In the last decade, graphene has found a wide role and application in nanocomposites and nanodevices for its extraordinary properties. However, due to its low fracture toughness and brittleness, graphene is brittle, and crack growth occurs rapidly. As a result, crack growth behavior and control of its progression are important. In this study, molecular dynamics modeling was used to investigate the crack growth behavior and mechanical properties in functionalized graphene (with middle and edge crack) with different oxide groups (hydroxyl, epoxide, and carboxyl) at different percentages of graphene oxide (0–3 wt. %). The results show that functionalized graphene with oxide groups changes the properties of graphene, effectively reducing the crack growth in crack length (4.9 Å), crack opening displacement (1.4 Å), tensile strength for edge crack (74 to 54 Gpa), and middle crack (128 to 63 Gpa). Also, carboxyl and epoxide groups have a greater reduction in crack growth rate, opening displacement growth rate, and stress concentration. In addition, increase in the number of atoms in oxide groups around the initial crack (with radius 13 Å) reduces crack growth rate, opening displacement growth rate, and stress concentration. This study provides a broader insight into crack growth behavior in functionalized graphene with oxide groups.
StankovichSDikinDADommettGH, et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature2006; 442: 282–286.
2.
BehdinanKMoradi-DastjerdiRSafaeiB, et al. Graphene and CNT impact on heat transfer response of nanocomposite cylinders. Nanotechnol Rev2020; 9: 41–52.
3.
KumarARoyS. Characterization of mixed mode fracture properties of nanographene reinforced epoxy and Mode I delamination of its carbon fiber composite. Compos B: Eng2018; 134: 98–105.
SalehiARash-AhmadiS. Effect of adsorption, hardener, and temperature on mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites with functionalized graphene: A molecular dynamics study. J Mol Graph Model2022; 117: 108311.
6.
BahramiMAFeliS. Synergistic influence of MWCNTs/RGO on low-velocity impact response and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composite. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems. Epub ahead of print 30May2023. DOI: 10.1177/2397791423117686.
7.
YadavAKumarASharmaK, et al. Determination of elastic constants of functionalized graphene-based epoxy nanocomposites: a molecular modeling and MD simulation study. J Mol Model2022; 28: 143.
8.
KumarASharmaKDixitAR. Effects of various functional groups in graphene on the tensile and flexural properties of epoxy nanocomposites: a comparative study. Fuller, Nanotub Carbon Nanostructures2022; 30: 1123–1133.
9.
SinghPKSharmaKKumarA, et al. Effects of functionalization on the mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: A molecular dynamics approach. J Compos Mater2017; 51: 671–680.
10.
AfsharimaniNUluutkuBSayginV, et al. Self-assembled molecular films of alkanethiols on graphene for heavy metal sensing. J Phys Chem C2018; 122: 474–480.
11.
RenSRongPYuQ. Preparations, properties and applications of graphene in functional devices: a concise review. Ceram Int2018; 44: 11940–11955.
12.
XuXZhouJXinY, et al. Alcohol recognition by flexible, transparent and highly sensitive graphene-based thin-film sensors. Sci Rep2017; 7: 1–10.
13.
ZhangYLiuGCaiJ, et al. Preparation of graphene from Taixi anthracite and its photocatalyst performance for CO2 conversion. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2014; 228: 61–64.
14.
GiannopoulosGIAvntoullaGS. Tensile strength of graphene versus temperature and crack size: analytical expressions from molecular dynamics simulation data. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2017; 231: 67–73.
15.
ZhangPMaLFanF, et al. Fracture toughness of graphene. Nat Commun2014; 5: 1–7.
16.
RakibTMojumderSDasS, et al. Graphene and its elemental analogue: a molecular dynamics view of fracture phenomenon. J Physica B: Condensed Matter2017; 515: 67–74.
17.
ZhangBYangGXuH. Instability of supersonic crack in graphene. Phys B: Condens Matter2014; 434: 145–148.
