of racism. Empirically capturing the relationship between White privilege and bi/multiracial people with White ancestry affords scholars an opportunity to explore racism as a highly adaptive system in a population that is erroneously presumed to reflect considerable racial progress.
Whiteness is unambiguously implicated in the escalating bi/multiracial population. The four most reported racial combinations in the 2010 Census were White and Black (1.8 million), white and “some other race” (1.7 million), White and Asian (1.6 million), and White and American Indian and Alaska Native (1.4 million) (U.S. Bureau of the Census 2010). Essentially, a statistical majority of U.S. residents who chose more than one racial background are half/part 3 White. Moreover, in 2015, 62 percent of all infants in the United States who lived with two parents were bi/multiracial and the White heritage trend persisted (Livingston 2017). Those infants’ ancestries were White and Black (10 percent), White and Asian (14 percent), and White and Hispanic (42 percent) (Livingston 2017). Consequently, these data beg the question: “Do bi/multiracial Americans with White ancestry experience White privilege?” If so, how is it similar to and different from conventional White privilege? This article examines what this unparalleled racial moment means for an increasingly bi/multiracial America that is predominantly half/part White. This inquiry is particularly relevant in a nation with a violent history of whiteness that is rooted in a mythical notion of racial “purity.”
Whiteness and White Privilege: Exclusion and Enrichment
In the seventeenth century, the concept of whiteness emerged in the context of two power structures: capitalism and colonialism (Bush 2004). White elites strategically constructed racial boundaries to ensure their wealth amid a budding mutiny of White and Black workers of lower statuses (Wilson 1996). Whiteness has been packaged as a “pan-ethnic ‘club’” whose membership is determined by mechanisms of exclusion (Bush 2004:11). Once recognized, whiteness bestows astounding unearned social, economic, and legal benefits. White people are socialized with a “deeply internalized sense of superiority and entitlement” that comes with the privilege of individuality, whereas the inferiority that people of color are associated with accompanies an exclusion from individuality (DiAngelo 2020:204). Economically, White individuals have been gifted “undeserved material advantages” over the course of multiple generations due to enslavement, racial segregation, and systemic racism (Feagin 1999:86). Conversely, people of color have been excluded from building wealth, which is why a pernicious racial wealth gap exists and is widening, regardless of equal income levels (Thomas, Mann, and Meschede 2018). Furthermore, the entire American legal system was designed to maintain a White supremacist racial order, although it “pretend[s] to rely on reason,” as critical race scholars have noted (De La Garza and Ono 2016:391). Yet African Americans and members of the Latinx community are disproportionately monitored, stopped by police officers, and incarcerated (Pettit and Gutierrrez 2018). In fact, people of color are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, via incarceration or other forms of state control, by 300 percent (Irizarry and Raible 2014).
Peggy McIntosh’s (1988) famous essay, “Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack of White Privilege” was published more than 30 years ago and is regularly cited among academics. Nevertheless, it is crucial to remind readers that people of color have been discussing oppression and privileges long before McIntosh. 4 White privilege is the “conferred dominance” that White people enjoy through numerous unearned benefits (McIntosh 1988:3), regardless of their gender (identity), ability status, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and other identities. These cumulative unmerited advantages are vehemently denied, yet fiercely protected by White people (McIntosh 1988). The power and paradox of whiteness is that it is invisible to the untrained White eye (Bush 2004), all while it is constructed as normal, standard, and universal (DiAngelo 2018). The cumulative “unjust enrichment” of White people has transpired for over 15 generations (Feagin 1999:80). Relevant to this study, these previous generations were largely assumed to be monoracial in terms of ancestry 5 and identity. What will happen as future generations are bi/multiracial, whether they identify as such? My study begins to explore this question by building on critical multiracial theory, which illuminates how the “monoracial paradigm of race” upholds White privilege (Harris 2016:803). My work demonstrates how White privilege manifests in the lives of bi/multiracial people with White ancestry. Notably, I include an iteration of White privilege that has been rendered untraceable, due to an exclusively monoracial understanding of White privilege, which I call “White privilege by proxy.” Last, I explore how looking White, and light-skinned, comes with the price of exclusion from communities of color. These findings reveal the paradoxical nature of White privilege in the lives of bi/multiracial individuals with White ancestry: it offers advantages and creates disadvantages.
Bi/Multiracial Americans: Invisible Minorities and Honorary Whites
According to a Pew Research Center analysis in 2018, 2.4 percent or 6.2 million adults in America report two or more racial backgrounds (Horowitz and Budiman 2020), although scholars reason that the number of Americans who have two or more racial heritages is likely higher, given the cohort of bi/multiracial Americans who self-identify monoracially (Waring 2017). Irrespective of identity, this population often faces microaggressions, such as isolation, objectification, and pathologization, regarding their racial realities (Johnston and Nadal 2010). These experiences are grounded in monoracism, a typically unnoticed mutation of racism. Monoracism, coined by Marc P. Johnston and Kevin L. Nadal (2010:125), is “a social system of psychological inequality where individuals who do not fit monoracial categories may be oppressed on systemic and interpersonal levels because of underlying assumptions and beliefs in singular, discrete racial categories.” Eric Hamako (2014) enhances the concept by emphasizing the institutional, cultural, and internalized dimensions of monoracism or “multiracial oppression,” as he refers to it.
