Live Video MBSR is a Feasible and Acceptable Adjunctive Therapy for Youth With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Abstract

Background

Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has been shown to be beneficial for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but little is known about its use in pediatric IBD.

Objective

This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an MBSR program delivered by live-video during the COVID-19 pandemic for youth with IBD.

Methods

Four cohorts of an 8-session MBSR program were conducted via a HIPAA-compliant, video-conferencing platform from winter 2021 to spring 2022. Mixed-methods data were collected through semi-structured focus groups, study-specific surveys, attendance data, and self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures.

Results

Forty-six participants enrolled across 4 cohorts. Participants were 64% female, M_age=14.1 years, 36% non-Latinx White; most had Crohn’s disease (81%). Participants attended an average of 7.6 of 8 classes, with 69% attending all 8 classes. Majority of participants (77%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the program. Three themes emerged from the focus groups (n=27): (1) IBD-specific benefits: reduced stress (which some identified as an IBD trigger) and connecting with IBD peers; (2) mental health benefits; and (3) virtual MBSR was feasible and well-liked, but challenges were present. Pre- vs post-program data (n = 30) showed statistically significant improvements in HRQOL (P = 0.04), HRQOL social functioning (P = 0.03), and perceived stress (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

This pilot study of live-video MBSR for youth with IBD shows feasibility and acceptability, high rates of attendance and satisfaction, and potential benefits in quality of life and stress. MBSR is a potential adjunctive therapy in pediatric IBD.

Keywords

mindfulness mind body stress inflammatory bowel disease Crohn’s disease ulcerative colitis pediatrics virtual

Introduction

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal condition often diagnosed in the pediatric population that involves life-long care and treatment. When compared with healthy peers, youth with IBD are at increased risk of developing behavioral and emotional dysfunction as well as impaired self-esteem.¹ Children with IBD are at increased risk for psychosocial co-morbidities such as depression and anxiety, worsened quality of life, and less effective coping skills when compared to healthy population controls.^2,3 These factors can greatly affect IBD patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Furthermore, IBD flares have been associated with various psychological triggers, including stress, negative affect, and major life events^4-6 while low stress levels and engaging in active coping strategies have shown fewer relapses of disease.⁷ Psychological stress also drives intestinal inflammation.⁸ Therefore, targeting the stress response could be a potential avenue for adjunctive therapy in children with IBD.

While a variety of brain-gut therapies exist to modulate stress, Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is one such intervention that has been effective at targeting the stress response.⁹ MBSR, developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn at University of Massachusetts Medical Center in the 1970s, consists of an 8-week group program facilitated by a trained instructor to enhance participants’ innate capacity for non-judgmental, present-focused awareness.¹⁰ MBSR directly focuses on 2 primary mechanisms to decrease stress: attention monitoring (focusing awareness on current thoughts, sensations, emotions) and acceptance (response without judgement or avoidance).^11,12 MBSR and mindfulness interventions have been shown to be a beneficial therapy in adults with anxiety, depression, and IBD as well as in other pediatric chronic diseases.^13-17 Benefits of the program may be due, in part, to findings that MBSR has an effect on decreasing the stress response physiologically as well as psychologically, including lowering cortisol, blood pression, pro-inflammatory cytokines and improving autonomic nervous system balance, and helping decrease inflammation.^18-20

Ahola Kohut et al published the first mindfulness-based intervention trial in adolescents with IBD investigating the feasibility and acceptability of an 8-week mindfulness-based intervention program, consisting of two-hour, in-person, group classes in May 2019 in Canada.²¹ While the intervention was well accepted by participants, authors suggested that feasibility could have been improved by an online delivery method. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual 8-week MBSR intervention as an adjunct therapy for children with IBD as well as to determine the impact of MBSR on stress and health-related quality of life.

Methods

Study Design

We designed a single-center, mixed-methods, non-randomized prospective pre/post pilot feasibility and acceptability trial at a large referral quaternary care pediatric IBD center. Our study was approved by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Institutional Review Board.

Participants were approached via various recruitment methods including: clinics, IBD patient education days, the hospital’s research recruitment website, and email to the IBD patient listserv. Those between the ages of 12-19 years with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD (Crohn’s disease/ulcerative colitis/IBD-U) who had been seen for care of IBD in the last 6 months were eligible to participate. Participants also needed to have the ability to attend the live-video sessions and complete baseline and follow-up surveys with adequate equipment (computer, internet, audio/video capability) as well as English language proficiency (reading and speaking). In addition, participants were encouraged to be comfortable being on-camera for the duration of the classes.