18.
KumarASharmaKDixitAR. A review on the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene and graphene-based polymer nanocomposites: understanding of modelling and MD simulation. Mol Simul2020; 46: 136–154.
19.
ZhangTLiXGaoH. Fracture of graphene: a review. Int J Fract2015; 196: 1–31.
20.
VermaAParasharA. Reactive force field based atomistic simulations to study fracture toughness of bicrystalline graphene functionalised with oxide groups. Diam Relat Mater2018; 88: 193–203.
21.
VermaAParasharA. Molecular dynamics based simulations to study failure morphology of hydroxyl and epoxide functionalised graphene. Comput Mater Sci2018; 143: 15–26.
22.
DattaDNadimpalliSPLiY, et al. Effect of crack length and orientation on the mixed-mode fracture behavior of graphene. J Extreme Mech Lett2015; 5: 10–17.
23.
TabarraeiAWangXJiaD. Effects of hydrogen adsorption on the fracture properties of graphene. Comput Mater Sci2016; 121: 151–158.
24.
NajafiFWangGCuiT, et al. Fatigue resistance of atomically thin graphene oxide. Carbon2021; 183: 780–788.
25.
ElapoluMSTabarraeiA. An atomistic study of the stress corrosion cracking in graphene. J Phys Chem A2020; 124: 7060–7070.
26.
BuYLiKGuoF, et al. Mechanical behavior and failure mechanism of multilayer graphene oxides with various oxygen contents and functional types: a ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulation. Appl Surf Sci2022; 606: 154920.
27.
CaoCMukherjeeSHoweJY, et al. Nonlinear fracture toughness measurement and crack propagation resistance of functionalized graphene multilayers. Sci Adv2018; 4: eaao7202.
28.
TersoffJ. Empirical interatomic potential for silicon with improved elastic properties. Phys Rev B1988; 38: 9902.
29.
JorgensenWLChandrasekharJMaduraJD, et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys1983; 79: 926–935.
30.
KhoeiAKhorramiM. Mechanical properties of graphene oxide: a molecular dynamics study. Fuller, Nanotub Carbon Nanostructures2016; 24: 594–603.
31.
PlimptonS. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys1995; 117: 1–19.
32.
IzadiRTrovalusciPFantuzziN. A study on the effect of doping metallic nanoparticles on fracture properties of Polylactic acid Nanofibres via molecular dynamics simulation. Nanomaterials2023; 13: 989.
33.
IzadiRTunaMTrovalusciP, et al. Thermomechanical characteristics of green nanofibers made from polylactic acid: an insight into tensile behavior via molecular dynamics simulation. Mech Mater2023; 181: 104640.
34.
DewapriyaMPhaniASRajapakseR. Influence of temperature and free edges on the mechanical properties of graphene. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2013; 21: 065017.
35.
StukowskiA. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2009; 18: 015012.
36.
DaiJYuanJ. Adsorption of molecular oxygen on doped graphene: atomic, electronic, and magnetic properties. Phys Rev B2010; 81: 165414.
37.
SunYTangXBaoH, et al. The effects of hydroxide and epoxide functional groups on the mechanical properties of graphene oxide and its failure mechanism by molecular dynamics simulations. RSC Adv2020; 10: 29610–29617.
38.
YangQXuWGongS, et al. Atomically dispersed Lewis acid sites boost 2-electron oxygen reduction activity of carbon-based catalysts. Nature Commun2020; 11: 1–10.
39.
LiuLZhangJZhaoJ, et al. Mechanical properties of graphene oxides. Nanoscale2012; 4: 5910–5916.
40.
SukJWPinerRDAnJ, et al. Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene oxide. ACS Nano2010; 4: 6557–6564.
41.
SalehiARash-AhmadiS. Effect of temperature and oxygen functional groups on interaction between epoxy resins and graphene surface. J Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2023; 237: 941–951.
