Abstract
Advances in oncology have extended survival for many individuals with cancer; however, a substantial proportion now live with advanced or incurable disease for prolonged periods. In this context, goals of care shift from cure to comfort, autonomy, and quality of life. Despite this, cancer care systems often remain disease-centered and symptom-focused, with less attention to functional ability and participation. This Special Report argues that preservation of function should be recognized as a central goal of advanced cancer care, as function directly supports dignity, autonomy, and participation. When functional decline is unaddressed, symptom control alone is insufficient to prevent dependence, caregiver burden, and social withdrawal. Palliative rehabilitation aligns rehabilitation principles with palliative care by optimizing function and participation within progressive illness. Interventions such as activity modification, energy conservation, assistive devices, environmental adaptation, and caregiver education enable continued engagement in meaningful activities. Despite growing recognition of supportive care needs, palliative rehabilitation remains inconsistently integrated into cancer services. Strengthening its integration into clinical pathways and health systems is essential for delivering holistic, person-centered care in advanced cancer.
Introduction: Reframing Goals in Advanced Cancer Care
Advances in oncology have extended survival for many individuals with cancer; however, a substantial proportion now live for prolonged periods with advanced or incurable disease.1,2 In this context, goals of care frequently shift from cure to comfort, autonomy, and quality of life.3,4 Despite this shift, cancer care systems often remain disease-centered and symptom-focused, with comparatively less attention given to functional ability and participation in everyday life.3,5
This Special Report argues that preservation of function should be recognized as a central goal of advanced cancer care. Function directly enables autonomy, supports dignity, and makes participation in valued activities possible. When functional decline is unaddressed, symptom control alone is insufficient to prevent dependence, social withdrawal, and increased caregiver burden.3,11 Palliative rehabilitation directly addresses the functional consequences of advanced illness through interventions such as strength training, activities of daily living (ADL) training, mobility and gait support, assistive device provision, and caregiver education.9–11 By maintaining and adapting function despite disease progression, it fills a critical gap within symptom-focused models of care. Palliative rehabilitation, therefore, represents a core component of comprehensive palliative care rather than an optional or late-stage intervention.
Clinical Vignette
A 62-year-old man with metastatic lung cancer experiences progressive breathlessness and fatigue despite optimal symptom management. Although pain is controlled, he becomes increasingly dependent on his spouse for basic self-care and is unable to participate in shared meals or brief outings that he values. Through palliative rehabilitation including energy conservation strategies, assistive devices, and caregiver education, he regains selective independence and meaningful participation in family routines despite ongoing disease progression.
This vignette illustrates how reframing goals toward functional enablement can meaningfully improve lived experience in advanced cancer, even when disease-modifying treatment is no longer possible.
The Unmet Functional Burden in Advanced Cancer
Individuals with advanced cancer commonly experience complex symptom clusters including pain, fatigue, breathlessness, weakness, cognitive changes, and emotional distress.6,7 These symptoms impair ADL and restrict engagement in personally valued roles.5,9 Loss of functional independence often increases caregiver burden and diminishes sense of identity.7,11
Although palliative care services have advanced symptom management,4,6 functional needs are frequently addressed late or inconsistently.3,10 Previous literature has described persistent misconceptions that rehabilitation may be inappropriate in progressive or life-limiting illness.3,11 Such perceptions may contribute to delayed referral or discontinuation of services as disease advances. Limited rehabilitation staffing and fragmented referral pathways further restrict access.
From a rehabilitation perspective, this reflects a failure to integrate function as a routine outcome of palliative care. When functional assessment and intervention are not embedded within care pathways, disability becomes normalized rather than addressed as modifiable.
What Distinguishes Palliative Rehabilitation
Palliative rehabilitation focuses on optimizing function and participation within the constraints of progressive illness.3,11 While functional improvement may occur in selected individuals, the primary aim is to maintain or adapt function, prevent avoidable decline, and reduce burden on patients and caregivers.
Many principles associated with palliative rehabilitation—person-centered care, activity adaptation, and participation—are foundational to rehabilitation practice more broadly. What distinguishes palliative rehabilitation is its explicit alignment with the goals and realities of palliative care, including fluctuating trajectories and changing priorities.
Interventions may include activity modification, energy conservation, fatigue management, environmental adaptation, assistive device provision, caregiver training, and psychosocial support.9–11 Importantly, palliative rehabilitation adapts goals as clinical conditions change rather than withdrawing when decline occurs.
Participation as a Central Outcome of Care
Participation in meaningful activities—defined as involvement in personally valued roles—provides continuity of identity and purpose during advanced illness.11,12 These activities may include self-care, family roles, spiritual practices, leisure, or modified engagement in work.
Rather than emphasizing complete self-sufficiency, palliative rehabilitation supports independence through assistive devices, environmental modification, and adaptive strategies. By enabling participation in meaningful activities, rehabilitation supports dignity and autonomy even as physical capacity changes.
Gaps in Practice and Policy
Despite increasing recognition of supportive and palliative care needs, palliative rehabilitation remains inconsistently integrated into advanced cancer services.3,6 Barriers include limited awareness among oncology professionals, misconceptions regarding rehabilitation in noncurative contexts, insufficient staffing, and absence of structured referral pathways.10,11
Cancer care frameworks often prioritize medical and nursing services, with limited explicit inclusion of rehabilitation professionals in advanced disease management.3,5 Funding models frequently fail to support interdisciplinary rehabilitation within palliative care settings. Standardized service models for palliative rehabilitation remain underdeveloped, resulting in variable access across health care systems.
Previous studies have also demonstrated the benefits of physical activity and rehabilitation in palliative care settings, including improvements in well-being and functional outcomes.8,14,15
Implications for Health Systems
Health systems must recognize rehabilitation as a continuum across the cancer trajectory, including advanced and end-of-life stages.3,5 Integrating palliative rehabilitation requires interdisciplinary collaboration, early referral based on functional need rather than prognosis, and flexible service delivery responsive to changing patient needs.3,6
Embedding rehabilitation principles within palliative care education, clinical pathways, and national cancer control programs can strengthen person-centered care and reduce avoidable disability.2,11,13
Conclusion
Preservation of function is fundamental to dignity, autonomy, and participation in advanced cancer care. Palliative rehabilitation serves as a core component of comprehensive palliative care by addressing functional decline within the realities of progressive illness. Strengthening its integration into clinical practice and health systems is essential for delivering holistic, person-centered care throughout the illness trajectory.
Patient Consent
Patient consent was not required for this publication.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