Participants were excluded if they had severely active IBD based on Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) or requiring hospitalization or surgery to treat IBD, needing biologic induction, using prednisone dose > 20 mg daily, or taking antibiotics 3 months prior to the start of intervention. Those with a diagnosis of serious mental illness, pervasive developmental disorder, or intellectual disorder as determined by medical chart review or patient/caregiver report, had initiated or changed dosages of psychotropic medications in the last 3 months, or were part of another clinical trial involving an intervention were excluded. Those who were already regularly (weekly or more) practicing specific mind-body techniques (yoga, breath work or pranayama, biofeedback, hypnosis, guided imagery, meditation) were also excluded.

Written informed consent was obtained from participants (if aged >18 years old) and/or parents/guardians (for participants <18 years old) for those who met eligibility criteria and enrolled in the study. Assent was obtained from those participants less than 18 years old.

Procedures

Four cohorts of classes were conducted between Spring 2021 and Spring 2022. Participants were asked to contact the study team if any medication were changed, and chart reviews were also performed at the end of the 8-week sessions to assess for clinical status change during the study period that would exclude them from analysis. In addition, they were asked on their post-intervention MBSR questionnaire of any changes to their medication regimen. We tracked participant enrollment, session attendance, and program evaluation. We examined both quantitative and qualitative measures. Data on psychosocial functioning, IBD disease activity, and HRQOL was collected at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T8 weeks), and 3 months post-intervention (T20 weeks) using REDCap. Additionally, a focus group was conducted at the end of each cohort, for a total of 4 focus groups, to qualitatively assess feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits and challenges.

Intervention

The live-video MBSR program was taught by an expert instructor with experience with youth with chronic disease and conducted via an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant web conferencing platform, BlueJeans. Prior to the first class, participants were mailed the adapted MBSR class handbook, used in previous research.^15,18 For each cohort, 8 classes were conducted once weekly on the same day and time every week, and the participants received email reminders prior to each class to encourage and increase attendance. Participants were guided through the sessions by the instructor, with modifications made as appropriate at the discretion of the instructor to enhance learning and participation. Each session was structured similarly: introductions, beginning mindfulness exercises, reflection on the content previously covered, didactic/experiential introduction to the week’s content, small group discussion, experiential mindfulness technique, and small/large group reflection followed by outlining the home exercises for the following week. Each class in the 8 week session had different areas of focus on various MBSR concepts and practices, e.g., mindful body awareness (gentle yoga, body scan), mindful attention (sitting meditation), walking meditation, present focus (using breath as an anchor).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes: Feasibility and Acceptability

Feasibility was measured by recruitment, withdrawal rate, and class attendance, which was tracked via an enrollment log. Acceptability measures included participation and completion in group sessions and satisfaction with the intervention, measured via focus group analysis and a study-specific questionnaire. Focus group data also assessed perceived challenges and benefits of the intervention.

Secondary Outcomes

Quality of life was assessed via Impact-III and the Pediatric Quality of Live Inventory (PedsQL). Impact-III is a validated, disease-specific pediatric questionnaire that measures HRQOL in pediatric IBD patients age 9-17 years.^22,23 PedsQL is a validated pediatric questionnaire that measures general HRQOL in children ages 8-17 years.^24,25 The total score and emotional and social functioning scales were utilized given their relevance to the focus of the MBSR group intervention.

Stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Psychological Stress Experiences (8a). The PSS is a validated and widely used 10-item questionnaire that assesses the perception of stress in one’s life.²⁶ The PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences form is a validated 8-item questionnaire that assesses children’s and adolescents’ thoughts or feelings within the context of their environment and/or internal challenges.

Data capturing disease activity were collected using the sCDAI and PUCAI, both of which are validated disease activity indices used for pediatric Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, respectively.^27,28

Statistical Analysis

Demographics, feasibility data, and self-report of intervention acceptability were assessed via descriptive statistics. To assess changes in secondary outcomes at pre-, post-, and 3-month post-MBSR intervention, repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with planned contrasts were conducted, with time entered as a within-subjects variable and group entered as a between-subjects variable. Pre-MBSR intervention values were used as the comparison group in planned contrast analyses. Statistical significance was determined by a 2-sided significance level of P < 0.05. Participants who met exclusion criteria were omitted from secondary analyses to reduce the likelihood of misinterpretation of results, although their focus group data were retained for acceptability and feasibility analyses. Focus group audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim using a professional transcribing service. The transcripts were de-identified and independently reviewed by 2 of the investigators (SV and LA) using the constant comparative approach associated with grounded theory. Each investigator developed codes which were then organized into categories and then into themes; member-checking and debriefing with the other investigators was done to verify our themes.

