Objective: To identify nursing problems of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients after discharge from clinical rehabilitation and to identify gaps in the nursing care regarding the prevention of these problems.
Design: The study had an exploratory character and was divided into three phases. Phase 1 had a qualitative nature. Eight patients were interviewed to obtain insight into experienced problems after discharge. In phase 2, a panel of experts regarding nursing care for SCI patients selected nursing problems out of all problems mentioned. Phase 3 consisted of a mailed questionnaire including the nursing problem areas identified in phase 2, which was sent to all patients that were discharged during the last 18 months before the study.
Setting: Specialist rehabilitation centre, the Netherlands.
Subjects: Eight patients participated in phase 1 (100% response rate), 35 nurses participated in phase 2 (87.5% response rate) and 35 patients participated in phase 3 (62.5% response rate).
Results: The most important nursing problems in the response group appeared to be: limitations to activities of daily living, having difficulties in asking for help (assertiveness), pain, coping with the disability, dependency on personal help and problems with changed bladder regulation. The respondents made several suggestions for improving nursing care, involving both clinical care and care after discharge.
Conclusions: SCI patients experience serious problems after discharge from clinical rehabilitation. Nurses can give input on a wide variety of these problems.
References
1.
Johnson RL, Gerhart KA, McCray J, Menconi JC, Whiteneck GG. Secondary conditions following spinal cord injury in a population-based sample. Spinal Cord1998; 36: 45–50.
2.
Anson CA, Shepherd C. Incidence of secondary complications in spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res1996; 19: 55–66.
3.
Noreau L, Proulx P, Gagnon L, Drolet M, Laramee MT. Secondary impairments after spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2000; 79: 526–535.
4.
Widerstrom-Noga EG, Felipe-Cuervo E, Broton JG, Duncan RC, Yezierski RP. Perceived difficulty in dealing with consequences of spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 580–586.
5.
Levi R, Hultling C, Seiger A. The Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study. 3. Health-related issues of the Swedish annual level-of-living survey in SCI subjects and controls. Paraplegia1995; 33: 726–730.
6.
Harrison C, Kuric J. Community reintegration of SCI persons: problems and perceptions. SCI Nurs1989; 6: 44–47.
7.
Brown DJ, Judd FK, Ungar GH. Continuing care of the spinal cord injured. Paraplegia1987; 25: 296–300.
8.
Cyr LB. Sequelae of SCI after discharge from the initial rehabilitation program. Rehabil Nurs1989; 14: 326–329.
9.
Levi R, Hultling C, Nash MS, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population. Paraplegia1995; 33: 308–315.
10.
McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 1402–1410.
11.
Cox RJ, Amsters DI, Pershouse KJ. The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 600–660.
12.
Dunn M, Love L, Ravesloot C. Subjective health in spinal cord injury after outpatient healthcare followup. Spinal Cord2000; 38: 84–91.
13.
Glidden MM. Spinal cord injury and case management. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil1999; 4: 16–23.
14.
Fine PR, Better SR, Engstrand JL. The operation of a hospital based specialty home health team: activities and associated costs. Rehabil Nurs2000; 25: 70–75.
15.
Mattson J. Case management: a historical and future perspective of its in‘uence on outcome for persons who have sustained spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil1999; 4: 30–37.
16.
Rawl SM, Easton KL, Kwiatkowski S, Zemen D, Burczyk B. Effectiveness of a nurse-managed followup program for rehabilitation patients after discharge. Rehabil Nurs1998; 23: 204–209.
17.
Leih P, Salentijn C. Verpleegkundige diagnoses: Betekenis, classificatie en vragen (Nursing diagnoses: Meaning, classi” cation and questions). Verpleegkunde1991; 6: 3–10.
18.
Chenitz WC, Swanson JM. From practice to grounded theory, qualitative research in nursing.Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1986.
19.
De Boer D, Plagge E. Verpleegkundige diagnoses bij personen met een dwarslaesie na ontslag uit het revalidatiecentrum (Nursing diagnoses of spinal cord injured patients after discharge from clinical rehabilitation). Unpublished nursing science master thesis, University of Groningen, the Netherlands, 2001.
20.
Pye CG. Nursing diagnosis in long-term spinal cord injury. In: Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the eleventh conference. Glendale, CA, 1995: 284–285.
21.
Gordon M. Nursing diagnosis, process and application, third edition. St. Louis, MO: Alison Miller, 1994.