As a result of the omnipresence of monoracism, bi/multiracial Americans report feeling like an “invisible minority” whose unique experiences are imperceptible to monoracials because monoracials are oblivious to “a type of [monoracial] privilege” that they enjoy (Waring 2014:93). Even highly educated professors in the purportedly liberal, progressive space of academia have perpetuated the invisibility of bi/multiracial people (Harris 2016; Waring 2014) or the “systematic erasure” of this community through “monoracial normativity” (Ford et al. 2019). This invisibility generates another layer when bi/multiracial individuals are White-appearing, as is the case with Kerry Ann Rockquemore (2005:18), who wrote in her auto-ethnography, “. . . most people do not have a cognitive scheme for ‘biracial’ and most social roles are implicitly racialized as ‘black’ or ‘white’ . . . people often need me to be one particular race,” and therefore, she is “forced to pass” as White. Other scholars have echoed this trend of coerced or imposed passing as White (Bettez 2011). The invisibility and erasure of this population are predicated upon a monoracial model that needs to be explicitly identified and dismantled to accurately reflect American society and the complex lived experiences of bi/multiracial Americans, an expanding population.
While being an “invisible minority” is an important counter-story that centers the specific narratives and struggles that bi/multiracial people endure, it is imperative to offer an analysis of bi/multiraciality in direct connection with the longstanding racial hierarchy. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva (2018:184) argues that the majority of multiracial people are “honorary whites” who are nestled neatly below White people and unmistakably above “collective Blacks” in a “complex and loosely organized triracial stratification system.” Congruently, light-skinned Asian Americans and members of the Latinx community have been characterized as “honorary whites” (Bonilla-Silva 2018), which presents an interesting dynamic to examine among bi/multiracial Americans who are Asian/White or Latinx/White. These new racial understandings are essential to comprehend because they reveal how the racial order continues to be reinforced, rather than compromised, as America becomes more brown and more bi/multiracial. Scholars would benefit from exploring whiteness and White privilege in bi/multiracial people with White ancestry to advance our understanding of White supremacy by illustrating how it is preserved by this community, although it comes with a price.
Methods
To explore the relationship between whiteness, White privilege, and the bi/multiracial population, I conducted in-depth, open-ended interviews with 30 participants who have a White (or half-White) parent. In-depth interviews are a well-established methodological tool for exploring meanings, nuances, processes, and experiences (Sprague 2005), and how they are connected to larger social structures of the past and present, particularly when studying groups that disrupt the racial binary (Purkayastha 2005). Interviews invite storytelling, memory sharing, and the open expression of raw emotions (Garcia 2010) that are inextricable from the environments in which those stories, memories, and emotions unfolded (Charmaz 2006).
Recruitment and Reflexivity
I recruited participants through a variety of means to cultivate a diverse sample. I posted a “call for participants” at two Midwestern universities. 6 I also utilized snowball and convenience sampling by recruiting in my socioeconomically heterogeneous network in the Midwest, and later in the Northeast, to avoid an overrepresentation of college students, and to preclude an underwhelming number of non-Black/White participants, as most of the people who contacted me were of Black/White parentage. While these sampling methods generate some limitations (e.g., generalizability), they also yield meaningful advantages because knowing participants established a foundation of trust and connection.
During recruitment, I disclosed my Black/White biracial heritage to articulate why I am both professionally and personally invested in the bi/multiracial community. Sharing my background had the potential to generate a sense of trust based on a shared salient, nondominant identity (Johnson-Bailey 2004). This is particularly noteworthy in bi/multiracial research, as bi/multiracial individuals have historically been characterized as “marginal” and prone to inevitable identity crises (Stonequist 1935). In fact, it has largely been bi/multiracial researchers who have acknowledged and honored the complexity of bi/multiracial America by providing a more textured analysis of this population (Funderburg 1994; Jackson and Samuels 2011; Root 1992; Waring and Bordoloi 2019). Therefore, racial insider status as it relates to the bi/multiracial community is not only important in terms of establishing trust and fostering honest testimonies (Waring 2013b), but also with regard to generating knowledge that modernizes our racial understandings about this population. Nevertheless, I am aware that I occupy a paradoxical status as an insider/outsider with each participant, based on other identities, as Jillian Paragg (2014) has noted.