Results

Demographics

Participants completed self-reported measures assessing age, gender, race, and ethnicity at baseline. Overall, our sample was 63.9% female with a mean age of 14.1 years, and 36.1% identified as a race/ethnicity other than Non-Latinx White (Table 1). Eighty-one percent of participants had a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease, with a majority (94.3%) reporting quiescent disease activity. The 4 cohorts did not differ by demographic factors, although there were cohort differences on 4 baseline secondary outcome measures (i.e., IMPACT-III Total, PedsQL Total, PedsQL Social Functioning, PSS; Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographics (N = 36 Participants)

Age in years, mean ± SD	14.1 ± 1.8
Sex
Female, n (%)	23 (64)
Race/Ethnicity, n (%)^a
Asian	9 (25)
Caucasian/White	25 (69)
Latinx	2 (6)
Multiracial	2 (6)
Disease, n (%)
Crohn’s disease	29 (81)
Indeterminate Colitis/Ulcerative colitis	7 (19)
Baseline disease severity scores, mean ± SD
Mean PUCAI	9.2 ± 9.7
Mean sCDAI	52.1 ± 7.7
Baseline disease severity Classifications, n (%)
Quiescent	33 (94)
Mild	2 (6)

^aParticipants were allowed to provide multiple responses.

PUCAI: Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index.

sCDAI: Short Crohn’s Disease Activity Index.

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of Each Cohort

Measure	Total sample (N = 36)	Cohort 1 (n = 13)	Cohort 2 (n = 10)	Cohort 3 (n = 6)	Cohort 4 (n = 7)	Statistic	P
Measure	n (%)					χ²	P
Female	23 (64%)	9 (69%)	5 (50%)	5 (83%)	4 (57%)	2.12	0.548
Race/ethnicity other than White/Non-Latinx	13 (36%)	6 (46%)	3 (30%)	0 (0%)	4 (57%)	5.46	0.141
CD	29 (81%)	11 (85%)	9 (90%)	3 (50%)	6 (86%)	4.40	0.221
Quiescent disease	33 (94%)	13 (100%)	9 (90%)	4 (80%)	7 (100%)	3.45	0.328
	M (SD)					F
Age in years	14.1 (1.8)	13.5 (1.6)	14.3 (2.1)	14.3 (1.8)	14.7 (2.1)	0.74	0.538
IMPACT-III total	69.5 (11.8)	75.8 (10.5)	70.7 (11.4)	58.5 (8.2)	68.3 (11.8)	3.34	0.033
IMPACT-III emotional	64.1 (18.6)	70.4 (17.4)	67.5 (15.4)	47.6 (15.3)	64.8 (21.8)	2.30	0.099
IMPACT-III social	77.0 (11.6)	80.4 (10.8)	76.2 (13.6)	68.4 (11.4)	80.4 (7.7)	1.71	0.187
PedsQL total	71.4 (15.1)	81.6 (11.3)	69.9 (14.0)	61.2 (13.3)	67.4 (16.6)	3.19	0.039
PedsQL emotional	59.5 (17.9)	67.5 (22.0)	60.0 (16.6)	47.5 (12.1)	57.9 (13.8)	1.69	0.193
PedsQL social	79.1 (18.7)	91.5 (10.6)	78.9 (18.7)	66.0 (16.0)	72.9 (22.0)	3.33	0.034
PSS	17.7 (7.2)	12.4 (6.3)	17.2 (7.1)	25.2 (4.5)	19.3 (4.6)	5.96	0.003
PROMIS stress	58.4 (8.6)	53.6 (10.3)	58.8 (7.7)	64.9 (3.2)	59.4 (7.2)	2.60	0.072

CD: Crohn’s disease.

PedsQL: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

PSS: Perceived Stress Scale.

PROMIS-Stress: PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Psychological Stress Experience (8a).

