Increasing Rural Special Education Teacher Candidates' Ability to Implement Evidence-Based Practices: A Program Description of the Boise State University TATERS Program
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2015
Increasing Rural Special Education Teacher Candidates' Ability to Implement Evidence-Based Practices: A Program Description of the Boise State University TATERS Program
The Technology Accentuated Teacher Education for Rural Specialists (TATERS) program aimed to: (a) prepare highly qualified special education teachers across a state comprised of more than 70% rural districts, (b) develop a system of support through a mentor network and institutions of higher education collaboration to address the needs of teacher candidates in rural areas, (c) ground special education teachers in the use of evidence-based practices to improve the instructional services that students with disabilities in Idaho receive, and (d) develop a mechanism to evaluate and provide feedback on teacher candidates' implementation of evidence-based practices. This article describes the application of a special education teacher evaluation system to a teacher preparation program designed to improve special education teachers' ability to implement evidence-based practices for students with disabilities in rural areas. Key program components are described and future directions for continuous improvement are highlighted.
BillingsleyB. S. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature.The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 39–55. doi: 10.1177/00224669040380010401
2.
BillingsleyB. S., FallA. M., & WilliamsT. O. (2006). Who is teaching students with emotional and behavioral disorders?A comparison to other special educators. Behavioral Disorders, 31(3), 252–264.
3.
BoeE. E., & CookL. H. (2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully-certified teachers in special and general education.Exceptional Children, 72(4), 443–460.
4.
BoeE. E., CookL. H., & SunderlandR. J. (2008). Teacher turnover: Examining exit attrition, teaching area transfer, and school migration.Exceptional Children, 75(1), 7–31.
5.
BrownellM. T., RossD., ColonE., & McCallumC. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with exemplary practices in general education.Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–251.
6.
ChardD. J., Ketterlin-GellerL. R., BakerS. K., DoablerC., & ApichatabutraC. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence.Exceptional Children, 75(3), 263–281.
7.
ConnellyV., & GrahamS. (2009). Student teaching and teacher attrition in special education.Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(3), 257–269. doi: 10.1177/0888406409339472
8.
CookB. G., & OdomS. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education.Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144.
9.
CookB. G., TankersleyM., & LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education.Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365–383.
10.
DanielsonC. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
FuchsL. S., & FuchsD. (2005). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for students with disabilities.The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 45–57.
12.
GerstenR., ChardD. J., JayanthiM., BakerS. K., MurphyP., & FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components.Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242.
13.
GerstenR., KeatingT., YovanoffP., & HarnissM. K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators' intent to stay.Exceptional Children, 67(4), 549–567.
14.
HardmanM. L., RosenbergM., & SindelarP. (2005). NCLB, IDEA, and alternative routes in prepartation of rural special education teachers in high incidence areas.Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 16–24.
15.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?: Understanding race & disability in schools. New York; London: Teachers College Press.
16.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Taylor & Francis.
17.
HoldheideL., GoeL., CroftA., & ReschlyD. J. (2010). Challenges in evaluating special education teachers and English language learner specialists (pp. 1–40). Washington DC.
18.
JohnsonE. S., HumphreyM. & AllredK. (2009). Mentoring and online learning: A helping hand for rural districts?Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(2), 32–38.
19.
JohnsonE. S. & SemmelrothC. L. (in press). Validating an Observation Protocol to Measure Special Education Teacher Effectiveness, Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals.
20.
JohnsonE. S., & SemmelrothC. L. (2014). Special education teacher evaluation: Why it matters and what makes it challenging. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 39(2), 71–82.
21.
LittrellP. C., BillingsleyB. S., & CrossL. H. (1994). The effects of principal support on special and general educators' stress, job satisfaction, school commitment, health, and intent to stay in teaching.Remedial and Special Education, 15(5), 297–310.
22.
McLeskeyJ., TylerN. C., Saunders, & FlippinS. (2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers.The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5–21.
23.
MenloveR., & Lignugaris/KraftB. (2004). Preparing rural distance education preservice special educators to succeed.Rural Special Education Quarterly23(2), 18–26.
24.
MorganP. L., FriscoM. L., FarkasG., & HibelJ. (2008). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services.The Journal of Special Education, 43(4), 236–254. doi: 10.1177/0022466908323007
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53–61.
27.
OdomS. L., BrantlingerE., GerstenR., HornerR. H., ThompsonB., & HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices.Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148.
28.
ReschlyD. J., HoldheideL. R., SmarttS. M., & OliverR. M. (2007). Evaluation of special education teacher preparation coursework reading, behavior, and inclusive practices. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education.
29.
SindelarP. T., BrownellM. T., & BillingsleyB. (2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions.Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 8–24. doi: 10.1177/0888406409358593
30.
SpoonerF., KnightV. F., BrowderD. M., & SmithB. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities.Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 374–387. doi: 10.1177/0741932511421634
31.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Sciences. (2011). The nation's report card. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsre-portcard/
32.
VannestK. J., & Hagan-BurkeS. (2009). Teacher time use in special education.Remedial and Special Education, 31(2), 126–142. doi: 10.1177/0741932508327459