Sample and Data Collection
Participants ranged from 18 to 64 years old. Twenty women participated in the study along with 10 men, 1 of whom is transgender. Twenty-one participants were raised in the Midwestern United States. One participant grew up on the West Coast, one came of age in multiple military settings and seven spent their formative years on the East Coast. Please see Table 1 for demographic information about participants’ backgrounds, ages, and genders. Twenty-seven participants have one monoracial White parent, two participants have a Black/White biracial parent, and one participant has two monoracial White (adoptive) parents. Eight participants are second-generation bi/multiracial, meaning one of their parents is biracial. All of these parents are half-White. I have noted which participants fall into this category.
Participants’ Demographic Information.
Questions asked in a research study form the building blocks of knowledge production (Duster 2000). Therefore, my interviews followed a chronological timeline that invited respondents to share a series of stories about their lives (Weiss 1994). The two questions that inform this article are “Do you think that you experience White privilege?” and “Do you think you experience any advantages due to having a White/half-White parent?” I asked these questions irrespective of phenotype. I collected data from January 2019 to June 2021. Most interviews took place face-to-face in a location of the interviewee’s choosing, such as a coffee shop. Due to the pandemic, I interviewed eight participants via Zoom. The shortest interview was 46 minutes and the longest interview was three hours; the average interview was 1 hour and 28 minutes. Each interview was audio-recorded with the verbal and written permission of each respondent, and then transcribed, coded, and analyzed. I video-recorded Zoom interviews, which allowed me to describe my respondents’ narratives in greater detail, including gestures, such as air quotes and facial expressions, or “thick description” (Geertz 1973). Given the sensitive and emotional nature of these topics, nonverbal forms of communication were factored into my data and analysis as “[a]ll is data” (Glaser 2002:145). In the interest of confidentiality, all names, locations, and other identifying information were assigned pseudonyms.
Coding and Analysis
Drawing on the work of Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (1967), I utilized grounded theory to systematically code and analyze my data. I read transcriptions, identified recurring themes, and organized these themes into categories (Saldana 2009). This coding method required frequent reflection and re-coding as I re-read transcriptions (Weiss 1994). I then created analytic memos about each theme; these memos morphed into new coding processes (Saldana 2009). The more participants I interviewed, the more themes emerged, so I re-read previous transcriptions to identify new themes. In re-reading transcriptions several times, I was also able to detect distinctions between themes, thereby creating subthemes (Ryan and Bernard 2003). As my study progressed, I was able to construct a typology (Lofland and Lofland 1995) of White privilege that formed the basis of this article and comprehensively captured White privilege in my participants’ lives, including clear complications and difficulties.
Data and Analysis
Possessing some White ancestry creates an interesting vantage point to view and analyze whiteness and White privilege. This article foregrounds the ways in which whiteness and ensuing White privilege manifest and impact my participants’ lives in both favorable and unfavorable ways. First, I outline how my interviewees experience privilege based on looking White. Second, I call attention to a more insidious iteration of White privilege, one that is acquired via White parentage, that persists regardless of phenotype, and consequently, transpires inconspicuously based on the current White privilege discourse. I call this “white privilege by proxy” because participants—regardless of skin color—can access resources through their White parent that improved their opportunities and quality of life. Last, I illuminate the exclusionary impact of close proximity to whiteness. Collectively, this article offers an analysis of how whiteness and White privilege operate paradoxically in the lives of bi/multiracial Americans with White ancestry: they create advantages; they also deliver disadvantages.
White Privilege by Appearance: Looking White . . . to White People
When I asked respondents if they experienced White privilege, the large majority of those who answered “yes,” were participants who were phenotypically White or White-passing. I asked each participant what most strangers thought or assumed their racial background(s) is/are. Of the 30 participants, 15 reported that most strangers, particularly White people, assumed they were White. I refer to these participants as “phenotypically white” or “white-passing.” Some participants provided caveats to their assumed monoracial White lineage. Khadijah, a 21-year-old Black/White college student, explained that she was often treated as “a questionable white” based on her “very light . . . almost white skin” and her hair that “is not like white people’s.” Her debatable White status, imposed by White individuals, aligns with the exclusionary tradition of whiteness. In fact, Michael K. Brown et al. (2003:44) argues that “[e]xclusion . . . is a cardinal principle of white identity.” Interestingly, people of color and fellow bi/multiracial people were often able to discern their bi/multiracial heritage. To explain this dynamic, Khadijah joked, “It’s like we have a scent or something!”