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility

Recruitment and Retention: 46 participants were enrolled between Spring 2021 and Spring 2022. Ten participants withdrew from the study, with the most common reason related to scheduling conflicts. Two participants withdrew due to difficulties maintaining interest and/or concentration with the virtual format of the intervention. The final sample consisted of 36 participants (Spring 2021: n=13; Summer 2021: n=10; Fall 2021: n=6; Winter 2022: n=7).

Attendance: Participants attended 7.58 classes out of 8 classes on average. Of the 36 total participants, 25 (69.4%) attended all 8 MBSR sessions. Eight participants (22.2%) missed 1 session only. The remaining 3 (8.3%) participants attended 5 or 6 sessions. Participants were present for the entire two-hour duration of each session for 86.8% of all attended sessions.

Technological difficulties: The majority (77.8%) of participants did not experience any audio or video difficulties during the course of the MBSR intervention. For those experiencing technological challenges, 16.7% did not utilize video features as intended (either due to technological challenges or choosing to leave camera off) for at least 1 session; 8.3% encountered difficulty with audio features for at least 1 session.

Acceptability

Focus Groups: Twenty-seven (75.0%) participants participated in 4 focus groups. Three main themes with supporting sub-themes were elucidated from focus group analysis (Table 3). First, participants indicated that the MBSR intervention was helpful in relation to their IBD by allowing for peer-to-peer connection and reducing stress, which was noted as a trigger for IBD symptoms. The second theme was that participants identified multiple mental health benefits from participating in the MBSR intervention, including improved mood and energy, cognitive reframing skills for negative attitudes and thoughts, and increased productivity and self-care. Lastly, specific to the virtual MBSR intervention, participants reported that the virtual format likely allowed for easier attendance, intervention content was engaging, and mindfulness exercises were feasible to practice between sessions. Despite the MBSR intervention being generally well-liked, participants noted several challenges: (1) increased distractions and screen fatigue due to virtual format; (2) technological difficulties; (3) 2-hour length of intervention session, and (4) scheduling conflicts and competing demands that negatively affected attendance and acceptability. Participants offered suggestions for improvement, such as decreasing the length of each session, hybrid (in-person and virtual) format, alternatives for virtual platforms, and considerations for altering class content (e.g., more GI-specific techniques, more movement exercises, altering the balance between didactic and experiential exercises) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Focus Group Themes for MBSR Intervention (N = 27)

Theme 1: IBD-specific benefits of the MBSR course included: (a) mindfulness techniques helped reduce stress, which some identified as an IBD trigger; (b) participants enjoyed connecting with peers with IBD
Reduced stress and increased awareness of connection between stress and IBD	“In terms of the Crohn’s, […] I never actually realized how much of my IBD was triggered by stress, and the only time that I actually came across that idea was through this class. So, I think that was something that really changed the game for me, because I had no clue that there was even that sort of correlation.”
Connecting with others with IBD helped improve feeling of isolation and disease perception	“I also wanted to mention how this class helped me -- it showed me that there were other people with IBD, but seeing them […] talk, it makes you feel better and you know that some of them have the same experiences as you. And […] hearing them talk about [their IBD] makes you feel better.”
Theme 2: Participants experienced multiple mental health benefits as a result of participating in the MBSR course
Helped reframe attitude and response to stressful situations/unhelpful cognitions in daily life	“I never realized how negative I am. But when I realized that, I was like, […] ‘why am I like this?’ But then I kind of switched that when [the teacher] gave us that sort of guidance. So, I think the unpleasant effects were just reversed when I actually applied what was in the class.”
Positive change in mood and energy, improved feeling of wellness	“I noticed that [the class] made me think of [and] look at things differently and was sure it affected other things. […] I think I [got] stressed just as easily as I always have, but I found it much easier to deal with it. […] I would [also] seem like a little bit more energetic or in like better moods sometimes.”
Increased productivity after class and allowed time for self-care	“Whenever I would come off of the meeting, I would feel a lot more calm. [The classes] helped me refocus my thoughts and priorities and when [the class] ended, I could get a lot of work done or do things I enjoyed.”
Theme 3: The virtual MBSR program was feasible and well-liked, but several challenges were identified because of the virtual format.
Virtual format was feasible and therefore contributed to attendance, but it also led to decreased focus due to virtual environment fatigue and increased distractions in home environment	“It was good that [the class] was virtual, because otherwise, it would have been hard to make it to participate, but it would have been a little more helpful [and] engaging if it was in-person, just because of external distractions and I feel like being on online calls in this time is […] a little annoying.”
Class content was interesting and engaging, and mindfulness practices could be incorporated into daily life	“I liked [the class] as well, and I think I would recommend it to other people because it was long enough to where I feel like I got the purpose out of it, but it wasn’t too long where I was dying for it to end. And I think that it was -- it was […] interesting enough that you could focus. And I’d say they […] helped me. During them I was able to relax […], so, I did like it a lot.”
Technology difficulties such as poor audio/video connection were a barrier to acceptability as well as scheduling conflicts/competing demands were a barrier to attendance and acceptability	“I think one of the biggest things that made the classes [less] enjoyable […] was just -- it wasn’t really the class itself. It’s just like being at home and technology issues, because my computer would always break. I [could] never hear anything, and my camera wouldn’t turn on, etc.”

IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

MBSR: Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction.

Table 4.

Focus Group Participant Identified Solutions to Improving Feasibility/Acceptability

Identified challenges	Identified/proposed solutions
2 hours a long class time	• Decrease class time
	• Hybrid model (in-person and virtual classes)
	• Split class into 2 days
	• Consider weekend classes
Technology related issues	• Utilize more familiar online platforms such as zoom, etc. instead of BlueJeans to facilitate ease of access/improve technical issues
	• Email reminders were helpful to increase attendance
	• Youtube playlist for guided meditations was easily accessible and helpful
Difficulties focusing in the virtual environment	• Integrate more movement meditations throughout classes to improve focus/decrease distraction as these practices were overall better accepted by participants
	• Modify the balance between didactic and interactive content
	• Increase more GI-specific practices (ex: body scan for the gut)

Self-report: In line with focus group data, 77.1% of participants reported they were satisfied or very satisfied with the MBSR intervention; only 2 (5.7%) participants expressed dissatisfaction. Similarly, 68.6% of participants reported they would be likely or very likely to recommend the MBSR program to others, with an additional 28.7% reported a neutral opinion; only one participant reported being unlikely to recommend the intervention.

Secondary Outcomes

After omitting participants who met exclusion criteria (e.g., initiated cognitive behavioral therapy, escalation of IBD therapy), thirty (83.3%) participants were included in secondary data analyses. Of those included, post-intervention data were available for 90-97% and 3-month post-intervention data were available for 80-87%, depending on the outcome. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed significant differences by time for 3 (PedsQL Total score, P=0.035; PedsQL Social Functioning, P=0.033; PSS, P=0.008) of 8 secondary outcomes, with an additional outcome (PedsQL Emotional Functioning: P=0.055) approaching significance (Table 5). Planned contrasts showed that PSS scores were the only secondary outcome that significantly differed from pre- to post-intervention (P=0.012). However, participants reported significant improvement from pre-intervention to 3-month post-intervention for the PedsQL Total Score (P=0.038), PedsQL Emotional Functioning (P=0.028), PedsQL Social Functioning (P=0.022), and PSS (P=0.008). Of note, there were no significant time X cohort interactions, suggesting that changes in secondary outcomes over time did not differ by cohort. No significant differences were found for IMPACT-III total and subscale scores or PROMIS Psychological Stress Experiences scores.

Table 5.

Secondary Outcome Repeated Measures ANOVAs With Planned Contrasts (Baseline as the Comparison Group)

Measure	N	Baseline (T0)	Post-intervention (T8)	3 months post-intervention (T20)	F	P
IMPACT-III total	23	72.83	73.83	73.30	0.51	0.603
IMPACT-III emotional	25	66.86	68.12	70.30	0.81	0.453
IMPACT-III social	25	78.76	78.60	79.84	0.15	0.807
PedsQL total	26	74.31	77.04	79.00^b	3.62	0.035
PedsQL emotional	26	60.77	66.92	68.27^b	3.09	0.055
PedsQL social	26	81.96	84.04	89.04^b	3.69	0.033
PSS	26	17.50	15.12^a	14.46^b	5.39	0.008
PROMIS-stress	26	58.22	57.58	55.97	1.67	0.201

^aIndicates significant difference at P < .05 between baseline and post-intervention scores.

^bIndicates significant difference at P < .05 between baseline and 3 months post-intervention scores.

PedsQL: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

PSS: Perceived Stress Scale.

PROMIS-Stress: PROMIS Pediatric Short Form Psychological Stress Experience (8a).