Bianca, a 28-year-old Puerto Rican/White woman, eagerly said, “Absolutely! Yes, definitely,” when I asked her if she experienced White privilege. When I invited her to elaborate, she explained that when she gets pulled over by law enforcement officers with her White male friends, who are “stoners,” the cops “will not even assume I know what drugs are. I look so strait-laced. They’ll just be like, ‘Aren’t you supposed to be studying, ma’am? You’re clearly a nerd, a good, well-behaved white woman. So, we don’t think you’re a threat.’” She voluntarily juxtaposed this experience with her Black male friends. “If I get pulled over with a Black [male] friend of mine, I’m like, ‘We’re fucked. We’re totally fucked. Actually, you know what? Just let me talk.’” Bianca’s explanation highlights how her White privilege affords her a level of protection, even while she is traveling with White friends who are breaking the law. Her narrative also suggests that her White privilege provides a degree of security for her Black friends when she intervenes. In her words, after she interacts with the police officers when with her Black friends, “They’re like, ‘Okay. Well, get home safe.’” Furthermore, the fact that Bianca presented a comparison between her experiences with law enforcement when she is with White and Black male friends without prompting is telling. White privilege facilitates more positive experiences with police officers who “protect and serve,” a phrase that graces many police vehicles. Scholars have documented the negative and violent encounters that African Americans have had with law enforcement, namely, racial profiling (Khoury 2009), police brutality (Cooper 2015), and “centuries of contentious Black citizen-police relationships . . .” (Boyles 2015:19).
Isabella is a 21-year-old Japanese/White college student who disclosed that being White-passing “has a lot of conveniences.” She shared examples of the White privileges that she observes: On the one hand, I’m very happy to have the white privilege thing going for me because it’s very nice. I haven’t dealt with much in the way of racism because I’m white-passing. Some of the most eye-opening stuff is when you find out what [oppressed people] do to change their behavior. A lot of Black men try to walk in a way that’s very un-intimidating because they don’t want to get shot. I’ve never had to edit my behavior for my race. I’ve done it as a woman, but not for my race.
Isabella’s account echoes Bianca’s in that she uses the lack of White privilege among African Americans to explain how White privilege materializes in her life. In addition, she characterizes White privilege in the context of physical protection; she does not feel compelled to “edit” her actions to avoid being a victim or survivor of gun violence. She provided another example of her Southeast Asian friend who is routinely racially profiled as Middle Eastern at the airport unless he shaves. She recalled asking him, “Shave? That’s a thing that you do? You have to do that?” Again, her example emphasizes the extra steps that visible people of color feel compelled to take to potentially enjoy what she easily has access to as a White-appearing person in the United States, despite her Japanese heritage.
Daisy, 19-years-old, shares a similar perspective regarding racialized behavior. She is a second-generation biracial; her father is Black/White biracial and her mother isWhite. She contextualizes her White privilege, environment, and presentation of self: My dad definitely grew up in the way where he hung around Black people and got into trouble. After [he joined] the military, I never grew up in that. I wasn’t exposed to how he lived. I think he tried to raise us differently in a more positive atmosphere. I definitely think my white privilege definitely plays through because I know how to . . . present myself in a way that’ll definitely benefit me more in certain situations.
Daisy is assumed to be White, “just really tan,” by White people, whereas African Americans and other bi/multiracial people detect her Black ancestry. By referencing how different her childhood was from her father’s—who also has White ancestry—Daisy’s narrative illuminates how White privilege is not merely rooted in how she “presents” herself but is also grounded in where she was raised and how she is perceived by the White community. Intriguingly, she used the word “definitely” three times in reference to benefiting from White privilege. Also, she conflates White privilege with class privilege, which is similar to other participants in this study.
Casey is a 22-year-old Indigenous/White university student. On campus, he is assumed to be White. In his words, “When I express that I’m Native, [people] are like, ‘I kind of forgot that exists.’” Casey’s White-passing status on his predominately White campus is likely tempered by the erasure of the Indigenous population in United States, which is markedly different from his non-Native counterparts in this study. In fact, scholars have coined the term “settler colonialism” to capture the unending timeline of oppression that Indigenous peoples have endured, including the erasure of Indigenous nationhood (McKay, Vinyeta, and Norgaard 2020). The erasure of Indigenous communities is paramount to White supremacy because the construction of whiteness is tied to land entitlement and imperial expansion (McKay et al. 2020).
When I asked Casey if he experiences White privilege, his response was, Oh, I do. For sure. I know I get treated differently. I can just feel that. I can’t think of a specific scenario, but I know for sure that I’m more white-passing than other Native people or other people of color.
Casey later explained how he leverages his White privilege to educate others.
I try to use it for good. I’m a diversity advocate so I’m using it to educate people and to further my growth as a person because I’m still trying to realize what I can do with it being productive.
Casey then remembered a specific example of White privilege when he stated that he would face more backlash in diversity workshops were it not for his White and male privilege, which Casey might be more aware of due to being transgender. In essence, his ability to pass as a White, cisgender man creates twofold privileges that allow him to give lectures about privilege without being questioned. Presumed objectivity when discussing power, particularly as it relates to race, is a touchstone of White privilege. In fact, White persons habitually become defensive when their subjectivity is openly named, and their responses tend to be emotionally intense because as a group, they subscribe to ideologies drenched in individualism, meritocracy, and colorblindness (DiAngelo 2018) that obstruct their ability to understand how their subjectivity is indivisible from White privilege.