Discussion

Virtual adaptation of MBSR is a feasible and acceptable intervention in youth with IBD. Our study had a high retention rate of 78% (36 participants remained in the study out of the 46 enrolled) and nearly 70% attended all 8 classes with 90% attending 7 of the 8 classes, indicating high interest and engagement in the intervention. The main barrier to attendance was scheduling conflicts, suggesting that external factors to the intervention prevented participation. Our qualitative data further supports this; focus group results showed that the virtual nature of the intervention increased the likelihood of participation in patients who would otherwise not have considered enrolling in such an intervention. Therefore, our study suggests that virtual MBSR intervention may be more feasible than in-person formats, potentially removing a barrier that leads to decreased engagement and retention rates in similar MBSR interventions.²¹

Two of the sessions were conducted during Spring-Summer 2021 (closer to the COVID-19 pandemic while most children were in virtual school), it is important to note that the last 2 sessions were conducted in Fall-Winter 2021-2022 when most participants returned to in-person school/activities. This argues that the results are still relevant post-pandemic as at least half the sessions were conducted in a post-pandemic environment. However, as the COVID-19 pandemic improved, we saw a decrease in enrollment of participants, likely due to a rise in in-person activities conflicting with ability to attend classes. Weekend classes could be considered as a way to combat this, though timing of such group interventions might pose an enrollment challenge given the wide variability in adolescent schedules. Furthermore, there has been a notable increase in both mental health disorders and the incidence of IBD post-COVID-19-pandemic.^29-32 Increase in these disorders argues the need for further adjunctive therapies such as MBSR to be incorporated into traditional treatment paradigms to help patients, making our results applicable despite the intervention being conducted partly during the pandemic.

Participants reported positive experiences with the course content and were engaged in the sessions as evidenced by their commitment to stay for the duration of the two-hour courses. Our qualitative data suggest the participants experienced several noted benefits, including reducing stress, which can be a trigger of IBD-related symptoms for some. Recognizing that their emotional status and mood could affect their GI symptoms is an important connection to make for many patients with chronic GI illnesses such as IBD and can lead to empowerment over their body and their ability to manage their condition. Overall, a majority of the participants would recommend MBSR to other youth with IBD, indicating that they saw value and benefit from participating in the intervention.

Despite interesting and enjoyable intervention content and noted benefits (e.g., stress reduction, community formation with others with IBD), some participants acknowledged that the nature of the virtual format led to decreased engagement. Class length was cited as a barrier to engagement; future interventions could modify class content to be shorter, especially in the virtual environment, to help increase satisfaction and engagement. It is important to note that this intervention occurred at varying time points of the COVID-19 pandemic when virtual environment fatigue was at a high, potentially leading to decreased participant engagement.

Secondary outcomes were notable for improved PSS scores at both follow up time points (post-intervention and 3-month follow-up), suggesting that the virtual MBSR intervention had an acute and longer-term effect on stress. Given that stress has been implicated in disease exacerbation of IBD,³³ the MBSR intervention may offer benefits for physical health. The focus group data highlighted that participants noted a connection between stress levels and their GI symptoms and that the intervention provided adolescents with tools to help mitigate stress and respond to situations differently. This dovetails with the objective difference observed in the PSS scores pre-and-post intervention, further cementing the value to be potentially gained from this intervention.

Our data also showed statistically significant improvement in overall quality of life from pre-intervention to 3-month post intervention as evidenced by the PedsQL measure. Further sub-analysis revealed significant improvement in the emotional and social functioning in the PedsQL questionnaire. While this may support that the MBSR intervention improves overall HRQOL, it is also possible that participants’ experienced improvements due to other factors (e.g., easing of pandemic restrictions, returning to more active lifestyles), although we did not see time X cohort interactions.

While MBSR is one of many brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBT) available, it is important to acknowledge there are other therapies such as CBT or hypnotherapy.⁹ However, the advantages of our intervention over other forms of BGBT are several: the group format, virtual nature, and generalizability of the benefits to other aspects of life. For example, one of the major themes was the perceived camaraderie achieved through interacting with others with IBD that some other BGBT may not offer. However, it is important to screen patients prior to participating in virtual interventions for any serious/severe psychiatric co-morbidity or severe IBD to avoid harm. Therefore, characteristics of each patient should be considered when recommending various BGBT but for those who may benefit from group interactions in a virtual environment, interventions such as our live-video MBSR might be a feasible and acceptable option.