White Privilege by Proxy: The (Invisible) Benefits That Accompany a White Parent
The academic dialogue around White privilege has been centered on the cumulative unearned advantages that monoracial White Americans—and monoracial White Americans alone—enjoy throughout their life (Frankenberg 1997; McIntosh 1988). For example, Brown et al. (2003:44) writes, “The benefits of being white are related to the costs of being nonwhite.” This assertion begs the question, what does this mean for people who are both White and non-White? My study begins to answer this timely question. A critical exception to the academic tradition of exclusive monoracial White privilege includes the seminal work of Bonilla-Silva (2018). Yet even the “honorary white” designation is based on skin color as well as racial and ethnic categorization, not necessarily White parentage, which is becoming progressively common in the United States and is consequently, worthy of an empirical analysis.
My findings show how White privilege transcends and confounds the monoracial paradigm by unveiling a more elusive rendition of White privilege precisely because it is procured through a White parent, which extends beyond how even the most “racially conscious” people conceptualize White privilege. I refer to this theme as “white privilege by proxy” because participants can access valuable resources (i.e., housing, legal representation, etc.) through their White parent that affords them life-changing opportunities, despite never being able to pass as White. Although this is significantly different from being viewed as and treated as a White person daily in the United States, it is strikingly similar to customary White privilege in the sense that it is unmerited and is often unnoticeable to the recipient until it is brought to their attention. By this, I mean when I asked respondents if they experienced White privilege, not one participant referenced examples through their White parent. It was only when I explicitly asked if they think having a White parent afforded them any privileges that they began to share stories about this overlooked trend. Also, in some cases, participants denied having any privileges associated with their White parent, another parallel between “white privilege by proxy” and traditional White privilege.
Esmerelda is a 22-year-old Black/White college graduate. When I asked if there are benefits associated with having a White parent, she began with a social media reference: I saw a meme once that said, “Mixed kids are Black kids with white privilege.” I’ve thought a lot about it, and I think it’s true. I am a Black
7
person that has had privileges because I had a white parent who grew up in a [middle-class] town like they did.
Esmerelda’s answer acknowledged her mother’s White privilege and class privilege. She then asked if she could share a story about her brother’s experience with law enforcement. Her brother, Ernest, attended a college party with three male friends (two White, one Black), and on the way home, they stopped at a restaurant. Once they ordered, police officers “appeared out of nowhere” and asked who was driving their car. When Ernest disclosed that he was driving, they demanded the keys, searched the car, and found marijuana. The police officers arrested all four young men and took them to the police station. However, only Ernest and his Black friend were charged. His two White friends, who were also in the car and were also smoking marijuana, were not charged. Esmerelda explains that her mother’s White privilege played a pivotal role in how the circumstance unfolded as well as how her mother interpreted her own White privilege, without using such terminology: We hired a lawyer to help us, and my mom said something that stuck with me. She said, “Usually [the police] can just get away with this. They don’t expect these Black kids to have white moms that will go get lawyers,” and I was like, “That is the truth.” So that’s another way that the “Black kids with white privilege” thing came in. Ernest’s [Black] friend didn’t hire a lawyer. He just took the charges and paid the fines and everything . . . He didn’t have a white mom that knew what to do in that situation.
Esmerelda’s story is an example of “white privilege by proxy” in the context of the criminal justice system. The relationship between White privilege and the criminal justice system was a common theme, which might result from the racial justice movements that were referenced earlier. While Ernest was still involved in the legal process at the point of our interview, the fact that his White mother had the financial capital to hire a lawyer and confidence in the legal system was an advantage that his monoracial Black peer did not appear to share.
Andre is a 23-year-old Black/White man who grew up in a diverse Midwestern city. When I asked him if he experienced any privileges through his White parent, he explained that he had recently read McIntosh’s essay and was reflecting on his privileges that are inextricable from his White mother.
I thought about me being privileged with having a white mother because in the poor area of Lake City, whether it’s slum lords or whatever, the landlord would say, “I’d rather rent to somebody who is poor and white than poor and Black,” due to certain stereotypes.
8
So, me having a white mother, I benefited from that because what she would do is, she would go solo. She never had her kids go with her to look at a house when we rented. She never wanted to bring her boyfriends either, who were all Black.
Andre went on to say that he wondered, “Are you ashamed to bring your Black kids for [the landlord] to see this is what ya got?” He then chuckled and shared that as he aged, he grew to understand his mother’s behavior from the perspective of “survival,” a mother trying to protect her children. His family was able to rent in those neighborhoods, which he characterized as less dangerous than other areas in the city. In his words, “I never heard gunshots. I never heard any of that. Perhaps my mother’s privilege allowed us to get the best of the poor neighborhoods versus the worst of the worst.” This story shows how Andre’s mother’s White privilege positively impacted the housing options and community experiences that Andre and his biracial brothers were exposed to. Moreover, her White privilege afforded him and his brothers a level of physical safety, a life-enhancing privilege, as communicated by his comment regarding not hearing gunshots in his neighborhood. Andre’s testimony is particularly pertinent because it highlights how even as a poor visible person of color, he benefited from his mother’s White privilege, which would be untraceable if we limited our analytical lens to the compulsory White privilege framework.