Limitations and Future Directions

While the results of this study indicate MBSR could be a potentially advantageous adjunctive therapy for children with IBD, there are limitations to the findings. First, the aim of this study was to assess feasibility and acceptability of a virtual adaptation of an already well-studied intervention. Therefore, the study was not powered adequately to detect statistically significant changes in the secondary outcomes. Despite this, we observed improvements in psychosocial functioning in line with other studies assessing this intervention suggesting that these findings are relevant. Additionally, the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic should also be considered as a limitation in regard to the generalizability of our findings as 2 of the cohorts happened earlier in the course of the pandemic when virtual platform use was high while the latter 2 cohorts had much higher return to in-person activities/school.

The cohort was also overall ethnically/racially homogenous and the lack of Black, Latinx, and/or multiracial adolescents is another important limitation to consider. Equitable access to virtual interventions may also have limited interest/enrollment in the intervention and future iterations should consider offering support for reliable internet access/private space to attend sessions. Our study did not have an active control group and only included those with low baseline disease activity level. Future studies should consider an active control group or a waitlist control group and include participants with varying disease activity to assess if the changes were due to MBSR intervention, low disease activity, or relatively low starting baseline stress levels/symptoms. Future directions could include stool collection to examine the impact of the intervention on the gut microbiome and metabolome, as previous research has found higher perceived stress associated with significant differences in the gut microbiota and metabolome when compared to lower perceived stress.³⁴

In summary, our study showed that a virtual based MBSR program was highly acceptable and feasible in youth with IBD. Given the risk of mental health co-morbidities and the role of stress in IBD, providers should consider offering a holistic approach to treating IBD that includes stress management techniques. Stress reduction through MBSR could serve as a potentially helpful adjunctive therapy for youth with IBD and high psychological stress levels.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Maria Mascarenhas

Ethical Considerations

We received approval from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) for this study.

Consent to Participate

Author Contributions

Srisindu Vellanki, MD (SV). SV helped conceptualize and design the study. SV also conducted the focus groups and analyzed the focus group data. SV co-wrote the manuscript with Christina Holbein, helped edit, and finalize the manuscript. Christina Holbein, PhD (CH) helped conceptualize and design the study, analyzed the quantitative outcomes, co-wrote the manuscript, and helped edit, and finalize the manuscript. Adoma Boateng, BA (AB) contributed to conducting the study procedures. Naomi Pressman, MS RD (NP) contributed to conducting the study procedures. Jacqueline Kirsch, BS (JK) contributed to conducting the study procedures. Erica Sibinga, MD MHS (ES) helped conceptualize and design the study as well as helped edit and finalize the manuscript. Maria Mascarenhas, MBBS (MM) helped conceptualize and design the study as well as helped edit and finalize the manuscript. Lindsey Albenberg, DO (LA) helped conceptualize and design the study, analyzed the focus group data, as well as helped edit and finalize the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript content and accepted for publication.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Hommel

Greenley

Maddux

Gray

Mackner

. Self-management in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a clinical report of the North American society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(2):250-257. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182999b21

Mackner

Sisson

Crandall

. Review: psychosocial issues in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(4):243-257. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsh027

Kappelman

Long

Martin

, et al. Evaluation of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(8):1315-1323. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.10.019

Mackner

Greenley

Szigethy

Herzer

Deer

Hommel

. Psychosocial issues in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: report of the North American society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(4):449-458. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182841263

Bernstein

Singh

Graff

Walker

Miller

Cheang

. A prospective population-based study of triggers of symptomatic flares in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):1994-2002. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.140

Maunder

. Evidence that stress contributes to inflammatory bowel disease: evaluation, synthesis, and future directions. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11(6):600-608. doi:10.1097/01.MIB.0000161919.42878.a0

Bitton

Dobkin

Edwardes

, et al. Predicting relapse in Crohn’s disease: a biopsychosocial model. Gut. 2008;57(10):1386-1392. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.134817

Schneider

Blank

Alvarez

, et al. The enteric nervous system relays psychological stress to intestinal inflammation. Cell. 2023;186(13):2823-2838. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.001

Keefer

Ballou

Drossman

Ringstrom

Elsenbruch

Ljótsson

. A Rome working team report on brain-gut behavior therapies for disorders of gut-brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):300-315. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.015

10.

Kabat-Zinn

Hanh

. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. Random House Publishing Group; 2009.

11.