Notably, not all participants thought that having a White parent generated privileges for them. I asked Shade, a 21-year-old, White-passing, second-generation Black/White participant, if she experiences any privileges due to having a White mother and Black/White father. She said, “I don’t really think so. I can’t really relate to anything like that.” Although Shade was able to list the advantages that she experienced as a phenotypically White person—after some probing—she also conflated White privilege and class privilege by stating, “the person who makes the most money in my family is my dad and my dad’s Black 9 ” when I pointedly asked her if she experienced privileges by having a White parent.
Serena is a 26-year-old Black/White woman who was adopted by two White, middle-class parents. When I asked her if she experienced any privileges due to her White parents, she said, “I don’t think people like us have any type of White privilege, in all honesty.” Serena shared many struggles with her family life that were inseparable from having two White parents who were not intimately familiar with the Black community and Black experiences. In particular, she endured stressful hair challenges due to her parents’ lack of exposure to Black hair textures, products, and practices. In Serena’s case, it is possible that her experiences as a transracial adoptee with racially oblivious parents 10 eclipsed any awareness of the privileges that her White, middle-class parents afforded her.
On the other hand, Shade and Serena’s reflections might mirror a racial socialization pattern scholars have identified in some White families that practice a colorblind approach “. . . that makes whiteness invisible and normalized . . .” rather than a color-conscious approach that encourages White children to recognize Wbiracial familieshite privilege (Hagerman 2014:2611). Alternatively, Shade and Serena’s narratives might reflect what scholars have found in Black/White biracial families: frequent conversations about ethnic-racial heritage are less prevalent in Black/White biracial families than in Black families (Csizmadia, Rollins, and Kaneakua 2014).
The Price of Privilege: Fear and Lack of Acceptance among People of Color
It became clear after only a few interviews that although White-passing participants experienced benefits due to people assuming they are White, these benefits came with a high price. Participants endured negative experiences due to their proximity to whiteness, which is not discernible if we restrain our analysis to the default monoracial framework. An inclusive analysis that is not tethered to the omnipresence of the monoracial model allows us to detect how privilege operates in a paradoxical way in the bi/multiracial community, unlike in the monoracial White community. Some participants explained that they were targeted and even assaulted by fellow people of color exclusively for looking White, in their eyes, although I consider the web of community characteristics that contributed to extraordinarily high racialized tensions. Other respondents felt exiled from the very community they hoped—and initially, expected—would understand, affirm, and accept them: people of color. These findings are relevant to include in the conversation about the White privilege that bi/multiracial people with White ancestry experience because they highlight how whiteness for bi/multiracial Americans comes at a clear cost.
Bianca earlier explained how her White privilege “saves” her. She also included instances where White privilege “immediately isolates” her. She detailed several traumatic encounters in high school, college, the workplace, and her community where she was excluded and targeted by people of color for looking White. Students of color in high school regularly made comments like “Fuck you, white girl,” even after she disclosed her Puerto Rican heritage. Bianca grew up in “a [predominately Latinx gang]-controlled neighborhood” on the East Coast. She explained that part of the reason she moved to the Midwest was because she was afraid for her safety, which is conveyed by her impassioned response: They always treated me like shit. It was getting bad. I was just miserable. It was extremely tense. There were lots of ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] raids in my neighborhood. It was dangerous! It was scary and looking white made me a target all the time. I mean, I got followed home. I got harassed. I got constantly harassed, called “white girl,” “cracker.” I wanted to scream back “I’m Puerto Rican!” but what the hell kind of stupid ass comeback is that? Who cares? They’re harassing you. Just get away! Get to safety.
Bianca’s narrative underscores the stress and fear that accompany appearing White and consequently, being rejected by her peers and being physically targeted due to the highly racialized and politicized tension in her community. It is possible that Bianca’s classmates’ behavior was a reaction, albeit unhealthy, to the “. . . racial hierarchy that privileges the experiences, talents and knowledge bases of Whites” in American schools (Irizarry and Raible 2014:441). Although Bianca has Puerto Rican ancestry, her skin color could have trumped her ancestry with regard to classmates expressing anger and frustration rooted in institutional racism. Given the preponderance of immigrants in her neighborhood, it is important to acknowledge the ethno-racial trauma and lack of trust that many Latinx immigrants endure as they navigate racism, ethnocentrism, and nativism during “. . . one of the most anti-immigration periods in modern U.S. history” (Chavez-Dueñas et al. 2019:52). I offer these interpretations not to excuse or condone this behavior, but to contextualize it and to outline how White supremacy causes suffering for monoracial people of color as well as bi/multiracial individuals of White descent.
Ezra is a 37-year-old Black/White man who relayed a similar experience with being singled out because of his light complexion. He described himself as “pretty white-looking” as a child, yet as he aged, most people code him as a person of color. Ezra grew up in what was colloquially referred to as “the crack capital” of a large Midwestern city. He resided in a housing project with his White mother and biracial siblings. He detailed how his skin color and location created a “sickening” cycle of violence:
I grew up around a lot of violence. A lot of fights in the alley, fights in front of my house, fights in the park. Because I looked white growing up in the ghetto and a lot of [Black peers] thought I was a white boy that . . . couldn’t handle myself and . . . the ones that thought that found out the hard way. I got into a lot of fights . . . it’s sickening.
Do you feel like you had to fight a lot?
Oh, all the time. All the time.
Because they thought you were white?
Seriously, yeah.
Ezra had a physical disability as a child, and subsequently, wore leg braces. Some of these physical altercations took place while he was wearing his braces, making him exponentially more vulnerable. His story underlines the emotional toll and physical anguish of appearing White in an almost entirely Black, low-income neighborhood in a city with a well-documented infamous history of housing segregation based on race (Gordon 2018) and class (Bonds 2019). It is essential to mention that in neighborhoods with concentrated disadvantage, exposure to violence is disproportionately high (Quam et al. 2020). Furthermore, the chronic stress of systemic racism, peer pressure, and masculinity norms often facilitate an unhealthy expression of emotions (Quam et al. 2020). Collectively, these contextual factors put Ezra in the crosshairs of a community suffering from long-lasting racial trauma that profoundly impacted his physical safety and sense of community.
Notably, Ezra’s experience with having to defend himself paralleled the only other two considerably light-skinned Black/White men who came of age in low-income Midwestern cities with high rates of racial and socioeconomic segregation. Louis is 20 years old and has a Black/White biracial mother and a Black father. He explained how family and community members “stigmatized” him and other light-skinned people “as soft [not masculine]” rather than “just being a tolerable person.” He went on to say that people “kind of even take advantage of you and kind of push you past your limit.” Riley, a 21-year-old Black/White man, shares a similar experience: “People think you’re soft being light-skinned and that shit is confusing. I’ve had to be like, ‘No, it definitely ain’t that, son.’” Although Louis and Riley are not white-appearing, their testimonies demonstrate the disadvantages of being light-skinned in racially segregated cities in ways that foster frustration and lack of family and community acceptance. They both explained that constantly having to prove that they are not “soft” was “exhausting.” Notably, colorism is a form of discrimination that researchers have found affords higher status to individuals with more White/European features, such as light skin (Thompson and Keith 2003). However, my findings tease out a gendered exception to this trend in which light-skinned Black/White biracial men are viewed as less masculine or “soft,” at least initially, which is a status demotion in a patriarchal society. Their lightness being associated with “soft” is a demonstration of how light-skinned privilege is not the same as White privilege because White privilege yields twofold advantages when it is coupled with male privilege, whereas Riley and Louis are revealing a clear disadvantage.
Gloria, a 24-year-old Black/Native/White graduate student, shared a story of being excluded from the Black community based on her White-passing status. She recalled when one of her classmates exchanged racial micro-affirmations with other visible students of color on campus. Micro-affirmations are small acts of inclusion that signal support or recognition and are associated with academic success in higher education because they often generate empowerment and connection (Rowe 2008). Gloria felt “left out” of these micro-moments of bonding with people of color, which caused her stress because her lived experiences were enmeshed with racial oppression. In her words, “Just because I’m mixed doesn’t mean I don’t have generations of stress in my DNA. It’s still there. I was raised middle-to-high income. It didn’t matter; my [Black/Native] father still went to jail.” Gloria expressed yearning for the recognition and support that comes from communities of color for people who are unmistakably a person of color.
Gloria’s sentiments mirror Louis and Riley, who resent being singled out by African American peers for being light-skinned, as well as Ezra and Bianca, who loathed being isolated from people of color through violent and terrifying means. Importantly, my participants’ stories show that whiteness and White privilege come at a price for those who are not monoracial. This finding reveals yet another departure from the traditional understanding of White privilege, which does not come with a cost. Notably, the price of privilege overlaps with monoracism, and yet, it is also distinct from monoracism because it is directly connected to whiteness and not all bi/multiracial people are White-appearing or have White ancestry. Strikingly, some of the same participants who benefited from white privilege were also disadvantaged by it, which underscores the paradox of White privilege in this group: it provides both advantages and disadvantages. The complexity of simultaneously being privileged and oppressed as a person of color with White ancestry produces the ultimate racial paradox, which might be why some participants did not acknowledge any privileges because experiencing racism is associated with the absence of White privilege.