Chin

Lindsay

Greco

, et al. Psychological mechanisms driving stress resilience in mindfulness training: a randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2019;38(8):759-768. doi:10.1037/hea0000763

12.

Puhlmann

LMC

Engert

. How mindfulness-based training improves stress-related health: a selective review of randomized clinical trials comparing psychological mechanisms of action. Front Endocrinol. 2025;16:1415081. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1415081

13.

Freedenberg

Hinds

Friedmann

. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and group support decrease stress in adolescents with cardiac diagnoses: a randomized two-group study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(7):1415-1425. doi:10.1007/s00246-017-1679-5

14.

Bawa

FLM

Mercer

Atherton

, et al. Does mindfulness improve outcomes in patients with chronic pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(635):e387-e400. doi:10.3399/bjgp15X685297

15.

Jedel

Hoffman

Merriman

, et al. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness based stress reduction to prevent Flare-up in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis. Digestion. 2014;89(2):142-155. doi:10.1159/000356316

16.

Neilson

Ftanou

Monshat

, et al. A controlled study of a group mindfulness intervention for individuals living with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(3):694-701. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000629

17.

Sibinga

EMS

Webb

Perin

, et al. Mindfulness instruction for medication adherence among adolescents and young adults living with HIV: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Care. 2022;34(12):1619-1627. doi:10.1080/09540121.2022.2105796

18.

Pascoe

Thompson

Jenkins

Ski

. Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;95:156-178. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.004

19.

Gamaiunova

Kreibig

Dan-Glauser

Pellerin

Brandt

Kliegel

. Effects of two mindfulness based interventions on the distinct phases of the stress response across different physiological systems. Biol Psychol. 2022;172:108384. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108384

20.

Canella

Fazia

Gardi

. Mindfulness-based stress reduction program improves psychological well-being and blood pressure in an Italian context: potential mechanisms and benefits. Psychol Health Med. 2025;23:1-16. doi:10.1080/13548506.2025.2561740. Published online September.

21.

Ahola

Stinson

Jelen

Ruskin

. Feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness-based group intervention for adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020;27(1):68-78. doi:10.1007/s10880-019-09622-6

22.

Uggla

Lindh

Lind

Lindkvist

. IMPACT-III is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in Swedish children with inflammatory bowel disease. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(2):347-353. doi:10.1111/apa.14119

23.

Otley

Smith

Nicholas

, et al. The IMPACT questionnaire: a valid measure of health-related quality of life in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35(4):557-563. doi:10.1097/00005176-200210000-00018

24.

Varni

Limbers

. The PedsQL^TM 4.0 generic core scales young adult version: feasibility, reliability and validity in a university student population. J Health Psychol. 2009;14(4):611-622. doi:10.1177/1359105309103580

25.

Varni

Burwinkle

Seid

Skarr

. The PedsQL^TM* 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(6):329-341. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0329:TPAAPP>2.0.CO;2

26.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-396. doi:10.2307/2136404

27.

Turner

Hyams

Markowitz

, et al. Appraisal of the pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index (PUCAI). Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(8):1218-1223. doi:10.1002/ibd.20867

28.

Thia

Faubion

Loftus

Persson

Sandborn

. Short CDAI: development and validation of a shortened and simplified Crohnʼs disease activity index. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):105-111. doi:10.1002/ibd.21400

29.

Palsson

Simren

Sperber

Bangdiwala

Hreinsson

Aziz

. The prevalence and burden of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) before vs after the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;Online ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.012

30.

Almario

Choi

Chey

Spiegel

BMR

. Trends in prevalence of Rome IV disorders of gut-brain interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a nationally representative sample of over 160,000 people in the US. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2025; e70020. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1111/nmo.70020

31.

Alvisi

Congiu

Scarallo

, et al. Update on pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases epidemiology during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak:data from the Italian society of pediatric gastroenterology, epatology and nutrition registry. Eur J Pediatr. 2025;184(9):581. doi:10.1007/s00431-025-06422-z

32.

Choi

Kang

, et al. Epidemiological trends of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Korea: a multicenter study of the last 3 years including the COVID-19 era. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(37):e279. doi:10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e279

33.

Sun

Xie

Wang

Jiang

Cao

. Stress triggers flare of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adults. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:432. doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00432

34.

Mackner

Hatzakis

Allen

, et al. Fecal microbiota and metabolites are distinct in a pilot study of pediatric Crohn’s disease patients with higher levels of perceived stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;111:104469. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104469