Discussion and Conclusion
American society is on the precipice of a historic moment with a burgeoning bi/multiracial population, coupled with an acknowledgment of White privilege beyond the scope of academia. The bi/multiracial population in the United States is more visible than ever before (Gardner and Hughey 2017) and is increasing at a higher rate than predicted by researchers (Saulny 2011). At the same time, whiteness and White privilege have also increased in visibility, as more scholars and activists are dedicated to examining how this dominant group’s status is entirely unearned and unconscionably maintained. Despite the implied intersection of these two areas of research, few scholars have made a clear empirical connection between White privilege and the bi/multiracial community. Although some studies on bi/multiracial Americans mention privilege in the title or analysis (Bettez 2011; Wilton, Sanchez, and Garcia 2013), they do not center how whiteness and White privilege shape the experiences and opportunities of bi/multiracial Americans with White ancestry. While a New York Times opinion-based article emphasized the role of White parentage, White proximity, and White acceptance in yielding opportunities that successful African Americans like Barack Obama enjoy (Holmes 2018), there has not been an empirical study on White privilege and bi/multiracial people with White ancestry, to my knowledge. A sociological analysis with participants of a variety of racial ancestries—with White ancestry in common—offers a unique contribution to the scholarship, by analyzing how whiteness works as it intersects with Asianness, Blackness, Indigeneity, and Latinxness.
My study builds on bi/multiracial studies and whiteness studies by demonstrating how White privilege manifests in traditional, insidious, and distressing ways in bi/multiracial America. My findings indicate the importance of disentangling White privilege from the monoracial paradigm to identify and analyze White privilege from an innovative angle more meticulously. First, I document how my participants experienced White privilege based on looking White to White people. Many examples were rooted in being protected from racist criminal justice system practices; that is, these respondents enjoyed the coveted American value of freedom that White privilege affords. These experiences correspond with Ruth Frankenberg’s (1993:1) characterization of whiteness as “. . . a location of structural advantage, of race privilege.”
Second, I detail how having a White parent opens the door to receiving some of the benefits that are built into whiteness. These privileges are unearned, unseen until they are pointedly exposed, and they positively impact my participants’ lives. Although researchers have illuminated how White women lose some privileges upon having bi/multiracial children (Harman 2010) or are “disowned,” which has material consequences (Frankenberg 1993), the literature does not seem to recognize the inverse pattern: how bi/multiracial children gain advantages, material, or otherwise, through their White parent. This neglected trend in the literature is a significant finding as it reveals how White privilege is not receding, despite the shrinking monoracial White population. Conversely, White privilege is subtly materializing in a group that is difficult, if not impossible, to detect due to a centuries-long adherence to monoracism. In this way, whiteness, through privilege, is deviating from the precedent of exclusion by extending some benefits to bi/multiracial individuals with White ancestry. Simultaneously, this finding confirms the persistence of White supremacy because a White-associated group, bi/multiracial people with White heritage, is being gifted unwarranted advantages. Furthermore, since bi/multiracial Americans as a group are still largely invisibilized, it will be even harder to recognize that they experience White privilege, especially via parentage.
Third, despite the unquestionable gains that White privilege unjustly provides, my study also unveils the collateral consequences of appearing White, and light-skinned, by illuminating the trauma of not being accepted by, and in some cases, being targeted by, fellow people of color. This trend is not to be confused with or conflated with “reverse racism,” which scholars have debunked (Feagin 2001). Also, this theme does not correspond with White fragility, White guilt, or White shame and is therefore not currently recognized in the White privilege discourse. Moreover, while this finding intersects with monoracism, it cannot entirely be explained by monoracism. The price of privilege requires an analysis that centers the paradoxical nature of White privilege in the lives of bi/multiracial Americans. In some ways, my respondents benefit from their whiteness (either personally or via a parent); in other ways, their whiteness is a burden.
In conclusion, my study calls for a reconceptualization of White privilege. These findings encourage us to move away from a framework of White privilege that is mired in the monoracial paradigm. My study shows how this framework is analytically insufficient because it distorts how White privilege operates by severely underrepresenting its scope. As outlined in the literature review, most bi/multiracial people have White ancestry. While more research should be conducted on the increasing bi/multiracial population With white parentage (and without), it is not a far reach to say that many bi/multiracial people with White ancestry have access to White privilege through their appearance and/or through their parent, albeit camouflaged by monoracial logic. It is our responsibility as researchers to unpack this monoracial logic and crack the ever-reaching code of White supremacy. Last, the implicit narrative of White privilege follows that whiteness routinely produces rewards and does not come with a cost. My findings counter this reasoning by expanding our understanding of how whiteness, lightness, and White privilege are also unfavorably experienced by bi/multiracial people with White heritage. More inclusive empirical analyses will begin to capture the magnitude of White supremacy in American society as it simultaneously becomes less monoracial White and more bi/multiracial (with) White (ancestry).
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
I profoundly appreciate Yves Kalambayi, Cia Wambach, Stephanie M. Ortiz, Ranita Ray, Georgiann Davis, Teresa I. Gonzales, Joselyne C. Nkogo, and Mignon Duffy for your insightful suggestions and heartfelt encouragement. Yordanos Tesfaye and Kaylee Gramly, thank you very much for your thoughtful analytical and copy-editing recommendations. To my participants, I am deeply grateful that you trusted me with your stories, and I am beyond honored to share your stories with the world.
